As a highly promising actuator in the field of cutting-edge technology, pneumatic soft actuators have found widespread application in areas such as flexible grasping, medical rehabilitation, and biomimetic motion, owing to their exceptional environmental adaptability and interactive safety. This paper presents a comprehensive review of their design, modeling, and applications, aiming to provide valuable insights for related research. It begins by classifying pneumatic soft actuators based on their motion characteristics and offers an in-depth analysis of typical structures such as fiber-reinforced and pneumatic network systems. Subsequently, it elaborates on the features, applicability, and implementation of various hyperelastic constitutive models. The review then summarizes the primary application domains and the practical challenges these actuators address. Finally, it discusses the current limitations of soft actuators and envisions future development directions to foster further advancements in this field.
WangNChenBGeX, et al. Design, kinematics, and application of axially and radially expandable modular soft pneumatic actuators. J Mech Robot2021; 13(2): 4049973.
6.
LampingFde PayrebruneKM.A virtual work model for the design and parameter identification of cylindrical pressure-driven soft actuators. J Mech Robot2022; 14(3): 1942-4302.
7.
SuzumoriKEndoSKandaT, et al. A bending pneumatic rubber actuator realizing soft-bodied manta swimming robot. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Roma, Italy, 10–14 April 2007, pp.4975–4980. New York, NY: IEEE.
8.
BertrandTVincentBPierreL.Naturally compliant robot-arms actuated by McKibben artificial muscles. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol. 3, 1994, pp.2635–2640.
9.
KurumayaSNabaeHEndoG, et al. Active textile braided in three strands with thin McKibben muscle. Soft Robot2019; 6(2): 250–262.
HuTLuXYiJ, et al. Biomimetic soft robotic wrist with 3-DOF motion and stiffness tunability based on ring-reinforced pneumatic actuators and a particle jamming joint. Sci China Technol Sci2024; 67(3): 774–790.
17.
GuoJLiZLowJH, et al. Kirigami-inspired 3D printable soft pneumatic actuators with multiple deformation modes for soft robotic applications. Soft Robot2023; 10(4): 737–748.
18.
LiuSLiuJZouK, et al. A six degrees-of-freedom soft robotic joint with tilt-arranged origami actuator. J Mech Robot2022; 14(6): 060912.
19.
LiangJHuangXLuoK, et al. Design and kinematic modeling of a pneumatic soft bellow-type wrist. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2024; 9(7): 6312–6319.
20.
LiuZZhangXWangJ, et al. Design, modelling and implementation of a foldable pneumatic soft manipulator. Microgravity Sci Technol2022; 34(3): 44.
21.
LeeJGRodrigueH.Origami-based vacuum pneumatic artificial muscles with large contraction ratios. Soft Robot2019; 6(1): 109–117.
22.
LiHXuYZhangC, et al. Kinematic modeling and control of a novel pneumatic soft robotic arm. Chin J Aeronaut2022; 35(7): 310–319.
23.
LiuZZhangXLiuH, et al. Kinematic modelling and experimental validation of a foldable pneumatic soft manipulator. Appl Sci2020; 10(4): 1447–1464.
MartinezRVFishCRChenX, et al. Elastomeric origami: programmable paper-elastomer composites as pneumatic actuators. Adv Funct Mater2012; 22(7): 1376–1384.
26.
LinYYangGLiangY, et al. Controllable stiffness origami “skeletons” for lightweight and multifunctional artificial muscles. Advanced Science News2020; 30(31): 2000349–2000359.
27.
LeePSSjaardaCGaoRZ, et al. Soft-rigid hybrid revolute and prismatic joints using multilayered bellow-type soft pneumatic actuators: design, characterization, and its application as soft-rigid hybrid gripper. Soft Robot2025; 12(2): 183–199.
ZhouJChenYChenX, et al. A proprioceptive bellows (PB) actuator with position feedback and force estimation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2020; 5(2): 1867–1874.
30.
YangDVerma MohitSVerma, et al. Buckling pneumatic linear actuators inspired by muscle. Adv Mater Technol2016; 1(3): 1600055.
31.
YangDVermaMSLossnerE, et al. Negative-pressure soft linear actuator with a mechanical advantage. Adv Mater Technol2017; 2(1): 1600164.
32.
