Flow and heat transfer of water-based nanofluid over a stretchable rotating disk under the influence of an alternating magnetic field is investigated. The external magnetic field creates a hindrance in the flow and depends on the frequency of the alternating magnetic field. The frequency of an alternating magnetic field can increase or decrease the viscosity of the magnetic fluid in the flow. A set of nonlinear differential equations in the present theoretical model is solved numerically using the finite element method. Volume concentration, frequency of the alternating magnetic field, magnetic polarization force, and Prandtl number play an important role in the velocity and temperature distributions of iron/water nanofluid. A comparative study for velocity and heat transfer is presented for iron/water, nickel/water, and cobalt/water ferromagnetic nanofluid. The rotational viscosity enhances the heat transfer in nanofluid provided the magnetic field should be stationary.
SarafrazMMSafaeiMR.Diurnal thermal evaluation of an evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) charged with graphene nanoplatelets-methanol nano-suspension. Renew Energy2019;
142: 364–372.
2.
RosensweigREKaiserRMiskolczyG.Viscosity of magnetic fluid in a magnetic field. J. Colloid Interface Sci1969;
29: 680–686.
3.
Odenbach S and Thurm S. Magnetoviscous effects in ferrofluids. Ferrofluids. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2002, pp.185-201.
4.
RosensweigRE.Ferrohydrodynamics.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press1985.
ShliomisMIMorozovKI.Negative viscosity of ferrofluid under alternating magnetic field. Phys. Fluids1994;
6: 2855–2861.
7.
BacriJCPerzynskiRShliomisMI, et al.
Negative-viscosity effect in a magnetic fluid. Phys Rev Lett1995;
75: 2128–2131.
8.
RamPBhandariA.Effect of phase difference between highly oscillating magnetic field and magnetization on the unsteady ferrofluid flow due to a rotating disk. Results Phys2013;
3: 55–60.
9.
RamPBhandariA.Negative viscosity effects on ferrofluid flow due to a rotating disk. JAE2013;
41: 467–478.
10.
PatelRUpadhyayRVMehtaRV.Viscosity measurements of a ferrofluid: comparison with various hydrodynamic equations. J Colloid Interface Sci2003;
263: 661–664.
11.
BacriJ-CDumasJGorseD, et al.
Ferrofluid viscometer. J Phyique Lett1985;
46: 1199–1205.
12.
TóthováJKováčJKopčanskýP, et al.
Viscosity dependence of a magnetic fluid nanoparticles concentration. Acta Phys Pol A2014;
126: 278–279.
13.
PourmehranOSarafrazMMRahimi-GorjiM, et al.
Rheological behaviour of various metal-based nano-fluids between rotating discs: a new insight. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng2018;
88: 37–48.
14.
BhandariAKumarV.Effect of magnetization force on ferrofluid flow due to a rotating disk in the presence of an external magnetic field. Eur Phys J Plus2015;
130: 1–12.
15.
ShahZAlzahraniEODawarA, et al.
Influence of Cattaneo-Christov model on Darcy-Forchheimer flow of micropolar ferrofluid over a stretching/shrinking sheet. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2020;
110: 104385.
16.
GhorbaniBEbrahimiSVijayaraghavanK.CFD modeling and sensitivity analysis of heat transfer enhancement of a ferrofluid flow in the presence of a magnetic field. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf2018;
127: 544–552.
17.
BezaatpourMGoharkhahM.Effect of magnetic field on the hydrodynamic and heat transfer of magnetite ferrofluid flow in a porous fin heat sink. J Magn Magn Mater2019;
476: 506–515.
18.
ShahsavarAAnsarianRBahiraeiM.Effect of line dipole magnetic field on entropy generation of Mn-Zn ferrite ferrofluid flowing through a minichannel using two-phase mixture model. Powder Technol2018;
340: 370–379.
19.
NadeemSUllahNKhanAU, et al.
