Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The literature on social exclusion has focused attention on the processes leading to exposure to multiple disadvantage. Despite the influence this perspective has had on both academic and policy discussions, conceptual analysis has remained imprecise and empirical evidence modest. We have made use of the European Community Household Panel (ECHP) in order to examine the extent to which persistent income poverty results in multiple deprivation. Our analysis shows that only a modest proportion of the persistently poor can be characterized as being exposed to such deprivation. While persistent poverty and multiple deprivation combine to produce extremely high levels of economic strain, there is no evidence that they interact in a significant fashion. We argue that understanding deprivation is not facilitated by focusing on a cleavage between a multiply deprived minority and a comfortable majority, and we consider the policy implications of this argument.

Les approches en terme d'exclusion sociale ont attiré l'attention sur les processus conduisant à des risques des désavantages cumulatifs. Malgré l'influence qu'a eu cette approche tant dans les débats académiques que politiques, l'analyse conceptuelle est restée imprécise et les preuves empiriques modestes. Nous avons utilisé le panel européen des ménages afin d'examiner dans quelle mesure la pauvreté monétaire persistante est le résultat de privations multiples. Notre analyse montre qu'un nombre relativement peu élevé de personnes en situation de pauvreté peut être caractérisé comme ayant été exposé à de telles privations.

De plus, tandis que la pauvreté persistante et les privations multiples s'additionnent pour produire des situations économiques extrêmement critiques, il n'y a pas de preuve qu'ils interagissent de manière significative. Nous argumentons que la compréhension de la privation n'est pas facilitée en se centrant sur le clivage entre une minorité ayant des privations multiples et une large majorité. Nous développons les implications politiques de cet argument.

Keywords

Deprivation persistent poverty social exclusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashworth, K. , Hill, M.S. and Walker, R. (2000), `A New Approach to Poverty Dynamics', in D. Rose (ed.) Researching Social and Economic pp. 210-29. London: Routledge.

Atkinson, A.B. (1998) `Social Exclusion, Poverty and Unemployment', in A. B. Atkinson and J. Hills (eds) Exclusion, Employment and Opportunity, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, CASE Paper 4, London School of Economics.

Bane, M.H. and Ellwood D.T. (1986) `Slipping into and out of Poverty: the Dynamics of Spells', Journal of Human Resources 21: 1-23.

Coulter, F. , Cowell, F. and Jenkins, S.P. (1992) `Equivalence Scale Relatives and the Extent of Inequality and Poverty', Economic Journal 102: 1067-82.

Duncan, G.J. (1984) Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan

Eurostat (1999) ECHP Data Quality, DOC.PAN 108/99.

Friedrichs, J. (1998) `Do Poor Neighbourhoods Make their Residents Poorer? Context Effects of Poverty Neighbourhoods on Residents', in H-J. Andreß (ed.) Empirical Poverty Research in Comparative Perspective pp. 77-100. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Gallie, D. and Paugam S. (eds) (2000) Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halleröd, B. (1996) `The Truly Poor: Direct and Indirect Measurement of Consensual Poverty in Sweden', Journal of European Social Policy 5 (2): 111-29.

10.

Heath, A. (1981) Social Mobility. London: Fontana.

11.

Hills, J. (1999) Social Exclusion, Income Dynamics and Public Policy, Annual Sir Charles Carter Lecture. Belfast: Northern Ireland Economic Development Office.

12.

Jarvis, S. and Jenkins, S. (1995) Do the Poor Stay Poor? New Evidence About Income Dynamics from the British Household Panel Study. Colchester : University of Essex. Occasional Paper 95-2.

13.

Jarvis, S. and Jenkins, S. (1997) `Low Income Dynamics in 1990s Britain', Fiscal Studies 18 (2): 123-42.

14.

Kleinman, M. (1998) Include me Out? The New Politics of Place and Poverty, Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, CASE Paper 11, London School of Economics.

15.

Layte, R. , Maitre, B. , Nolan, B. and Whelan, C.T. (2001) `Persistent and Consistent Poverty: an Analysis of the First Two Waves of the European Community Household Panel', Review of Income and Wealth 47 (4): 427-49.

16.

Mayer, S. and Jencks, C. (1988) `Poverty and the Distribution of Material Hardship' , Journal of Human Resources 24 (1): 88-114.

17.

Muffels, R. (1993) `Deprivation Standards and Style of Living Indices' , in J. Berghman and B. Cantillon (eds) The European Face of Social Security pp. 43-59. Avebury, Aldershot .

18.

Nolan, B. and Whelan, C.T. (1996a) `Resources, Deprivation and Poverty'. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

19.

Nolan, B. and Whelan, C.T. (1996b) `Measuring Poverty Using Income and Deprivation Indicators: Alternative Approaches', Journal of European Social Policy 6 (3): 225-40.

20.

Nolan, B. and Whelan, C.T. (2000) `Urban Housing, and the Role of Underclass Processes: the Case of Ireland', Journal of European Social Policy 10 (1): 5-21.

21.

Paugam, S. (1996a) `La Constitution d'un Paradigme', in S. Paugam (ed.) L'exclusion: L'état des Savoirs pp. 7-19. Paris: éditions la découverte.

22.

Paugam, S. (1996b) `The Spiral of Precariousness: a Multidimensional Approach to the Process of Social Disqualification in France', in G. Room (ed.) Beyond the Threshold: the Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion pp. 47-79. Bath : Policy Press.

23.

Paugam, S. and Russell, H. (2000) `The Effects of Employment Precarity and Unemployment on Social Isolation', in D. Gallie and S. Paugam (eds) Welfare Regimes and Unemployment in Europe pp. 243-364. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Rodgers, J.R. and Rodgers, J.L. (1993) `Chronic Poverty in the United States', Journal of Human Resources 28 (1): 25-54.

25.

Room, G. (ed.) (1999) `Social Exclusion, Solidarity and the Challenge of Globalization', International Journal of Social Welfare 8: 166-74.

26.

Stevens (1994) `The Dynamics of Poverty Spells, Updating Bane and Ellwood', American Economic Review 18 (2): 34-7.

27.

Watson, D. and Healy, M. (1999) `Sample Attrition between Waves 1 and 2 in the European Community Household Panel', Eurosat DOC.PAN 118/99.

28.

Whelan, C.T. , Layte, R. , Maître, B. and Nolan, B. (2000) `Poverty Dynamics: an Analysis of the 1994 and 1995 Waves of the European Community Household Panel Survey', European Societies 2 (4): 505-31.

29.

Whelan, C.T. , Layte, R. , Maître, B. and Nolan, B. (2001) `Income, Deprivation and Economic Strain', European Sociological Review 17 (4): 357-71.

30.

Whelan, C.T. , Layte, R. , Maître, B. and Nolan, B. (forthcoming) Persistent Income Poverty and Deprivation in the European Union: an Analysis of the First Three Waves of the European Community Household Panel, Journal of Social Policy.

Multiple deprivation and persistent poverty in the European Union

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References