Functionally graded materials (FGMs) are specially designed composite materials that gradually change their material properties. This distinctive property of materials comes with new challenges in the design and manufacturing sector. For such challenges, the best options are material property computation and material modelling using different computational materials science (CMS) algorithms. This review paper provides enriched information on CMS with an overview of the available FGM production techniques with a detailed study of FGM use in biomedical applications based on the available literature over the past couple of decades.
SalehBJiangJMaA, et al.Effect of main parameters on the mechanical and wear behaviour of functionally graded materials by centrifugal casting: a review. Met Mater Int2019; 25: 1395–1409.
2.
FathiRMaASalehB, et al.Investigation on mechanical properties and wear performance of functionally graded AZ91-SiCp composites via centrifugal casting. Mater Today Commun2020; 24: 101169.
3.
WangSS. Fracture mechanics for delamination problems in composite materials. J Compos Mater1983; 17: 210–223.
4.
ShanmugavelPBhaskarGBChandrasekaranM, et al.An overview of fracture analysis in functionally graded materials. Eur J Scientific Res2012; 68: 412–439.
5.
AtaiAANikranjbarAKasiriR. Buckling and post-buckling behaviour of semicircular functionally graded material arches: a theoretical study. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2012; 226: 607–614.
6.
KoizumiM. FGM activities in Japan. Composites Part B: Eng1997; 28: 1–4.
7.
ChauhanPKKhanS. Microstructural examination of aluminium-copper functionally graded material developed by powder metallurgy route. Mater Today Proc2019; 25: 833–837.
8.
SolaABellucciDCannilloV. Functionally graded materials for orthopedic applications––an update on design and manufacturing. Biotechnol Adv2016; 34: 504–531.
9.
Ramírez-GilFJMurillo-CardosoJESilvaECN, et al.Optimization of functionally graded materials considering dynamical analysis. In: Muñoz-RojasPA (ed) Advanced structured materials. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 205–237.
10.
PetitCMontanaroLPalmeroP. Functionally graded ceramics for biomedical application: concept, manufacturing, and properties. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2018; 15: 820–840.
11.
LiYFengZHaoL, et al.A review on functionally graded materials and structures via additive manufacturing: from multi‐scale design to versatile functional properties. Adv Mater Tech2020; 5: 1900981.
12.
SalehBJiangJFathiR, et al.30 years of functionally graded materials: an overview of manufacturing methods, applications and future challenges. Composites Part B: Eng2020; 201: 108376.
13.
LinDLiQLiW, et al.Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant for bone remodeling. Composites Part B: Eng2009; 40: 668–675.
14.
GuptaATalhaM. Recent development in modeling and analysis of functionally graded materials and structures. Prog Aerospace Sci2015; 79: 1–14.
15.
TarlochanF. Functionally graded material: a new breed of engineered material. J Appl Mech Eng2013; 2: 10–11.
16.
El-GalyIMSalehBIAhmedMH. Functionally graded materials classifications and development trends from industrial point of view. SN Appl Sci2019; 1: 1378.
17.
GayenDTiwariRChakrabortyD. Static and dynamic analyses of cracked functionally graded structural components: a review. Composites Part B: Eng2019; 173: 106982.
18.
PompeWWorchHEppleM, et al.Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng A2003; 362: 40–60.
19.
HeineT. Grand challenges in computational materials science: From description to prediction at all scales. Front Mater2014; 1: 1–3.
20.
RaabeD. Challenges in computational materials science. Adv Mater2002; 14: 639–650.
KostorzG. Theory of structural transformations in solids by A. G. Khachaturyan. Acta Crystallogr Section A Foundations Crystallogr1985; 41: 208–208.
25.
HurleDTJ. Nonlinear phenomena in materials science. MRS Bull1990; 15: 80–81.
26.
IslamMThakurMSHMojumderS, et al.Mechanical and vibrational characteristics of functionally graded Cu–Ni nanowire: a molecular dynamics study. Composites Part B: Eng2020; 198: 108212.
27.
RoseJHSmithJRGuineaF, et al.Universal features of the equation of state of metals. Phys Rev B1984; 29: 2963–2969.
28.
BarbuAZhuS-C. Monte Carlo methods. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020.
29.
FisherIZ. Applications of the Monte Carlo method in statistical physics. Soviet Phys Uspekhi1960; 2: 783–796.
30.
