An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) is a nonlinear nonholonomic dynamical system. Tracking control of AUVs in the presence of disturbances and uncertainties is a challenging problem. In this paper, an adaptive passivity-based algorithm is proposed for tracking control of an AUV. Also, a disturbance estimator has been used to attenuate the effects of unknown disturbances. A proper adaptive rule is designed to estimate unknown parameters and disturbances. The stability of the proposed method is analyzed using passivity properties and the Lyapunov theory. Obtained comparative results show the advantages of the proposed Adaptive Computed Torque Method ACTM plus disturbance estimator.
FarrellJAPangSLiW, et al. Biologically inspired chemical plume tracing on an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (IEEE Cat No 04CH37583), The Hague, Netherlands, 10–13 October 2004. IEEE, 2004, pp. 5991–5996.
WadooSKachrooP. Autonomous underwater vehicles: modeling, control design and simulation. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, 2017.
4.
ChenY. Modular modeling and control for autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). In: Masters Thesis, National University of Singapore: Singapore, 2007.
5.
SoyluSBuckhamBJPodhorodeskiRP. A chattering-free sliding-mode controller for underwater vehicles with fault-tolerant infinity-norm thrust allocation. Ocean Eng2008; 35: 1647–1659.
6.
AshrafiuonHMuskeKRMcNinchLC, et al.Sliding-mode tracking control of surface vessels. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2008; 55: 4004–4012.
7.
WangLZhangL-jJiaH-m, et al. Horizontal tracking control for AUV based on nonlinear sliding mode. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on information and automation, Shenyang, China, 6–8 June 2012. IEEE, 2012, pp. 460–463.
8.
MoosavianSAAKeymasi KhalajiATabataba'i-NasabFS. Tracking control of an underwater robot in the presence of obstacles. In: 2017 5th RSI international conference on robotics and mechatronics (ICRoM), Tehran, Iran, 25–27 October 2017. IEEE, 2017, pp. 298–303.
9.
JoeHKimMYuS-c. Second-order sliding-mode controller for autonomous underwater vehicle in the presence of unknown disturbances. Nonlinear Dynam2014; 78: 183–196.
10.
QiX. Adaptive coordinated tracking control of multiple autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng2014; 91: 84–90.
11.
MohanSKimJ. Indirect adaptive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle-manipulator system for underwater manipulation tasks. Ocean Eng2012; 54: 233–243.
12.
SahuBKSubudhiB. Adaptive tracking control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Int J Autom Comput2014; 11: 299–307.
13.
McGannCPyFRajanK, et al.Adaptive control for autonomous underwater vehicles. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2008, Chicago, Illinois, USA, July 13–17, 2008: 1319–1324.
14.
ChenYZhangRZhaoX, et al.Adaptive fuzzy inverse trajectory tracking control of underactuated underwater vehicle with uncertainties. Ocean Eng2016; 121: 123–133.
15.
SebastiánESoteloMA. Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller for the kinematic variables of an underwater vehicle. J Intell Rob Syst2007; 49: 189–215.
16.
Tabataba’i-NasabFSKeymasi KhalajiAMoosavianSAA. Adaptive nonlinear control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Trans Inst Meas Control2019; 41: 3121–3131.
17.
JunSWLeeHJ. Design of TS fuzzy-model-based controller for depth control of autonomous underwater vehicles with parametric uncertainties. In: 2011 11th international conference on control, automation and systems, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (South), 26–29 October 2011. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1682–1684.
18.
KhaledNChalhoubNG. A self-tuning guidance and control system for marine surface vessels. Nonlinear Dynam2013; 73: 897–906.
19.
LiangXWanLBlakeJI, et al.Path following of an underactuated AUV based on fuzzy backstepping sliding mode control. Int J Adv Rob Syst2016; 13: 122.
20.
XuBPandianSRSakagamiN, et al.Neuro-fuzzy control of underwater vehicle-manipulator systems. J Franklin Inst2012; 349: 1125–1138.
21.
WangHWangDPengZ,. Adaptive dynamic surface control for cooperative path following of marine surface vehicles with input saturation. 2014.
22.
DelavariHHeydarinejadH. Adaptive fractional order Backstepping sliding mode controller design for a magnetic levitation system. Modares Mech Eng2017; 17: 187–195.
23.
NikouYRezaieBRahmaniZ. Designing an intelligent finite-time terminal sliding mode controller with application to atomic force microscope. Modares Mech Eng2016; 16: 269–279.
24.
Keymasi KhalajiAZahedifarR. Lyapunov-based formation control of underwater robots. Robotica; 1–18: 1105–1122.
25.
Tabataba’i-NasabFSKeymasi KhalajiA. Potentially directed robust control of an underwater robot in the presence of obstacles. Modares Mech Eng2018; 18: 1–8.
26.
Keymasi KhalajiATourajizadehH. Nonlinear Lyapounov based control of an underwater vehicle in presence of uncertainties and obstacles. Ocean Eng2020; 198: 106998.
27.
TongSSunKSuiS. Observer-based adaptive fuzzy decentralized optimal control design for strict-feedback nonlinear large-scale systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2018; 26: 569–584.
28.
JiaZQiaoLZhangW. Adaptive tracking control of unmanned underwater vehicles with compensation for external perturbations and uncertainties using Port-Hamiltonian theory. Ocean Eng2020; 209: 107402.
29.
OrtegaRPerezJALNicklassonPJ, et al. Passivity-based control of Euler-Lagrange systems: mechanical, electrical and electromechanical applications. London: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
30.
SpongMWHutchinsonSVidyasagarM. Robot modeling and control. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
31.
ColgateJESchenkelGG. Passivity of a class of sampled‐data systems: application to haptic interfaces. J Rob Syst1997; 14: 37–47.
32.
LeeDSpongMW. Passive bilateral teleoperation with constant time delay. IEEE Trans Robot2006; 22: 269–281.
33.
SpongMWHolmJKLeeD. Passivity-based control of bipedal locomotion. IEEE Robot Autom Mag2007; 14: 30–40.
34.
ArcakM. Passivity as a design tool for group coordination. IEEE Trans Automat Control2007; 52: 1380–1390.
35.
OrtegaRSpongMW. Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: a tutorial. Automatica1989; 25: 877–888.
36.
OrtegaRVan Der SchaftAJMareelsI, et al.Putting energy back in control. IEEE Control Syst Mag2001; 21: 18–33.
37.
OrtegaR. Stability analysis of adaptive systems: an approach based on controller structure optimality. Optim Control Appl Methods1988; 9: 87–91.
ByrnesCIIsidoriAWillemsJC. Passivity, feedback equivalence, and the global stabilization of minimum phase nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control1991; 36: 1228–1240.
40.
YoulaDCastriotaLCarlinH. Bounded real scattering matrices and the foundations of linear passive network theory. IEEE Trans Circ Theor1959; 6: 102–124.
41.
OrtegaR. Applications of input–output techniques to control problems. Grenoble, France: European Control Conference, 1991, pp. 1307–1313.
42.
MoylanPAndersonB. Nonlinear regulator theory and an inverse optimal control problem. IEEE Trans Automat Control1973; 18: 460–465.
43.
OrtegaRRodriguezAEspinosaG. Adaptive stabilization of non-linearizable systems under a matching assumption. In: 1990 American control conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–25 May 1990. IEEE, 1990, pp. 67–72.
44.
RodriguezAOrtegaR. Adaptive stabilization of nonlinear systems: the non-feedback linearizable case. IFAC Proc Vol1990; 23: 303–306.
