Flow separation over a hydrofoil affects its hydrodynamic performance and ultimately reduces the power production of a turbine. Therefore, the different flow control methods have been proposed by the researchers to overcome these challenges. In this study, the combined effects of circular trailing edge with dimple have been investigated numerically on NACA S1210 hydrofoil to control the flow separation of the hydrofoil. The results showed that the coupled effects of the dimple and circular trailing edge modification appeared effective compared to baseline hydrofoil at a wide range of angles of attack. Maximum lift coefficient increments are 9 and 12% at an angle of attack of 10° and 12°, respectively, for circular trailing edge hydrofoil. The maximum increase of glide ratio for the coupled effect (circular trailing edge with outward dimple) is approximately 114% at an angle of attack of 12°. The outcome will be advantageous to design a proper blade profile for horizontal axis current turbines.
GoundarJNAhmedMR. Design of a horizontal axis tidal current turbine. Appl Energy2013; 111: 161–174.
2.
MyersLBahajAS. Power output performance characteristics of a horizontal axis marine current turbine. Renew Energy2006; 31: 197–208.
3.
GoundarJNAhmedMRLeeYH. Numerical and experimental studies on hydrofoils for marine current turbines. Renew Energy2012; 42: 173–179.
4.
BahajASMollandAFChaplinJR, et al.Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank. Renew Energy2007; 32: 407–426.
5.
BattenWMBahajASMollandAF, et al.Hydrodynamics of marine current turbines. Renew Energy2006; 31: 249–256.
6.
BahajASBattenWMMcCannG. Experimental verifications of numerical predictions for the hydrodynamic performance of horizontal axis marine current turbines. Renew Energy2007; 32: 2479–2490.
7.
RenYLiuBZhangT. Influences of winglets on the hydrodynamic performance of horizontal axis current turbines. Appl Ocean Res2019; 92: 101931–101931.
8.
BahajASMyersLE. Fundamentals applicable to the utilisation of marine current turbines for energy production. Renew Energy2003; 28: 2205–2211.
9.
BarlasTKvan KuikGA. Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines. Prog Aerosp Sci2010; 46: 1–27.
10.
AramendiaIFernandez-GamizURamos-HernanzJA, et al.Flow control devices for wind turbines. In: Bizon N., Mahdavi Tabatabaei N., Blaabjerg F., Kurt E. (eds) Energy harvesting and energy efficiency, Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 629–655.
11.
KunduP. Hydrodynamic performance improvement on small horizontal axis current turbine blade using different tube slots configurations. Appl Ocean Res2019; 91: 101873–101873.
12.
IsmailMFVijayaraghavanK. The effects of aerofoil profile modification on a vertical axis wind turbine performance. Energy2015; 80: 20–31.
13.
ShuklaVKavitiAK. Performance evaluation of profile modifications on straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine by energy and Spalart–Allmaras models. Energy2017; 126: 766–795.
14.
OlsmanWFColoniusT. Numerical simulation of flow over an airfoil with a cavity. AIAA J2011; 49: 143–149.
15.
YangKZhangLXuJ. Simulation of aerodynamic performance affected by vortex generators on blunt trailing-edge airfoils. Sci China Ser E: Technol Sci2010; 53: 1–7.
16.
GaoLZhangHLiuY, et al.Effects of vortex generators on a blunt trailing-edge airfoil for wind turbines. Renew Energy2015; 76: 303–311.
17.
ManolesosMVoutsinasSG. Experimental investigation of the flow past passive vortex generators on an airfoil experiencing three-dimensional separation. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodyn2015; 142: 130–148.
18.
LinJCRobinsonSKMcGheeRJ, et al.Separation control on high-lift airfoils via micro-vortex generators. J Aircr1994; 31: 1317–1323.
19.
FouatihOMMedaleMImineO, et al.Design optimization of the aerodynamic passive flow control on NACA 4415 airfoil using vortex generators. Eur J Mech-B/Fluid2016; 56: 82–96.
20.
