This study investigates the effects of the structured surface on the adhesion, proliferation and alignment of endothelial cells (HUVECs). The chemical state of laser-structured surface was also investigated in comparison with the non-treated surface. A novel design for biomedical applications consisting of parallel chain-like structures was realised on stainless steel surface by laser micromachining. The structures were designed to employ surface topography in the presence of micron and sub-micron features and to avoid intensive surface modification that could compromise the mechanical properties of thin devices like cardiovascular stents. The results showed that the structured surfaces favored the adhesion, proliferation and alignment of HUVECs. The proliferation and the alignment of HUVECs were pronounced when the periodic distance between two consecutive chain-like structures was 25 µm. Moreover, there was no significant difference in chemical composition on the structured surface suggesting that the cell proliferation and alignment were mainly influenced by the surface topography.
Li GG, YangP, QinW, The effect of coimmobilizing heparin and fibronectin on titanium on hemocompatibility and endothelialisation. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4691–4703. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.025
2.
ChenL, DongN, HuangJ, Effect of vascular nitric oxide pathway on vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Int J Cardiol. 2011;150:370–372. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.090
3.
MuellerPP, MayT, PerzA, Control of smooth muscle cell proliferation by ferrous iron. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2193–2200. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.042
4.
HassanAK, BergheanuSC, StijnenT, Late stent malposition risk is higher after drug-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent implantation and associates with late stent thrombosis. Eur Hearth Journal. 2010;31:1172–1180. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn553
5.
LuJ, RaoM, MacDonaldN, Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.07.008
6.
PalmazJC, BensonA, SpragueEA.Influence of surface topography on endothelialization of intravascular metallic material. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:439–444. doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(99)70063-1
7.
OberringerM, AkmanE, LeeJ, Reduced myofibroblast differentiation on femtosecond laser treated 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33:901–908. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.11.018
8.
De GiorgiC, FurlanV, DemirAG, Laser micropolishing of AISI 304 stainless steel surfaces for cleanability and bacteria removal capability. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;406:88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.083
9.
FurlanV, BiondiM, DemirAG, Sub-micrometric surface texturing of AZ31 Mg-alloy through two-beam direct laser interference patterning with a ns-pulsed green fiber laser. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;423:619–629. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.138
JagdheeshR, DiazM, MarimuthubS, Robust fabrication of m-patterns with tunable and durable wetting properties: hydrophilic to ultrahydrophobic via a vacuum process. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5:7125–7136. doi: 10.1039/C7TA01385J
12.
MirhosseiniN, CrousePL, SchmidthMJJ, Laser surface micro-texturing of Ti–6Al–4 V substrates for improved cell integration. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253:7738–7743. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.168
13.
WaughDG, LawrenceJ, BrownEM.Osteoblast cell response to a CO2 laser modified polymeric material. Opt Lasers Eng. 2012;50:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.08.010
14.
QinL, ZengQ, WangW, Response of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells to the microenvironment produced on Co-Cr-Mo alloy using laser surface texturing. J Mater Sci. 2014;49:2662–2671. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7972-7
15.
ZwahrC, GüntherD, BrinkmannT, Laser surface patterning of titanium for improving the biological performance of dental implants. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6:1600858. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600858
DumasV, RattnerA, VicoL, Multiscale grooved titanium processed with femtosecond laser influences mesenchymal stem cell morphology, adhesion, and matrix organization. J Biomed Mater Res – Part A. 2012;100A:3108–3116. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34239
18.
HaoL, LawrenceJ, ChianKS.Osteoblast cell adhesion on a laser modified zirconia based bioceramic. J Mater Sci Mater. 2005;16:719–726. doi: 10.1007/s10856-005-2608-3
19.
KiratT, KoseN, AltunI, What is the most possible cause of the side branch occlusion after bioresorbable everolimus-eluting stent?Int J Cardiol. 2015;209:348. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.244
20.
PacheJ, KastratiA, MehilliJ, Angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO-2) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1283–1288. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00119-0
21.
HaidopoulosM, TurgeonS, Sarra-BournetC, Development of an optimized electrochemical process for subsequent coating of 316 stainless steel for stent applications. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2006;17:647–657.
22.
Montano-MachadoV, ChevallierP, MantovaniD, On the potential for fibronectin/phosphorylcholine coatings on PTFE substrates to jointly modulate endothelial cell adhesion and hemocompatibility properties. Biomatter. 2015;5:e979679. doi: 10.4161/21592535.2014.979679
23.
DingY, YangZ, BiCW, Directing vascular cell selectivity and hemocompatibility on patterned platforms featuring variable topographic geometry and size. Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:12062–12070. doi: 10.1021/am502692k
24.
ShulzW, EppeltU, PopraweR.Review on laser drilling I. fundamentals, modeling, and simulation. J Laser Appl. 2013;25(1):012006-1–012006-17.
25.
LiuJM.Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes. Opt Lett1982;7(5):196–198. doi: 10.1364/OL.7.000196
26.
DemirAG, PangovskiK, PrevitaliB, Laser micromachining of TiN coatings with variable pulse durations and shapes in ns regime. Surf Coat Tech.2014;258:240–248. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.09.021
27.
PangovskiK, ThePS, LinD, Pulse energy packing effects on material transport during laser processing of <111> silicon. Appl Phys A. 2018;124(5):1–9.
28.
JeeY, BeckerMF, WalserRM.Laser-induced damage on single-crystal metal surfaces. J Opt Soc Am B. 1988;5(3):648–659. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.5.000648
29.
HryniewiczT, RokoszK, RokickiR.Electrochemical and XPS studies of AISI 316L stainless steel after electropolishing in a magnetic field. Corros Sci. 2008;50:2676–2681. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.06.048
30.
HryniewiczT, RokoszK.Analysis of XPS results of AISI 316L electropolished and magnetoelectropolished at varying conditions. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;204:2583–2592. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.02.005
31.
CristB. V.Handboook of monochromatic XPS spectra: the elements andnative oxides, vol. 1. New York
: Wiley; 2000. p. 353.
32.
FredriksonW, EdstromK.XPS study of duplex stainless steel as a possible current collector in a Li-ion battery. Electrochim Acta. 2012;79:82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.057
33.
GrosvenorAP, KobeBA, BiesingerMC, Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds. Surf Interface Anal. 2004;36:1564–1574. doi: 10.1002/sia.1984
34.
GoutierF, ValetteS, LabordeE, 304L stainless steel oxidation in carbon dioxide: An XPS study. J Alloys Compd. 2011;509:3246–3251. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.094
35.
LiL, MirhosseiniN, MichaelA, Enhancement of endothelialisation of coronary stents by laser surface engineering. Lasers Surg Med. 2013;45:608–616. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22180
36.
BritlandS, MorganH, Wojiak-StodartB, Synergistic and hierarchical adhesive and topographic guidance of BHK cells. Exp Cell Res. 1996;228:313–325. doi: 10.1006/excr.1996.0331
37.
RanjanA, WebsterTJ.Increased endothelial cell adhesion and elongation on micron-patterned nano-rough poly(dimethylsiloxane) films. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:305102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/30/305102
38.
CookeJP.Flow, NO, and atherogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:768–770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0430082100
39.
HuangNF, LaiES, RibeiroAJ, Spatial patterning of endothelium modulates cell morphology, adhesiveness and transcriptional signature. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2928–2937. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.017
