With the rapid development of electronic control and intelligent driving, vehicle chassis systems are shifting from mechanical structures to X-by-wire architectures. X-by-wire chassis reduce vehicle mass through lightweight design and offer excellent control precision, fast dynamic response, and strong scalability, which are crucial for intelligent connected vehicles. This review systematically summarizes the research progress of key technologies in X-by-wire chassis, with a focus on the control strategies of three core systems: steer-by-wire, brake-by-wire, and suspension-by-wire, as well as cutting-edge achievements in integrated chassis control. At the subsystem level, issues such as high-precision tracking control, robust fault-tolerant control and its deep integration with autonomous driving are discussed in depth. At the vehicle level, multidimensional cooperative control methods aimed at enhancing vehicle stability are thoroughly elaborated, encompassing lateral-longitudinal, lateral-vertical, longitudinal-vertical, and lateral-longitudinal-vertical cooperative control strategies. Finally, future challenges and development trends of X-by-wire chassis are outlined to provide guidance for further research in related fields.
WangBHanYWangS, et al. A review of intelligent connected vehicle cooperative driving development. Mathematics2022; 10(19): 3635.
2.
ChuWWuniriQDuX, et al. Cloud control system architectures, technologies and applications on intelligent and connected vehicles: a review. Chin J Mech Eng2021; 34(1): 139.
3.
FarivarFSayad HaghighiMJolfaeiA, et al. On the security of networked control systems in smart vehicle and its adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 22(6): 3824–3831.
4.
AbdelkaderGElgazzarKKhamisA.Connected vehicles: technology review, state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Sensors2021; 21(22): 7712.
5.
TanZDaiNSuY, et al. Human–machine interaction in intelligent and connected vehicles: a review of status quo, issues, and opportunities. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23(9): 13954–13975.
6.
ArthursPGillamLKrauseP, et al. A taxonomy and survey of edge cloud computing for intelligent transportation systems and connected vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 23(7): 6206–6221.
7.
WuJQuX.Intersection control with connected and automated vehicles: a review. J Intell Connect Veh2022; 5(3): 260–269.
8.
HeCXuXJiangH, et al. Cyber-attack detection for lateral control system of cloud-based intelligent connected vehicle based on BiLSTM-attention network. Measurement2025; 247: 116740.
9.
SandriniGGadolaMChindamoD, et al. Exploring the impact of vehicle lightweighting in terms of energy consumption: analysis and simulation. Energies2023; 16(13): 5157.
10.
KimHCWallingtonTJ.Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model to estimate use-phase fuel consumption of electrified vehicles. Environ Sci Technol2016; 50(20): 11226–11233.
11.
HeCXuXJiangH, et al. H∞ resilient control for trajectory tracking of cloud-based connected vehicle under hybrid cyber attack. In: Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Driving and Smart Transportation, 2024, pp. 38–44.
12.
ZhangLWangQChenJ, et al. Brake-by-wire system for passenger cars: a review of structure, control, key technologies, and application in X-by-wire chassis. ETransportation2023; 18: 100292.
13.
PengHChenX.Active safety control of X-by-wire electric vehicles: a survey. SAE Int J Veh Dyn Stab NVH2022; 06(2): 115–133.
14.
WangZDingXZhangL.Chassis coordinated control for full x-by-wire four-wheel-independent-drive electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2023; 72(4): 4394–4410.
15.
WangZLiYKakuC, et al. Trajectory tracking control of intelligent x-by-wire vehicles. World Electr Veh J2022; 13(11): 205.
16.
ZhouXZhaoWWangC, et al. Multidisciplinary optimization design of electric vehicle x-by-wire chassis integrating parameter coupling and uncertainties. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2025; 11: 4765–4777.
17.
LiY.Advanced x-by-wire technologies in design, control and measurement for vehicular electrified chassis. World Electr Veh J2023; 14(6): 136.
18.
ZhuFChenJGuanZ, et al. Development of a combined harvester navigation control system based on visual simultaneous localization and mapping-inertial guidance fusion. J Agric Eng2024; 55(3): 2239–2257.
19.
HuJPanJDaiB, et al. Development of an attitude adjustment crawler chassis for combine harvester and experiment of adaptive leveling system. Agronomy2022; 12(3): 717.
20.
IrmerMDegenRNüßgenA, et al. Development and analysis of a detail model for steer-by-wire systems. IEEE Access2023; 11: 7229–7236.
21.
PerdanaMAPBudimanACRistianaR, et al. Control strategies for steer-by-wire systems: an overview. Technologies2024; 13(1): 6.
22.
ZhangRZhaoWWangC, et al. Research on personalized control strategy of EHB system for consistent braking feeling considering driving behaviors. Energy2024; 293: 130568.
23.