SchmittFPiccinOBayleB, et al. Inverted honeycomb cell as a reinforcement structure for building soft pneumatic linear actuators. J Mech Robot2021; 13(1): 011020.
33.
WangDJiangCGuG.Modeling and design of lattice-reinforced pneumatic soft robots. IEEE Trans Robot2024; 40: 606–623.
34.
TagoYSatakeYIshiiH.Novel design of a pneumatic longitudinal actuator for both extending and contracting motions. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2024; 9(2): 1436–1443.
35.
PaglioccaNGuptaAKnosplerJ, et al. Modular reconfigurable rotary style soft pneumatic actuators. Sens Actuators A Phys2024; 378: 115830–115850.
36.
NguyenPHZhangW.Design and computational modeling of fabric soft pneumatic actuators for wearable assistive devices. Sci Rep2020; 10(1): 9638–9638.
37.
AliciGCantyTMutluR, et al. Modeling and experimental evaluation of bending behavior of soft pneumatic actuators made of discrete actuation chambers. Soft Robot2018; 5(1): 24–35.
38.
LiuCHChenLJChiJC, et al. Topology optimization design and experiment of a soft pneumatic bending actuator for grasping applications. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022; 7(2): 2086–2093.
ZhongGDouWZhangX, et al. Bending analysis and contact force modeling of soft pneumatic actuators with pleated structures. Int J Mech Sci2021; 193: 106150–106164.
41.
SierraEMOrdoñez-AvilaJL.Mathematical modeling of a multi-chamber pneumatic soft actuator. Actuators2022; 11(8): 221–242.
42.
GovinDSaenzLAthanasakiG, et al. Design and development of a soft robotic back orthosis. In: Design of medical devices conference, Minneapolis, MN, 9–12 April 2018. ASME.
43.
LiuTXuanWWangXJ. Modeling, analysis and design of pneumatic networks soft actuators. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, 2021.
44.
ChenSXuHHaseebF, et al. A pneumatic–hydraulic hybrid actuator for underwater soft robot swimming and crawling. Sens Actuators A Phys2023; 356: 114284–114294.
45.
LiHBaiHWangZ, et al. Soft bioinspired pneumatic actuator for adaptive grasping based on direct ink writing method. Sens Actuators A Phys2024; 367: 115041.
46.
LiaoZLiTWangY, et al. Soft pneumatic actuator optimal design based on isogeometric analysis. Manuf Lett2023; 35: 55–63.
47.
ZhangYGanYHeH.Kinematic analysis of a finger-mimicking pneumatic network actuator consisting of parallelogram-shaped chambers. Sens Actuators A Phys2024; 370: 114865–114877.
48.
HuWAliciG.Bioinspired three-dimensional-printed helical soft pneumatic actuators and their characterization. Soft Robot2020; 7(3): 267–282.
49.
YuYFuT.Design and experimental study of cavity structure of pneumatic soft actuator. Actuators2023; 12(8): 314–329.
50.
VellaiyanVVenkateshkumarRBijalwanV, et al. Structural optimization and parameter investigation of trapezoidal shape soft pneumatic actuator. Eng Res Express2024; 6(4): 045510–045524.
51.
XieZDomelAGAnN, et al. Octopus arm-inspired tapered soft actuators with suckers for improved grasping. Soft Robot2020; 7(5): 639–648.
52.
ZhangZNanRShenH, et al. A high load capacity and efficient-transporting inchworm-like crawling robot with bistable structure and pneumatic networks actuator. Smart Mater Struct2023; 32(12): 125009–125025.
53.
HaoYGongZXieZ, et al. A soft bionic gripper with variable effective length. J Bionic Eng2018; 15(2): 220–235.
54.
MaHZhouJ.Modeling, characterization, and application of soft bellows-type pneumatic actuators for bionic locomotion. Acta Mech Solida Sin2023; 36(1): 1–12.
55.
SongXJLiuSlvSF.Design and analysis of a bidirectional pneumatic soft actuator. J Dyn Control2021; 19(4): 89–96.
56.
YuMLiuWZhaoJ, et al. Modeling and analysis of a composite structure-based soft pneumatic actuators for soft-robotic gripper. Sensors2022; 22(13): 4851–4868.
57.
