Optimization of a multi-objective lean assembly problem with reconfigurable machine cells

Abstract

Manufacturing sector is regularly facing the challenges caused due to high market dynamics and mass customization. Traditionally designed machine cells fail to address this issue due to lack of flexibility in capacity and functionality. However, the benefits of cell based production can be achieved by changing the machines involved and the design of cells. This paper presents a hybrid model of machine cells comprising of reconfigurable machine tools (RMTs) that are acting as part feeders for a lean assembly line of discrete products. The strategies of lean manufacturing to maintain the Takt time and synchronized one-piece-flow are considered in the model. A multi-objective optimization problem is formulated and solved to minimize the inter-cellular part movement, the error for Takt time among machine cells and the total reconfiguration time of the RMTs using NSGA-II metaheuristic. A numerical case example for the model is solved using MATLAB^© and illustrated along with computational steps and Pareto optimal solutions.

Keywords

Cellular manufacturing system reconfigurable machine tools lean manufacturing non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Askin

. Contributions to the design and analysis of cellular manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 2013; 51(23–24): 6778–6787.

Johnson

Wemmerlöv

. Why does cell implementation stop? Factors influencing cell penetration in manufacturing plants. Prod Oper Manag 2009; 13(3): 272–289.

Pillai

Subbarao

. A robust cellular manufacturing system design for dynamic part population using a genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 2008; 46(18): 5191–5210.

Papadopoulou

Özbayrak

. Leanness: experiences from the journey to date. J Manuf Technol Manag 2005; 16(7): 784–807.

Henao

Sarache

Gómez

. Lean manufacturing and sustainable performance: trends and future challenges. J Clean Prod 2019; 208: 99–116.

Möldner

Garza-Reyes

Kumar

. Exploring lean manufacturing practices’ influence on process innovation performance. J Bus Res 2020; 106: 233–249.

Womack

Jones

Roos

, et al. The machine that changed the world. New York: MIT Press, 1990.

Gopinath

Freiheit

. A waste relationship model and center point tracking metric for lean manufacturing systems. IIE Trans 2012; 44(2): 136–154.

Schulze

Dallasega

. Industry 4.0 concepts and lean methods mitigating traditional losses in engineer-to-order manufacturing with subsequent assembly on-site: a framework. Procedia Manuf 2020; 51: 1363–1370.

10.

Achanga

Shehab

Roy

, et al. Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag 2006; 17(4): 460–471.

11.

Shah

Ward

. Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. J Oper Manag 2003; 21(2): 129–149.

12.

Benyoucef

. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: from design to Implementation. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, 2020.

13.

Nomden

Slomp

Suresh

. Virtual manufacturing cells: a taxonomy of past research and identification of future research issues. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 2005; 17(2): 71–92.

14.

Suresh

Slomp

. Performance comparison of virtual cellular manufacturing with functional and cellular layouts in DRC settings. Int J Prod Res 2005; 43(5): 945–979.

15.

Pattanaik

Jain

Mehta

. Cell formation in the presence of reconfigurable machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2007; 34: 335–345.

16.

Eguia

Racero

Guerrero

, et al. Cell formation and scheduling of part families for reconfigurable cellular manufacturing systems using tabu search. Simulation 2013; 89(9): 1056–1072.

17.

Renna

Ambrico

. Design and reconfiguration models for dynamic cellular manufacturing to handle market changes. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 2015; 28(2): 170–186.

18.

Eguia

Molina

Lozano

, et al. Cell design and multi-period machine loading in cellular reconfigurable manufacturing systems with alternative routing. Int J Prod Res 2017; 55(10): 2775–2790.

19.

Kataoka

. A multi-period mixed integer programming model on reconfigurable manufacturing cells. Procedia Manuf 2020; 43: 231–238.

20.

Kant

Pattanaik

Pandey

. Sequential optimisation of reconfigurable machine cell feeders and production sequence during lean assembly. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 2020; 33(1): 62–78.

21.

Koren

Heisel

Jovane

, et al. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Ann CIRP 1999; 48(2): 527–540.

22.

Koren

Shpitalni

. Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 2010; 29(4): 130–141.

23.

Bastos

Alves

Castro

, et al. Reconfiguration of assembly lines using lean thinking in an electronics components’ manufacturer for the automotive industry. Procedia Manuf 2021; 55: 383–392.

24.

Landers

Min

Koren

. Reconfigurable Machine Tools. Ann CIRP 2001; 50: 269–274.

25.

Pomalaza-Ráez

Singh

, et al. Reconfiguring machines to achieve system adaptability and sustainability: A practical case study. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2014; 228(12): 1676–1688.

26.

Black

. Design rules for implementing the Toyota production system. Int J Prod Res 2007; 45(16): 3639–3664.

27.

Pattanaik

Sharma

. Implementing lean manufacturing with cellular layout: a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2009; 42: 772–779.

28.

Saurin

Marodin

Ribeiro

JLD

. A framework for assessing the use of lean production practices in manufacturing cells. Int J Prod Res 2011; 49(11): 3211–3230.

29.

Marodin

Saurin

Tortorella

, et al. How context factors influence lean production practices in manufacturing cells. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2015; 79(5-8): 1389–1399.

30.

Venugopal

Narendran

. A genetic algorithm approach to the machine-component grouping problem with multiple objectives. Comput Ind Eng 1992; 22(4): 469–480.

31.

Mansouri

Moattar-Husseini

Zegordi

. A genetic algorithm for multiple objective dealing with exceptional elements in cellular manufacturing. Prod Plan Control 2003; 14(5): 437–446.

32.

Arkat

Hosseini

Farahani

. Minimization of exceptional elements and voids in the cell formation problem using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 2011; 38: 9597–9602.

33.

Srinivas

Deb

. Multi-objective optimization using non dominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolut Comput 1994; 2(3): 221–248.

34.

Deb

Pratap

Agarwal

, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2002; 6(2): 182–197.

35.

Neto

Filho

. A simulation-based evolutionary multiobjective approach to manufacturing cell formation. Comput Ind Eng 2010; 59: 64–74.

36.

Lian

Liu

, et al. Formation of independent manufacturing cells with the consideration of multiple identical machines. Int J Prod Res 2014; 52(5): 1363–1400.

37.

Forghani

Fatemi Ghomi

SMT

Kia

. Concurrent scheduling and layout of virtual manufacturing cells considering assembly aspects. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2021; 235(6-7): 1036–1049.

38.

Maniraj

Pakkirisamy

Jeyapaul

. An ant colony optimization–based approach for a single-product flow-line reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 2017; 231(7): 1229–1236.

39.

Zhao

Xue

, et al. Multi-objective classification based on NSGA-II. Int J Comput Sci Math 2018; 9(6): 539–546.

40.

Liu

Chen

. An improved NSGA-II algorithm based on crowding distance elimination strategy. Int J Comput Intell Syst 2019; 12(2): 513–518.