ZengDYuZXiongL, et al. Improved AEB algorithm combined with estimating the adhesion coefficient of road ahead and considering the performance of EHB. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng2023; 237(10–11): 2415–2430.
24.
LiCZhuoGTangC, et al. A review of electro-mechanical brake (EMB) system: structure, control and application. Sustainability2023; 15(5): 4514.
25.
LijinZShichunYJingyaoQ.Research progress of EMB systems key technology. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut2025; 51(4): 1037–1047.
26.
ChaiXHuJMaT, et al. Construction and characteristic analysis of dynamic stress coupling simulation models for the attitude-adjustable chassis of a combine harvester. Agronomy2024; 14(8): 1874.
27.
PangJLiYJiJ, et al. Vibration excitation identification and control of the cutter of a combine harvester using triaxial accelerometers and partial coherence sorting. Biosyst Eng2019; 185: 25–34.
28.
SolimanAMAKaldasMMS. Semi-active suspension systems from research to mass-market – Aa review. J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control2021; 40(2): 1005–1023.
29.
NaJHuangYWuX, et al. Active suspension control of quarter-car system with experimental validation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2022; 52(8): 4714–4726.
30.
LiYXuLLvL, et al. Study on modeling method of a multi-parameter control system for threshing and cleaning devices in the grain combine harvester. Agriculture2022; 12(9): 1483.
31.
XuCXieFZhouR, et al. Research on control strategy and comprehensive performance evaluation of semi-active suspension based on CDC shock absorber. J Vib Eng Technol2024; 12(2): 2451–2465.
32.
Abdul AzizMMohtasimSMAhammedR. State-of-the-art recent developments of large magnetorheological (MR) dampers: a review. Korea-Australia Rheol J2022; 34(2): 105–136.
33.
SunXWuMYinC, et al. Model predictive thrust force control for linear motor actuator used in active suspension. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2021; 36(4): 3063–3072.
34.
SunXWuMYinC, et al. Multiple-iteration search sensorless control for linear motor in vehicle regenerative suspension. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2021; 7(3): 1628–1637.
35.
LuEXueJChenT, et al. Robust trajectory tracking control of an autonomous tractor-trailer considering model parameter uncertainties and disturbances. Agriculture2023; 13(4): 869.
36.
ShiGLiuTWangS, et al. High authenticity steering feel control strategy for steer-by-wire system based on terminal sliding mode rack force observer. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng2025; 239: 2869–2885.
37.
XiaoPFangZJinK, et al. Study of the road feel model of a steer-by-wire system based on an improved dung beetle optimization algorithm. Elect Eng2025; 107: 8129–8140.
38.
LiuHJiXLiJ, et al. Systematic design and control of steering feel for steering-by-wire vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2025; 09544070241312373.
39.
ZhengHHuJLiuY.A bilateral control scheme for vehicle steer-by-wire system with road feel and steering controller design. Trans Inst Meas Contr2019; 41(3): 593–604.
40.
CheonDNamKOhS.Design and robust control of a precise torque controllable steering module for steer-by-wire systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2022; 69(12): 13245–13254.
41.
WangJJiangNH, C, Steering feel design for steer-by-wire system on electric vehicles. In: 2019 Chinese Control Conference (CCC), 2019, pp. 533–538.
42.
XuFXLiuXHChenW, et al. The fractional order PID method with a fault tolerant module for road feeling control of steer-by-wire system. Math Probl Eng2018; 2018(1): 1–12.
43.
ChenCZhengHZongC, et al. Design of steering wheel torque with human-machine interaction for uncoupled shared steering. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2025; 239: 3634–3650.
44.
XiaoZXiaoB. Research on road feeling control strategy for electric forklift steer-by-wire system. In: 2016 IEEE 11th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2016, pp. 1744–1749.
45.
ZhouJLuZ. Research of double closed loop PID Control strategy of road feeling motor. In: Joint International Information Technology, Mechanical and Electronic Engineering Conference (JIMEC 2016), 2016, pp. 199–206.
46.
LiJWuZLiM, et al. Dynamic measurement method for steering wheel angle of autonomous agricultural vehicles. Agriculture2024; 14(9): 1602.
47.
XieJXuXWangF, et al. Coordination control strategy for human-machine cooperative steering of intelligent vehicles: a reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23(11): 21163–21177.
48.
ZhangXKongHWangH. A composite control scheme for automotive steer-by-wire system. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Modelling, Identification & Control (ICMIC), 2014, pp. 237–242.
49.
AbbasSJHusainSSAl-WaisS, et al. Adaptive integral sliding mode controller (SMC) design for vehicle steer-by-wire system. SAE Int J Veh Dyn Stab NVH2024; 08(3): 383–396.
50.
SunZZhengJManZ, et al. Discrete-time iterative learning control for vehicle steer-by-wire systems. In: 2014 9th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2014, pp. 462–467.
