Pneumatic percussive riveting has the advantages of flexible operation and strong adaptability, and it is one of the important ways of aircraft assembly connection. At present, pneumatic percussive riveting still plays a very important role in the aircraft assembly process. With the continuous application of advanced materials in new machine structures, traditional pneumatic percussive riveting technology is facing challenges and demands towards precision and intelligence development. The in-depth research and innovative development of pneumatic percussive riveting technology is of great scientific significance and practical value for ensuring the performance of percussive riveted joints and the quality of aircraft assembly. This article reviews the current research status of pneumatic percussive riveting technology, proposes the research content and development trends of pneumatic percussive riveting technology for advanced materials, and provides reference for the innovative research and development of pneumatic percussive riveting technology in the riveting application scenarios of aircraft advanced materials.
LiYXiFBehdinanK. Dynamic modeling and simulation of percussive impact riveting for robotic automation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2010; 5(2): 021011-1–021011-10.
2.
HuanHChengLKeY. Dynamic modeling and sensitivity analysis of dual-robot pneumatic riveting system for fuselage panel assembly. Ind Rob Int J2016; 43(2): 221–230.
3.
WangHZhangJYuJ. Squeezing force detection and signal processing for robot assisted pneumatic percussive riveting system. J Manuf Process2020; 57: 389–399.
4.
MuellerRVetteMGeenenA, et al. Improving working conditions in aircraft productions using human-robot collaboration in a collaborative riveting process. SAE Technical Paper, 2017-01-2096, 2017.
5.
MuellerRVette-SteinkampMKansoA, et al. Collaboration in a hybrid team of human and robot for improving working conditions in an aircraft riveting process. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pract Mobil2019; 01(2): 396–403.
6.
MuellerRVette-SteinkampMSchirmerL, et al. Tolerance management in a semi-automated and collaborative human-robot aircraft riveting process. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pract Mobil2019; 01(2): 404–413.
7.
JohnsonMLiuRGopalanN, et al. An approach to human-robot collaborative drilling and fastening in aerospace final assembly. In: AIAA scitech 2021 forum, 11–15 & 19–21 Jan 2021, Vol. 0270.
8.
CherngJGPengSL. Transient multiple impulsive signal analysis for pneumatic percussive rivet tools. Mech Syst Signal Process1994; 8(1): 31–44.
9.
CherngJGGeTPengSL. Vibration isolation and damping for bucking bars. In: International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, 1997, Vol. 80401, V01AT04A005. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
10.
CherngJGEksiogluMKizilaslanK. Vibration reduction of pneumatic percussive rivet tools: mechanical and ergonomic re-design approaches. Appl Ergon2009; 40(2): 256–266.
11.
ThomasMLavilleFBeauchampY, et al. An experimental design for reducing riveting noise. In: International conference on computers and industrial engineering, Cairo, Egypt, 1997, pp.435–438.
12.
BloxsomWA. Modeling of the reciprocating, pneumatic impact hammer. Master’s Thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2003.
13.
JorgensenMJViswanathanM. Ergonomic field assessment of bucking bars during riveting tasks. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet2005; 49(14): 1354–1358.
14.
JorgensenMJKhanKS. Use of tungsten to reduce hand-arm vibration exposure in aircraft manufacturing. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet2008; 52: 1045–1048.
15.
LiYXiJMohamedRP, et al. Dynamic analysis for robotic integration of tooling systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2011; 133(4): 041002-1–041002-8.
16.
XiFFYuLTuXW. Framework on robotic percussive riveting for aircraft assembly automation. Adv Manuf2013; 1(2): 112–122.
17.
GuoSNieSLXiFF, et al. Modeling and simulation of percussive impact for robotic riveting system. Adv Manuf2014; 2(4): 344–352.
18.
NieSLiYShuaiG, et al. Modeling and simulation for fatigue life analysis of robots with flexible joints under percussive impact forces. Robot Comput Manuf2016; 37: 292–301.
19.
ZhaoYMLinYXiF, et al. Switch-based sliding mode control for position-based visual servoing of robotic riveting system. J Manuf Sci Eng2017; 139(4): 041010.
