Optimization and experimental study on structural parameters of bio-inspired tarsus compliant end-effector to reduce the risk of fruit sliding out from end-effector for cherry tomato harvesting

Abstract

High success rate of fruit picking is part of key technologies for robotic cherry tomato harvesting, which is closely related to the structure of end-effector. In order to prevent the fruit slipping from the end-effector for a high success rate of fruit picking during picking process, this paper presents a compliant end-effector with bio-inspired tarsus compliant gripper inspired by the structure and mechanics of the tarsal chain in the Serica orientalis Motschulsky. An experimental study to confirm the effect of the key structural parameters of the compliant end-effector on the angle (ESGA) formed by the extended segment tarsomere of two bio-inspired tarsus compliant grippers. Experiments were designed according to response surface methodology—box Behnken design by maintaining three levels of four process parameters—length of the offset segment tarsomere (OSL), angle of the inclined segment tarsomere (ISA), thickness of the extended segment tarsomere (EST), and length of the extended segment tarsomere (ESL). Results showed that ISA is the most important parameter, and ESL has little effect on ESGA, and ESGA was found within the range of 4.2°–17.5°. Results also revealed that the desired ESGA (12°) was obtained by the optimum conditions of OSL of 2.4 mm, ISA of 18°, EST of 4.9 mm, and ESL of 18 mm. Besides, the key structural parameters of the bio-inspired tarsus compliant end-effector are optimized by the expectation function. The reliability and feasibility of the constructed model are verified by validation experiments.

Keywords

Biologically-inspired end-effector response surface compliant mechanisms configuration optimization cherry tomato robotic harvesting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Graham

Zong

Feng

, et al. Design and testing of a kiwifruit harvester end-effector. Trans ASABE 2018; 61: 45–51.

Diener

Mohsenin

Jenks

. Vibration characteristics of trellis-trained apple trees with reference to fruit detachment. Trans ASAE 1965; 8: 20–24.

Liu

Yun

Muhammad

. Experimental and theoretical analysis of fruit plucking patterns for robotic tomato harvesting. Comput Electron Agric 2020; 173: 1–11.

Bloch

Degani

Bechar

. A methodology of orchard architecture design for an optimal harvesting robot. Biosyst Eng 2018; 166: 126–137.

Xie

Kong

Shan

, et al. Study the parametric effect of pulling pattern on cherry tomato harvesting using RSM-BBD techniques. Agric 2021; 11: 1–13.

Wang

Yang

, et al. End-effector with a bite mode for harvesting citrus fruit in random stalk orientation environment. Comput Elect Agric 2019; 157: 454–470.

Lin

. Design and force control of underactuated manipulator of fruit and vegetable picking. J Mech Eng 2014; 50: 1–7.

Zang

Liao

Lang

, et al. Bionic torus as a self-adaptive soft grasper in robots. Appl Phys Lett 2020; 116: 23701.

Luo

Wang

, et al. Development of active soft robotic manipulators for stable grasping under slippery conditions. IEEE Access 2019; 99: 604–613.

10.

Chiu

Yang

Chen

. Development of the end-effector of a picking robot for greenhouse-grown tomatoes. Appl Eng Agric 2019; 155: 102–110.

11.

Chen

Yang

et al. Passive particle jamming and its stiffening of soft robotic grippers. IEEE Trans Robotics 2017; 33: 446–455.

12.

Russo

Ceccarelli

Corves

, et al. Design and test of a gripper prototype for horticulture products. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2017; 44: 266–275.

13.

Liu

Zhang

. Design and control of a novel compliant constant-force gripper based on buckled fixed-guided beams. Ieee/asme Trans Mech 2016; 22: 476–486.

14.

Miao

Zheng

. Optimization design of compliant constant-force mechanism for apple picking actuator. Comput Elect Agric 2020; 170: 105232.

15.

Zhang

Yuan

, et al. A compliant adaptive gripper and its intrinsic force sensing method. IEEE Trans Robot 2021; 99: 1–20.

16.

Bac

Hemming

Van Tuijl

BAJ

, et al. Performance evaluation of a harvesting robot for sweet pepper. J Field Robotics 2017; 34: 1123–1139.

17.

Kumar

. Multi-response optimization of process parameters based on response surface methodology for pure titanium using wedm process. Int J Adv Manufacturing Tech 2013; 68: 2645–2668.

18.

Nikkhah

Baroutaji

Olabi

. Crashworthiness design and optimisation of windowed tubes under axial impact loading. Thin-Walled Structures 2019; 142: 132–148.

19.

Chen

, et al. Experimental and simulation analysis of optimum picking patterns for robotic apple harvesting. Sci Hortic 2019; 261: 108937.

20.

Gilman

. Branch-to-stem diameter ratio affects strength of attachment. J Arboric 2003; 29: 291–294.

21.

Tong

Zhang

Karkee

, et al. Understanding the dynamics of hand picking patterns of fresh market apples. In: Proceedings of the ASABE and CSBE/SCGAB Annual International Meeting. Montreal, QC, 13–16 July 2014.

22.

Liu

Sun

, et al. A wheeled wall-climbing robot with bio-inspired spine mechanisms. J Bionic Eng 2015; 12: 17–28.

23.

Liu

Wang

, et al. A novel tracked wall-climbing robot with bio-inspired spine feet. Intell Robotics Appl 2019; 12: 84–96.

24.

Frantsevich

Gorb

. Structure and mechanics of the tarsal chain in the hornet, Vespa crabro (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): implications on the attachment mechanism. Arthropod Struct Dev 2004; 33: 77–89.

25.

Singh

Pardeshi

Kumar

, et al. Optimisation of machine parameters of a pedal-operated paddy thresher using RSM. Biosyst Eng 2008; 100: 591–600.

26.

Stagnari

Galieni

Pisante

. Shading and nitrogen management affect quality, safety and yield of greenhouse-grown leaf lettuce. Scientia Horticulturae 2015; 192: 70–79.

27.

Zhao

Sugirbay

Chen

, et al. FEM explicit dynamics simulation and NIR hyperspectral reflectance imaging for determination of impact bruises of Lycium barbarum L. Postharvest Biol Tech 2019; 155: 102–110.

28.

Feng

Zou

, et al. Design and test of robotic harvesting system for cherry tomato. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2018; 11: 96–100.

29.

Liu

. Relationship between mechanical property and damage of tomato during robot harvesting. Trans CSAE 2010; 26: 112–116.

30.

Kondo

Yata

Iida

, et al. Development of an end-effector for a tomato cluster harvesting robot. Eng Agric Environ Food 2010; 3: 20–24.

31.

Eizicovits

van Tuijl

Berman

, et al. Integration of perception capabilities in gripper design using graspability maps. Biosyst Eng 2016; 146: 98–113.

32.

Liu

, et al. Study on the collision-mechanical properties of tomatoes gripped by harvesting robot fingers. Afr J Biotechnol 2009; 8: 7000–7007.

33.

Liu

. Analysis and experiment on laser cutting of fruit peduncles. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 2014; 45: 59–64.

34.

Arad

Balendonck

Barth

, et al.. Development of a sweet pepper harvesting robot. J Field Robotics 2020; 37: 1027–1039.

35.

Yin

Chen

Kun

, et al. Design and experiment of grape-picking device with grasping and rotary-cut type of underactuated double fingered hand. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 2017; 48: 12–20.