BinderKHeermannDRoelofsL, et al.Monte Carlo simulation in statistical physics. Comput Phys1993; 7: 156.
31.
MechabBMechabIBenaissaS, et al.Probabilistic analysis of effect of the porosities in functionally graded material nanoplate resting on Winkler–Pasternak elastic foundations. Appl Math Model2016; 40: 738–749.
32.
ChakrabortyARahmanS. Stochastic multiscale models for fracture analysis of functionally graded materials. Eng Fracture Mech2008; 75: 2062–2086.
33.
RodgersTMMadisonJDTikareV. Simulation of metal additive manufacturing microstructures using kinetic Monte Carlo. Comput Mater Sci2017; 135: 78–89.
LeSarR. Introduction to computational materials science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
36.
ZinovievaOZinovievAPloshikhinV, et al.Two dimensional cellular automata simulation of grain growth during solidification and recrystallization. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2015; 71: 012073.
37.
PottsRB. Some generalized order-disorder transformations. Math Proc Cambridge Philos Soc1952; 48: 106–109.
38.
OlevskyE. Sintering of tailored powder components: multi-scale modeling and experimentation. In: 11th International Ceramics Congress. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2006, pp. 510–515.
39.
MehnertKKlimanekP. Three-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation of primary recrystallization and grain growth in metals with texture. In: SchwarzerRBungeHJBungeHJ (eds) Materials science forum. Clausthal: Trans Tech Publication, CH-Aedermannsdorf, 1998, pp. 425–432.
40.
PauzaJRollettA. Simulation study of hatch spacing and layer thickness effects on microstructure in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using a texture-aware solidification Potts model. J Mater Eng Perform2021; 30: 7007–7018.
41.
SukumarNSrolovitzDJBakerTJ, et al.Brittle fracture in polycrystalline microstructures with the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng2003; 56: 2015–2037.
42.
BahreinizadHSalimi BaniMKhosraviA, et al.A numerical study on the application of the functionally graded bioabsorbable materials in the stent design. Artery Res2018; 24: 1–8.
43.
RamuIMohantySC. Modal analysis of functionally graded material plates using finite element method. Proced Mater Sci2014; 6: 460–467.
44.
WangLFZhouXP. Fracture analysis of functionally graded materials by the field-enriched finite element method. Eng Fracture Mech2021; 253: 107875.
45.
NguyenDTDJavidanFAttarM, et al.Fracture analysis of cracked magneto-electro-elastic functionally graded materials using scaled boundary finite element method. Theor Appl Fracture Mech2022; 118: 103228.
46.
JafariBKatoozianHRTahaniM, et al.A comparative study of bone remodeling around hydroxyapatite-coated and novel radial functionally graded dental implants using finite element simulation. Med Eng Phys2022; 102: 103775.
47.
DaoMGuPMaewalA, et al.A micromechanical study of residual stresses in functionally graded materials. Acta Mater1997; 45: 3265–3276.
48.
GengYHarrisonN. Functionally graded bimodal Ti6Al4V fabricated by powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: crystal plasticity finite element modelling. Mater Sci Eng A2020; 773: 138736.
49.
GengYXieWTuY, et al.Ti–6Al–4V microstructural functionally graded material by additive manufacturing: experiment and computational modelling. Mater Sci Eng A2021; 823: 141782.
50.
HirshikeshNatarajanSAnnabattulaRK, et al.Phase field modelling of crack propagation in functionally graded materials. Composites Part B: Eng2019; 169: 239–248.
51.
DinachandraMAlankarA. A phase-field study of crack propagation and branching in functionally graded materials using explicit dynamics. Theor Appl Fracture Mech2020; 109: 102681.
52.
MalininaMSammiTGasikMM. Corrosion resistance of homogeneous and FGM coatings. Mater Sci Forum2005; 492–493: 305–310.
53.
WatanabeYEryuHMatsuuraK. Evaluation of three-dimensional orientation of Al3Ti platelet in Al-based functionally graded materials fabricated by a centrifugal casting technique. Acta Materialia2001; 49: 775–783.
54.
Metals Handbook: Forging and Casting. Vol. 5. 8th ed. American Society for Metals, In: Taylor Lyman (ed). Apart from this no other information is available.1970.
55.
El-GalyIMAhmedMHBassiounyBI. Characterization of functionally graded Al-SiCp metal matrix composites manufactured by centrifugal casting. Alexandria Eng J2017; 56: 371–381.
