The inevitable errors in the manufacturing, assembly, and testing of a remote center-of-motion (RCM) mechanism lead to the erroneous link parameters which deviate its geometry. Consequently, the motion, as well as the force, become non-zero at the entry port to the patient’s body which is undesirable. To address this issue, the current work first presents the accurate kinematic model of the RCM of an exemplary double-parallelogram-based RCM mechanism. Thereafter, it introduces the RCM adjustment concept and a flexure-based compliant mechanism to nullify/minimize the said deviation. For the analytical design of the flexure element, this paper makes the required design calculations and performs the finite element analysis. It is followed by the disclosure of the RCM Adjustment System and a systematized method of RCM adjustment for a mechanically constrained RCM device. The devised system is based on the prescribed compliant mechanism design and is advantageous, over the traditional RCM adjustments. The potential of the proposed concept lies in the fact that it is not limited to the adopted mechanism only rather, it is extendable to other mechanisms as well which was missing in the prior art. In addition, it offers a more simplified and economical design. Further, an initial prototype of the exemplary mechanism is manufactured using laser micromachining and rapid prototyping techniques. Both analytical as well as physical validations have been performed which proved the efficacy of the proposed kinematic modeling concept. Furthermore, the prototype of the introduced RCM Adjustment System is manufactured as a single-piece design which demonstrated its effectiveness. The preferred embodiment of the same is the said double-parallelogram-based RCM mechanism which is most widely used for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS). It is designed in a SolidWorks environment and manufactured using Al6101-T6 and SS304 as link material, and a variety of standard elements.
ZhangXNelsonCA. Kinematic analysis, and optimization of a novel robot for surgical tool manipulation. J Med Device2008; 2(2): 021003.
2.
LiJWangSWangX, et al. Development of a novel mechanism for minimally invasive surgery. In: IEEE Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Tianjin, China, 14-18 December 2010, pp.1370–1375. New York: IEEE.
3.
LiJZhangGMüllerA, et al. A family of remote center of motion mechanisms based on intersecting motion planes. J Mech Des2013; 135(9): 091009.
4.
KuoCHDaiJS. Kinematics of a fully-decoupled remote Center-of-Motion parallel manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. J Med Device2012; 6(2): 021008.
5.
LiJXingYLiangK, et al. Kinematic design of a novel spatial remote center-of-motion mechanism for minimally invasive surgical robot. J Med Device2015; 9(1): 011003.
6.
LaRoseDTaylorRHFundaJ, et al. A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag1995; 14(3): 279–288.
7.
MadhaniAJNiemeyerGSalisburyJK. Black Falcon: A teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications, Victoria, BC, Canada, 17-17 October 1998, (Cat. No. 98CH36190), vol. 2, pp.936–944. New York: IEEE.
8.
RosenJBrownJDChangL, et al. The blueDRAGON - A system for measuring the kinematics and the dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in-vivo. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Washington, DC, USA, 11-15 May 2002, (Cat. No. 02CH37292), vol. 2, pp.1876–1881. New York: IEEE.
9.
TaylorRHStoianoviciD. Medical Robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom2003; 19(5): 765–781.
10.
LiuHHLiLJShiB, et al. Robotic surgical systems in maxillofacial surgery: A review. Int J Oral Sci2017; 9(2): 63–73.
11.
TrejosALPatelRV.Port placement for endoscopic cardiac surgery based on robot dexterity optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Barcelona, Spain, 18-22 April 2005, pp.912–917. New York: IEEE.
12.
LoserMHNavabN.A new robotic system for visually controlled percutaneous interventions under CT fluoroscopy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 1935. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-40899-4_92
13.
NawratZPodsedkowskiLMianowskiK, et al. RobIn Heart in 2002 - Actual state of Polish Cardio-Robot. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo), Bukowy Dworek, Poland, 11-11 Nov 2002, pp.33–38. Bukowy Dworek, Poland: IEEE.
14.
BaiGQiPAlthoeferK, et al. Kinematic analysis of a mechanism with dual remote centre of motion and its potential application. In: International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (IDETC-CIE), Boston, Massachusetts, 2-5 Aug. 2015, 57137, V05BT08A011.
15.
ZhouXZhangHFengM, et al. New remote centre of motion mechanism for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Biomed Eng Online2018; 17(1): 1–6.
16.
SunJYanZDuZ. Optimal design of a novel remote center-of-motion mechanism for minimally invasive surgical robot. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci2017; 69(1): 012097.
17.
NisarSEndoTMatsunoF. Design and kinematic optimization of a two Degrees-of-Freedom Planar Remote Center of Motion Mechanism for minimally invasive surgery manipulators. J Mech Rob2017; 9(3): 031013.
18.