51.
HeSXuXXieJ, et al. Adaptive control of dual-motor autonomous steering system for intelligent vehicles via Bi-LSTM and fuzzy methods. Control Eng Pract2023; 130: 105362.
52.
XuXLiuZWangF, et al. Trajectory tracking control based on the dual-motor autonomous steering system with time-varying network-induced time delay. Control Eng Pract2021; 116: 104915.
53.
XuXSuPWangF, et al. Coordinated control of dual-motor using the interval type-2 fuzzy logic in autonomous steering system of AGV. Int J Fuzzy Syst2021; 23: 1070–1086.
54.
XieJXuXWangF, et al. Coordinated control based path following of distributed drive autonomous electric vehicles with yaw-moment control. Control Eng Pract2021; 106: 104659.
55.
LiuZXuXXieJ, et al. Variable transmission ratio design of a steer-by-wire system for intelligent vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2022; 236(16): 9341–9353.
56.
LinJZhangFSuL, et al. Research on variable transmission ratio control method to improve vehicle handling comfort based on steer-by-wire system. Actuators2024; 13(2): 48.
57.
ZouSLuanZZhaoW, et al. Personalized design strategy of vehicle steer-by-wire characteristics considering driving style. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2023; 237(2): 253–266.
58.
ChenJChenJZhangZ, et al. Research on following suction and discharging motion control method of vacuum-vibration precision seeding manipulator. Appl Eng Agric2022; 38(6): 873–883.
59.
LiJShangZLiR, et al. Adaptive sliding mode path tracking control of unmanned rice transplanter. Agriculture2022; 12(8): 1225.
60.
LeeJKimKShinD.Active rack control of steer-by-wire systems for vehicle lateral stability. Veh Syst Dyn2025; 63: 1770–1789.
61.
HashemiEJalaliMKhajepourA, et al. Vehicle stability control: model predictive approach and combined-slip effect. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2020; 25(6): 2789–2800.
62.
ZhaoBXuNChenH, et al. Stability control of electric vehicles with in-wheel motors by considering tire slip energy. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 118: 340–359.
63.
ZhangBWangCZhaoW, et al. The design and stable delay range analysis of TD-H2/H∞ controller for SbW systems. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2024; 11(1): 404–415.
64.
ZhangBZhaoWWangC, et al. Layered time-delay robust control strategy for yaw stability of SbW vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Vehicles2023; 8(7): 3913–3924.
65.
DelayT. Stability analysis and optimization of vehicle active motion control system with feedback. In: Vehicle and automotive engineering 4: select proceedings of the 4th VAE2022, Miskolc, Hungary, 2022, p.111.
66.
AissHEBarbosaKAPetersAA.Nonlinear time-delay observer-based control to estimate vehicle states: lateral vehicle model. IEEE Access2022; 10: 110459–110472.
67.
LanDYuMHuangY, et al. Fault diagnosis and prognosis of steer-by-wire system based on finite state machine and extreme learning machine. Neural Comput Appl2022; 34(7): 5081–5095.
68.
WangYWangYTieM.Hybrid adaptive learning neural network control for steer-by-wire systems via sigmoid tracking differentiator and disturbance observer. Eng Appl Artif Intell2021; 104: 104393.
69.
ZhaoJChengSLiL, et al. A model free controller based on reinforcement learning for active steering system with uncertainties. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2021; 235(9): 2470–2483.
70.
AnwarSChenL.An analytical redundancy-based fault detection and isolation algorithm for a road-wheel control subsystem in a steer-by-wire system. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2007; 56(5): 2859–2869.
71.
BoudaoudMSentouhCCappelleC, et al. A new observer-based fault tolerant shared control for SbW systems with actuator fault for driver assistance. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO 2024), 2024, Vol. 1, pp. 189–197.
72.
JudaletVGlaserSGruyerD, et al. Fault detection and isolation via the interacting multiple model approach applied to drive-by-wire vehicles. Sensors2018; 18(7): 2332.
73.
GaddaCDLawsSMGerdesJC.Robust fault detection filter design with applications to steer-by-wire vehicles. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE 2007), 2007, Paper No. IMECE2007-42623, pp. 215–223.
74.
HuangCNaghdyFDuH.Delta operator-based model predictive control with fault compensation for steer-by-wire systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2020; 50(6): 2257–2272.
75.
XuKZhouXZhaoW, et al. Performance-guaranteed adaptive switching fault-tolerant control of steer-by-wire system considering actuator fault and load disturbance. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2024; 10: 8513–8527.
76.
YangCWangQWangW, et al. A fault estimation and fault-tolerant operation scheme design under simultaneous actuator and sensor faults for steer-by-wire system. Veh Syst Dyn2025; 1–28.
77.
