The objective of this paper is to advance the assessment of efficiency and effectiveness of technology development, transfer and implementation, and to explore industrial patterns of technological change. Based on a literature overview, methods used to measure technological change are identified and their usefulness assessed. Criteria for evaluation and selection of individuals, institutions and projects are examined. The summary section provides some advice for the development and use of methods to evaluate/select technology change agents and projects.
BrockhoffK. K.Necessary conditions for successful company research. In Management of Technology IV, The Creation of Wealth, Vol. 1, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Management of Technology, Portland, Oregon, 1994, pp. 508–511.
MansfieldE.Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing. Am. Economic Rev., 1980, 70, 863–873.
4.
GrilichesZ.Productivity, R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s. Am. Economic Rev., 1986, 76, 41–154.
5.
PisanoG. P.The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Res. Policy, 1991, 20, 237–249.
6.
ErnstH.The patent portfolio for strategic R&D planning. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Management of Technology, Vol. 1, Portland, Oregon, 1994, pp. 491–496.
7.
GrahamM. B. W.PruittB. H.R&D for Industry. A Century of Technical Innovation at Alcoa, 1990 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
8.
World Competitiveness Yearbook (WCR), 2002 (IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland).
9.
SchainblattA. H.How companies measure the productivity of engineers and scientists. Res. Managmt, 1982, 25(3), 10–19.
SchwartzmanS.de SouzaA.Evaluation and efficiency of research and experimental development (R&D) institutions and units. March 1984.
13.
HeidenbergerK.StummerCh.Research and development project selection and resource allocation: A review of quantitative modelling approaches. Int. J. Managmt Rev., 1999, 1(2), 197, 28 pp.
14.
HallB. H.GrilichesZ.HausmannJ. A.Patents and R&D: Is there a lag?Int. Econ. Rev., 1986, 27(2), 265–283.
15.
PakesA.GrilichesZ.Estimating distributed lags in short panels with an application to the specification of depreciation patterns and capital stock constructs. Rev. Econ. Stud., 1984, 15(2), 243–262.
16.
GrilichesZ.PakesA.HallB. H.The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. Discussion Paper 1285, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986.
17.
GrilichesZ.Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econ. Lit., 1990, 18(4), 1661–1707.