XiaoWHuDYangG, et al. Modeling and analysis of soft robotic surfaces actuated by pneumatic network bending actuators. Smart Mater Struct2022; 31(5): 055001–055015.
58.
GallowayKCPolygerinosPWalshCJ, et al. Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators. In: ICRA, Montevideo, Uruguay, 25–29 November 2013, Paper no. 978-1-4799-2722-7/13, pp.8450–8456. New York, NY: IEEE.
59.
FanJWangSYuQ, et al. Swimming performance of the frog-inspired soft robot. Soft Robot2020; 7(5): 615–626.
60.
López-DíazADe La MorenaJBraicA, et al. Proprioception and control of a soft pneumatic actuator made of a self-healable hydrogel. Soft Robot2024; 11(5): 889–901.
61.
Quevedo-MorenoDRocheET.Design and modeling of fabric-shelled pneumatic bending soft actuators. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8(6): 3110–3117.
62.
JamilBYooGChoiY, et al. Proprioceptive soft pneumatic gripper for extreme environments using hybrid optical fibers. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2021; 6(4): 8694–8701.
63.
ZhouYHeadingsLMDapinoMJ.Modeling of soft robotic grippers integrated with fluidic prestressed composite actuators. J Mech Robot2022; 14(3): 031001.
BhatAAmbroseJWYeowRCH. Composite soft pneumatic actuators using 3d printed skins. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8(4): 2086–2093.
66.
GonzalezDGarciaJVoylesRM, et al. Characterization of 3d printed pneumatic soft actuator. Sens Actuators A Phys2022; 334: 113337–113357.
67.
FengMSunJYangD, et al. Characterization and modeling of fabric-based pneumatic actuators with asymmetric chambers for soft gloves. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2024; 9(11): 10589–10596.
68.
ChenWXiongCLiuC, et al. Fabrication and dynamic modeling of bidirectional bending soft actuator integrated with optical waveguide curvature sensor. Soft Robot2019; 6(4): 495–506.
69.
HuJFChenWL.Design and performance analysis of origami pneumatic actuator. Mech Sci Technol2024; 43(9): 1537–1544.
70.
ChenHMaYChenW.Design and optimization of an origami-inspired foldable pneumatic actuator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2024; 9(2): 1278–1285.
71.
KimWEomJChoKJ.A dual-origami design that enables the quasisequential deployment and bending motion of soft robots and grippers. Adv Intell Syst2022; 4(3): 1–10.
72.
ZhangBGuXLiuJ, et al. Spring-reinforced pneumatic actuator and soft robotic applications. Smart Mater Struct2024; 33: 105017–105026.
73.
XieRZSuMJZhangYH, et al. 3D-PSA: a 3d pneumatic soft actuator with extending and omnidirectional bending motion. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12–15 December 2018, paper no. 978-1-7281-0377-8/18/, pp.618–623. IEEE.
74.
EugsterSRHarschJBartholdtM, et al. Soft pneumatic actuator model based on a pressure-dependent spatial nonlinear rod theory. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022; 7(2): 2471–2478.
75.
LiuXZhangJGuS, et al. Modelling and angle tracking control for multi-chamber soft bending pneumatic muscle. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8(11): 7647–7654.
76.
WangYXLiuCYWangJB.A dual-module soft robot with multi-terrain movement capabilities. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University2022; 56(10): 1388–1397.
77.
MoutousiMPolygerinosP.Omnidirectional soft pneumatic actuators: a design and optimization framework. Front Rob AI2024; 11: 1418484–1418497.
78.
ElsayedYLekakouCGengT, et al. Design optimisation of soft silicone pneumatic actuators using finite element analysis. In: 2014 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), Besancon, France, 8–11 July 2014, pp.44–49. IEEE.
79.
XuFYJiangFYJiangQS, et al. Soft actuator model for a soft robot with variable stiffness by coupling pneumatic structure and jamming mechanism. IEEE Access2020; 8: 26356–26371.
80.
XiongJLuoYGuanF, et al. Bioinspired soft actuators for high bending stiffness and flexible spatial locomotion. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2024; 9(11): 10391–10398.
81.
YanJHDongHBZhangXB, et al. A three-chambed soft actuator module with omnidirectional bending motion. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE international conference on real-time computing and robotics, Cambodia, 6–10 June 2016, paper no. 978-1-4673-8959-4/16/, pp.505–510. IEEE.