HeSXuXXieJ, et al. Fault detection and fault-tolerant control of autonomous steering system for intelligent vehicles combining Bi-LSTM and SPRT. Measurement2023; 212: 112708.
78.
XuXWuZHeS, et al. Fault detection and fault-tolerant control of dual-motor autonomous steering system. Trans Inst Meas Contr2024; 46(15): 2984–2995.
79.
GengKChulinNAWangZ.Fault-tolerant model predictive control algorithm for path tracking of autonomous vehicle. Sensors2020; 20(15): 4245.
80.
WangWYangSZhangX, et al. Research on the smart broad bean harvesting system and the self-adaptive control method based on CPS tTechnologies. Agronomy2024; 14(7): 1405.
81.
ChenJNingXLiY.A fuzzy control strategy for the forward speed of a combine harvester based on KDD. Appl Eng Agric2017; 33(1): 15–22.
82.
WangFChenDCaiY, et al. Nonlinear clamping force estimation and robust control of an electro-mechanical brake system for electric vehicles based on PWA-H∞-H∞. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2025; 30(6): 4341–4352.
83.
ShiBXiongLYuZ.Pressure estimation of the electro-hydraulic brake system based on signal fusion. Actuators2021; 10(9): 240.
84.
GaoZYangYChenG, et al. Adaptative pressure estimation and control architecture for integrated electro-hydraulic brake system. Chin J Mech Eng2025; 38(1): 28.
85.
ShiBXiongLYuZ.Pressure estimation based on vehicle dynamics considering the evolution of the brake linings’ coefficient of friction. Actuators2021; 10(4): 76.
86.
ShiBXiongLYuZ.Master cylinder pressure estimation of the electro-hydraulic brake system based on modeling and fusion of the friction character and the pressure-position character. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2023; 72(2): 1748–1762.
87.
HanWXiongLYuZ, et al. Integrated pressure estimation and control for electro-hydraulic brake systems of electric vehicles considering actuator characteristics and vehicle longitudinal dynamics. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2023; 28(1): 197–209.
88.
XuZGeradaC.Enhanced estimation of clamping-force for automotive EMB actuators using a switching extended state observer. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2024; 71(3): 2220–2230.
89.
MengYWuTRongJ, et al. Clamping force control of electromechanical brake actuator considering contact point between friction lining and brake disc. Actuators2024; 13(9): 345.
90.
XuZGeradaC.Enhanced force estimation for electromechanical brake actuators in transportation vehicles. IEEE Trans Power Electron2021; 36(12): 14329–14339.
91.
RivaGFormentinSSavaresiSM.Force estimation in electro-mechanical systems: theory and experiments. In: 2021 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), 2021, pp. 992–997.
92.
LiYShimTShinDH, et al. Control system design for electromechanical brake system using novel clamping force model and estimator. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2021; 70(9): 8653–8668.
93.
LiuKLiuZTanX, et al. A fusion estimation method of clamping force for electro-mechanical brake system based on adaptive Kalman filtering. Trans Inst Meas Contr2024; 01423312241291096.
94.
ParkGKimSKimJ.Clamping force estimation for electro-mechanical brake based on friction torque fusion approach. Electronics2025; 14(2): 348.
95.
ShiQHeL.A model predictive control approach for electro-hydraulic braking by wire. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2023; 19(2): 1380–1388.
96.
ChenZLiuZHuangC, et al. A nonlinear wheel cylinder pressure controller based on CESO for integrated braking system. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2024; 73: 9839–9848.
97.
JiYZhangJHeC, et al. Wheel braking pressure control based on central booster electrohydraulic brake-by-wire system. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2023; 9(1): 222–235.
98.
LiuWZhangJMaR, et al. Predictive wheel cylinder pressure control for automotive hydraulic brake-by-wire systems. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2025; 30: 840–850.
99.
JiangLShiQWeiY, et al. Electro-hydraulic braking dynamics for pressure demand control of brake-by-wire system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2024; 238(4): 735–748.
100.
ZhaoYLinHLiB.Sliding-mode clamping force control of electromechanical brake system based on enhanced reaching law. IEEE Access2021; 9: 19506–19515.
101.
ChenQLvZTongH, et al. Clamping force control strategy of electro-mechanical brake system using VUF-PID controller. Actuators2023; 12(7): 272.
102.
XuZWuJBiG, et al. An adaptive clamping force control strategy for electro-mechanical brake system considering nonlinear friction resistance. SAE technical paper 2024-01-2282, 2024.
103.
JinXWuJZhangY, et al. A precise clamping force control strategy for electro-mechanical braking system based on nonlinear characteristics compensation. SAE technical paper 2024-01-2322, 2024.
104.
WeiWHeTMenY, et al. Nonlinear model predictive clamping force control for electromechanical brake system. In: 2024 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), 2024, pp. 789–794.
105.
