Mobile manipulators are instrumental in enhancing efficiency and autonomy across various industries, showcasing versatility and adaptability in different scenarios. This review delves into the theories, technologies and applications of mobile robotic manipulators, tracing their evolution and detailing key components such as system composition, path planning, perception, mechanism, and interaction techniques for future innovation. The paper seeks to clarify the elements that make mobile manipulators effective and versatile. It conducts a comparative analysis of their applications in primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors, noting the distinct demands and features of mobile manipulators in each industry setting. At the same time, it also provides a set of methodologies from mechanical design of robotic arms and overall design of the robots through modular research on system composition to path planning, perception, and interaction technology, which are of great significance to the mobile manipulators of the design of next generation. Additionally, the paper suggests a holistic approach to design mobile manipulators, underscoring the necessity of user-centric design and adaptability. Concluding with an outlook, the paper points out the potential for further progress in mobile manipulator technology and increased usage in various application areas.
PerryM.Science and innovation strategic policy plans for the 2020s (EU,AU,UK): will they prepare us for the world in 2050?Appl Econ Finance2015; 2(3): 76–84.
2.
GaoBFanJZhengP.Empower dexterous robotic hand for human-centric smart manufacturing: a perception and skill learning perspective. Robot Comput Manuf2025; 93: 102909.
3.
BogueR.Domestic robots: has their time finally come?Ind Robot2017; 44(2): 129–136.
4.
De LucaAMuratoreLTsagarakisN.A hierarchical simulation-based push planner for autonomous recovery in navigation blocked scenarios of mobile robots. Robot Auton Syst2025; 184: 104867.
5.
ZhangFEIYugengXIZongliLIN, et al. Constrained motion model of mobile robots and its applications. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B2009; 39(3): 773–787.
6.
ZhangSChengSJinZ.Variable trajectory impedance: a super-twisting sliding mode control method for mobile manipulator based on identification model. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2025; 72(1): 610–619.
7.
MartinJAnsuategiAMaurtuaI, et al. A generic ROS-based control architecture for pest inspection and treatment in greenhouses using a mobile manipulator. IEEE Access2021; 9: 94981–94995.
8.
RamanagopalMSNguyenAPVNyJL.A motion planning strategy for the active vision-based mapping of ground-level structures. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2018; 15(1): 356–368.
9.
ThakarSMalhanRKBhattPM, et al. Area-coverage planning for spray-based surface disinfection with a mobile manipulator. Robot Auton Syst2022; 147: 103920.
10.
DörflerKDielemansGLeuteneggerS, et al. Advancing construction in existing contexts: prospects and barriers of 3D printing with mobile robots for building maintenance and repair. Cem Concr Res2024; 186: 107656.
11.
RescsanskiSHebertRHaghighiA, et al. Towards intelligent cooperative robotics in additive manufacturing: past, present, and future. Robot Comput Manuf2025; 93: 102925.
12.
KaraarslanDKahramanAErginE.How does training given to pediatric nurses about artificial intelligence and robot nurses affect their opinions and attitude levels? A quasi-experimental study. J Pediatr Nurs2024; 77: e211–e217.
13.
LiuHRahmanMRahimiM, et al. An autonomous rail-road amphibious robotic system for railway maintenance using sensor fusion and mobile manipulator. Comput Electr Eng2023; 110: 108874.
14.
SadangharnP.A multidimensional analysis of robotic deployment in thai hotels. Int J Soc Robot2022; 14(4): 859–873.
15.
ZhangBLiGZhangJ, et al. A reliable traversability learning method based on human-demonstrated risk cost mapping for mobile robots over uneven terrain. Eng Appl Artif Intell2024; 138: 109339.
16.
ZhangWLyuSYaoC, et al. Analysis of robot traversability over unstructured terrain using information fusion. In: 2022 International conference on advanced robotics and mechatronics (ICARM), Guilin, July 2022, pp.413–418. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICARM54641.2022.9959694.
17.
ZhouHFengPChouW.A hybrid obstacle avoidance method for mobile robot navigation in unstructured environment. Ind Robot Int J Robot Res Appl2023; 50(1): 94–106.
18.
ShamshiriRRNavasEDworakV, et al. A modular sensing system with CANBUS communication for assisted navigation of an agricultural mobile robot. Comput Electron Agric2024; 223: 109112.
19.
