The dimensionless velocity of steady streaming flow with small oscillation amplitude and low viscous layer thickness was assumed to be a function of one dimensionless parameter (viscous layer thickness). This functional relationship was validated by measuring the streaming velocities for bubbles on the size scale of hundreds of micrometers. The streaming velocities were computed for smaller bubbles to extend the range of viscous layer thickness applicable in the functional relationship. The dimensionless velocities were fitted well to the negative three-fourth power of the dimensionless viscous layer thickness, and a scaling law between the streaming velocity and bubble radius was proposed.
Longuet-HigginsMS. Viscous streaming from an oscillating spherical bubble. Proc R Soc London A1998; 454: 725–742.
4.
JuffermansLJMDijkAVJongenelenCAM. Ultrasound and microbubble-induced intra- and intercellular bioeffects in primary endothelial cells. Ultrasound Med Biol2009; 35: 1917–1927.
5.
WiklundMGreenROhlinM. Acoustofluidics 14: applications of acoustic streaming in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip2012; 12: 2438–2451.
WuJDuG. Streaming generated by a bubble in an ultrasound field. J Acoust Soc Am1997; 101: 1899–1907.
8.
LiuXWuJ. Acoustic microstreaming around an isolated encapsulated microbubble. J Acoust Soc Am2009; 125: 1319–1330.
9.
MarmottantPHilgenfeldtS. Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles. Nature2003; 423: 153–156.
10.
BlakeJRChwangAT. Fundamental singularities of Viscous flow. J Eng Math1974; 8: 23–29.
11.
PozrikidisC. Boundary integral and singularity methods for linearized viscous flow, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
12.
FengZCLealLG. Nonliner bubble dynamics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech1997; 29: 201–243.
13.
ThoPManassehROoiA. Cavitaion microstreaming patterns in single and multiple bubble systems. J Fluid Mech2007; 576: 191–233.
14.
KoSHLeeSJKangKH. A synthetic jet produced by eletrowetting-driven bubble oscillations in aqueous solution. Appl Phys Lett2009; 94: 194102–194102.
15.
CollisJManassehRLiovicP. Cavitation microstreaming and stress fields created by microbubbles. Ultrasonics2010; 50: 273–279.
16.
WangCJalikopSVHilgenfeldtS. Efficient manipulation of microparicles in bubble streaming flows. Biomicrofluidics2012; 6: 012801–012801.
17.
MinnaertM. On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water. Phil Mag1993; 16: 235–248.
18.
VazquezASanchezRMSalinas-RodrquezE. A look at three measurement techniques for bubble size determination. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2005; 30: 49–57.
19.
KwonYSJeongWWChungSK. Computational study of steady streaming from oscillating microbubbles with uniform and wavy wall motions. J Fluids Struct2014; 45: 250–255.
20.
MarmottantPVersluisMde JongN. High-speed imaging of an ultrasound-driven bubble in contact with a wall: “Narcissus” effect and resolved acoustic streaming. Exp Fluids2006; 41: 147–153.
21.
AnderssonHVan den BergA. Microfluidic devices for cellomics: a review. Sens Actuat B-Chem2003; 92: 315–325.
22.
FrankeTAbateARWeitzDA. Surface acoustic wave (SAW) directed droplet flow in microfluidics for PDMS devices. Lab Chip2009; 9: 2625–2627.
23.
UngerECMatsunagaTOMcCreeryT. Therapeutic applications of microbubbles. Eur J Radiol2002; 42: 160–168.
24.
FerraraKPollardRBordenM. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Ann Rev Biomed Eng2007; 9: 415–447.
25.
McDannoldNVykhodtsevaNHynynenK. Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. Ultrasound Med Biol2008; 34: 834–840.
