Predictive analysis of tensile strength ratios in laminated bamboo composites: Unraveling the stochastic impact of ply angle variations through machine learning model
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024
Predictive analysis of tensile strength ratios in laminated bamboo composites: Unraveling the stochastic impact of ply angle variations through machine learning model
Laminated bamboo composites (LBC), made by sandwiching bamboo strips, offer promising alternatives to traditional construction materials, especially for housing. However, subjection to the continuous static loading makes these materials initiate cracks inside their various ply. This study uses classical laminate theory (CLT) to determine the strength ratio (SR) of the LBC at different ply orientations by applying Tsai-Wu and Tsai-Hill failure criteria using MATLAB. The study aims to calculate the SRs for LBCs using CLT, employing an ANN model and stochastic finite element (FE) modeling to investigate SRs of five-layered LBCs with varying ply orientations. Applying CLT, the highest SR was determined to be 1.5375 × 107 N/m for the [0°/0°/0°/0°/0°] laminate, as per both failure theories. The study reveals substantial SR variations depending on ply orientation, consistently showing higher SR predictions with the Tsai-Wu theory compared to the Tsai-Hill theory. Next, the study emphasizes the deterministic methodologies to account for the stochastic effects of ply angle on the obtained SR of LBCs. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was utilized to model 10,000 randomly generated ply angle inputs and their associated SRs. By incorporating MCS to introduce ±1% variations in ply angles and utilizing normally distributed data, this research effectively captures uncertainties associated with ply orientation. Finally, to forecast the random SR of LBC with various ply orientations, an artificial neural network (ANN) surrogate model is employed. The stochastic analysis confirms the need to quantify the associated uncertainties. The findings of this study are crucial for advancing the application of LBC in sustainable construction, providing valuable insights into their mechanical behavior under different ply orientations, considering the stochastic effect in properties.
KumarDMandalA.Review on manufacturing and fundamental aspects of laminated bamboo products for structural applications. Constr Build Mater2022; 348: 128691.
2.
XuXXuPZhuJ, et al. Bamboo construction materials: carbon storage and potential to reduce associated CO2 emissions. Sci Total Environ2022; 814: 152697.
3.
RahmatabadiDSoleymanEFallah Min BashiM, et al. 4D printing and annealing of PETG composites reinforced with short carbon fibers. Phys Scr2024; 99(5): 055957.
4.
KarimiARahmatabadiDBaghaniM.Various FDM mechanisms used in the fabrication of continuous-fiber reinforced composites: a review. Polymers2024; 16(6): 831. DOI: 10.3390/polym16060831.
5.
KamTYJanTB.First-ply failure analysis of laminated composite plates based on the layerwise linear displacement theory. Compos Struct1995; 32(1–4): 583–591.
MatsagarV.Advances in structural engineering: mechanics, volume one. New York, NY: Springer; 2015.
10.
ChatterjeeDGhoshAChakravortyD.First ply failure behaviour of corner point supported laminated composite skew plate. In: MaityDPatraPKAfzalMS, et al. (eds) Recent advances in computational and experimental mechanics. Berlin: Springer, 2022, pp.1–10.
11.
SitohangRDRGrouveWJBWarnetLL, et al. The relation between in-plane fiber waviness severity and first ply failure in thermoplastic composite laminates. Compos Struct2022; 289: 115374.
12.
KushariSGuptaKKDeyS.Metamodeling-assisted probabilistic first ply failure analysis of laminated composite plates—rs-hdmr- and GPR-based approach. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(8): 1–21.
13.
HaynesRClineJShonkwilerB, et al. On plane stress and plane strain in classical lamination theory. Compos Sci Technol2016; 127: 20–27.
14.
OnkarAKUpadhyayCSYadavD.Probabilistic failure of laminated composite plates using the stochastic finite element method. Compos Struct2007; 77(1): 79–91.
15.
JeongHKShenoiRA.Probabilistic strength analysis of rectangular FRP plates using Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Struct2000; 76(1–3): 219–235.
16.
SafaeiMPourbandariDKarimiMR, et al. Developing a multiscale approach for damage analysis of functionalized-GNP/PET nanocomposite. J Mater Sci2024; 59(7): 2907–2923.
17.
KumarDMandalA. Surrogate model-based stochastic FPF study of tensile-loaded laminated. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2024, pp. 1–11.
18.
KushariSChakrabortyAMukhopadhyayT, et al. ANN-based random first-ply failure analyses of laminated composite plates. In:SahaSKMukherjeeM (eds) Recent advances in computational mechanics and simulations. Singapore: Springer, 2021, pp.131–142.
19.
ShinozukaM.Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics. Comput Struct1972; 2(5-6): 855–874.
20.
PellissettiMFSchuëllerGI.Scalable uncertainty and reliability analysis by integration of advanced Monte Carlo simulation and generic finite element solvers. Comput Struct2009; 87(13–14): 930–947.
21.
KumarDMandalA.Response surface method-based optimisation of advanced mechanochemical approach for bead minimisation in bamboo fiber extraction, and improving hydrophobicity via diisopropanolamine treatment. Biomass Convers Biorefinery2023: 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-04420-5.
22.
KumarDBiswasAMandalA, et al. Improvement of welding performance on mild steel by a hybrid TIG-MAG welding technique. Int J Steel Struct2023; 23(4): 993–1004.
23.
AbambresMLantsoghtEOL. ANN-based fatigue strength of concrete under compression. Materials2019; 12(22): 26–34.
24.
ChakrabortyD.Artificial neural network based delamination prediction in laminated composites. Mater Des2005; 26(1): 1–7.