20.
LiYJiJGuoS, et al. Process parameter optimization of a mobile robotic percussive riveting system with flexible joints. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn2017; 12(6): 061005.
21.
SongTXiFGuoS, et al. Slip analysis for a wheeled mobile manipulator. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2018; 140(2): 021005.
22.
QuWWShiXDongHY, et al. Simulation and test on process of percussive impact riveting. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci)2014; 48(8): 1411–1418.
23.
ChengLHuanHKeY. Elastic-plastic analysis and riveting energy control for dual-robot pneumatic riveting system. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2020; 234(9): 1836–1847.
24.
MingLWeiQGangL. Test-bed design and process research for pneumatic hammer riveting. Telecom Power Technol2015; 32(6): 92–94.
25.
XianweiLWeiQ. Process research of automatic riveting for pneumatic riveting hammer. Nonferr Mater Eng2017; 38(3): 154–159.
26.
AhnJY. Methods for evaluating the performance and human stress-factors of percussive riveting. PhD Thesis, University of Washington, 2017.
27.
KeZYunfeiFGangL, et al. Force test and research of the riveting platform based on the robot riveting. Equip Manuf Technol2018; 11: 178–182.
28.
ShuaiZQiZand Wang, H. Study on simulation modeling and experiment of riveting considering strain rate difference. Mach Des Manuf2018; 9: 197–200.
29.
ShuaiZ. Research on method and experiment of aircraft pneumatic percussive riveting process real-time monitoring based on riveting force. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018.
30.
HailongWWangH. Finite element simulation modeling and experimental study of pneumatic hammer riveting process. Mach Des Manuf2020; 11: 154–157.
31.
HailongW. Simulation modeling and experimental study of pneumatic hammer riveting based on impact dynamics. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019.
32.
WangHZhangJYuJ. Process capability-based tolerance allocation in pneumatic percussive riveting. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2020, Vol. 84492, V02BT02A057. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
33.
ZhangJ. Fatigue performance oriented optimization method and experimental study of Al-Li alloy pneumatic percussive riveting process parameters. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019.
34.
ZhangJWangH. Experimental study on the effect of pneumatic percussive riveting process parameters on the quality of Joint. Mach Des Res2021; 37(4): 126–131.
35.
LiYDongWWuL, et al. Squeezing force-based training method for manual pneumatic percussive riveting. In: Second international conference on advanced manufacturing technology and manufacturing systems (ICAMTMS 2023), 2023, Vol. 12744, pp.703-709. SPIE.
36.
HeYDongWWuL, et al. Accurate mathematical modeling and experimental verification of impact riveting. In: Second international conference on advanced manufacturing technology and manufacturing systems (ICAMTMS 2023), 2023, Vol. 12744, pp.697-702. SPIE.
37.
KrovvidiSCRamuluMReinhallPG. Numerical study of the percussive riveting process: initial results. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2019, Vol. 59360, V001T03A011. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
38.
KrovvidiSCRamuluMReinhallPG. Numerical study of the percussive riveting process: simulation results. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2020, Vol. 84485, V02AT02A030. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
39.
KrovvidiSCRamuluMReinhallPG. Numerical study of the percussive riveting process: analysis validation. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2021, Vol. 85550, V02AT02A069. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
40.
JiangCYLiuXCYeCL, et al. Analysis of stiffness characteristic of five-degree-of-freedom hammer riveting robot based on spiral theory. J Mech Transm2022; 46(3): 122–127.
41.
JohnsonTJManningRAdamsDE, et al. Diagnostics of tool-part interactions during riveting on an aluminum aircraft fuselage. J Aircr2006; 43(3): 779–786.
42.
McDowellTWWarrenCWelcomeDE, et al. Laboratory and field measurements and evaluations of vibration at the handles of riveting hammers. Ann Occup Hyg2012; 56(8): 911–924.
43.
McDowellTWWarrenCXuXS, et al. Laboratory and workplace assessments of rivet bucking bar vibration emissions. Ann Occup Hyg2015; 59(3): 382–397.