ZhangXChenCSuK, et al. Design of the outdoor cruising control system of the quadrotor drone. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2021; 632(2): 022062.
20.
WangZTianGShaoX.Home service robot task planning using semantic knowledge and probabilistic inference. Knowl Syst2020; 204: 106174.
21.
LiuLWangXYangX, et al. Path planning techniques for mobile robots: review and prospect. Expert Syst Appl2023; 227: 120254.
22.
SunHZhangCHuC, et al. Event-triggered reconfigurable reinforcement learning motion-planning approach for mobile robot in unknown dynamic environments. Eng Appl Artif Intell2023; 123: 106197.
23.
ZhengJZhouKLiJ.Visual-inertial-wheel SLAM with high-accuracy localization measurement for wheeled robots on complex terrain. Measurement2025; 243: 116356.
24.
ColucciGBottaATagliaviniL, et al. Kinematic modeling and motion planning of the mobile manipulator Agri.Q for precision agriculture. Machines2022; 10(5): 321.
25.
TorresanFBaltieriM.Disentangled representations for causal cognition. Phys Life Rev2024; 51: 343–381.
26.
XiongPLiuZWeiP, et al. Collective cognition based analysis of community structure discovery algorithms. Cogn Syst Res2024; 86: 101241.
27.
SoyluF.A new ontology for numerical cognition: Integrating evolutionary, embodied, and data informatics approaches. Acta Psychol2024; 249: 104416.
28.
WangLZouYWangH, et al. Icon similarity model based on cognition and deep learning. Displays2024; 85: 102864.
29.
WangSBiDRuanH, et al. Radar maneuvering target tracking algorithm based on human cognition mechanism. Chin J Aeronaut2019; 32(7): 1695–1704.
30.
QinCSongALiH, et al. Overcoming the cognition-reality gap in robot-to-human handovers with anisotropic variable force guidance. Comput Struct Biotechnol J2024; 24: 185–195.
31.
LiNChengLChenH, et al. SDG: A global large-scale airport perception disparity cognition modeling method based on deep learning and geographic knowledge. Eng Appl Artif Intell2024; 137: 109091.
32.
NadlerEODarragh-FordEDesikanBS, et al. Divergences in color perception between deep neural networks and humans. Cognition2023; 241: 105621.
33.
PangJZhengPFanJ, et al. Towards cognition-augmented human-centric assembly: a visual computation perspective. Robot Comput Manuf2025; 91: 102852.
34.
EngemannHDuSKallweitS, et al. OMNIVIL-An autonomous mobile manipulator for flexible production. Sensors2020; 20(24): 7249.
35.
Guamán RiveraRGarcía AlvaradoRMartínez-RocamoraA, et al. Workspace analysis of a mobile manipulator with obstacle avoidance in 3D printing tasks. Appl Sci2021; 11(17): 7923.
36.
GuoSLiSSongT, et al. Tip localization analysis for mobile manipulator in construction field. In: Presented at the 2018 3rd international conference on advanced robotics and mechatronics (ICARM), Singapore, July 2018, pp.661–666. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICARM.2018.8610860.
37.
GoricanecJKapetanovićNVatavukI, et al. Heterogeneous autonomous robotic system in viticulture and mariculture - Project overview. In: 2021 16th international conference on telecommunications (ConTEL), Zagreb, Croatia, June 2021, pp.181–188. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.23919/ConTEL52528.2021.9495969.
38.
VatavukIVasiljevićGKovačićZ.Task space model predictive control for vineyard spraying with a mobile manipulator. Agriculture2022; 12(3): 381.
39.
SunZYangHMaY, et al. BIT-DMR: a humanoid dual-arm mobile robot for complex rescue operations. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022; 7(2): 802–809.
40.
ChoiBParkGLeeY.Practical control of a rescue robot while maneuvering on uneven terrain. J Mech Sci Technol2018; 32(5): 2021–2028.
41.
YazdjerdiPMeskinN.Design and real-time implementation of actuator fault-tolerant control for differential-drive mobile robots based on multiple-model approach. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2018; 232(6): 652–661.
42.
MarinLVallesMSorianoA, et al. Event-based localization in Ackermann steering limited resource mobile robots. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2014; 19(4): 1171–1182.
43.
EyubogluMAtaliG.A novel collaborative path planning algorithm for 3-wheel omnidirectional autonomous mobile robot. Robot Auton Syst2023; 169: 104527.