56.
NegahdariZWillert-PoradaMSchermF. Development of novel functionally graded Al2O3-lanthanum hexaaluminate ceramics for thermal barrier coatings. Mater Sci Forum2009; 631–632: 97–102.
57.
RajanTPDJayakumarEPaiBC. Developments in solidification processing of functionally graded aluminium alloys and composites by centrifugal casting technique. Trans Indian Inst Met2012; 65: 531–537.
58.
RoyrAVasseurS. ASM hand book—castings. Ohio: ASM International, 1988.
WatanabeYKimISFukuiY. Microstructures of functionally graded materials fabricated by centrifugal solid-particle and in-situ methods. Met Mater Int2005; 11: 391–399.
61.
MahamoodRMAkinlabiETShuklaM, et al.Functionally graded material: an overview. Lecture Notes Eng Comp Sci2012; 3: 1593–1597.
62.
Mahmood AliS. Optimization of centrifugal casting parameters of AlSi Alloy by using the response surface methodology. Int J Eng Trans B: Appl2019; 32: 1516–1526.
63.
JamianSWatanabeYSatoH. Formation of compositional gradient in Al/SiC FGMs fabricated under huge centrifugal forces using solid-particle and mixed-powder methods. Ceramics Int2019; 45: 9444–9453.
64.
SalehBJiangJMaA, et al.Review on the influence of different reinforcements on the microstructure and wear behavior of functionally graded aluminum matrix composites by centrifugal casting. Met Mater Int2020; 26: 933–960.
65.
SalehBIAhmedMH. Development of functionally graded tubes based on pure Al/Al2O3 metal matrix composites manufactured by centrifugal casting for automotive applications. Met Mater Int2020; 26: 1430–1440.
66.
ContatoriCDominguesNIBarretoRL, et al.Effect of Mg and Cu on microstructure, hardness and wear on functionally graded Al–19Si alloy prepared by centrifugal casting. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9: 15862–15873.
67.
OwoputiAOInambaoFLEbhotaWS. Influence of SiC particles reinforcement on the mechanical properties of functionally graded aluminum metal matrix composites fabricated by centrifugal casting technique. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET)2019; 10(8): 306–316.
68.
OwoputiAOInambaoFLEbhotaWS. Examining the mechanical and tribological behavior of Al-Sic composite developed by centrifugal casting technique. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev2021; 11: 119–130.
69.
MilosanIBedőTGaborC, et al.Characterization of aluminum alloy-silicon carbide functionally graded materials developed by centrifugal casting process. Appl Sci (Switzerland)2021; 11: 1–14.
70.
WatanabeYSatoRMatsudaK, et al.Evaluation of particle size and particle shape distributions in Al-Al 3Ni FGMs fabricated by a centrifugal in-situ method. Sci Eng Compos Mater2004; 11: 185–199.
71.
WatanabeYSatoHOgawaT, et al.Density and hardness gradients of functionally graded material ring fabricated from Al-3 mass% Cu alloy by a centrifugal in-situ method. Mater Trans2007; 48: 2945–2952.
72.
YousefiMDoostmohammadiH. Fabrication and characterization of functionally graded in-situ Al/Al-Cu-Cr composite by centrifugal casting process. Iranian J Manufacturing Eng2020; 7: 52–64.
73.
SavaşÖ. Fabrication and characterization of TiB2-reinforced functionally graded aluminum matrix material. Ind Lubrication Tribology2020; 72: 1147–1152.
74.
El-WazeryMSEl-DesoukyAR. A review on functionally graded ceramic-metal materials. J Mater Environ Sci2015; 6: 1369–1376.
75.
WatanabeYSatoHMiura-FujiwaraE. Functionally graded metallic biomaterials. In: NiinomiMNarushimaTNarushimaTNakaiMNakaiM (eds) Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2021, pp. 181–209.
76.
SuryaMSPrasanthiG. Tribological behaviour of aluminum silicon carbide functionally graded material. Tribology in Industry2018; 40: 247–253.
77.
KırmızıGArıkHÇiniciH. Experimental study on mechanical and ballistic behaviours of silicon carbide reinforced functionally graded aluminum foam composites. Composites Part B: Eng2019; 164: 345–357.
78.
MadanRBhowmickS. A review on application of FGM fabricated using solid-state processes. Adv Mater Process Tech2020; 6: 608–619.
79.
