Knoop microhardness method possesses several advantages over Vickers testing: lower penetration depth, higher accuracy in indentation measurement, and a better suitability to measuring thin and elongated morphological features. This study explores the optimal loading and load independent hardness of selective laser melted specimens in non-heat-treated and heat-treated conditions, by using different Knoop test loads. The obtained results were used to plot load to indentation size charts, which, in turn, were used to obtain prediction curves in accordance to Meyer, proportional specimen resistance, and modified proportional specimen resistance models. The fitting of fitting curves to the measured values was used to calculate appropriate correlation factors. The results indicate that indentation size effect occurs in all measured specimens. This suggests that there is material true microhardness. Also, the most adequate model was modified proportional specimen resistance, with correlation factors just under one.
DeckersJMeyersSKruthJP, et al.Direct selective laser sintering/melting of high density alumina powder layers at elevated temperatures. Phys Procedia2014; 56: 117–124.
2.
VaeziMSeitzHYangS. A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2013; 67: 1721–1754.
3.
AkyildizHKKulekciMKEsmeU. Influence of shot peening parameters on high-cycle fatigue strength of steel produced by powder metallurgy process. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2015; 38: 1246–1254.
4.
AttarHCalinMZhangLC, et al.Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of commercially pure titanium. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 593: 170–177.
5.
PrashanthKGScudinoSKlaussHJ, et al.Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-12Si produced by selective laser melting: effect of heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 590: 153–160.
6.
BuchbinderDSchleifenbaumHHeidrichS, et al.High power Selective Laser Melting (HP SLM) of aluminum parts. Phys Procedia2011; 12: 271–278.
7.
Ćirić-Kostic S, Bogojević N, Vranić A, et al. Machining and heat treatment effects on the fatigue properties of Maraging steel produced by DMLS. In: IX International Conference “Heavy Machinery-HM 2017”. Zlatibor, 2017.
8.
AbeFOsakadaKShiomiM, et al.The manufacturing of hard tools from metallic powders by selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol2001; 111: 210–213.
9.
ShahzadKDeckersJKruthJP, et al.Additive manufacturing of alumina parts by indirect selective laser sintering and post processing. J Mater Process Technol2013; 213: 1484–1494.
10.
DrexlerMLexowMDrummerD. Selective laser melting of polymer powder - part mechanics as function of exposure speed. Phys Procedia2015; 78: 328–336.
11.
CaulfieldBMcHughPELohfeldS. Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process. J Mater Process Technol2007; 182: 477–488.
12.
KalenticsNBoillatEPeyreP, et al.Tailoring residual stress profile of selective laser melted parts by laser shock peening. Addit Manuf2017; 16: 90–97.
13.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMFiniS, et al.Fatigue response of as-built DMLS maraging steel and effects of aging, machining, and peening treatments. Metals (Basel)2018; 8: 505.
14.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMFiniS, et al.Effects of build orientation and thickness of allowance on the fatigue behaviour of 15–5 PH stainless steel manufactured by DMLS. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2018; 41: 900–916.
15.
SanzCNavas GarciaVGonzaloO, et al.Study of surface integrity of rapid manufacturing parts after different thermal and finishing treatments. Procedia Eng2011; 19: 294–299.
16.
ZaehMFOttM. Investigations on heat regulation of additive manufacturing processes for metal structures. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol2011; 60: 259–262.
17.
ShifengWShuaiLQingsongW, et al.Effect of molten pool boundaries on the mechanical properties of selective laser melting parts. J Mater Process Technol2014; 214: 2660–2667.
18.
ChlebusEKuźnickaBKurzynowskiT, et al.Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater Charact2011; 62: 488–495.
19.
CroccoloDDe AgostinisMFiniS, et al.Influence of the build orientation on the fatigue strength of EOS maraging steel produced by additive metal machine. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2016; 39: 637–647.
20.
RyniewiczAMBojkoŁRyniewiczWI. Microstructural and micromechanical tests of titanium biomaterials intended for prosthetic reconstructions. Acta Bioeng Biomech2016; 18: 111–117.
21.
CampanelliSLContuzziNLudovicoAD, et al.Manufacturing and characterization of Ti6Al4V lattice components manufactured by selective laser melting. Materials (Basel)2014; 7: 4803–4822.
22.
ZahariaSMChicosLA. Mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of 316L stainless steel honeycomb cellular cores manufactured by selective laser melting. Trans FAMENA XLI2017; 4: 11–24.
23.
NakamotoTShirakawaNMiyataY, et al.Selective laser sintering of high carbon steel powders studied as a function of carbon content. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 5653–5660.
24.
NieBYangLHuangH, et al.Femtosecond laser additive manufacturing of iron and tungsten parts. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process2015; 119: 1075–1080.
SwadenerJGGeorgeEPPharrGM. The correlation of the indentation size effect measured with indenters of various shapes. J Mech Phys Solids2002; 50: 681–694.
27.
HanCSHartmaierAGaoH, et al.Discrete dislocation dynamics simulations of surface induced size effects in plasticity. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 415: 225–233.
28.
NixWDGaoH. Indentitation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids1998; 46: 411–425.
29.
DobránskyJBaronPSimkuletV, et al.Examination of material manufactured by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). Metal METABK Slovak Repub E Vojn2015; 54: 477–480.
30.
ASTM E 384-08. Standard test method for microindentation hardness of materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2008, pp.1–33.
31.
GongJLiY. Energy-balance analysis for the size effect in low-load hardness testing. J Mater Sci2000; 35: 209–213.
32.
LiHBradtRC. The microhardness indentation load/size effect in rutile and cassiterite single crystals. J Mater Sci1993; 28: 917–926.