44.
ManzlPSereinigMGerstmayrJ.A mecanum wheel model based on orthotropic friction with experimental validation. Mech Mach Theory2024; 193: 105548.
45.
KnierimKLSawodnyO.Tool-center-point control of the KAI manipulator using constrained QP optimization. Mechatronics2015; 30: 85–93.
46.
WuYJiaXLiT, et al. A real-time collision avoidance method for redundant dual-arm robots in an open operational environment. Robot Comput Manuf2025; 92: 102894.
47.
WangWYuCYAbrego SerranoPA, et al. Shape memory alloy-based soft finger with changeable bending length using targeted variable stiffness. Soft Robot2020; 7(3): 283–291.
48.
ShintakeJCacuccioloVFloreanoD, et al. Soft robotic grippers. Adv Mater2018; 30(29): 1707035.
49.
RakićM.Multifingered robot hand with selfadaptability. Robot Comput Manuf1989; 5(2–3): 269–276.
50.
OdhnerLUJentoftLPClaffeeMR, et al. A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation. Int J Rob Res2014; 33(5): 736–752.
51.
BertoniMMichielettoSMichielettoG.Towards a low-cost robot navigation approach based on a RGB-D sensor network. In: 2022 IEEE 17th international conference on advanced motion control (AMC), Padova, Italy, February 2022, pp.458–463. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/AMC51637.2022.9729292.
52.
ChungJH.Interactive force control of an operator-mobile manipulator coordination system. J Robot Syst2002; 19(4): 189–198.
53.
ObasekoreHFanniMAhmedSM. Insect killing robot for agricultural purposes. In: 2019 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), Hong Kong, July2019, pp.1068–1074. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/AIM.2019.8868507.
54.
VafadarSOlabiAPanahiMS. Optimal motion planning of mobile manipulators with minimum number of platform movements. In: 2018 IEEE International conference on industrial technology (ICIT), Lyon, February2018, pp.262–267. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICIT.2018.8352187.
55.
ThakarSFangLShahB, et al. Towards time-optimal trajectory planning for pick-and-transport operation with a mobile manipulator. In: 2018 IEEE 14th international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), Munich, Germany, August 2018, pp.981–987. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/COASE.2018.8560446.
56.
XieDJZengLDXuZ, et al. Base position planning of mobile manipulators for assembly tasks in construction environments. Adv Manuf2022; 11: 93–110.
57.
RenJWuTZhouX, et al. SLAM, path planning algorithm and application research of an indoor substation wheeled robot navigation system. Electronics2022; 11(12): 1838.
58.
KalmariJBackmanJVisalaA.Coordinated motion of a hydraulic forestry crane and a vehicle using nonlinear model predictive control. Comput Electron Agric2017; 133: 119–127.
59.
FuBChenYQuanY, et al. Bidirectional artificial potential field-based ant colony optimization for robot path planning. Robot Auton Syst2024; 183: 104834.
60.
TengTFernandesMGattiM, et al. Whole-body control on non-holonomic mobile manipulation for grapevine winter pruning automation. In: 2021 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), Chongqing, July 2021, pp.37–42. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICARM52023.2021.9536083.
61.
SilwalADavidsonJRKarkeeM, et al. Design, integration, and field evaluation of a robotic apple harvester. J Field Robot2017; 34(6): 1140–1159.
62.
KapustaASGricePMCleverHM, et al. A system for bedside assistance that integrates a robotic bed and a mobile manipulator. PLoS One2019; 14(10): e0221854.
63.
Al-HussainiSDhanarajNGregoryJM, et al. Seeking human help to manage plan failure risks in semi-autonomous mobile manipulation. J Comput Inf Sci Eng2022; 22(5): 050906.
64.
KuoCYHuangCCTsaiCH, et al. Development of an immersive SLAM-based VR system for teleoperation of a mobile manipulator in an unknown environment. Comput Ind2021; 132: 103502.
65.
JianSYangXYuanX, et al. On-line precision calibration of mobile manipulators based on the multi-level measurement strategy. IEEE Access2021; 9: 17161–17173.
66.
ObertiRMarchiMTirelliP, et al. Selective spraying of grapevines for disease control using a modular agricultural robot. Biosyst Eng2016; 146: 203–215.
67.
KostavelisIKargakosASkartadosE, et al. Robotic assistance in medication intake: a complete pipeline. Appl Sci2022; 12(3): 1379.