44.
McDowellTWXuXSWarrenC, et al. The effects of feed force on rivet bucking bar vibrations. Int J Ind Ergon2018; 67: 145–158.
45.
ViLTBangaruSSAghazadehF, et al. Effect of riveting tools on riveters’ vibration exposure and muscle fatigue. Int J Ind Ergon2022; 92: 103341.
46.
JinQHChenJPengLM, et al. Research progress in joining of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites and aluminum/magnesium alloys. J Mater Eng2022; 50(1): 15–24.
47.
DuSYGuanZD. Strategic considerations for development of advanced composite technology for large commercial aircraft in China. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica2008; 25(1): 1–10.
48.
LinDCPanDGaoJ. Application of carbon fiber composite materials in aerospace. Chinese J Fib Reinfo Plast2017; 1: 18–28.
49.
CaoZQZhangMHTanXC, et al. Overview of riveting technology for aviation composite structure. Aeronaut Manuf Technol2023; 66(1/2): 26–37.
50.
LiuGZhangPLiWD, et al. Permeability of toughened RTM composite preforms by structural toughening layer. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica2015; 32(2): 586–593.
51.
SunSYanZBZhaoYG. The study of chopped fiber reinforcement on the prevention of burrs and delamination of composite materials in drilling. J Mech Eng2015; 51(21): 206–212.
52.
MurakamiSOzakiKOnoK, et al. Effect of alloying elements on machinability and hot workability of α-β titanium alloy containing Fe and C. Kobelco Technol Rev2011; 30: 13–18.
53.
KashaevNVentzkeVRiekehrS, et al. Assessment of alternative joining techniques for Ti–6Al–4V/CFRP hybrid joints regarding tensile and fatigue strength. Mater Des2015; 81: 73–81.
54.
ZhangMCaoZZhengG, et al. Quasi-static tensile failure mechanism analysis of CFRP/Al countersunk electromagnetic riveted joints with different rivet-hole clearances. Eng Fail Anal2024; 155: 107759.
55.
WangHDongYHuZ, et al. The research on laser welding-riveting hybrid bonding of titanium alloy and carbon fiber reinforced composites. Opt Laser Technol2022; 155: 108405.
56.
KimSWKongJHLeeSW, et al. Recent advances of artificial intelligence in manufacturing industrial sectors: a review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2022; 23(1): 111–129.
57.
HongBZhaoPLiuJ, et al. The application of artificial intelligence technology in assembly techniques within the industrial sector. J Artif Intell Gen Sci2024; 5(1): 1–12.
58.
De SantisASicilianoBDe LucaA, et al. An atlas of physical human–robot interaction. Mech Mach Theory2008; 43(3): 253–270.
59.
LiGLiZKanZ. Assimilation control of a robotic exoskeleton for physical human-robot interaction. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022; 7(2): 2977–2984.
60.
MurphyJGretzelUPesonenJ. Marketing robot services in hospitality and tourism: the role of anthropomorphism. In: KimSSWangD (eds.) Future of tourism marketing. Routledge2021, pp.16–27.
61.
YoonYKoWRJangM, et al. Robots learn social skills: End-to-end learning of co-speech gesture generation for humanoid robots. In: 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2019, pp.4303-4309. IEEE.
62.
ModaresHRanatungaILewisFL, et al. Optimized assistive human-robot interaction using reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Cybern2016; 46(3): 655–667.
63.
LaiMZhangYJiangY, et al. An automatic riveting method for robots based on the improved EDCircles algorithm. Robot Comput Manuf2024; 86: 102648.
64.
YükselNBörklüHRSezerHK, et al. Review of artificial intelligence applications in engineering design perspective. Eng Appl Artif Intell2023; 118: 105697.
65.
CaoZZuoY. Electromagnetic riveting technique and its applications. Chin J Aeronaut2020; 33(1): 5–15.
66.
JinJYangWLiaoY, et al. Fatigue performance of electromagnetic self-pierce riveting-bonding hybrid joint under alternating load and corrosion coupling conditions. Int J Fatigue2024; 180: 108079.
