In view of the common problems of time delay, nonlinearity, multi-parameter coupling, and external disturbances in vehicle hydraulic active suspension systems, a Smith-predictor-based variable-universe fuzzy self-tuning PID position control strategy (SVUFMS-PID) is proposed. By employing a Smith predictor to effectively predict and compensate for the system delay and introducing variable-universe fuzzy control to enhance the self-tuning capability of the PID parameters, the proposed approach improves the system’s adaptability to varying operating conditions and external disturbances. First, a mathematical model of the vehicle hydraulic active suspension system is established; subsequently, a simulation model is constructed on the MATLAB/Simulink platform, and simulation experiments are conducted. The results indicate that, compared with PID, fuzzy PID, and uncompensated control methods, the proposed control strategy delivers superior performance in suppressing overshoot, shortening settling time, reducing position error, and enhancing system robustness. Even under parameter perturbations and external disturbances, the method maintains high control accuracy and system stability, providing an effective solution for achieving high-performance position control of vehicle hydraulic active suspension systems and further improving the safety, stability, and comfort of the suspension system.
NeumannT. Analysis of advanced driver-assistance systems for safe and comfortable driving of motor vehicles. Sensors2024; 24(19): 6223.
2.
DiaoSZhaoXZhaoD, et al. Hierarchical control of nonlinear uncertain active suspension system based on extended state observer. J Vib Eng Technol2025; 13(2): 178.
3.
KumarVRanaKPS. A novel fuzzy PID controller for nonlinear active suspension system with an electro-hydraulic actuator. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2023; 45(4): 189.
4.
FlayyihMAHamzahMNHassanJM. Nonstandard backstepping based integral sliding mode control of hydraulically actuated active suspension system. Int J Autom Technol2023; 24(6): 1665–1673.
5.
TanZWenGPanZ, et al. Control of a nonlinear active suspension system based on deep reinforcement learning and expert demonstrations. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng2024; 238(13): 4093–4113.
6.
LiJDuXLiW, et al. Research on sliding mode backstepping control of electro-hydraulic servo active suspension flexible system based on state observer. J Vib Control2025; 10775463251347839.
7.
AtindanaVAXuXNyedebAN, et al. The evolution of vehicle pneumatic vibration isolation: a systematic review. Shock Vib2023; 2023(1): 1–23.
8.
WangFWenHXieS. Performance analysis and hybrid control strategy research of vehicle semi-active suspension for ride comfort and handling stability. Machines2025; 13(5): 393.
9.
WuZZhangFCaiJ, et al. Height-posture and load coupling control methodology of URAPM and its application in active suspension control of multi-axle vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2024; 238(15): 7410–7428.
10.
LiJLiWDuX. Research on the characteristics of electro-hydraulic position servo system of RBF neural network under fuzzy rules. Sci Rep2024; 14(1): 15332.
11.
LiuYJZengQLiuL, et al. An adaptive neural network controller for active suspension systems with hydraulic actuator. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2020; 50(12): 5351–5360.
12.
LiJWeiAYangM, et al. Research on the compliant control of electro-hydraulic servo drive force/position switching for a lower limb exoskeleton robot. Trans FAMENA2024; 48(1): 97–116.
13.
NguyenDNNguyenTA. Evaluate the stability of the vehicle when using the active suspension system with a hydraulic actuator controlled by the OSMC algorithm. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 19364.
14.
HasbullahFFarisWFDarsivanFJ, et al. Ride comfort performance of a non-linear full-car using active suspension system with active disturbance rejection control and input decoupling transformation. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2019; 26(2): 188–224.
15.
NanYShaoSRenC, et al. Simulation and experimental research on active suspension system with time-delay feedback control. IEEE Access2023; 11: 88498–88510.
16.
YinYLuoBRenH, et al. Robust control design for active suspension system with uncertain dynamics and actuator time delay. J Mech Sci Technol2022; 36(12): 6319–6327.
17.
ShuprajhaaTSujitSKSrinivasanK. Reinforcement learning based adaptive PID controller design for control of linear/nonlinear unstable processes. Appl Soft Comput2022; 128: 109450.
18.
EuzebioTAMSilvaMTDYamashitaAS. Decentralized PID controller tuning based on nonlinear optimization to minimize the disturbance effects in coupled loops. IEEE Access2021; 9: 156857–156867.
19.
GhamariSMNarmHGMollaeeH. Fractional-order fuzzy PID controller design on buck converter with antlion optimization algorithm. IET Control Theory Appl2022; 16(3): 340–352.
20.
ZhangYLiuLHeD. Application of variable universe fuzzy PID controller based on ISSA in bridge crane control. Electronics2024; 13(17): 3534.
21.
AlcaláEPuigVQuevedoJ, et al. Autonomous racing using linear parameter varying-model predictive control (LPV-MPC). Control Eng Pract2020; 95: 104270.
22.
ZhuQShangHLuX, et al. Adaptive sliding mode tracking control of underwater vehicle-manipulator systems considering dynamic disturbance. Ocean Eng2024; 291: 116300.
23.
TuYHWangRFSuWH. Active disturbance rejection control—New trends in agricultural cybernetics in the future: A comprehensive review. Machines2025; 13(2): 111.
24.
Wanore MadeboNMerga AbdissaCNegash LemmaL. Enhanced trajectory control of quadrotor UAV using fuzzy PID based recurrent neural network controller. IEEE Access2024; 12: 190454–190469.
25.
DingYWangLLiY, et al. Model predictive control and its application in agriculture: a review. Comput Electron Agric2018; 151: 104–117.
26.
FattahRKenneJPBenjellounK, et al. Optimization of the backstepping control parameters of an active electrohydraulic suspension to improve passenger comfort and road handling. IEEE Access2025; 13: 35985–36005.
27.
KorupuVLMuthukumarasamyM. A comparative study of various Smith predictor configurations for industrial delay processes. Chem Prod Process Model2022; 17(6): 701–732.
28.
DogruerT. Design of I-PD controller based modified smith predictor for processes with inverse response and time delay using equilibrium optimizer. IEEE Access2023; 11: 14636–14646.
29.
YuSHanJZhangW, et al. Smith predictor compensation and fuzzy incremental control for delay of space docking hardware-in-the-loop simulation system. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2022; 236(11): 2179–2193.
30.
YuMWuGKongL, et al. Tire-pavement friction characteristics with elastic properties of asphalt pavements. Appl Sci2017; 7(11): 1123.
31.
ZhangBTanCADaiT. Ride comfort and energy dissipation of vehicle suspension system under non-stationary random road excitation. J Sound Vib2021; 511: 116347.
32.
AlmeidaRS, Vasconcelos da Silva F and Vianna SSV. Combining the bow-tie method and fuzzy logic using Mamdani inference model. Process Saf Environ Prot2023; 169: 159–168.