68.
MagalhãesSAMoreiraAPSantosFND, et al. Active perception fruit harvesting robots—a systematic review. J Intell Robot Syst2022; 105(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10846-022-01595-3
69.
DhanarajNYoonYJMalhanR, et al. A mobile manipulator system for accurate and efficient spraying on large surfaces. Procedia Comput Sci2022; 200: 1528–1539.
70.
YangZLiMZhaF, et al. Imitation learning of a wheeled mobile manipulator based on dynamical movement primitives. Ind Robot Int J Robot Res Appl2021; 48(4): 556–568.
71.
WangJTaoBGongZ, et al. A mobile robotic measurement system for large-scale complex components based on optical scanning and visual tracking. Robot Comput Manuf2021; 67: 102010.
72.
WangJGongZYuS, et al. A pose estimation and optimization method for mobile manipulator’s end-effectors based on stereo vision and ICoP algorithm. In: 2021 27th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), Shanghai, November 2021, pp.744–749. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/M2VIP49856.2021.9665072.
73.
FanQGongZZhangS, et al. A vision-based fast base frame calibration method for coordinated mobile manipulators. Robot Comput Manuf2021; 68: 102078.
74.
MoutinhoDRebeloPCostaC, et al. Force control heuristics for surpassing pose uncertainty in mobile robotic assembly platforms. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on autonomous robot systems and competitions (ICARSC), Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal, April 2021, pp.130–136. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICARSC52212.2021.9429818.
75.
ShiYChenZCongL, et al. Maximizing the use of environmental constraints: a pushing-based hybrid position/force assembly skill for contact-rich tasks. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), Sanya, December 2021, pp.496–501. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ROBIO54168.2021.9739349.
76.
ZhaoTLiuYLiZ, et al. Adaptive control and optimization of mobile manipulation subject to input saturation and switching constraints. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2019; 16(4): 1543–1555.
77.
ChenTLBhattacharjeeTBeerJM, et al. Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise. PLoS One2017; 12(10): e0182736.
78.
ZahidTKausarZShahMF, et al. Workspace design and trajectory planning of a five degree of freedom mobile welding manipulator for spherical objects. IEEE Access2021; 9: 73843–73856.
79.
SayarEGaoXHuY, et al. Toward coordinated planning and hierarchical optimization control for highly redundant mobile manipulator. ISA Trans2024; 146: 16–28.
80.
SongTYangHGuoS, et al. Configuration selection for tip-over stability of a modular reconfigurable mobile manipulator under various application situations. Robotica2022; 41: 1066–1085.
81.
ArnarsonHSolvangB.Reconfigurable autonomous industrial mobile manipulator system. In: 2022 IEEE/SICE International symposium on system integration (SII), Narvik, January 2022, pp.772–777. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/SII52469.2022.9708887.
82.
KongYZhangRJiangY, et al. A repeatable optimization for kinematic energy system with its mobile manipulator application. Complexity2019; 2019: 1.
83.
XingHTorabiADingL, et al. Human-robot collaboration for heavy object manipulation: Kinesthetic teaching of the role of wheeled mobile manipulator. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic, September 2021, pp.2962–2969. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9635910.
84.
JiaoJCaoZGuN, et al. Transportation by multiple mobile manipulators in unknown environments with obstacles. IEEE Syst J2017; 11(4): 2894–2904.
85.
ZhangHShengQSunY, et al. A novel coordinated motion planner based on capability map for autonomous mobile manipulator. Robot Auton Syst2020; 129: 103554.
86.
ZeghlacheSRahaliHDjeriouiA, et al. Robust adaptive backstepping neural networks fault tolerant control for mobile manipulator UAV with multiple uncertainties. Math Comput Simul2024; 218: 556–585.
87.
FanQGongZTaoB, et al. Base position optimization of mobile manipulators for machining large complex components. Robot Comput Manuf2021; 70: 102138.
88.
Habibnejad KorayemMGhobadiNFathollahi DehkordiS.Designing an optimal control strategy for a mobile manipulator and its application by considering the effect of uncertainties and wheel slipping. Optim Control Appl Methods2021; 42(5): 1487–1511.
89.
Aguilera-MarinovicSTorres-TorritiMAuat-CheeinF.General dynamic model for skid-steer mobile manipulators with wheel-ground interactions. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2017; 22(1): 433–444.