Effect of homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions on ferrofluid in the presence of magnetic dipole along a stretching cylinder. Results Phys2017;
7: 3574–3582.
20.
AnderssonHIValnesOA.Flow of a heated ferrofluid over a stretching sheet in the presence of a magnetic dipole. Acta Mech1998;
128: 39–47.
21.
IqbalZMarajENMehmoodZ, et al.
Effectiveness of magnetic dipole and framing the performance of Fe 3O 4 in rotating transport influenced by viscous dissipation. Arab J Sci Eng2019;
44: 993–1000.
22.
BhandariA.Study of magnetoviscous effects on ferrofluid flow. Eur Phys J Plus2020;
135: 1–14.
23.
AhmedJKhanMAhmadL.Radiative heat flux effect in flow of maxwell nanofluid over a spiraling disk with chemically reaction. Phys A Stat Mech Appl2020;
551: 123948.
24.
KhanMAhmedJRasheedZ.Entropy generation analysis for axisymmetric flow of Carreau nanofluid over a radially stretching disk. Appl Nanosci. Epub ahead of print 8 May 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s13204-020-01399-7.
25.
KhanMAhmedJSultanaF, et al.
Non-axisymmetric homann MHD stagnation point flow of Al2O3-Cu/water hybrid nanofluid with shape factor impact. Appl Math Mech2020; 41: 1125–1138.
26.
HafeezAKhanMAhmedA, et al.
Rotational flow of Oldroyd-B nanofluid subject to Cattaneo-Christov double diffusion theory. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed2020;
41: 1083–1094.
27.
KhanMAliWAhmedJ. A hybrid approach to study the influence of hall current in radiative nanofluid flow over a rotating disk. Appl. Nanosci. Epub ahead of print 18 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-020-01415-w
28.
SarafrazMMAryaANikkhahV, et al.
Thermal performance and viscosity of biologically produced silver/coconut oil nanofluids. Chem Biochem Eng Q2017;
30: 489–500.
29.
BhandariAPavanRKPannalaK.Optimization of heat transfer properties of nanofluid flow over a shrinking surface through mathematical modeling. Int J Appl Mech Eng2020;
25: 40–56.
30.
KhanMSarfrazMAhmedJ, et al.
Non-axisymmetric Homann stagnation-point flow of Walter’s B nanofluid over a cylindrical disk. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed2020;
41: 725–740.
31.
BhandariAHusainA.Optimization of heat transfer properties on ferrofluid flow over a stretching sheet in the presence of static magnetic field. J Therm Anal Calorim. Epub ahead of print 9 April 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09636-5
32.
AhmedJKhanMAhmadL.MHD von Kármán swirling flow in the Maxwell nanofluid with nonlinear radiative heat flux and chemical reaction. Heat Trans Res2020;
51: 377–394.
33.
IqbalKAhmedJKhanM, et al.
Magnetohydrodynamic thin film deposition of Carreau nanofluid over an unsteady stretching surface. Appl Phys A2020;
126: 105.
34.
SarafrazMMPourmehranOYangB, et al.
Pool boiling heat transfer characteristics of iron oxide nano-suspension under constant magnetic field. Int J Therm Sci2020;
147: 106131.
35.
SalariEPeyghambarzadehSMSarafrazMM, et al.
Thermal behavior of aqueous iron oxide nano-fluid as a coolant on a flat disc heater under the Pool boiling condition. Heat Mass Transfer2017;
53: 265–275.
36.
SarafrazMMHormoziFKamalgharibiM.Sedimentation and convective boiling heat transfer of CuO-water/ethylene glycol nanofluids. Heat Mass Transfer2014;
50: 1237–1249.
37.
SarafrazMMArjomandiM.Thermal performance analysis of a microchannel heat sink cooling with copper oxide-indium (CuO/in) nano-suspensions at high-temperatures. Appl Therm Eng2018;
137: 700–709.
38.
SarafrazMMAryaHSaeediM, et al.