ZhaoHChenZLiL, et al. High-quality clamping force control for electro-mechanical brake considering nonlinear disturbances. SAE technical paper 2025-01-8304, 2025.
106.
ChenZDingRZhouQ, et al. Research on coordinated control of electro-hydraulic composite braking for an electric vehicle based on the Fuzzy-td3 deep reinforcement learning algorithm. Control Eng Pract2025; 157: 106248.
107.
WangHWangJPiD, et al. Optimization of commercial vehicle mechatronics composite ABS braking control considering braking efficiency and energy regeneration. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2025; 11: 2332–2343.
108.
ZhouXWuGWangC, et al. Cooperative optimization of energy recovery and braking feel based on vehicle speed prediction under downshifting conditions. Energy2024; 301: 131699.
109.
GuoJLiWWangJ, et al. Safe and energy-efficient car-following control strategy for intelligent electric vehicles considering regenerative braking. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2022; 23(7): 7070–7081.
110.
HeHWangCJiaH, et al. An intelligent braking system composed single-pedal and multi-objective optimization neural network braking control strategies for electric vehicle. Appl Energy2020; 259: 114172.
111.
PeiXPanHChenZ, et al. Coordinated control strategy of electro-hydraulic braking for energy regeneration. Control Eng Pract2020; 96: 104324.
112.
MengXWangRXuY, et al. Study on electro-mechanical combined braking control strategy for 4WD electric vehicle with two motors. In: 2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), 2020, pp. 508–512.
113.
LiuTZhengJSuY, et al. A study on control strategy of regenerative braking in the hydraulic hybrid vehicle based on ECE regulations. Math Probl Eng2013; 2013(1): 1–9.
114.
ChuLWangXZhangL, et al. Integrative control of regenerative braking system and anti-lock braking system. Adv Mater Res2013; 706–708: 830–835.
115.
YanPYangLZhangJ, et al. Reinforcement learning-based braking energy recovery control strategy for multi-axle electric heavy-duty truck vehicles. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Transportation, 2024, pp.466–476. Springer.
116.
PrasanthBPaulRKaliyaperumalD, et al. Maximizing regenerative braking energy harnessing in electric vehicles using machine learning techniques. Electronics2023; 12(5): 1119.
117.
HanJYanXTangH.Method of controlling tillage depth for agricultural tractors considering engine load characteristics. Biosyst Eng2023; 227: 95–106.
118.
TangLWangWZhangC, et al. Linear active disturbance rejection control system for the travel speed of an electric reel sprinkling irrigation machine. Agriculture2024; 14(9): 1544.
119.
LiHWangKHaoH, et al. Yaw moment control based on brake-by-wire for vehicle stbility. World Electr Veh J2023; 14(9): 256.
120.
EmirlerMTGuvencBA.Model predictive vehicle yaw stability control via integrated active front wheel steering and individual braking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10225, 2022.
121.
TianXQinHBaoX. Lateral stability control of brake-by-wire vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacture (AIAM 2021), 2021, pp. 2614–2619.
122.
ZhouJDiYMiaoX.Single-wheel failure stability control for vehicle equipped with brake-by-wire system. World Electr Veh J2023; 14(7): 177.
123.
TemizOCakmakciMYildizY.A fault-tolerant integrated vehicle stability control using adaptive control allocation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.05697, 2020.
124.
YangTLiPLiQ, et al. Vehicle stability control strategy for high-speed curves based on mode switching. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2024; 238(12): 3825–3842.
125.
LiuHDengWHeR, et al. Fault-tolerant control of brake-by-wire systems based on control allocation. SAE technical paper 2016-01-0132, 2016.
126.
XieXChenL.Research on regenerative braking and fault-tolerant control strategy of pure electric commercial vehicles based on brake-by-wire control. Int J High Speed Electron Syst2025; Article ID 2540434.
127.
WuTWangJRongJ, et al. Braking reconstruction control for fault-tolerance in electro-mechanical brake actuator failures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2025; 239: 6455–6470.
128.
JeongY.Model predictive control based integrated fault tolerant controller for autonomous vehicles with four-wheel independent steering, driving and braking systems. Veh Syst Dyn2025; 63: 2062–2085.
129.
CaoXTianYJiX, et al. Fault-tolerant controller design for path following of the autonomous vehicle under the faults in braking actuators. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2021; 7(4): 2530–2540.
130.
HuangSZhouCYangL, et al. Transient fault tolerant control for vehicle brake-by-wire systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2016; 149: 148–163.
131.
PatanKPatanMKlimkowiczK.Sensor fault-tolerant control design for magnetic brake system. Sensors2020; 20(16): 4598.
132.
ZhengLLuYWangJ, et al. Braking failure anti-rollover control and hardware-in-the-loop verification of wire-controlled heavy vehicles. Sci Rep2024; 14(1): 29802.