SaxenaAGuptaSSinghB, et al.Improved functional response of spark plasma sintered hydroxyapatite based functionally graded materials: An impedance spectroscopy perspective. Ceramics Int2019; 45: 6673–6683.
80.
DuttaGBoseD. Effect of sintering temperature on density, porosity and hardness of a powder metallurgy component. Int J Emerging Technol Adv Eng2012; 2: 121–123.
81.
SrinivasPNSBabuPRBB. Microstructural, mechanical and tribological characterization on the Al based functionally graded material fabricated powder metallurgy. Mater Res Express2020; 7: 026513.
82.
Ananta BhaskararaoKRanga JanardhanaG. Experimental study on mechanical properties of Ni/TiO2 FGM processed by pressureless sintering technique. Sādhanā2020; 45: 164.
83.
GheysarianAHonarpishehM. Experimental and numerical investigation of process parameters on the residual stresses in the Al-Cu FGM materials. Exp Tech2021; 45: 601–612.
84.
LugininaMAngioniDMontinaroS, et al.Hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass functionally graded materials (FGM) for bone tissue engineering. J Eur Ceram Soc2020; 40: 4623–4634.
85.
RajasekharKSuresh BabuVDavidsonMJ. Interfacial microstructure and properties of Al-Cu functionally graded materials fabricated by powder metallurgy method. Mater Today Proc2019; 46: 9212–9216.
86.
WuXLiuWWangMY. A CAD modeling system for heterogeneous object. Adv Eng Softw2008; 39: 444–453.
87.
YanLChenYLiouF. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded metallic materials using laser metal deposition. Additive Manufacturing2020; 31: 100901.
88.
ZhangCChenFHuangZ, et al.Additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: a review. Mater Sci Eng A2019; 764: 138209.
89.
OlakanmiEOCochraneRFDalgarnoKW. A review on selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM) of aluminium alloy powders: processing, microstructure, and properties. Prog Mater Sci2015; 74: 401–477.
90.
TernerMRicordelTChoJ-H, et al.The response surface methodology for optimizing the process parameters of selective laser melting. J Welding Joining2019; 37: 27–39.
91.
LeeJYAnJChuaCK. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today2017; 7: 120–133.
92.
NgoTDKashaniAImbalzanoG, et al.Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Eng2018; 143: 172–196.
93.
FogliattoAABAhrensCHWendhausenPAP, et al.Correlation between porosity and permeability of stainless steel filters with gradient porosity produced by SLS/SLM. Rapid Prototyping J2020; 26: 73–81.
94.
ZhangXHuiCYWeiC, et al.Additive manufacturing of three-dimensional metal-glass functionally gradient material components by laser powder bed fusion with in situ powder mixing. Additive Manufacturing2020; 33: 101113.
95.
TanCZhouKKuangT. Selective laser melting of tungsten-copper functionally graded material. Mater Lett2019; 237: 328–331.
96.
MasonMSHuangTLandersRG, et al.Aqueous-based extrusion of high solids loading ceramic pastes: process modeling and control. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 2946–2957.
97.
DeyAYodoN. A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics. J Manufacturing Mater Process2019; 3: 64.
98.
SinghNSinghRAhujaIPS. On development of functionally graded material through fused deposition modelling assisted investment casting from Al2O3/SiC reinforced waste low density polyethylene. Trans Indian Inst Met2018; 71: 2479–2485.
99.
SrivastavaMMaheshwariSKundraTK. Virtual modelling and simulation of functionally graded material component using FDM technique. Mater Today Proc2015; 2: 3471–3480.
100.
YapYLWangCSingSL, et al.Material jetting additive manufacturing: an experimental study using designed metrological benchmarks. Precision Eng2017; 50: 275–285.
101.
UdroiuRBragaIC. Polyjet technology applications for rapid tooling. MATEC Web of Conferences2017; 112: 1–6.
102.
SalcedoEBaekDBerndtA, et al.Simulation and validation of three dimension functionally graded materials by material jetting. Additive Manufacturing2018; 22: 351–359.
103.
KaweesaD v.SpillaneDRMeiselNA. Investigating the impact of functionally graded materials on fatigue life of material jetted specimens. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - an Additive Manufacturing Conference, 2020, pp. 578–592.
104.
YanJBattiatoIFadelGM. Planning the process parameters for the direct metal deposition of functionally graded parts based on mathematical models. J Manufacturing Process2018; 31: 56–71.
