This paper deals with the modeling and control of rail vehicle suspensions. The analytical models of the quarter rail vehicle with a passenger seat, describing the vertical dynamic, are presented for passive and active suspensions. Three controllers, i.e. PID-ZN, LQR and a PID-LQR are designed in order to improve the passenger comfort. This comfort is evaluated in terms of the passenger displacement, acceleration and frequency as a response of a two types of rail imperfection excitations. Results show that passenger comfort can be improved up to 98%. The obtained results prove that the active suspension with a PID- LQR controller yields the best results by regrouping the advantage of both PID and LQR controllers.
NejlaouiMHouidiAAffiZet al.Multiobjective robust design optimization of rail vehicle moving in short radius curved tracks based on the safety and comfort criteria. Simul Model Pract Theory2013; 30: 21–34.
2.
AboodKHAKhanRA. The Railway carriage simulation model to study the influence of vertical secondary suspension stiffness on ride comfort of railway carboy. J Mech Eng Sci2011; 225: 1349–1359.
3.
ZhangYWZhaoYZhangYHet al.Riding comfort optimization of railway trains based on pseudo-excitation method and symplectic method. J Sound Vib2013; 332: 5255–5270.
4.
WangWLYangXJXuGXet al.Multi-objective design optimization of the complete valve system in an adjustable linear hydraulic damper. J Mech Eng Sci2011; 225: 679–699.
5.
YaoGZYapFFChenGet al.MR damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system. Mechatronics2002; 12: 963–973.
6.
Gao GS and Yang SP. Semi-active control performance of railway vehicle suspension. Featuring Magneto-rheological Dampers, ICIEA, 2006.
7.
YangZZhangJChenZet al.Semi-active control of high-speed trains based on fuzzy PID control. Procedia Eng2011; 15: 521–525.
8.
Pratt I. Active suspension applied to railway trains. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, UK, 2002.
9.
Vincent J. Etude du concept de suspensions actives-Applications aux voitures ferroviaires. PhD Thesis, INSA de Lyon, France, 1999.
10.
Pugi L, Rindi A, Bartolini F, et al. Simulation of a semi-active suspension system for a high speed train. Proceedings of the international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks (IAVSD'09), Stockholm, Sweden, August 2009, pp.17–21.
11.
JonassonMRoosF. Design and evaluation of an active electromechanical wheel suspension system. Mechatronics2008; 18: 218–230.
12.
Zhou R, Zolotas A and Goodall R. 9 DOF railway vehicle modeling and control for the integrated tilting bolster with active lateral secondary suspension. In: UKACC international conference on systems technology control, Coventry, UK, 2010, pp.1–6.
13.
SezerSAtalayAE. Dynamic modeling and fuzzy logic control of vibrations of a railway vehicle for different track irregularities. Simul Model Pract Theory2011; 19: 1873–1894.
14.
EskiIYıldırımS. Vibration control of vehicle active suspension system using a new robust neural network control system. Simul Model Pract Theory2009; 17: 778–793.
15.
SunWLiJfZhaoYet al.Vibration control for active seat suspension systems via dynamic output feedback with limited frequency characteristic. Mechatronics2011; 21: 250–260.
16.
Sanchez-PenaRSSznaierM. Robust systems: Theory and applications. In: Simon Haykin (ed.) Adaptive and learning systems for signal processing communications, and control, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998. .
17.
SahaSDasSDasSet al.A conformal mapping based fractional order approach for sub-optimal tuning of PID controllers with guaranteed dominant pole placement. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul2012; 17: 3628–3642.
18.
Sasaki K, Kamoshita S and Enomoto M. A design and bench test of multi-modal active suspension of railway vehicle. In: IECON'94, 20th international conference on industrial electronics, control and instrumentation, Stockholm, Sweden, 1994, pp.2011–2016.
19.
YuGRHwangRC. Optimal PID speed control of brush less DC motors using LQR approach. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybernet2004; 1: 473–478.
20.
Li XH, Yu HB and Yuan MZ. Design of an optimal PID controller based on Lyapunov approach. In: International conference on information engineering and computer science, Wuhan, China, 2009, pp.1–5.
21.
HeJBWangQGLeeTH. PI/PID controller tuning via LQR approach. Chem Eng Sci2000; 55: 2429–2439.
22.
He JB, Wang QG and Lee TH. PI/PID controller tuning via LQR approach. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE conference on decision and control, Tampa, Florida USA, 1998, pp.1177–1182.
23.
Karimi-Ghartemani M, Maboodi M and Nikkhajoei H. Optimal design of current and voltage controllers for a distributed energy resource. In: 35th annual conference of IEEE industrial electronics, IECON '09, Porto, Portugal, 2009, pp.1675–1681.
24.
FooEGoodallRM. Active suspension control of flexible-bodied railway vehicles using electro-hydraulic and electro-magnetic actuators. Control Eng Pract2000; 8: 507–518.
25.
Du X, Dixon R, Goodall RM, et al. Modelling and control of a highly redundant actuator. Paper for Control, Loughborough University, UK, 2006.
26.
AngKHChongGCYLiY. PID control system analysis, design, and technology. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2005; 13: 559–576.
27.
Wolfgang A. Practical control for engineers and technicians, pp.115–117.
28.
ISO 2631: 2001. Mechanical vibration and shock-evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Part 4: Guidelines for the evaluation of the effects of vibration and rotational motion on passenger and crew comfort in fixed guide way transport systems.
29.
KimYGKwonHBKimSWet al.Correlation of ride comfort evaluation methods for railway vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2003, pp. 217.
30.
CEN, EN 12299. Railway applications - Ride comfort for passengers - Measurement and evaluation, Brussels, April 2009.