133.
HuQLuWJiangJ.Design of a vehicle height and body posture adjustment hybrid automaton of electronically controlled air suspension. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process2021; 35(9): 1879–1897.
134.
YinCZhaoDZhangJ, et al. Body height robust control of automotive air suspension system using finite-time approach. Asian J Control2022; 24(2): 859–871.
135.
WongPKWangHZhaoJ.Robust finite-time fault-tolerant control for vehicle height and posture regulation with air suspension system subject to actuator faults, uncertainties and external disturbance. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111(11): 10113–10130.
136.
BaiXLuLZhangC, et al. Research on height adjustment characteristics of heavy vehicle active air suspension based on fuzzy control. World Electric Vehicle Journal2023; 14(8): 210.
137.
ZhaoRXieWYuG, et al. Adaptive ride height controller design for vehicle active suspension systems with uncertain sprung mass and time-varying disturbance. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2022; 32(10): 5950–5966.
138.
LiZYaoJXuY.Research and application of a new method for adjusting the vehicle body height. PLoS One2022; 17(10): e0274108.
139.
ZhaoRXieWZhaoJ, et al. Nonlinear ride height control of active air suspension system with output constraints and time-varying disturbances. Sensors2021; 21(4): 1539.
140.
LongYTanXLiW, et al. Modeling and state-preview height control of electronically controlled air suspension system based on experiment. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2024; 238(8): 2465–2476.
141.
YuexiaCLongCRuochenW, et al. Modeling and test on height adjustment system of electrically-controlled air suspension for agricultural vehicles. Int J Agric Biol Eng2016; 9(2): 40–47.
142.
CuiLMaoHXueX, et al. Design optimization and test for a pendulum suspension of the crop sprayer boom in dynamic conditions based on a six DOF motion simulator. Int J Agric Biol Eng2018; 11(3): 76–85.
143.
CuiLXueXLeF, et al. Design and experiment of electro hydraulic active suspension for controlling the rolling motion of spray boom. Int J Agric Biol Eng2019; 12(4): 72–81.
144.
TangZWangHJingT, et al. Centroid swinging property of a machine body undergoing longitudinal excitation in a straw compression baler. Eng Agric2024; 44: e20230109.
145.
ChenLXuXLiangC, et al. Semi-active control of a new quasi-zero stiffness air suspension for commercial vehicles based on H2/H∞ state feedback. J Vib Control2023; 29(7–8): 1910–1926.
146.
LiGRuanZGuR, et al. Fuzzy sliding mode control of vehicle magnetorheological semi-active air suspension. Appl Sci2021; 11(22): 10925.
147.
LeeDJinSLeeC.Deep reinforcement learning of semi-active suspension controller for vehicle ride comfort. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2023; 72(1): 327–339.
148.
HanSYLiangT.Reinforcement-learning-based vibration control for a vehicle semi-active suspension system via the PPO approach. Appl Sci2022; 12(6): 3078.
149.
YuanHNguyenVZhouH.Research on semi-active air suspensions of heavy trucks based on a combination of machine learning and optimal fuzzy control. SAE Int J Veh Dyn Stab NVH2021; 05(2): 159–172.
150.
WangRLiuWDingR, et al. Switching control of semi-active suspension based on road profile estimation. Veh Syst Dyn2022; 60(6): 1972–1992.
151.
MaTBiFWangX, et al. Optimized fuzzy skyhook control for semi-active vehicle suspension with new inverse model of magnetorheological fluid damper. Energies2021; 14(6): 1674.
152.
KimJLeeTKimCJ, et al. Model predictive control of a semi-active suspension with a shift delay compensation using preview road information. Control Eng Pract2023; 137: 105584.
153.
ZhangBZhaoHZhangX.Adaptive variable domain fuzzy PID control strategy based on road excitation for semi-active suspension using CDC shock absorber. J Vib Control2024; 30(3–4): 860–875.
154.
KojisPŠabanovičESkrickijV.Deep neural network based data-driven virtual sensor in vehicle semi-active suspension real-time control. Transport2022; 37(1): 37–50.
155.
ZhuMLvGZhangC, et al. Delay-dependent sliding mode variable structure control of vehicle magneto-rheological semi-active suspension. IEEE Access2022; 10: 51128–51141.
156.
MeeteiLVDasDK.Enhanced nonlinear disturbance observer based sliding mode control design for a fully active suspension system. Int J Dyn Control2021; 9: 971–984.
157.
MengQChenCWangP, et al. Study on vehicle active suspension system control method based on homogeneous domination approach. Asian J Control2021; 23(1): 561–571.
158.
MahmoodabadiMJNejadkourkiNIbrahimMY.Optimal fuzzy robust state feedback control for a five DOF active suspension system. Results in Control and Optimization2024; 17: 100504.