105.
CarrollBEOtisRABorgoniaJP, et al.Functionally graded material of 304L stainless steel and inconel 625 fabricated by directed energy deposition: characterization and thermodynamic modeling. Acta Materialia2016; 108: 46–54.
106.
LiWZhangJZhangX, et al.Effect of optimizing particle size on directed energy deposition of functionally graded material with blown pre-mixed multi-powder. Manufacturing Lett2017; 13: 39–43.
107.
BanaitSMPaulCPJinoopAN, et al.Experimental investigation on laser directed energy deposition of functionally graded layers of Ni-Cr-B-Si and SS316L. Opt Laser Technol2020; 121: 105787.
108.
DasASarkarSKarmakarA. Vibration characteristics of functionally graded pre-twisted turbo machinery blade with rotational effect. Adv Sci Lett2016; 22: 111–117.
109.
DasARoutMKarmakarA. Time dependent response of impact induced functionally graded conical shell considering porosity. Sādhanā2020; 45: 219.
110.
DasADeb SinghaTKarmakarA. Low velocity normal impact performance of functionally graded conical shell with simple power law. Mater Today Proc2019; 11: 729–739.
111.
DasAKarmakarA. Temperature dependent natural modes for sigmoidal functionally graded conical shell. Mater Today Proc2019; 11: A15–A24.
112.
SuZInabaKKarmakarA, et al.Analytical and numerical study of vibration and transient heat conduction in a functionally graded pipe. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manufacturing2021; 15: 2021jamdsm0054.
113.
SuZInabaKKarmakarA, et al.Fluid structure interaction simulation of thermal striping in a t-junction pipe made of functionally graded material. Int J Mech Mater Des2021; 18: 461–473.
114.
LimargaAMWidjajaSYipTH. Mechanical properties and oxidation resistance of plasma-sprayed multilayered Al2O3/ZrO2 thermal barrier coatings. Surf Coat Technol2005; 197: 93–102.
115.
KimJIKimWJChoiDJ, et al.Design of a C/SiC functionally graded coating for the oxidation protection of C/C composites. Carbon N Y2005; 43: 1749–1757.
116.
ZhangLXZhangBSunZ, et al.Preparation of graded double-layer materials for brazing C/C composite and TC4. J Alloys Comp2020; 823: 153639.
117.
HuangCYChenYL. Design and impact resistant analysis of functionally graded Al2O3-ZrO2 ceramic composite. Mater Des2016; 91: 294–305.
118.
GuptaNBhanu PrasadVMadhuV, et al.Ballistic studies on TiB2-Ti functionally graded armor ceramics. Defence Sci J2012; 62: 382–389.
119.
ChinESC. Army focused research team on functionally graded armor composites. Mater Sci Eng A1999; 259: 155–161.
120.
LiLChengLFanS, et al.Fabrication and dynamic compressive response of laminated ZrO-Zr2CN/Si3N4 ceramics. Ceramics Int2015; 41: 8584–8591.
121.
LiSBXieJX. Processing and microstructure of functionally graded W/Cu composites fabricated by multi-billet extrusion using mechanically alloyed powders. Composites Sci Technol2006; 66: 2329–2336.
122.
WośkoMPaszkiewiczBPiaseckiT, et al.Applications of functionally graded materials in optoelectronic devices. Optica Applicata2005; 35: 663–667.
123.
MüllerEDrašarČSchilzJ, et al.Functionally graded materials for sensor and energy applications. Mater Sci Eng A2003; 362: 17–39.
124.
BhartiIGuptaNGuptaKM. Novel applications of functionally graded nano, optoelectronic and thermoelectric materials. Int J Mater Mech Manufacturing2013; 1: 221–224.
125.
AkmalMKhalidFAHussainMA. Interfacial diffusion reaction and mechanical characterization of 316L stainless steel-hydroxyapatite functionally graded materials for joint prostheses. Ceramics Int2015; 41: 14458–14467.
126.
AlmasiDSadeghiMLauWJ, et al.Functionally graded polymeric materials: a brief review of current fabrication methods and introduction of a novel fabrication method. Mater Sci Eng C2016; 64: 102–107.
127.
BakarWZWBasriSJamaludinSNS, et al.Functionally graded materials: an overview of dental applications. World J Dentistry2018; 9: 137–144.
128.