KongKLiJZhangH, et al. Kinematic design of a generalized double parallelogram based remote center-of-motion mechanism for minimally invasive surgical robot. J Mech Des2016; 10(4): 41006.
19.
LiJZhangGXingY, et al. A class of 2-degree-of-freedom planar remote center-of-motion mechanisms based on virtual parallelograms. J Mech Rob2014; 6(3): 031014.
20.
KuoCHLaiSJ. Design of a novel statically balanced mechanism for laparoscope holders with decoupled positioning and orientating manipulation. J Mech Rob2016; 8(1): 015001.
21.
LiGKEssombaTWuCT, et al. Kinematic design and optimization of a novel dual-orthogonal remote center-of-motion mechanism for craniotomy. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Sciences2017; 231(6): 1129–1145.
22.
AhnJHwangMKwonDS.Kinematic Analysis of Needle-like Overtube Supporting Robot. In: Proceedings of international conference on ubiquitous robots (UR), Honolulu, HI, USA, 26-30 Jun, 2018, pp.38–43. Honolulu, HI: IEEE.
23.
ChristensenSBaiS. Kinematic analysis and design of a novel shoulder exoskeleton using a double parallelogram linkage. J Mech Rob2018; 10(4): 41008.
24.
StoianoviciDWhitcombLLAndersonJH, et al. A modular surgical robotic system for image guided percutaneous procedures. Lecture notes in computer science.(including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)1998, Vol. 1496.
25.
KobayashiEMasamuneKSakumaI, et al. A new safe laparoscopic manipulator system with a five-bar linkage mechanism and an optical zoom. Comput Aided Surg1999; 4(4): 182–192.
26.
TaylorRJensenPWhitcombL, et al. A steady-hand robotic system for microsurgical augmentation. Int J Rob Res1999; 18(12): 1201–1210.
27.
YangYLiuHZhengH, et al. Two types of remote-center-of-motion deployable manipulators with dual scissor-like mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory2021; 160: 104274.
28.
LinRGuoWChengSS. Type synthesis of 2R1T remote center of motion parallel mechanisms with a passive limb for minimally invasive surgical robot. Mech Mach Theory2022; 172: 104766.
MasoryOWangJZhuangH. Kinematic modeling and calibration of a Stewart platform. Adv Robot1996; 11(5): 519–539.
31.
TingKLZhuJWatkinsD. The effects of joint clearance on position and orientation deviation of linkages and manipulators. Mech Mach Theory2000; 35: 391–401.
32.
RaoSSBhattiPK. Probabilistic approach to manipulator kinematics and dynamics. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2001; 72(1): 47–58.
33.
JinYChenIM. Effects of constraint errors on parallel manipulators with decoupled motion. Mech Mach Theory2006; 41(8): 912–928.
34.
FloresP. A methodology for quantifying the kinematic position errors due to manufacturing and assembly tolerances. Stroj vestn-J Mech Eng2011; 57(06): 457–467.
35.
KimJSongWJKangBS. Stochastic approach to kinematic reliability of open-loop mechanism with dimensional tolerance. Appl Math Model2010; 34(5): 1225–1237.
36.
Abbaszadeh-MirYMayerJRRCloutierG, et al. Theory and simulation for the identification of the link geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool using a telescoping magnetic ball-bar. Int J Prod Res2002; 40(18): 4781–4797.
37.
KumaraswamyUShunmugamMSSujathaS. A unified framework for tolerance analysis of planar and spatial mechanisms using screw theory. Mech Mach Theory2013; 69: 168–184.
38.
TannousMCaroSGoldsztejnA. Sensitivity analysis of parallel manipulators using an interval linearization method. Mech Mach Theory2014; 71: 93–114.
39.
HafezipourMKhodayganS. An uncertainty analysis method for error reduction in end-effector of spatial robots with joint clearances and link dimension deviations. Int J Comput Integr Manuf2017; 30(6): 653–663.
40.
LuoXXieFLiuXJ, et al. Error modeling and sensitivity analysis of a novel 5-degree-of-freedom parallel kinematic machine tool. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2019; 233(6): 1637–1652.
41.
MavroidisCFlanzJDubowskyS, et al. High performance medical robot requirements and accuracy analysis. Robot Comput Integr Manuf1998; 14(5-6): 329–338.
42.
NasseriMAEderMEbertsD, et al. Kinematics and dynamics analysis of a hybrid parallel-serial micromanipulator designed for biomedical applications. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics(AIM), Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 9-12 July 2013, pp.293–299.
43.
YoshidaSKannoTKawashimaK. A novel RCM mechanism using pneumatically driven flexible joint for laparoscopic forceps holder. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New York, NY, USA, 26-31 August 2016, pp.1132–1137. New York: IEEE.
44.
SinghASinglaA. Kinematic modeling of robotic manipulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A Phys Sci2017; 87(3): 303–319.