ZhangLLiXYangK, et al.Effects of vortex generators on aerodynamic performance of thick wind turbine airfoils. J Wind Eng Indus Aerodyn2016; 156: 84–92.
21.
WangHZhangBQiuQ, et al.Flow control on the NREL S809 wind turbine airfoil using vortex generators. Energy2017; 118: 1210–1221.
22.
VelteCMHansenMO. Investigation of flow behind vortex generators by stereo particle image velocimetry on a thick airfoil near stall. Wind Energy2013; 16: 775–785.
23.
Sørensen NN, Zahle F, Bak C, et al. Prediction of the effect of vortex generators on airfoil performance. In: Journal of physics: conference series. vol. 524. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing, 2014, p.012019.
24.
KunduPSarkarANagarajanV. Improvement of performance of S1210 hydrofoil with vortex generators and modified trailing edge. Renew Energy2019; 142: 643–657.
25.
ZhenTKZubairMAhmadKA. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effects of passive vortex generators on Aludra UAV performance. Chin J Aeronaut2011; 24: 577–583.
26.
Martínez-FilgueiraPFernandez-GamizUZuluetaE, et al.Parametric study of low-profile vortex generators. Int J Hydrog Energy2017; 42: 17700–17712.
27.
SeligMSGuglielmoJJBroerenAP, et al.Summary of low speed airfoil data1995; vol. 1Orlando, FL: SoarTech Publication.
28.
Lyon C, Selig M, Broeren A, et al. Boundary layer trips on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. In: 35th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 6–9 January 1997, pp. 97–0511. AIAA.
Tillman JP. Improvements to vertical axis wind turbine blades to aid in self-starting. Master’s Thesis, Eastern Illinois University, IL, USA.
32.
Chougule P and Nielsen S. Overview and design of self-acting pitch control mechanism for vertical axis wind turbine using multi body simulation approach. In: Journal of physics: conference series. vol. 524. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing, 2014, p.12055.
33.
SinghRKAhmedMRZullahMA, et al.Design of a low Reynolds number airfoil for small horizontal axis wind turbines. Renew Energy2012; 42: 66–76.
34.
SeligMSMcGranahanBD. Wind tunnel aerodynamic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines. J Sol Energy Eng2004; 126: 986–1001.
35.
Fluent, ANSYS 15.0 User’s Manual, ANSYS Documentation N Fluent N User’s Guide & Theory Guide – Release 15.0. ANSYS Inc.
36.
RoachePJ. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering, Albuquerque, NM: Hermosa, 1998.
37.
Eça L and Hoekstra M. Discretization uncertainty estimation based on a least squares version of the grid convergence index. In: 2nd workshop on CFD uncertainty analysis, Lisbon, Portugal, 19 October 2006.
38.
XingTSternF. Factors of safety for Richardson extrapolation. J Fluid Eng2010; 132: 061403–061403.
39.
XingTSternF. Closure to “discussion of ‘factors of safety for Richardson Extrapolation’”. ASME J Fluids Eng2011; 133: 115501–115501.
40.
Spalart P and Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: 30th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 6–9 January 1992, pp. 92-0439. AIAA.
41.
LaunderBSpaldingD. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Energy1974; 3: 269–289.
42.
BradshawP. An introduction to turbulence and its measurement, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1971. ISBN: 0080166210.
43.
Menter F. Zonal two equation kw turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In: 24th fluid dynamics conference, Orlando, Florida, 6–9 July 1993, pp. 93-2906. AIAA.
44.
von KrzywoblockiMZ. Elementary propeller theories in compressible inviscid fluids. Appl Sci Res1951; 2: 205–205.
45.
Fernandez-GamizUZuluetaEBoyanoA, et al.Five megawatt wind turbine power output improvements by passive flow control devices. Energies2017; 10: 742–742.
46.
HansenMOAagaard MadsenH. Review paper on wind turbine aerodynamics. J Fluid Eng2011; 133: 114001–114001.
47.
ManwellJFMcGowanJGRogersAL. Wind energy explained: theory, design and application, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