159.
AlqudsiYBolatFCMakaraciM.Optimal and robust control methodologies for 4DOF active suspension systems: a comparative study with uncertainty considerations. Optim Control Appl Methods2024; 46(1): 3.
160.
ZhangMJingX.Energy-saving robust saturated control for active suspension systems via employing beneficial nonlinearity and disturbance. IEEE Trans Cybern2022; 52(10): 10089–10100.
161.
ZhangNYangSWuG, et al. Fast distributed model predictive control method for active suspension systems. Sensors2023; 23(6): 3357.
162.
HoangVNDengFVanCN.Adaptive optimal control system design for semi-active suspension system by supposing variable parameters under exogenous road disturbance. Control Theory Technol2025; 23: 64–73.
163.
MannaSManiGGhildiyalS, et al. Ant colony optimization tuned closed-loop optimal control intended for vehicle active suspension system. IEEE Access2022; 10: 53735–53745.
164.
PengJShiXHuY.Robust decoupled sliding mode control for active suspension systems with prescribed tracking performance. Control Theory Technol2025; 23: 310–320.
165.
OvalleLRíosHAhmedH.Robust control for an active suspension system via continuous sliding-mode controllers. Eng Sci Technol Int J2022; 28: 101026.
166.
MrazguaJTissirEHOuahiM, et al. Reliable H∞ fuzzy control for fault-tolerant actuator failures of active suspension system. IFAC J Syst Control2024; 27: 100258.
167.
MrazguaJTisssirEHOuahiM.Fuzzy fault-tolerant H∞ control approach for nonlinear active suspension systems with actuator failure. Procedia Comput Sci2019; 148: 465–474.
168.
GuoXZhangJSunW.Robust saturated fault-tolerant control for active suspension system via partial measurement information. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 191: 110116.
169.
LiuSZhouHLuoX, et al. Adaptive sliding fault tolerant control for nonlinear uncertain active suspension systems. J Franklin Inst2016; 353(1): 180–199.
170.
GuoXWangJSunW.Nonlinear adaptive fault-tolerant control for full-car active suspension with velocity measurement errors and full-state constraints. J Franklin Inst2024; 361(10): 106845.
171.
ZhaoWGuL. Guaranteed cost-based fault-tolerant controller design for nonlinear suspension systems. In: Proceedings of the 2024 14th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), 2024, pp. 1–5.
172.
RetianzaDVDuivenbodeJHuismanH, et al. Fault-tolerant controller and failure analysis of automotive electromagnetic suspension systems. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Fourteenth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), 2019, pp. 1–9.
173.
ZhuHDingWYangM, et al. Research on robust fault-tolerant control of the controllable suspension based on knowledge-data fusion driven. Sci Rep2023; 13(1): 22723.
174.
Rueda VillanobaSABorrás PinillaC. Neural network based fault tolerant control for a semi-active suspension. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, 2019, p.V004T05A089. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
175.
LiuHYanSShenY, et al. Model predictive control system based on direct yaw moment control for 4WID self-steering agriculture vehicle. Int J Agric Biol Eng2021; 14(2): 175–181.
176.
CuiBCuiXWeiX, et al. Design and testing of a tractor automatic navigation system based on dynamic path search and a fuzzy Stanley Model. Agriculture2024; 14(12): 2136.
177.
JingCShuHShuR, et al. Integrated control of electric vehicles based on active front steering and model predictive control. Control Eng Pract2022; 121: 105066.
178.
NahidiAKasaiezadehAKhosravaniS, et al. Modular integrated longitudinal and lateral vehicle stability control for electric vehicles. Mechatronics2017; 44: 60–70.
179.
ShiKYuanXHuangG, et al. MPC-based compensation control system for the yaw stability of distributed drive electric vehicle. Int J Syst Sci2018; 49(8): 1795–1808.
180.
ZhangJLiJ.Integrated vehicle chassis control for active front steering and direct yaw moment control based on hierarchical structure. Trans Inst Meas Contr2019; 41(9): 2428–2440.
181.
ZhangHZhaoW.Decoupling control of steering and driving system for in-wheel-motor-drive electric vehicle. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 101: 389–404.
182.
JingCShuHSongY, et al. Hierarchical control of yaw stability and energy efficiency for distributed drive electric vehicles. Int J Autom Technol2021; 22: 1169–1188.
183.
WuJChengSLiuB, et al. A human-machine-cooperative-driving controller based on AFS and DYC for vehicle dynamic stability. Energies2017; 10(11): 1737.
184.
ZhaoLLuSZhangB.Game-based hierarchical cooperative control for electric vehicle lateral stability via active four-wheel steering and direct yaw-moment control. Energies2019; 12(17): 3339.
185.