82.
LiYZTakanishiAIshiiH. Design of a soft rat robot based on pneumatic actuators. In: 2022 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), Sapporo, Japan, 11–15 July 2022, Paper no. 978-1-6654-1308-4/22/, pp.926–931. IEEE.
83.
SunYRenH.Soft transnasal endoscopic robot for patient-administered nasopharynx inspection. J Med Device2015; 9: 020930.
84.
FerrandyVIndrawantoFF.Modeling of a two-degree-of-freedom fiber-reinforced soft pneumatic actuator. Research2023; 41: 3608–3626.
85.
ChaillouPShiJLKruszewskiA. Reduced finite element modelling and closed-loop control of pneumatic-driven soft continuum robots. In: 2023 IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft), 2023, pp.1–8.
86.
DrotmanDIshidaMJadhavS, et al. Application-driven design of soft, 3-d printed, pneumatic actuators with bellows. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2019; 24(1): 78–87.
87.
ZhangJWeiHShanY, et al. Modeling and experimental study of a novel multi-dof parallel soft robot. IEEE Access2020; 8: 62932–62942.
88.
XiaoWHuDChenW, et al. Modeling and analysis of bending pneumatic artificial muscle with multi-degree of freedom. Smart Mater Struct2021; 30(9): 095018–095029.
89.
HuangWXuZXiaoJ, et al. Multimodal soft robot for complex environments using bionic omnidirectional bending actuator. IEEE Access2020; 8: 193827–193844.
90.
XavierMSTawkCDYongYK, et al. 3D-printed omnidirectional soft pneumatic actuators: design, modeling and characterization. Sens Actuators A Phys2021; 332: 113199–113212.
91.
GongZFangXChenX, et al. A soft manipulator for efficient delicate grasping in shallow water: modeling, control, and real-world experiments. Int J Rob Res2021; 40(1): 449–469.
92.
GarbinNWangLChandlerJH, et al. A disposable continuum endoscope using piston-driven parallel bellow actuator. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft), Atlanta, GA, 1–3 March 2018, Paper no. 978-1-5386-2512-5/18/, pp.1–11. IEEE.
93.
QinYWanZYSunYN, et al. Design, fabrication and experimental analysis of a 3-d soft robotic snake. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft), Livorno, Italy, 24–28 April 2018, Paper no. 978-1-5386-4516-1/18/, pp.77–82. IEEE.
ChenGLinTLodewijksG, et al. Design of an active flexible spine for wall climbing robot using pneumatic soft actuators. J Bionic Eng2023; 20(2): 530–542.
96.
ErelVLindsayARSinghI, et al. Corrugated diaphragm actuator for soft robotic applications. J Mech Des2022; 144(4): 045001.
97.
AntonelliMGBeomonte ZobelPSarwarMA, et al. Seahorse-tail-inspired soft pneumatic actuator: development and experimental characterization. Biomimetics2024; 9(5): 264–280.
98.
CaoMSunYZhangJ, et al. A novel pneumatic gripper driven by combination of soft fingers and bellows actuator for flexible grasping. Sens Actuators A Phys2023; 355: 3238–3245.
Darmont ArayaFRadhakrishnanP. Investigating the design and manufacture of PneuNet actuators as a prosthetic tongue for mimicking human deglutition. ASME J Med Diagnostics2021; 4(4): 041003.
101.
QiuZWuQLiuZ, et al. A new three-dimensional deformation pneumatic soft actuator with mutually vertical pneunets. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2024; 71(12): 16003–16012.
GuGWangDGeL, et al. Analytical modeling and design of generalized pneu-net soft actuators with three-dimensional deformations. Soft Robot2021; 8(4): 462–477.
104.
HuYTangWQuY, et al. Shape estimation for a TPU-based multi-material 3D printed soft pneumatic actuator using deep learning models. Sci China Technol Sci2024; 67(5): 1470–1481.
105.
McMahanWChitrakaranVCsencsitsM, et al. Field trials and testing of the octarm continuum manipulator. In: ICRA conference on robotics and automation, Orlando, FL, 15–19 May 2006, pp.2336–2346. New York, NY: IEEE.
106.
