Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Experimental investigation and multi-criteria optimization of rough and finish milling for AISI 316L stainless steel: A focus on surface integrity,temperature,and tool performance
This study experimentally investigates the machinability of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel under dry and air-assisted cooling during rough and finish milling. A high-feed milling cutter was employed for roughing and a solid carbide end mill for finishing. Cutting temperature, surface roughness, and tool wear were evaluated using thermal imaging, profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The results demonstrate that air-assisted cooling significantly reduces thermal loads and tool wear. Specifically, during rough milling, air cooling lowered average cutting temperatures by approximately 27% (from 150°C to 110°C) and maximum temperatures by 24% (from 267°C to 204°C). In finish milling, average and maximum temperatures decreased by 33% (from 194°C to 129°C) and 35% (from 272°C to 177°C), respectively. Surface quality improved notably under air cooling, with reductions in average roughness (Ra) by 21%, maximum height (Rz) by 35%, and total height (Rt) by 46%. SEM/EDS analyses revealed that air cooling minimized coating delamination, adhesion, and oxidative wear. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach integrating the CRITIC and ARAS methods was applied to optimize the process parameters. The optimum condition – air cooling, 4375 rpm spindle speed, and 500 mm/min feed – achieved the highest relative utility (Ki = 0.895), balancing material removal rate, surface finish, and thermal performance. This study concludes that air-assisted cooling is a sustainable and effective strategy for enhancing surface integrity and tool life in the milling of difficult-to-machine materials such as AISI 316L.
UysalADemirenFAltanE. Applying minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) method on milling of martensitic stainless steel by using nano Mos2 reinforced vegetable cutting fluid. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci2015; 195: 2742–2747.
2.
OzcelikBKuramESimsekBT. Comparison of dry and wet end milling of AISI 316 stainless steel. Mater Manuf Process2011; 26(8): 1041–1049.
3.
XinHDongMXianC, et al. Optimization method for rough-finish milling allowance based on depth control of milling affected layer. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 126(5-6): 2083–2095.
4.
ÇakırogluRUzunG. Yüksek İlerleme ile Frezeleme İşlemi Esnasında Oluşan Kesme Kuvvetinin ve İş Parçası Yüzey Pürüzlülüğünün Yapay Sinir Ağları ile Modellenmesi. Gazi J Eng Sci2021; 7(1): 58–66.
5.
GuoYBLiWJawahirIS. Surface integrity characterization and prediction in machining of hardened and difficult-to-machine alloys: a state-of-art research review and analysis. Mach Sci Technol2009; 13(4): 437–470.
6.
MejriHMehdiK. Modeling of cutting forces in curvilinear peripheral milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 102(1–4): 277–291.
7.
ChenXZhaoJZhangW. Optimization analysis considering the cutting effects for high-speed five-axis down milling process by employing ball end mill. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 105(12): 4989–5008.
8.
SurGMotorcuARNohutçuS. Single and multi-objective optimization for cutting force and surface roughness in peripheral milling of Ti6Al4V using fixed and variable helix angle tools. J Manuf Process2022; 80: 529–545.
9.
YangDLiuYXieF, et al. Analytical investigation of workpiece internal energy generation in peripheral milling of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mech Sci2019; 161–162: 105063.
10.
DomingoRde AgustinaBMarínMM. An analysis of the forces in the cryogenic peripheral milling of composites reinforced with carbon fiber. Procedia Manuf2019; 41: 423–429.
11.
YangDLiuZ. Surface topography analysis and cutting parameters optimization for peripheral milling titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater2015; 51: 192–200.
12.
FuhKHChangHY. An accuracy model for the peripheral milling of aluminum alloys using response surface design. J Mater Process Technol1997; 72(1): 42–47.
13.
GururajaSRahulANandamSR, et al. Parametric evaluation of chip formation in peripheral milling of single crystal Ni-based superalloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 132(5–6): 2293–2313.
14.
DevarajaiahDMuthumariC. Evaluation of power consumption and MRR in WEDM of Ti–6Al–4V alloy and its simultaneous optimization for sustainable production. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2018; 40(8): 1–18.
15.
SivalingamVPoogavanamGNatarajanY, et al. Optimization of atomized spray cutting fluid eco-friendly turning of Inconel 718 alloy using ARAS and CODAS methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 120(7–8): 4551–4564.
16.
MarakiniVPai PSBolarG, et al. Cryogenic and conventional milling of AZ91 magnesium alloy. J Magnes Alloys2024; 12(6): 2503–2519.
17.
WangDZhaoJ. Design optimization of mechanical properties of ceramic tool material during turning of ultra-high-strength steel 300M with AHP and CRITIC method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 84(9–12): 2381–2390.
18.
SharmaDKSinghPKSharmaF, et al. Machining performance of Inconel 718 in dry, air-cooling and bio-oil based minimum quantity lubrication environments. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E: J Process Mech Eng. Epub ahead of print 5 December 2024. DOI: 10.1177/09544089241301596.
19.
HuJSLiuDXLiuYZ, et al. Experimental investigation on air cooling of GCr15. Key Eng Mater2008; 375-376: 197–200.
20.
BencheikhIBilterystFNouariM, et al. Wear estimation of coated tools using XFEM/level set function. Procedia CIRP2017; 58: 428–433.
21.
WuBZhangMZhaoB, et al. Tool wear evolution and its influence on cutting performance during milling ultra-high-strength steel using different cooling conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2024; 135(1–2): 525–541.
22.
ChangYYYangMXChangCE, et al. Cyclic thermal shock resistance and tribological properties of AlCrSiN, AlTiSiN and AlCrSiN/AlTiSiN multilayer hard coatings. Surf Coat Technol2025; 496: 131650.