XieJXuXWangF, et al. Adaptive coordination control strategy for path-following of DDAEV with neural network based moving weight coefficients. Trans Inst Meas Contr2023; 45(7): 1282–1297.
186.
LiJNieZChenY, et al. Development of boom posture adjustment and control system for wide spray boom. Agriculture2023; 13(11): 2162.
187.
XuLChaiXGaoZ, et al. Experimental study on driver seat vibration characteristics of crawler-type combine harvester. Int J Agric Biol Eng2019; 12(2): 90–97.
188.
ZhaoQZhuBPeiY, et al. Integrated control of electric power steering and active suspension systems based on model predictive algorithm. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech2021; 65(4): 681–701.
189.
LiangJLuYPiD, et al. A decentralized cooperative control framework for active steering and active suspension: Multi-agent approach. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification2022; 8(1): 1414–1429.
190.
JiaFJingHLiuZ, et al. Cooperative control of yaw and roll motion for in-wheel motor vehicle with semi-active suspension. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2022; 236(1): 3–15.
191.
LongGDingFZhangN, et al. Regenerative active suspension system with residual energy for in-wheel motor driven electric vehicle. Appl Energy2020; 260: 114180.
192.
WuHZhengLLiY, et al. Robust control for active suspension of hub-driven electric vehicles subject to in-wheel motor magnetic force oscillation. Appl Sci2020; 10(11): 3929.
193.
YaoJWangMLiZ, et al. Research on model predictive control for automobile active tilt based on active suspension. Energies2021; 14(3): 671.
194.
ChenSACaiYMWangJ, et al. A novel LQG controller of active suspension system for vehicle roll safety. Int J Control Autom Syst2018; 16(5): 2203–2213.
195.
WangZFDongMMGuL, et al. Influence of road excitation and steering wheel input on vehicle system dynamic responses. Appl Sci2017; 7(6): 570.
196.
TangZWangHLiuS, et al. Development of structure and control system of self-propelled small green vegetables combine harvester. J Agric Sci Tech A2023; 25(5): 1045–1058.
197.
SunJWangZDingS, et al. Adaptive disturbance observer-based fixed time nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for path-tracking of unmanned agricultural tractors. Biosyst Eng2024; 246: 96–109.
198.
HerHKohYJoaE, et al. An integrated control of differential braking, front/rear traction, and active roll moment for limit handling performance. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2016; 65(6): 4288–4300.
199.
WangWYChenMCSuSF.Hierarchical T–S fuzzy-neural control of anti-lock braking system and active suspension in a vehicle. Automatica2012; 48(8): 1698–1706.
200.
LiZSongXChenX, et al. Dynamic characteristics analysis of the hub direct drive-air suspension system from vertical and longitudinal directions. Shock Vib2021; 2021(1): 8891860.
201.
QinYZhaoZWangZ, et al. Study of longitudinal–vertical dynamics for in-wheel motor-driven electric vehicles. Automot Innov2021; 4: 227–237.
202.
AghasizadeSMirzaeiMRafatniaS.Novel constrained control of active suspension system integrated with anti-lock braking system based on 14-degree of freedom vehicle model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K: J Multi-body Dyn2018; 232(4): 501–520.
203.
OnsyAMSharafAMAshreyMM, et al. Influence of intelligent active suspension system controller design techniques on vehicle braking characteristics. SAE Int J Veh Dyn Stab NVH2018; 03(1): 31–46.
204.
HanKLeeBChoiSB.Development of an antilock brake system for electric vehicles without wheel slip and road friction information. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol2019; 68(6): 5506–5517.
205.
WangQZhaoYLinF, et al. Integrated control for distributed in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle based on states estimation and nonlinear MPC. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2022; 236(5): 893–906.
206.
AtaeiMKhajepourAJeonS.Model predictive control for integrated lateral stability, traction/braking control, and rollover prevention of electric vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn2020; 58(1): 49–73.
207.
TanDWuYSongF.Study on the vertical and lateral coupling dynamics control of the in-wheel motor-driven electric vehicles under multi-excitation. Int J Electric Hybrid Vehicles2017; 9(4): 322–349.
208.
ZhaoJWongPKMaX, et al. Chassis integrated control for active suspension, active front steering and direct yaw moment systems using hierarchical strategy. Veh Syst Dyn2017; 55(1): 72–103.
209.
ChokorATaljRDoumiatiM, et al. A global chassis control system involving active suspensions, direct yaw control and active front steering. IFAC-PapersOnLine2019; 52(5): 444–451.
210.
ChenXWangMWangW.Unified chassis control of electric vehicles considering wheel vertical vibrations. Sensors2021; 21(11): 3931.
211.
FerganiSMenhourLSenameO, et al. Integrated vehicle control through the coordination of longitudinal/lateral and vertical dynamics controllers: flatness and LPV/-based design. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2017; 27(18): 4992–5007.