GuanQSunJLiuY, et al. Novel bending and helical extensile/contractile pneumatic artificial muscles inspired by elephant trunk. Soft Robot2020; 7(5): 597–614.
107.
TianWHShuichiWDaisukeY. Fabrication process for twisting artificial muscles by utilizing braiding technology and water-soluble fibers. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2024; 9(4): 3147–3154.
108.
ShimookaSKawanakaMGofukuA.A soft rotary actuator with a flexible shaft using flexible pneumatic actuators. Sens Actuators A Phys2023; 361: 114603–114612.
109.
YanJZhangXXuB, et al. A new spiral-type inflatable pure torsional soft actuator. Soft Robot2018; 5(5): 527–540.
110.
UppalapatiNKKrishnanG.Design and modeling of soft continuum manipulators using parallel asymmetric combination of fiber-reinforced elastomers. J Mech Robot2021; 13(1): 011010.
111.
ShimookaSAkagiTDohtaS, et al. Development of a spiral shaped soft holding actuator using extension type flexible pneumatic actuators. J Robot Mechatron2022; 34(2): 373–381.
112.
XiaoWHuDHuG, et al. Investigation of mechanical and electrical characteristics of self-sensing pneumatic torsional actuators. Sci China Technol Sci2024; 67(1): 130–142.
113.
JiaoZDJiCZouJ, et al. Vacuum-powered soft pneumatic twisting actuators to empower new capabilities for soft robots. Adv Mater Technol2019; 4(1): 1800429.
114.
XiaoWHuDChenW, et al. A new type of soft pneumatic torsional actuator with helical chambers for flexible machines. J Mech Robot2021; 13(1): 011003.
115.
JinTLiLWangT, et al. Origami-inspired soft actuators for stimulus perception and crawling robot applications. IEEE Trans Robot2022; 38(2): 748–764.
116.
YuanPKawanoGTsukagoshiH.Design and modeling of soft pneumatic helical actuator with high contraction ratio. J Robot Mechatron2020; 32(5): 1061–1070.
117.
MartinezRVBranchJLFishCR, et al. Robotic tentacles with three-dimensional mobility based on flexible elastomers. Adv Mater2013; 25(2): 205–212.
118.
BhatAJaipurkarSSLowLT, et al. Reconfigurable soft pneumatic actuators using extensible fabric-based skins. Soft Robot2023; 10(5): 923–936.
119.
JohnRNorman. An introduction to the theory of elasticity. London: Longman, 1980, p.0582442834.
120.
WangRLiSQSongSY.Study on constitutive modeling of vibration isolation rubber. J Vib Shock2007; 26(1): 77–83.
121.
TreloarLRG. The physics of rubber elasticity. Br Polym J1976; 8(1): 39.
122.
WuPDVan Der GiessenE.On improved network models for rubber elasticity and their applications to orientation hardening in glassy polymers. J Mech Phys Solids1993; 41(3): 427–456.
123.
ArrudaEMBoyceMC.A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids1993; 41(2): 389–412.
124.
TreloarLRG. The elasticity of a network of long-chain molecules. I. Trans Faraday Soc1943; 39: 36–41.
125.
KhajehsaeidHArghavaniJNaghdabadiR.A hyperelastic constitutive model for rubber-like materials. Eur J Mech/A Sol2013; 38: 144–151.
FloryPJ.Network structure and the elastic properties of vulcanized rubber. Chem Rev1944; 35(1): 51–75.
128.
LuoWBTanJH.A hybrid constitutive model of rubber elastic materials. Acta Mech Solida Sin2008; 29(3): 277–285.
129.
KuhnWGrünF.Beziehungen zwischen elastischen konstanten und dehnungsdoppelbrechung hochelastischer stoffe. Koll Zeitsch1942; 101(3): 248–271.
130.
HeiseBKilianHGSchmidtH.Thermodynamics and superstructure in crosslinked polymers based on the theory of eutectoid multicomponent systems. Colloid Polym Sci1981; 259(6): 611–624.
131.
AmbacherHEnderleHFKilianHG, et al. Relaxation in permanent networks. In: StroblGR (ed.) Physics of polymer networks. Progress in colloid & polymer science. Vol. 90. Darmstadt: Steinkopff, 1989, pp.209–220.
132.
MooneyM.A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys1940; 11(9): 582–592.
133.