90.
JangidHJainSTekaB, et al. Kinematics-based end-effector path control of a mobile manipulator system on an uneven terrain using a two-stage support vector machine. Robotica2020; 38(8): 1415–1433.
91.
PrasadASharmaBVanualailaiJ, et al. Motion control of an articulated mobile manipulator in 3D using the lyapunov-based control scheme. Int J Control2022; 95(9): 2581–2595.
92.
Cedeno-CamposVMTroddenPADoddTJ, et al. Highly flexible self-reconfigurable systems for rapid layout formation to offer manufacturing services. In: Presented at the 2013 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC 2013), Manchester, England, October 2013, pp.4819–4824. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/SMC.2013.820.
93.
RothomphiwatKHarnkhamenATothongT, et al. Advanced collaborative robots for the factory of the future. In: 2021 IEEE/SICE International symposium on system integration (SII), Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan, January 2021, pp.578–579. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IEEECONF49454.2021.9382664.
94.
WolfÁWoltonDTraplJ, et al. Towards robotic laboratory automation plug & play: the ‘LAPP’ framework. SLAS Technol2022; 27(1): 18–25.
95.
RenYSosnowskiSHircheS.Fully distributed cooperation for networked uncertain mobile manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot2020; 36(4): 984–1003.
96.
LiCHansenAKChrysostomouD, et al. Bringing a natural language-enabled virtual assistant to industrial mobile robots for learning, training and assistance of manufacturing tasks. In: 2022 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration (SII), Narvik, Norway, January 2022, pp. 238–243. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/SII52469.2022.9708757.
97.
XingHDingLGaoH, et al. Dual-user haptic teleoperation of complementary motions of a redundant wheeled mobile manipulator considering task priority. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2022; 52(10): 6283–6295.
98.
YamamotoTYaguchiHKatoS, et al. Evaluation of impression difference of a domestic mobile manipulator with autonomous and/or remote control in fetch-and-carry tasks. Adv Robot2020; 34(20): 1291–1308.
99.
GarciaCANaranjoJECampanaLA, et al. Flexible robotic teleoperation architecture under IEC 61499 standard for oil & gas process. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), Turin, September 2018, pp.1269–1272. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ETFA.2018.8502520.
100.
BejczyBBozyilRVaičekauskasE, et al. Mixed reality interface for improving mobile manipulator teleoperation in contamination critical applications. Procedia Manuf2020; 51: 620–626.
101.
SuYChenXZhouT, et al. Mixed reality-integrated 3D/2D vision mapping for intuitive teleoperation of mobile manipulator. Robot Comput Manuf2022; 77: 102332.
102.
CallariTCVecellio SegateRHubbardEM, et al. An ethical framework for human-robot collaboration for the future people-centric manufacturing: a collaborative endeavour with European subject-matter experts in ethics. Technol Soc2024; 78: 102680.
103.
FarajtabarMCharbonneauM.The path towards contact-based physical human-robot interaction. Robot Auton Syst2024; 182: 104829.
104.
WanKLiCLoFS, et al. A virtual reality-based immersive teleoperation system for remote human robot collaborative manufacturing. Manuf Lett2024; 41: 43–50.
105.
AldawsariSChenYPP. Intervention scenarios and robot capabilities for support, guidance and health monitoring for the elderly. Comput Sci Rev2024; 54: 100687.
106.
ZachariaeAPlahlFTangY, et al. Human-robot interactions in autonomous hospital transports. Robot Auton Syst2024; 179: 104755.
107.
Noormohammadi-AslAFanKSmithSL, et al. Human leading or following preferences: effects on human perception of the robot and the human-robot collaboration. Robot Auton Syst2025; 183: 104821.
108.
AsifSBuenoMFerreiraP, et al. Rapid and automated configuration of robot manufacturing cells. Robot Comput Manuf2025; 92: 102862.
109.
NikolovaMCnossenFNikolaevB.Robots, meaning, and self-determination. Res Policy2024; 53: 104987.
110.
KannanPNatarajanSKDashSS.Design and implementation of fuzzy logic controller for online computer controlled steering system for navigation of a teleoperated agricultural vehicle. Math Probl Eng2013; 2013: 1–10.
111.
TanigakiKFujiuraTAkaseA, et al. Cherry-harvesting robot. Comput Electron Agric2008; 63(1): 65–72.
112.