23.
KumarPMaJMohanS, et al. Hundred-fold reduction in iron diffusivity in titanium nitride diffusion barrier on steel by microstructure engineering. Thin Solid Films2020; 716: 138416.
24.
HeZLiuLWangJ, et al. Nitrogen pressure significantly impacts microstructures and mechanical properties of CrAlN coatings prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Ceram Int2025; 51(5): 6481–6495.
25.
AllahyarzadehMHAliofkhazraeiMRezvanianAR, et al. Ni-W electrodeposited coatings: characterization, properties and applications. Surf Coat Technol2016; 307: 978–1010.
26.
ChandramouliTVJoladarashiSRameshMR, et al. Microstructure, mechanical properties, and tribological properties of Fe-based composite coatings reinforced with WC-Co and Cr3C2. J Mater Eng Perform2024; 34(11): 10323–10338.
27.
RahmatiBSarhanAADBasirunWJ, et al. Ceramic tantalum oxide thin film coating to enhance the corrosion and wear characteristics of Ti 6Al 4V alloy. J Alloys Comp2016; 676: 369–376.
28.
AntonovMHussainovaISergejevF, et al. Assessment of gradient and nanogradient PVD coatings behaviour under erosive, abrasive and impact wear conditions. Wear2009; 267(5–8): 898–906.
29.
BeakeBDEndrinoJLKimptonC, et al. Elevated temperature repetitive micro-scratch testing of AlCrN, TiAlN and AlTiN PVD coatings. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater2017; 69: 215–226.
30.
ChowdhuryMSIChowdhurySYamamotoK, et al. Wear behaviour of coated carbide tools during machining of Ti6Al4V aerospace alloy associated with strong built up edge formation. Surf Coat Technol2017; 313: 319–327.
31.
BleicherFPollakCBrierJ, et al. Reduction of built-up edge formation in machining Al- and cast iron hybrid components by internal cooling of cutting inserts. CIRP Ann2016; 65(1): 97–100.
32.
Bibeye JahazielRKrishnarajVGeetha PriyadarshiniB. Investigation on influence of micro-textured tool in machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Mech Sci Technol2022; 36(4): 1987–1995.
33.
SarıkayaMYıldırımÇVŞirinŞ, et al. Performance and wear analysis in machining of Co-based Haynes 25/L605 superalloy using sustainable cooling/lubrication agencies. Sustain Mater Technol2025; 43: e01268.
34.
DuanLZhuRXuJ, et al. Corrosion resistance of NiCoCrAlY/AlSiY composite coatings in alternating high temperature-room temperature marine environment. Mater Today Commun2025; 48: 113344.
35.
MatsumuraRNishidaIShiraseK. Tool temperature prediction in end milling using voxel model-based simulation. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf2024; 18(7): JAMDSM0093.
36.
BhirudNLDubeASPatilAS, et al. Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters and helix angle for temperature rise and surface roughness using response surface methodology and desirability approach for Al 7075. Int J Interact Des Manuf2024; 18(10): 7095–7114.
37.
AlbrechtTThiemXPenterL, et al. Effects of hot chips in dry cutting processes on the temperature field and displacement of the machine tool table. J Mach Eng2019; 19(3): 31–42.
38.
AgeboSWPatelMDejaM. Multi-response optimization on the effect of wet and eco-friendly cryogenic turning of D2 steel using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 128(9–10): 4561–4578.
39.
FersiAYessineABrunoL, et al. Identification of friction coefficient between uncoated carbide tool and Ti-6Al-4V alloy under different lubrication conditions. In: ESAFORM, 2024, Vol. 41, pp.1990–1999.
40.
BartoszukMPrażmowskiMHureyI. Testing of air-cooling efficiency of the underside of a turning tool carbide insert in EN-GJL 250 cast iron turning operations. Adv Sci Technol Res J2022; 16(4): 1–9.
41.
SunSBrandtMPalanisamyS, et al. Effect of cryogenic compressed air on the evolution of cutting force and tool wear during machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol2015; 221: 243–254.
42.
SarafGNiralaCK. Experimental investigation of micro-pillar textured WC inserts during turning of Ti6Al4V under various cutting fluid strategies. J Manuf Process2024; 113: 61–75.
43.
VeigaFArizmendiMJiménezA, et al. Analytical thermal model of orthogonal cutting process for predicting the temperature of the cutting tool with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity. Int J Mech Sci2021; 204: 106524.
44.
OzkanDPanjanPGokMS, et al. Experimental study on tool wear and delamination in milling CFRPs with TiAlNn- and TiN-coated tools. Coatings2020; 10(7): 623.
45.
ZhaoJLiuZ. Effects of thermo-physical properties of Ti0.41Al0.59N coating on transient and steady cutting temperature distributions in coated cemented carbide tools. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2018; 96: 80–89.
46.
TrungDD. Application of EDAS, MARCOS, TOPSIS, MOORA and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in milling process. Strojnícky Časopis–J Mech Eng2021; 71(2): 69–84.
47.
Duc TrungD. Multi-criteria decision making under the MARCOS method and the weighting methods: applied to milling, grinding and turning processes. Manuf Rev2022; 9: 3.
48.
Al-HchaimiAAJSulaimanNBMustafaMAB, et al. A comprehensive evaluation approach for efficient countermeasure techniques against timing side-channel attack on MPSoC-based IoT using multi-criteria decision-making methods. Egypt Inform J2023; 24(2): 351–364.
49.
KavimaniVGopalPMKeerthiveettil RamakrishnanS, et al. Predictive modelling and optimization of WEDM parameter for Mg-Li alloy using ANN integrated CRITIC-WASPAS approach. Heliyon2024; 10(15): e35194.