RivlinRS.Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials V. Math Phys Sci1949; 195(1043): 463–473.
134.
RivlinRS. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV. Further developments of the general theory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci1948; 241(835): 379–397.
135.
YeohOH.Characterization of elastic properties of carbon-black-filled rubber vulcanizates. Rubber Chem Technol1990; 63(5): 792–805.
136.
OgdenRW.Large deformation isotropic elasticity – on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci1972; 326(1567): 565–584.
137.
BidermanV.Calculations of rubber parts (enrusse). Raschetina Prochnost1958; 40: 314–319.
138.
GentAN.A new constitutive relation for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol1996; 69(1): 59–61.
139.
MarlowR. A general first-invariant hyperelastic constitutive model. In: Constitutive models for rubber. London: CRC Press, 2003, pp. 157–160.
140.
HeHZhangQZhangY, et al. A comparative study of 85 hyperelastic constitutive models for both unfilled rubber and highly filled rubber nanocomposite material. Nano Materials Science2022; 4(2): 64–82.
141.
MansouriMRDarijaniH.Constitutive modeling of isotropic hyperelastic materials in an exponential framework using a self-contained approach. Int J Solids Struct2014; 51(25–26): 4316–4326.
142.
XueXQZhanZHCaiYW, et al. Design and finite element analysis of fiber-reinforced soft pneumatic actuator. Lect Notes Comput Sci2019; 641–651.
143.
de PayrebruneKMO’ReillyOM. An experimentally validated rod model for soft continuum robots. Proc Appl Math Mech2016; 16(1): 317–318.
144.
MahlTHildebrandtASawodnyO.A variable curvature continuum kinematics for kinematic control of the bionic handling assistant. IEEE Trans Robot2014; 30(4): 935–949.
145.
GravagneIARahnCDWalkerID.Large deflection dynamics and control for planar continuum robots. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2003; 8(2): 299–307.
146.
BaoJChenWXuJ.Kinematics modeling of a twisted and coiled polymer-based elastomer soft robot. IEEE Access2019; 7: 136792–136800.
147.
MengFCXuFYWuML, et al. Modeling and experiment of three-cavity soft manipulator. In: 5th IEEE international conference on cloud computing and intelligence systems, Piscataway, USA, 2018, pp.1018–1022. IEEE.
148.
KatzschmannRKDella SantinaCToshimitsuY, et al. Dynamic motion control of multi-segment soft robots using piecewise constant curvature matched with an augmented rigid body model. In: 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics, Piscataway, USA, 2019, pp.454–461. IEEE.
149.
TrivediDLotfiARahnCD.Geometrically exact models for soft robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot2008; 24(4): 773–780.
150.
RenDFCacuccioloVDiasJ, et al. Discrete cosserat approach for soft robot dynamics: a new piece-wise constant strain model with torsion and shears. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Piscataway, USA, 2016, pp.5495–5502. IEEE.
151.
MbakopSTagneGFrouinMH, et al. Inverse dynamics model-based shape control of soft continuum finger robot using parametric curve. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2021; 6(4): 8053–8060.
152.
CoevoetEMorales-BiezeTLargilliereF, et al. Software toolkit for modeling, simulation, and control of soft robots. Adv Robot2017; 31(22): 1208–1224.
153.
MarcheseADTedrakeRRusD.Dynamics and trajectory optimization for a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator. Int J Rob Res2016; 35(8): 1000–1019.
154.
JonesBAWalkerID.Kinematics for multisection continuum robots. IEEE Trans Robot2006; 22(1): 43–55.
155.
WangCFrazelleCGWagnerJR, et al. Dynamic control of multisection three-dimensional continuum manipulators based on virtual discrete-jointed robot models. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2021; 26(2): 777–788.
156.
ThieffryMKruszewskiAGouryO, et al. Dynamic control of soft robots. In: IFAC world congress, 2017. Toulouse, France: HAL. https://hal.science/hal-01558844
157.
YangWTStuart HannahSMasayoshiT. Mechanical modeling and optimal model-based design of a soft pneumatic actuator. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics, Singapore, 2023, pp.2769–4526. Oakland: University of California.
158.
MengFCXuFYWuML, et al. Modeling and experiment of three-cavity soft manipulator. In: Proceedings of CCIS, Nanjing, China, 23–25 November 2018, Paper no. 978-1-5386-6005-8/18/, pp.1018–1022. IEEE.