WangWDongWSuY, et al. Development of search-and-rescue robots for underground coal mine applications: search and rescue robot for underground coal mine. J Field Robot2014; 31(3): 386–407.
113.
SongJSharfI.Stability-constrained mobile manipulation planning on rough terrain. Robotica2022; 40(11): 4090–4119.
114.
KahnamoueiJTMoallemM.Advancements in control systems and integration of artificial intelligence in welding robots: a review. Ocean Eng2024; 312: 119294.
115.
LakhalOChettibiTBelarouciA, et al. Robotized additive manufacturing of funicular architectural geometries based on building materials. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2020; 25(5): 2387–2397.
116.
PardiTMaddaliVOrtenziV, et al. Path planning for mobile manipulator robots under non-holonomic and task constraints. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, October 2020, pp.6749–6756. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9340760.
117.
ZengLGuoSWuJ, et al. Autonomous mobile construction robots in built environment: a comprehensive review. Dev Built Environ2024; 19: 100484.
118.
RahmanMLiuHCardenasID, et al. Towards an autonomous RIRS: design, structure investigation and framework. In: 2021 7th International conference on mechatronics and robotics engineering (ICMRE), Budapest, Hungary, February 2021, pp.164–168. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICMRE51691.2021.9384846.
119.
CleverHMKapustaAParkD, et al. 3D human pose estimation on a configurable bed from a pressure image. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), Madrid, October 2018, pp.54–61. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2018.8593545.
120.
PuthuveetilKKempCCEricksonZ.Bodies uncovered: Learning to manipulate real blankets around people via physics simulations. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022; 7(2): 1984–1991.
121.
GricePMKempCC.In-home and remote use of robotic body surrogates by people with profound motor deficits. PLoS One2019; 14(3): e0212904.
122.
VonaMShekarNH.Teaching robotics software with the open hardware mobile manipulator. IEEE Trans Educ2013; 56(1): 42–47.
123.
Garcia RicardezGAOkadaSKogantiN, et al. Restock and straightening system for retail automation using compliant and mobile manipulation. Adv Robot2020; 34(3-4): 235–249.
124.
MucchianiCTorresWOEdgarD, et al. Development and deployment of a mobile manipulator for assisting and entertaining elders living in supportive apartment living facilities. In: 2018 27th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), Nanjing, Auguat 2018, pp.121–128. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525826.
125.
PengHWuMLuH, et al. Stability control for medical rescue robot in unconstructed environment. In: 2020 5th International conference on advanced robotics and mechatronics (ICARM), Shenzhen, China, December 2020, pp.184–188. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICARM49381.2020.9195272.
126.
SujatiTDewiTRusdianasariR.Charging system design of a solar powered mobile manipulator. In: 2021 International conference on electrical and information technology (IEIT), Malang, September 2021, pp.179–184. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IEIT53149.2021.9587401.
127.
ElwinMLStrongBFreemanRA, et al. Human-multirobot collaborative mobile manipulation: the omnid mocobots. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2023; 8(1): 376–383.
128.
LeeCJLeeJRhimS.Design of maximum stopping deceleration of mobile manipulator considering the protective separation distance without tip-over. In: 2021 IEEE International conference on intelligence and safety for robotics (ISR), Tokoname, Japan, March 2021, pp.326–329. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ISR50024.2021.9419546.
129.
VermaAGautamASingh ShekhawatV, et al. DTA-HMR-TT: dynamic task allocation for a heterogeneous team of mobile robots with task transfer. IEEE Access2024; 12: 177050–177063.
130.
FengYTianXLiT, et al. Measurement of mobile manipulator chassis pose change caused by suspension deformation and end-effector accuracy improvement based on multi-sensor fusion. Robot Auton Syst2023; 170: 104553.
131.
GuoSYanZ-XSongT, et al. Improvement of localization with artificial landmark for mobile manipulator. Int J Adv Robot Syst2019; 16(4): 172988141986298.
132.
BildsteinHCadenatVDurand-PetitevilleA.Visual predictive control for mobile manipulator: visibility, manipulability, and stability. Robot Auton Syst2024; 180: 104754.
133.
Di CastroMFerreMMasiA.CERNTAURO: A modular architecture for robotic inspection and telemanipulation in harsh and semi-structured environments. IEEE Access2018; 6: 37506–37522.
134.
