Mastering the high strain characteristics at cryogenics and constructing an accurate constitutive model are critical for establishing a cryogenic cutting simulation of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The traditional constitutive model is inadequate for accounting for high and cryogenic conditions. In this paper, cryogenic split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiments are conducted, specifically for Ti-6Al-4V alloy, to develop a modified Johnson–Cook (J–C) constitutive model that incorporates the cryogenic effect. A coupled two-dimensional orthogonal finite element simulation involving temperature displacement was conducted for the cryogenic cutting of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. This simulation was performed using ABAQUS, based on a modified J–C constitutive model subroutine. It was observed that the smallest discrepancy between the simulation results and the data from ice-fixed milling experiments was just 2.12%. The modified J–C constitutive model is more adept at simulating the chip morphology under cryogenic conditions. It was also found that cryogenic machining enhances the distribution of temperature and stress within the chip. For every 5°C reduction in processing temperature, the tool temperature diminishes by more than 2%.
ChenGRenCZouY, et al. Mechanism for material removal in ultrasonic vibration helical milling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2019; 138: 1–13.
2.
KhanWZhangCJamilM, et al. Tool wear, surface quality, and residual stresses analysis of micro-machined additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V under dry and MQL conditions. Tribol Int2020; 151(1): 106408.
3.
XuXZhangJLiuH, et al. Effect of morphological evolution of serrated chips on surface formation during high speed cutting Ti6Al4V. Procedia CIRP2018; 8: 262.
4.
SongWNingJMaoX, et al. A modified Johnson–Cook model for titanium matrix composites reinforced with titaniuarbide particles at elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng2013; 576: 280–289.
5.
TangDWangCHuY, et al. Finite element simulation of chip formation during high-speed peripheral milling of hardened mold steel. Key Eng Mater2010; 443: 274–278.
6.
LinYChenXLiuG. A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile behaviors of typical high-strength alloy steel. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527(26): 6980–6986.
7.
DengYZhangYWuH, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties and modification of J–C constitutive model of 6061-T651 aluminum alloy. J Mech Eng2020; 56(20): 74–81.
8.
JohnsonGRCookWH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Eng Fract Mech1983; 21: 541–548.
9.
WangJHuXYuanK, et al. Impact resistance prediction of superalloy honeycomb using modified Johnson–Cook constitutive model and fracture criterion. Int J Impact Eng2019; 131: 66–77.
10.
ZhouXLiuXCuiS, et al. Dynamic tensile behavior and constitutive modeling of magnesium based hybrid nanocomposites at elevated temperatures. Int J Impact Eng2019; 131: 282–290.
11.
LiuLLüMWuW. An improved constitutive model and finite element simulation for machining Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ2013; 47(7): 73–79.
12.
MingXLinYMiS. An improved Johnson–Cook constitutive model and its experiment validation on cutting force of ADC12 aluminum alloy during high-speed milling. Metals2020; 10(8): 1038.
13.
HuangYJiJLeeK-M. An improved material constitutive model considering temperature-dependent dynamic recrystallization for numerical analysis of Ti-6Al-4V alloy machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 97: 3655–3670.
14.
SimaMÖzelT. Modified material constitutive models for serrated chip formation simulations and experimental validation in machining of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2010; 50(11): 943–960.
15.
WangCDingFTangD, et al. Modeling and simulation of the high-speed milling of hardened steel SKD11 (62 HRC) based on SHPB technology. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2016; 108:13–26.
16.
MengXLinY. Chip morphology and cutting temperature of ADC12 aluminum alloy during high-speed milling. Rare Met2021; 40: 1915–1923.
17.
LiuLLüMWuW, et al. Experimental study on the chip morpholgy in high speed milling Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Mech Eng2015; 51(3): 196–205.
18.
DuMChengZWangS, et al. Effects of damage evolution on simulation results of high speed machining of Ti6Al4V. J Astronaut Sci2019; 40(7): 279–291.
19.
JomaaWMechriOLevesqueJ, et al. Finite element simulation and analysis of serrated chip formation during high–speed machining of AA7075-T651 alloy. J Manuf Process2017; 26: 446–458.
20.
LiJWangXQiaoY, et al. Experiment and simulation research on cryogenic cutting of Inconel 718. J Mech Eng2020; 56(18): 61–72.
21.
PengZYanP. Investigation into residual stress of austenitic 304 stainless steel at Cryogenic temperature. Acta Armamentarii2019; 40(6): 1271–1276.
22.
CaudillJSchoopJJawahirIS. Numerical modeling of cutting forces and temperature distribution in high speed cryogenic and flood-cooled milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Procedia CIRP2019; 82: 83–88.
23.
JinGZhanQLiW, et al. Study on the control method of flatness of thin-walled parts milled from 7075 aluminum alloy based on ice-fixation. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf2023; 6(4): 563–573.
24.
ListGSutterGBiXF, et al. Strain, strain rate and velocity fields determination at very high cutting speed. J Mater Process Technol2013; 213(5): 693–699.
25.
WangXHuangCZouB, et al. Dynamic behavior and a modified Johnson–Cook constitutive model of Inconel 718 at high strain rate and elevated temperature. Mater Sci Eng A2013; 580(15): 385–390.
26.
GuXDongCChengT. MPM simulations of high-speed machining of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy considering dynamic recrystallization phenomenon and thermal conductivity. Appl Math Model2018; 56: 517–538.
27.
TangDWangCHuY, et al. Finite-element simulation of traditional and high-speed peripheral milling of hardened mold steel. Metall Mater Trans A2009; 40(13): 3245.
28.
LiuXChengKWebbD, et al. Prediction of cutting force distribution and its influence on dimensional accuracy in peripheral milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2002; 42(7): 791–800.
29.
ZorevNN. Inter-relationship between shear processes occurring along tool face and shear plane in metal cutting. Int Res Prod Eng1963; 49: 143–152.
30.
ZhaoZAnLZhangH, et al. Characteristics of chip morphology and surface topography in milling TC4. Surface Technol2023; 52(5): 247–256.
31.
KayG. Failure modeling of titanium-6Al-4V and 2024-T3 aluminum with the Johnson–Cook material model. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Lab, 2002.
32.
ZhanQJinGLiW, et al. Study on milling flatness control method for TC4 titanium alloy thin-walled parts under ice fixation. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2024; 238(6): 2018–2033.