159.
KatzschmannRKSantinaCDToshimitsuY, et al. Dynamic motion control of multi-segment soft robots using piecewise constant curvature matched with an augmented rigid body model. In: 2019 2nd IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft), Seoul, South Korea, 14–18 April 2019, Paper no. 978-1-5386-9260-8/19/, pp.454–461. IEEE.
160.
RendaFCacuccioloVDiasJ, et al. Discrete cosserat approach for soft robot dynamics: a new piece-wise constant strain model with torsion and shears. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Daejeon, South Korea, 9–14 October 2016, Paper no. 978-1-5090-3762-9/16/, pp.5495–5502. IEEE.
161.
WebsterRJJonesBA.Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: a review. Int J Rob Res2010; 29(13): 1661–1683.
162.
MeiYPrestonFVaibhavS. Simultaneous motion and stiffness control for soft pneumatic manipulators based on a Lagrangian-based dynamic model. In: 2023 American control conference (ACC), 2023, pp.145–152.
LinHTLeiskGGTrimmerB.GoQBot: a caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspir Biomim2011; 6(2): 026007–131-14.
165.
TangYChiYSunJ, et al. Leveraging elastic instabilities for amplified performance: Spine-inspired high-speed and high-force soft robots. Sci Adv2020; 6(19): 6912–6924.
166.
SinghGPatiballaSZhangXT.A pipe-climbing soft robot. In: 2019 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2019, pp.8450–8456.
167.
MilanaERaemdonckBVCornelisK, et al. EELWORM: a bioinspired multimodal amphibious soft robot. In: 2020 3rd IEEE international conference on soft robotics (RoboSoft), New Haven, CT, 15 July 2020, Paper no. 978-1-7281-6570-7/20/, pp.766–771. IEEE.
168.
FeiYPangWYuWB.Movement of air-driven soft robot. J Mech Eng2017; 53(13): 14–18.
169.
BehzadfarMFengYSongKY.Advancing soft robotics: a high energy-efficient actuator design using single-tube pneumatic for bidirectional movement. J Mech Des2025; 147(4): 043301-1.
170.
ZhongWWuYLiL, et al. A tortoise-inspired quadrupedal pneumatic soft robot that adapts to environments through shape change. Bioinspir Biomim2025; 20(3): 036002.
171.
LinYXuYXJuangJY.Single-actuator soft robot for in-pipe crawling. Soft Robot2023; 10(1): 174–186.
HuangHMXieJTHuangCW, et al. A bimodal deformation-driven shape-morphing soft robot. J Shenzhen Univ2024; 41(5): 602–611.
174.
WuJWuMChenW, et al. Multimodal soft amphibious robots using simple plastic-sheet-reinforced thin pneumatic actuators. IEEE Trans Robot2024; 40(1): 1874–1889.
175.
ZhaoWZhangYYangL, et al. Research and implementation of pneumatic amphibious soft bionic robot. Machines2024; 12(6): 393–415.
176.
GuoYQXuFYSongYR, et al. A soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation using pneumatic actuators with variable stiffness. In: 12th International conference on intelligent robotics and applications (ICIRA), Shenyang, China, 8–11 August 2019, pp.119–129. IEEE.
177.
ChenBWuYNiX, et al. Robotic hand exoskeletons for rehabilitation and assistance: a state-of-the-art. J Med Device2025; 19(1): 010802.
178.
WangYXuQ.Design and testing of a soft parallel robot based on pneumatic artificial muscles for wrist rehabilitation. Sci Rep2021; 11(1): 1273–1284.
179.
ChenXZhangSCaoK, et al. Development of a wearable upper limb rehabilitation robot based on reinforced soft pneumatic actuators. Chin J Mech Eng2022; 35(1): 83–89.
180.
FangJYuanJWangM, et al. Novel accordion-inspired foldable pneumatic actuators for knee assistive devices. Soft Robot2020; 7(1): 95–108.
181.
JohnsonAGaoRZMarriottK, et al. Electronics-free soft robotic knee brace for dynamic unloading during gait for knee osteoarthritis: a proof-of-concept study. J Med Device2023; 17(4): 041004.
182.