Flow boiling heat transfer to MgO-therminol 66 heat transfer fluid: experimental assessment and correlation development. Appl Therm Eng2018;
138: 552–562.
39.
SalariEPeyghambarzadehSMSarafrazMM, et al.
Boiling thermal performance of TiO2 aqueous nanofluids as a coolant on a disc copper block. Period Polytech Chem Eng2015;
60: 106–122.
40.
SarafrazMMHormoziF.Experimental investigation on the Pool boiling heat transfer to aqueous multi-walled carbon nanotube nanofluids on the micro-finned surfaces. Int J Therm Sci2016;
100: 255–266.
41.
AlsaberyAIIsmaelMAChamkhaAJ, et al.
Effect of nonhomogeneous nanofluid model on transient natural convection in a non-Darcy porous cavity containing an inner solid body. Int. Commun Heat Mass Transf2020;
110: 104442.
42.
TayebiTChamkhaAJ.Entropy generation analysis during MHD natural convection flow of hybrid nanofluid in a square cavity containing a corrugated conducting block. Hff2019;
30: 1115–1136.
43.
SelimefendigilFChamkhaAJ.MHD mixed convection of nanofluid in a three-dimensional vented cavity with surface corrugation and inner rotating cylinder. Hff2019;
30: 1637–1660.
44.
RasoolGZhangTChamkhaAJ, et al.
Entropy generation and consequences of binary chemical reaction on MHD Darcy-Forchheimer Williamson nanofluid flow over non-linearly stretching surface. Entropy2019;
22: 18.
45.
TurkyilmazogluM.Nanofluid flow and heat transfer due to a rotating disk. Comput. Fluids2014;
94: 139–146.
46.
CochranWG.The flow due to a rotating disc. Math Proc Camb Phil Soc1934;
30: 365–375.
47.
BentonER.On the flow due to a rotating disk. J Fluid Mech1966;
24: 781–800.
48.
AttiaHA.Unsteady MHD flow near a rotating porous disk with uniform suction or injection. Fluid Dyn Res1998;
23: 283–290.
49.
AttiaHA.On the effectivness of ion slip and uniform suction or injection on steady MHD flow due to rotating disk with heat transfer ohmic heating. Chem Eng Commun2007;
194: 1396–1407.
50.
TurkyilmazogluM.MHD fluid flow and heat transfer due to a shrinking rotating disk. Comput. Fluids2014;
90: 51–56.
51.
SibandaPMakindeOD.On steady MHD flow and heat transfer past a rotating disk in a porous medium with ohmic heating and viscous dissipation. Int Jnl of Num Meth Hff2010;
20: 269–285.
52.
RamPBhandariASharmaK.Effect of magnetic field-dependent viscosity on revolving ferrofluid. J Magn Magn. Mater2010;
322: 3476–3480.
53.
BhandariA.Study of ferrofluid flow in a rotating system through mathematical modeling. Math Comput. Simul2020;
178: 290–306.
54.
BhandariA.Effect of magnetic field dependent viscosity on the unsteady ferrofluid flow due to a rotating disk. Int J Appl Mech Eng2020;
25: 22–39.
55.
ChaturaniPNarasimmanS.Numerical solution of a micropolar fluid flow between two rotating coaxial disks. Acta Mech1991;
89: 133–145.
56.
AttiaHA.Rotating disk flow and heat transfer of a conducting non-Newtonian fluid with suction-injection and ohmic heating. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng2007;
29: 168–173.
57.
RehmanKUMalikMYZahriM, et al.
Numerical analysis of MHD Casson Navier’s slip nanofluid flow yield by rigid rotating disk. Results Phys2018;
8: 744–751.
58.
YinCZhengLZhangC, et al.
Flow and heat transfer of nanofluids over a rotating disk with uniform stretching rate in the radial direction. Propuls. Power Res2017;
6: 25–30.
59.
BlūMsETSEbersAOAndrei˘O, et al. Magnetic fluids. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1997.