XiongYZGaoRNZhangH, et al.Rationally designed functionally graded porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with high strength and toughness built via selective laser melting for load-bearing orthopedic applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2020; 104: 103673.
129.
FujiiTTohgoKIwaoM, et al.Fracture toughness distribution of alumina-titanium functionally graded materials fabricated by spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Comp2018; 766: 1–11.
130.
WeiCSunZChenQ, et al.Additive manufacturing of horizontal and 3D functionally graded 316L/Cu10Sn components via multiple material selective laser melting. J Manufacturing Sci Eng2019; 141(8): 081014.
131.
Ataollahi OshkourAPramanikSMehraliM, et al.Mechanical and physical behavior of newly developed functionally graded materials and composites of stainless steel 316L with calcium silicate and hydroxyapatite. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2015; 49: 321–331.
132.
DongCZhongMLiuW, et al.Laser deposition of Ti6Al4V-316L composition gradient structure: challenge on intermetallics. ICALEO 2009 - 28th Int Congress Appl Lasers Electro-Optics, Congress Proc2009; 102: 453–461.
AfzalMAFKesarwaniPReddyKM, et al.Functionally graded hydroxyapatite-alumina-zirconia biocomposite: synergy of toughness and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C2012; 32: 1164–1173.
135.
GuoHKhorKABoeyYC, et al.Laminated and functionally graded hydroxyapatite/yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia composites fabricated by spark plasma sintering. Biomaterials2003; 24: 667–675.
136.
HanCLiYWangQ, et al.Titanium/hydroxyapatite (Ti/HA) gradient materials with quasi-continuous ratios fabricated by SLM: material interface and fracture toughness. Mater Des2018; 141: 256–266.
137.
WatariFYokoyamaASasoF, et al.Fabrication and properties of functionally graded dental implant. Composites Part B: Eng1997; 28: 5–11.
138.
SazeshSGhassemiAEbrahimiR, et al.Experimental and numerical analysis of titanium/HA FGM for dental implantation. Int J Adv Des Manufacturing Technol2017; 10: 57–74.
139.
SedighiMOmidiNJabbariA. Experimental investigation of FGM dental implant properties made from Ti/HA composite. Mech Adv Compos Structures2017; 4: 233–237.
140.
KondoHYokoyamaAOmoriM, et al.Fabrication of titanium nitride/apatite functionally graded implants by spark plasma sintering. Mater Trans2004; 45: 3156–3162.
141.
TamuraYYokoyamaAWatariF, et al.Mechanical properties of surface nitrided titanium for abrasion resistant implant materials. Mater Trans2002; 43: 3043–3051.
142.
WatariFYokoyamaAMatsunoH, et al.Biocompatibility of titanium/hydroxyapatite and titanium/cobalt functionally graded implants. Mater Sci Forum1999; 308–311: 356–361.
143.
Peñarrieta-JuanitoGCruzMCostaM, et al.A novel gradated zirconia implant material embedding bioactive ceramics: osteoblast behavior and physicochemical assessment. Materialia (Oxf)2018; 1: 3–14.
144.
KladovasilakisNTsongasKTzetzisD. Finite element analysis of orthopedic hip implant with functionally graded bioinspired lattice structures. Biomimetics2020; 5: 44.
145.
KhosraviABahreinizadHBaniMS, et al.A numerical study on the application of the functionally graded materials in the stent design. Mater Sci Eng C2017; 73: 182–188.
146.
MehraliMShiraziFSMehraliM, et al.Dental implants from functionally graded materials. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A2013; 101: 3046–3057.
147.
OshkourAAOsmanNAAYauYH, et al.Design of new generation femoral prostheses using functionally graded materials: a finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H: J Eng Med2013; 227: 3–17.
148.
DubeyAJaiswalSHaldarS, et al.Functionally gradient magnesium-based composite for temporary orthopaedic implant with improved corrosion resistance and osteogenic properties. Biomed Mater (Bristol)2021; 16: 15017.
149.
ThiemeMWietersKPBergnerF, et al.Titanium powder sintering for preparation of a porous functionally graded material destined for orthopaedic implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med2001; 12: 225–231.
150.
HediaHSFoudaN. Design optimization of cementless hip prosthesis coating through functionally graded material. Comput Mater Sci2014; 87: 83–87.
151.
XiaoRFengXFanR, et al.3D printing of titanium-coated gradient composite lattices for lightweight mandibular prosthesis. Composites Part B: Eng2020; 193: 108057.