25.
SaravanakumarSSathiyamurthySPathmanabanP, et al. Integrating machine learning and response surface methodology for analyzing anisotropic mechanical properties of biocomposites. Compos Interfaces2024; 31(1): 1–28.
26.
SengottaiyanSSubbarayanSViswanathanV, et al. Optimized machine learning with hyperparameter tuning and response surface methodology for predicting tribological performance in bio-composite materials. Polym Compos2024; 45(10): 9421–9439.
27.
Fernández-FdzDLópez-PuenteJZaeraR.Prediction of the behaviour of CFRPs against high-velocity impact of solids employing an artificial neural network methodology. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39(6): 989–996.
28.
Erkan IşıkBÇiçekA, et al. Prediction of damage factor in end milling of glass fibre reinforced plastic composites using artificial neural network. Appl Compos Mater2013; 20(4): 517–536.
29.
SaravanakumarSSathiyamurthySVinothV.Enhancing machining accuracy of banana fiber-reinforced composites with ensemble machine learning. Measurement2024; 235: 114912.
30.
SathiyamurthySSaravanakumarSVinothV.Enhancing tribological performance of hybrid fiber-reinforced composites through machine learning and response surface methodology. J Reinforced Plast Compos2024. DOI: 10.1177/07316844241256421.
31.
VermaCSChariarVM.Development of layered laminate bamboo composite and their mechanical properties. Compos B Eng2012; 43(3): 1063–1069.
32.
VermaCSSharmaNKChariarVM, et al. Comparative study of mechanical properties of bamboo laminae and their laminates with woods and wood based composites. Compos B Eng2014; 60: 523–530.
33.
NiLZhangXLiuH, et al. Manufacture and mechanical properties of glued bamboo laminates. BioResources2016; 11(2): 4459–4471.
34.
ChenGYuYLiX, et al. Mechanical behavior of laminated bamboo lumber for structural application: an experimental investigation. Eur J Wood Wood Prod2020; 78(1): 53–63.
35.
SharmaBGatóoARamageMH.Effect of processing methods on the mechanical properties of engineered bamboo. Constr Build Mater2015; 83: 95–101.
36.
WeiYJiXDuanM, et al. Flexural performance of bamboo scrimber beams strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer. Constr Build Mater2017; 142: 66–82.
37.
WeiYTangSJiX, et al. Stress-strain behavior and model of bamboo scrimber under cyclic axial compression. Eng Struct2020; 209: 110279.
38.
WangZWeiYHuY, et al. An investigation of the flexural performance of bamboo-concrete composite beams with precast light concrete slabs and dowel connectors. J Build Eng2021; 41: 102759.
39.
HuangDBianYZhouA, et al. Experimental study on stress–strain relationships and failure mechanisms of parallel strand bamboo made from phyllostachys. Constr Build Mater2015; 77: 130–138.
40.
DongshengHAipingZYulingB.Experimental and analytical study on the nonlinear bending of parallel strand bamboo beams. Constr Build Mater2013; 44: 585–592.
41.
CorrealJFEcheverryJSRamírezF, et al. Experimental evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of glued laminated Guadua angustifolia kunth. Constr Build Mater2014; 73: 105–112.
42.
WeiYZhouMZhaoK, et al. Stress–strain relationship model of glulam bamboo under axial loading. Adv Compos Lett2020; 29: 1–11.
43.
LiZHeXZCaiZM, et al. Mechanical properties of engineered bamboo boards for glubam structures. J Mater Civ Eng2021; 33(5): 1–13.
44.
LiZXiaMKShiJJ, et al. Shear properties of composite cross-laminated bamboo panels. Eur J Wood Wood Prod2022; 80(3): 635–646.
45.
ZhangHYokoyamaA.Predicting strength ratio of laminated composite material with evolutionary artificial neural network. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl2021; 12(6): 11–18.
46.
TsaiSWWuEM.A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater1971; 5(1): 58–80.
47.
MisesRV.Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch-deformablen Zustand. Nachr Von Der Ges Der -wiss Berl Gött Math Kl1913; 1913: 582–592.
48.
GuoDWangYXiaJ, et al. Investigation of BaTiO3 formulation: an artificial neural network (ANN) method. J Eur Ceram Soc2002; 22(11): 1867–1872.
49.
KushariSChakrabortyAMukhopadhyayT, et al. ANN-based random first-ply failure analyses of laminated composite plates. Lect Notes Civ Eng2021; 103(4): 131–142.
50.
HsuP-LRobbinsH.Complete convergence and the law of large numbers. Proc Natl Acad Sci1947; 33(2): 25–31.
51.
MartinezJRBishayPL.On the stochastic first-ply failure analysis of laminated composite plates under in-plane tensile loading. Compos C Open Access2021; 4: 100102.
52.
ChoEArhonditsisGBKhimJ, et al. Modeling metal-sediment interaction processes: parameter sensitivity assessment and uncertainty analysis. Environ Model Softw2016; 80: 159–174.
53.
EbiwonjumiBLeeHKimW, et al. Validation of nuclide depletion capabilities in Monte Carlo code MCS. Nucl Eng Technol2020; 52(9): 1907–1916.
54.
KawAK. Mechanics of composite materials. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2005.
55.
TakeuchiCPEstradaMLineroDL.The elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of laminated bamboo Guadua angustifolia. Key Eng Mater2015; 668: 126–133.
56.
ShanbehzadehMNopourRKazemi-ArpanahiH.Design of an artificial neural network to predict mortality among COVID-19 patients. Inform Med Unlocked2022; 31: 100983.
