Aiming to realize levitation for a novel permanent magnetic levitation system, this paper proposes a double control strategy. The coupled dynamic model with two subsystems was established at first. According to the analysis of stable levitation, four joint control strategies of air gap length and rotation angle were designed. Then, the controller parameters tuning was implemented utilizing the improved PSO (particle swarm optimization) algorithm with non-linear inertia weight. At last, step response simulations and experiments were carried out to compare the performance of the proposed four control strategies. Results demonstrate the validity of PSO using for tuning proportional-integral-derivative (PID) parameters. In addition, the parallel double PD controller and cascade double PD controller both have better dynamic performance but more significant steady-state error. When using PID control for the air gap, the error could be eliminated. Compared with the parallel PID-PD control strategy, the cascade control is competitive in terms of 0.03 s rising time, 4.3 s settling time, and 24% peak overshoot.
WangZLongZLiX. Levitation control of permanent magnet electromagnetic hybrid suspension maglev train. Proc IMechE, J Syst Control Eng2018; 232(3): 315–323.
2.
SunYXuJQiangH, et al.Adaptive Neural-Fuzzy robust position control scheme for maglev train systems with experimental verification. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2019; 66(11): 8589–8599.
3.
XiaoLHouTLiM, et al.Dynamic performances of a magnetic thrust bearing based on new soft magnetic composites. Proc IMechE, C: J Mech Eng Sci2019; 233(10): 3388–3399.
4.
RasmussenPOAndersenTOJorgensenT, et al.development of a high-performance magnetic gear. IEEE Trans Ind App2005; 41(3): 764–770.
5.
ZhouHDengHDuanJ. Hybrid fuzzy decoupling control for a precision maglev motion system. Ieee-asme Trans Mech2018; 23(1): 389–401.
6.
OuTHuCZhuY, et al.Intelligent feedforward compensation motion control of maglev planar motor with precise reference modification prediction. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2021; 68(9): 7768–7777.
7.
Bojan-DragosCAPreitlSPrecupRE, et al.State feedback and proportional-integral-derivative control of a magnetic levitation system. In: IEEE 14th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Subotica, Serbia, 29–31 August 2016, pp: 111–116. New York: IEEE.
8.
ZhaoCOkaKSunF, et al.Design of zero-power control strategy with resisting tilt of hybrid magnetic levitation system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. Epub ahead of print 28 October 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3121670.
9.
JaeyoungKKingGBChang-HyunK, et al.Modeling and designing levitation, roll and pitch controller for high accuracy maglev tray system. Mechatronics2018; 53:181–191.
10.
YangDGaoXCuiE, et al.State-constraints adaptive backstepping control for active magnetic bearings with parameters nonstationarities and uncertainties. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2021: 68(10):9822–9831.
11.
RubioJLughoferEPieperJ, et al.Adapting H-infinity controller for the desired reference tracking of the sphere position in the maglev process, Inf Sci2021; 569: 669–686,
12.
KangBJHungLSKuoSK, et al.H∞ 2DOF control for the motion of a magnetic suspension positioning stage driven by inverter-fed linear motor. Mechatronics2003; 13(7): 677–696.
13.
RenG PChenZZhangH T, et al.design of interval type-2 fuzzy controllers for active magnetic bearing systems. Ieee-asme Trans Mech2020; 25(5): 2449–2459.
14.
ChenSLinF. Robust Nonsingular terminal sliding-mode control for nonlinear magnetic bearing system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2011; 19(3): 636–643.
15.
ZhangJMeiXZhangD, et al.Application of decoupling fuzzy sliding mode control with active disturbance rejection for MIMO magnetic levitation system. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2013; 227(2): 213–229.
16.
ZhaoCSunFJinJ, et al.analysis of quasi-zero power characteristic for a permanent magnetic levitation system with a variable flux path control mechanism. Ieee-asme Trans Mech2021; 26(1): 437–447.
17.
MengZLiGWangX, et al.A comparative study of metaheuristic algorithms for reliability-based design optimization problems. Arch Computat Methods Eng2020; 28: 1853–1869.
18.
GuptaSAbderazekHYldzBS, et al.Comparison of metaheuristic optimization algorithms for solving constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl2021; 183: 115351.
19.
YildizARAbderazekHMirjaliliS. A comparative study of recent non-traditional methods for mechanical design optimization. Arch Computat Methods Eng2020; 27: 1031–1048.
20.
PanagantNPholdeeNBureeratS, et al.A comparative study of recent multi-objective metaheuristics for solving constrained truss optimisation problems. Arch Computat Methods Eng2021; 28: 4031–4047.
21.
YildizARBureeratSKurtuluE, et al.A novel hybrid Harris hawks-simulated annealing algorithm and RBF-based metamodel for design optimization of highway guardrails. Mater Test2020; 62(3): 1–15.
22.
AbderazekHSaitSMYildizAR. Optimal design of planetary gear train for automotive transmissions using advanced meta-heuristics. Int J Vehicle Des2019, 80(2/3/4): 121–136.
23.
ChampaskPPanagantNPholdeeN, et al.Self-adaptive many-objective meta-heuristic based on decomposition for many-objective conceptual design of a fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle. Aerosp Sci Technol2020; 100: 105783.
24.
AyeCMPholdeeNBureeratS, et al.Multi- surrogate-assisted metaheuristics for crashworthiness optimisation. Int J Vehicle Des2019; 80(2/3/4): 223–240.
25.
YildizAR. A new hybrid differential evolution algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Appl Soft Comput2013; 13(3):1561–1566.
26.
KennedyJEberhartR. Particle swarm optimization. Proc Int Conf Neural Networks1995; 4:1942–1948.
27.
ZhangSYuanXDochertyPD, et al.An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application in solving forward kinematics of a 3-DoF parallel manipulator. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2021; 235(5): 896–907.
28.
ZhangQShenXZhaoJ, et al.Hysteresis modeling of piezoelectric actuator using particle swarm optimization-based neural network. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2020; 234(23): 4695–4707.
29.
ZhangNShiY. Improvement of cutting force and material removal rate for disc milling TC17 blisk tunnels using GRA–RBF–PSO method. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2019; 233(16): 5556–5567.
30.
ZanTLiuZWangH, et al.Prediction of performance deterioration of rolling bearing based on JADE and PSO-SVM. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2021; 235(9): 1684–1697.
31.
YeKLiP. A new adaptive PSO-PID control strategy of hybrid energy storage system for electric vehicles. Adv Mech Eng2020; 12(9): 1–15.
32.
WaiJLeeJDChuangKL, Real-time PID control strategy for maglev transportation system via particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2011; 58(2): 629–646.
ZhangYLiuXBaoF, et al.Particle swarm optimization with adaptive learning strategy. Knowl-Based Syst2020; 196(3): 105789.
35.
YildizARSolankiKN. Multi-objective optimization of vehicle crashworthiness using a new particle swarm based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2012; 59: 367–376.
36.
OrlandoCRicciardelloA. Analytic solution of the continuous particle swarm optimization problem. Optim Lett2021; 15: 2005–2015.
