To identify rolling bearing faults under variable load conditions, a method named DISA-KNN is proposed in this paper, which is based on the strategy of feature extraction-domain adaptation-classification. To be specific, the time-domain and frequency-domain indicators are used for feature extraction. Discriminative and domain invariant subspace alignment (DISA) is used to minimize the data distributions’ discrepancies between the training data (source domain) and testing data (target domain). K-nearest neighbor (KNN) is applied to identify rolling bearing faults. DISA-KNN’s validation is proved by the experimental signal collected under different load conditions. The identification accuracies obtained by the DISA-KNN method are more than 90% on four datasets, including one dataset with 99.5% accuracy. The strength of the proposed method is further highlighted by comparisons with the other 8 methods. These results reveal that the proposed method is promising for the rolling bearing fault diagnosis in real rotating machinery.
YuJXuYYuG, et al. Fault severity identification of roller bearings using flow graph and non-naive bayesian inference. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233: 5161–5171.
2.
WangGDuMHuangL, et al. Prediction of bearing damage in wind turbines based on the quadratic root mean square of sub-band manifold. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 232: 3213–3223.
3.
FuentesRDwyer-JoyceRSMarshallMB, et al. Detection of Sub-surface damage in wind turbine bearings using acoustic emissions and probabilistic modelling. Renew Energy2020; 147: 776–797.
4.
ZhouLDuanFCorsarM, et al. A study on helicopter main gearbox planetary bearing fault diagnosis. Appl Acoust2019; 147: 4–14.
5.
XuGHouDQiH, et al. High-speed train wheel set bearing fault diagnosis and prognostics: a new prognostic model based on extendable useful life. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 146: 1–23.
6.
WangHLiuZPengD, et al. Understanding and learning discriminant features based on multiattention 1DCNN for wheelset bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Inf2020; 16: 5735–5745.
7.
SmithWARandallRB.Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the case Western reserve university data: a benchmark study. Mech Syst Signal Process2015; 64–65: 100–131.
8.
ZhangJZhongMZhangJ.Detection for weak fault in planetary gear trains based on an improved maximum correlation kurtosis deconvolution. Meas Sci Technol2020; 31: 1–8.
9.
WangZYaoLCaiY.Rolling bearing fault diagnosis using generalized refined composite multiscale sample entropy and optimized support vector machine. Measurement2020; 156: 107574.
10.
LiYXuMWeiY, et al. A new rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on multiscale permutation entropy and improved support vector machine based binary tree. Measurement2016; 77: 80–94.
11.
MuruganathamBSanjithMAKrishnakumarB, et al. Roller element bearing fault diagnosis using singular spectrum analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process2013; 35: 150–166.
12.
DuWGuoXWangZ, et al. A new fuzzy logic classifier based on multiscale permutation entropy and its application in bearing fault diagnosis. Entropy2019; 22: 27.
13.
TianJMorilloCAzarianMH, et al. Motor bearing fault detection using spectral kurtosis-based feature extraction coupled with K-nearest neighbor distance analysis. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2016; 63: 1793–1803.
14.
LeiYYangBJiangX, et al. Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: a review and roadmap. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 138: 1–39.
15.
ZhengHWangRYangY, et al. Intelligent fault identification based on multisource domain generalization towards actual diagnosis scenario. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2020; 67: 1293–1303.
16.
WangSXiangJZhongY, et al. A data indicator-based deep belief networks to detect multiple faults in axial piston pumps – ScienceDirect. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 112: 154–170.
17.
ZhaoXJiaM.Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on feature reduction with global-local margin fisher analysis. Neurocomputing2018; 315: 447–464.
18.
ZhangBLiWLiXL, et al. Intelligent fault diagnosis under varying working conditions based on domain adaptive convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access2018; 6: 66367–66384.
19.
TianYMaJLuC, et al. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis under variable conditions using LMD-SVD and extreme learning machine. Mech Mach Theory2015; 90: 175–186.
20.
HamadacheMLeeDVeluvoluKC.Rotor speed-based bearing fault diagnosis (RSB-BFD) under variable speed and constant load. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62: 6486–6495.
21.
ZhangJZhangJZhongM, et al. A GOA-MSVM based strategy to achieve high fault identification accuracy for rotating machinery under different load conditions. Measurement2020; 163: 108067.
22.
AzamfarMLiXLeeJ.Intelligent ball screw fault diagnosis using a deep domain adaptation methodology. Mech Mach Theory2020; 151: 1–18.
23.
LiXZhangWXuNX, et al. Deep learning-based machinery fault diagnostics with domain adaptation across sensors at different places. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2020; 67: 6785–6794.
24.
WeissKKhoshgoftaarTMWangD.A survey of transfer learning. J Big Data2016; 3: 1–40.
25.
LuWLiangBChengY, et al. Deep model based domain adaptation for fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2017; 64: 2296–2305.
26.
HanTLiuCYangW, et al. Deep transfer network with joint distribution adaptation: a new intelligent fault diagnosis framework for industry application. ISA Trans2020; 97: 269–281.
27.
SunBFengJSaenkoK.Correlation alignment for unsupervised domain adaptation. In: CsurkaG (ed.) Domain adaptation in computer vision applications. Springer: Cham, 2017, pp.153–171.
28.
GongBShiYShaF, et al. Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation. In: 2012 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Providence, USA, 16–21 June 2012, pp.2066–2073. IEEE.
29.
FernandoBHabrardASebbanM, et al. Unsupervised visual domain adaptation using subspace alignment. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on computer vision, Sydney, Australia, 18 December 2013, pp.2960–2967. IEEE.
30.
LongMWangJDingG, et al. Transfer feature learning with joint distribution adaptation. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on computer vision, Sydney, Australia, 18 December 2013, pp.2200–2207. IEEE.
31.
WangJChenYHaoS, et al. Balanced distribution adaptation for transfer learning. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on data mining, New Orleans, USA, 1821 November 2017, pp.1129–1134. IEEE.
32.
TahmoresnezhadJHashemiS.Visual domain adaptation via transfer feature learning. Knowl Inf Syst2017; 50: 585–605.
33.
LiuJLiJLuK.Coupled local-global adaptation for multi-source transfer learning. Neurocomputing2018; 275: 247–254.
34.
YanRShenFSunC, et al. Knowledge transfer for rotary machine fault diagnosis. IEEE Sensors J2020; 20: 8374–8393.
35.
ZhangZChenHLiS, et al. A novel geodesic flow kernel based domain adaptation approach for intelligent fault diagnosis under varying working condition. Neurocomputing2020; 376: 54–64.
36.
RezaeiSTahmoresnezhadJ.Discriminative and domain invariant subspace alignment for visual tasks. Iran J Comput Sci2019; 2: 219–230.
37.
QiuHLeeJLinJ, et al. Wavelet filter-based weak signature detection method and its application on rolling element bearing prognostics. J Sound Vib2006; 289: 1066–1090.
38.
Ben AliJFnaiechNSaidiL, et al. Application of empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural network for automatic bearing fault diagnosis based on vibration signals. Appl Acoust2015; 89: 16–27.
39.
SaremiSMirjaliliSLewisA.Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application. Adv Eng Softw2017; 105: 30–47.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