LiuQLiuYZhuC, et al. Design and control of a reconfigurable upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton with soft modular joints. IEEE Access2021; 9(1): 166815–166824.
183.
ChiHSuHLiangW, et al. Control of a rehabilitation robotic device driven by antagonistic soft actuators. Actuators2021; 10(6): 123–145.
184.
ZhengKZhangQ.Research on configuration design and intelligent compliance control of reconfigurable modular flexible upper limb rehabilitation robot. Int J Adv Robot Syst2023; 20(3): 172988062311756.
185.
MuramatsuYKobayashiHSatoY, et al. Quantitative performance analysis of muscle suit-estimation by oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, Karon Beach, Thailand, 7–11 December 2011, pp.293–298. IEEE.
186.
GovinDSaenzLAthanasakiG, et al. Design and development of a soft robotic back orthosis. In: Design of medical devices conference, Minneapolis, MN, 9–12 April 2018. ASME.
187.
ChungJHeimgartnerRO'NeillCT, et al. ExoBoot a soft inflatable robotic boot to assist ankle during walking: design, characterization and preliminary tests. In: 2018 7th IEEE international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (Biorob), Enschede, The Netherlands, 26 –29 August 2018, pp.509–516. IEEE.
188.
LowFZTanHHLimJH, et al. Development of a soft pneumatic sock for robot-assisted ankle exercise. J Med Device2016; 10(1): 014503.
189.
LiHYaoJZhouP, et al. High-Load soft grippers based on bionic winding effect. Soft Robot2019; 6(2): 276–288.
190.
WuMZhengXLiuR, et al. Glowing sucker octopus (stauroteuthis syrtensis)-inspired soft robotic gripper for underwater self-adaptive grasping and sensing. Adv Sci2022; 9(17): e2104382.
191.
LiSGStampfliJJXuHJ, et al. A vacuum-driven origami “magic-ball” soft gripper. In: 2019 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 2019, pp.7401–7408.
192.
ZhaoYWangY.A palm-shape variable-stiffness gripper based on 3D-printed fabric jamming. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8(6): 3238–3245.
ChengPYeYYanB, et al. Eccentric high-force soft pneumatic bending actuator for finger-type soft grippers. J Mech Robot2022; 14(6): 060908.
195.
LvZXiaoFChenB, et al. Design and performance analysis of wavy nonrotating pneumatic soft actuator. J Mech Robot2024; 16(2): 021011.
196.
YangXZhangNHuangX, et al. Multidirectional bending soft pneumatic actuator with fishbone-like strain-limiting layer for dexterous manipulation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2024; 9(4): 3815–3822.
197.
WuYZengGXuJ, et al. A bioinspired multi-knuckle dexterous pneumatic soft finger. Sens Actuators A Phys2023; 350: 114105.
198.
WongDCYLiMKangS, et al. Reconfigurable, transformable soft pneumatic actuator with tunable three-dimensional deformations for dexterous soft robotics applications. Soft Robot2025; 12(2): 228–241.
199.
PuhlmannSHarrisJBrockO.RBO hand 3: a platform for soft dexterous manipulation. IEEE Trans Robot2022; 38(6): 3434–3449.
200.
ZhuWLuCZhengQ, et al. A soft-rigid hybrid gripper with lateral compliance and dexterous in-hand manipulation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2023; 28(1): 104–115.
201.
LuCTangKYangM, et al. Dexitac: soft dexterous tactile gripping. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2025; 30(1): 333–344.
202.
ZhouJHuangJDouQ, et al. A dexterous and compliant (DEXCO) hand based on soft hydraulic actuation for human-inspired fine in-hand manipulation. IEEE Trans Robot2025; 41: 666–686.
203.
ZhouJChenXChangU, et al. A soft-robotic approach to anthropomorphic robotic hand dexterity. IEEE Access2019; 7: 101483–101495.
204.
TangWZhangCZhongY, et al. Customizing a self-healing soft pump for robot. Nat Commun2021; 12(1): 2247–2258.
205.
MatsudaRSongZOtaH.Electro-powerless balloon soft actuator with manually driven fluidic circuit. Adv Electron Mater2023; 9(3): 2201065–2201076.
206.
WehnerMTrubyRLFitzgeraldDJ, et al. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature2016; 536(7617): 451–455.