StetcoCMuhlbacher-KarrerSLucchiM, et al. Gesture-based contactless control of mobile manipulators using capacitive sensing. In: 2020 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC), Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 2020, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/I2MTC43012.2020.9128751.
135.
AsfourTPausFWaechterM, et al. ARMAR-6: A high-performance humanoid for human-robot collaboration in real-world scenarios. IEEE Robot Autom Mag2019; 26(4): 108–121.
136.
MershaAYde KinkelderRBekkeD.Affordable modular mobile manipulator for domestic applications. In: 2018 19th International conference on research and education in mechatronics (REM), Delft, June 2018, pp.141–146. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/REM.2018.8421773.
137.
LunghiGMarinRDi CastroM, et al. Multimodal human-robot interface for accessible remote robotic interventions in hazardous environments. IEEE Access2019; 7: 127290–127319.
138.
ChoiD.Min-max control for vibration suppression of mobile manipulator with active suspension system. Int J Control Autom Syst2022; 20(2): 618–626.
139.
SandyTStadelmannLKerscherS, et al. ConFusion: sensor fusion for complex robotic systems using nonlinear optimization. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2019; 4(2): 1093–1100.
140.
YamazakiKSuzukiSKuribayashiY.Approaching motion planning for mobile manipulators considering the uncertainty of self-positioning and object’s pose estimation. Robot Auton Syst2022; 158: 104232.
141.
AhmadUPanYShenH.Robust control design for teleoperation of multiple mobile manipulators under time delays. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2020; 30(16): 6454–6472.
142.
NeszmélyiBPfisterR.To err is human: differences in performance monitoring ERPs during interactions with human co-actors and machines. Biol Psychol2025; 194: 108965.
143.
SnowLJainSKrishnamurthyV.Lyapunov based stochastic stability of a quantum decision system for human-machine interaction. Automatica2024; 164: 111628.
144.
YangJLiuYMorganPL.Human-machine interaction towards Industry 5.0: human-centric smart manufacturing. Digit Eng2024; 2: 100013.
145.
SanfilippoFHamza ZafarMWileyT, et al. From caged robots to high-fives in robotics: Exploring the paradigm shift from human-robot interaction to human-robot teaming in human-machine interfaces. J Manuf Syst2025; 78: 1–25.
146.
LiuRWangYChuH, et al. High-performance gelatin-based hydrogel flexible sensor for respiratory monitoring and human-machine interaction. Chem Eng J2024; 502: 157975.
147.
XuQLiZWangJ, et al. Enhanced casein organohydrogel coating with the liquid metal catalyst for electric leather in human-machine interaction. Chem Eng J2024; 500: 156841.
148.
SongYSunWShiX, et al. Bio-inspired e-skin with integrated antifouling and comfortable wearing for self-powered motion monitoring and ultra-long-range human-machine interaction. J Colloid Interface Sci2025; 679: 1299–1310.
149.
BaiTWangYZhuK, et al. Multifunctional ultraelastic helical conductive yarn for motion detection and human-machine interaction. Chem Eng J2024; 498: 155143.
150.
FanXMRuanQ.Design and locomotion analysis of a close-chain leg-wheel mobile platform. Ind Robot Int J Robot Res Appl2023; 50(1): 122–134.
151.
PsarakisLNathanaelDMarmarasN.Communicating robots’ intent through visual cues enhances human anticipatory behavior in human-dual robot collaboration. Robot Comput Manuf2025; 92: 102886.
152.
TsarouhasPHFourlasGK.Mission reliability estimation of mobile robot system. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag2016; 7(2): 220–228.
153.
RameshAStolkinRChiouM.Robot vitals and robot health: towards systematically quantifying runtime performance degradation in robots under adverse conditions. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2022; 7(4): 10729–10736.
154.
SchranzMUmlauftMSendeM, et al. Swarm robotic behaviors and current applications. Front Rob AI2020; 7: 36.
155.
MazloomiNZandinejadZZaretalabA, et al. Multi-objective QoS optimization in swarm robotics. Robot Auton Syst2024; 182: 104796.
156.
KangGSeongHLeeD, et al. A versatile door opening system with mobile manipulator through adaptive position-force control and reinforcement learning. Robot Auton Syst2024; 180: 104760.
157.
AlbonicoMDordevicMHamerE, et al. Software engineering research on the Robot Operating System: A systematic mapping study. J Syst Softw2023; 197: 111574.
