Choi SUS and Eastman J. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ASME Fluid Eng Div (Publication) FED 1995; 66: 99–105.
2.
ChoiSUSEastmanJA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, Lemont, IL: Argonne National Lab, 1995.
3.
AbbasSZKhanWAKadryS, et al.Entropy optimized Darcy-Forchheimer nanofluid (silicon dioxide, molybdenum disulfide) subject to temperature dependent viscosity. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 190: 105363–105363.
4.
AbbasSZKhanMIKadryS, et al.Fully developed entropy optimized second order velocity slip MHD nanofluid flow with activation energy. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 190: 105362–105362.
5.
TurkyilmazogluM. Single phase nanofluids in fluid mechanics and their hydrodynamic linear stability analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 187: 105171–105171.
6.
TurkyilmazogluM. Fully developed slip flow in a concentric annuli via single and dual phase nanofluids models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2019; 179: 104997–104997.
7.
HuminicGHuminiA. Entropy generation of nanofluid and hybrid nanofluid flow in thermal systems: a review. J Mol Liq2020; 302: 112533–112533.
8.
HayatTKhanMIQayyumS, et al.Entropy generation in flow with silver and copper nanoparticles. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspect2018; 539: 335–346.
9.
UddinMJKabirMNAlginahiY, et al.Numerical solution of bio-nano-convection transport from a horizontal plate with blowing and multiple slip effects. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 14: 6910–6927.
10.
TurkyilmazogluM. Buongiorno model in a nanofluid filled asymmetric channel fulfilling zero net particle flux at the walls. Int J Heat Mass Transf2018; 126: 974–979.
11.
HayatTKhanMIKhanTA, et al.Entropy generation in Darcy-Forchheimer bidirectional flow of water-based carbon nanotubes with convective boundary conditions. J Mol Liq2018; 265: 629–638.
12.
MahantheshBGireeshaBJThammannaGT, et al.Magnetohydrodynamic squeezing two-phase flow of particulate suspension in a rotating channel with transpiration cooling. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 27: 1224–1235.
13.
TurkyilmazogluM. Exact analytical solutions for heat and mass transfer of MHD slip flow in nanofluids. Chem Eng Sci2012; 84: 182–187.
14.
MotamediMNaghdiAJalaliS. Effect of temperature on properties of aluminum/single-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 30: 635–642.
15.
HayatTAhmadSKhanMI, et al.Modeling and analyzing flow of third grade nanofluid due to rotating stretchable disk with chemical reaction and heat source. Phys B Cond Matt2018; 537: 116–126.
16.
KármánTV. Über laminare und turbulente Reibung. J Appl Math Mech (ZAMM)1921; 1: 233–252.
17.
StewartsonK. On the flow between two rotating coaxial disks. Proc Cambridge Philos Soc1953; 49: 333–341.
18.
KhanMIHayatTShahF, et al.Physical aspects of CNTs and induced magnetic flux in stagnation point flow with quartic chemical reaction. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019; 135: 561–568.
19.
KhanMIShahFHayatT, et al.Transportation of CNTs based nanomaterial flow confined between two coaxially rotating disks with entropy generation. Phys A Stat Mech Appl2019; 527: 121154–121154.
20.
ImtiazMHayatTAlsaediA, et al.Convective flow of carbon nanotubes between rotating stretchable disks with thermal radiation effects. Int J Heat Mass Transf2016; 101: 948–957.
21.
HayatTQayyumSImtiazM, et al.Flow between two stretchable rotating disks with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model. Results Phys2017; 7: 126–133.
22.
DohD-HMuthtamilselvanMSwatheneB, et al.Homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions in a nanofluid flow due to a rotating disk of variable thickness using HAM. Math Comput Simul2020; 168: 90–110.
23.
KhanMIWaqasMHayatT, et al.A comparative study of Casson fluid with homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. J Colloid Interf Sci2017; 498: 85–90.
24.
XuH. Modelling unsteady mixed convection of a nanofluid suspended with multiple kinds of nanoparticles between two rotating disks by generalized hybrid model. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2019; 108: 104275–104275.
25.
MehmoodAUsmanMWeigandB. Heat and mass transfer phenomena due to a rotating non-isothermal wavy disk. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019; 129: 96–102.
26.
BejanA. A study of entropy generation in fundamental convective heat transfer. J Heat Transf1979; 101: 718–725.
27.
BejanA. Method of entropy generation minimization, or modeling and optimization based on combined heat transfer and thermodynamics. Rev Gén Therm1996; 35: 637–646.
28.
KhanMIAlsaediAHayatT, et al.Modeling and computational analysis of hybrid class nanomaterials subject to entropy generation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2019; 179: 331–345.
29.
MuhammadRKhanMIKhanNB, et al.Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) radiated nanomaterial viscous material flow by a curved surface with second order slip and entropy generation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 189: 105294–105294.
30.
GaneshNVMdallalQMAChamkhaAJ. A numerical investigation of Newtonian fluid flow with buoyancy, thermal slip of order two and entropy generation. Case Stud Therm Eng2019; 13: 100376–100376.
31.
MuhammadRKhanMIJameelM, et al.Fully developed Darcy-Forchheimer mixed convective flow over a curved surface with activation energy and entropy generation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 188: 105298–105298.
32.
LiuYJianYTanW. Entropy generation of electromagnetohydrodynamic (EMHD) flow in a curved rectangular microchannel. Int J Heat Mass Transf2018; 127: 901–913.
33.
GireeshaBJSowmyaGKhanMI, et al.Flow of hybrid nanofluid across a permeable longitudinal moving fin along with thermal radiation and natural convection. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 185: 105166–105166.
34.
RanjitNKShitGC. Entropy generation on electromagnetohydrodynamic flow through a porous asymmetric micro-channel. Eur J Mech B Fluids2019; 77: 135–147.
35.
WangJMuhammadRKhanMI, et al.Entropy optimized MHD nanomaterial flow subject to variable thicked surface. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 189: 105311–105311.
36.
MaskaniyanMNazariMRashidiS, et al.Natural convection and entropy generation analysis inside a channel with a porous plate mounted as a cooling system. Therm Sci Eng Prog2018; 6: 186–193.
37.
AbbasSZKhanWASunH, et al.Von Kármán swirling analysis for modeling Oldroyd-B nanofluid considering cubic autocatalysis. Phys Scr2019; 95: 015206–015206.
38.
AshaSKDeepaCK. Entropy generation for peristaltic blood flow of a magneto-micropolar fluid with thermal radiation in a tapered asymmetric channel. Results Eng2019; 3: 100024–100024.
39.
ZangooeeMRHosseinzadehKGanjiDD. Hydrothermal analysis of MHD nanofluid (TiO2-GO) flow between two radiative stretchable rotating disks using AGM. Case Stud Therm Eng2019; 14: 100460–100460.
40.
KhanMIQayyumSKadryS, et al.Irreversibility analysis and heat transport in squeezing nanoliquid flow of non-Newtonian (second-grade) fluid between infinite plates with activation energy. Arab J Sci Eng2020, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-020-04442-5. .
