The Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico developed a theoretical framework for the study of human sciences that exerted a strong influence on psychology and other human sciences. He backed the notion of the unity of knowledge about human mind and culture, including history, linguistics, philosophy, philology, epistemology, psychology, and for the first time proposed a method for their study that he ambitiously called ‘new science’. The article presents an overview of Vico’s thought and discusses some of the main axioms of his theoretical system. His critique of Cartesianism and the alternative epistemology he outlined are put forward as a thoughtful tool for reflection on contemporary psychological science. Finally, this retrospective look at Vico's ideas provides useful insights for a programmatic view of cultural psychology.
AdamsH. P. (1935) The Life and Writings of Giambattista Vico. London: Allen & Unwin.
2.
Aristotle (1988) ‘Metaphysics’, in AckrillJ. L. (ed.) A New Aristotle Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 253–360.
3.
BaconF. (1857–9) ‘Novum Organum’, in The Works of Francis Bacon, vol. IV, ed. SpeddingJ.EllisR. L.HeathD. D.. London: Longman.
4.
BarnouwJ. (1980) ‘Vico and the Continuity of Science: The Relation of His Epistemology to Bacon and Hobbes’, Isis71(4): 609–20.
5.
BerlinI. (1974) ‘The Divorce between the Sciences and the Humanities’, Salmagundi27: 9–39.
6.
BerlinI. (1976) Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas. New York: Chatto & Windus.
7.
BoeschE. E. (1971) Zwischen zwei Wirklichkeiten. Prolegomena zu einer ökologischen Psychologie[Between Two Realities. Prolegomena to an Ecological Psychology]. Berne: Huber.
8.
CattaneoC. (1864) ‘Dell’antitesi come metodo di psicologia sociale’ [About the Antithesis as the Method of Social Psychology], Il politecnicoXX: 262–70.
9.
CattaneoC. (1960) ‘Filosofia della rivoluzione’ [Philosophy of Revolution], in BobbioN. (ed.) Scritti filosofici[Philosophical Works], vol. I. Florence: Le Monnier, pp. 272–86.
10.
CattaneoC. (2000[1866]) Psicologia delle menti associate[Psychology of Associated Minds]. Rome: Editori Riuniti.
11.
DanesiM. (1995) Giambattista Vico and the Cognitive Science Enterprise. New York: Peter Lang.
12.
DavisJ. C. (2010) Metaphysics and the Meaning of Life: Towards a Philosophy of Zen Buddhism. Milwaukee, Wis.: Three Brothers Press.
13.
De MasE.HouckJ. K. (1971) ‘On the New Method of a New Science: A Study of Giambattista Vico’, Journal of the History of Ideas32(1): 85–94.
14.
15.
DescartesR. (2008[1637]) Discourse on Method and Meditations, trans. VeitchJ.. New York: Cosimo Books.
16.
DiriwächterR. M.ValsinerJ., eds (2008) Striving for the Whole: Creating Theoretical Syntheses. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
17.
EckensbergerL. H. (2011) ‘Cross-cultural Differences as Meaning Systems’, in van de VijverF. J. R.ChasiotisA.BreugelmansS. M. (eds) Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 407–41.
18.
GalileiG. (1914[1638]) Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences or Discourses and Mathematical Demonstrations on Two New Sciences Concerning Mechanics and Local Motions, trans. CrewH.de SalvioA.from the Italian and Latin into English. New York: Macmillan.
19.
GoetschJ. R. (1995) Vico’s Axioms: The Geometry of the Human World. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
20.
JungC. G. (1981) ‘The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious’, in Collected Works9(1), 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Bollingen.
21.
KunzeD. (2012) Thought and Place: The Architecture of Imagination in the Philosophy of Giambattista Vico. Boalsburg, PA: Cyrano.
22.
LeachE. (1976) ‘Vico and the Future of Anthropology’, Social Research43(4): 807–17.
23.
MoscoviciS. (2007) Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
24.
PompaL. (2002) ‘Introduction’, in Vico: The First New Science, ed. PompaL.. Birmingham and London: Cambridge University Press, pp. xix–xxx.
25.
RogoffB. (2003) The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
26.
RosnowR. L. (1978) ‘The Prophetic Vision of Giambattista Vico: Implications for the State of Social Psychology Theory’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36(11): 1322–31.
27.
de SantillanaG. (1950) ‘Vico and Descartes’, Osiris9: 565–80.
28.
SchaefferJ. D. (1990) Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
TagliacozzoG. (1981) Vico: Past and Present. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
30.
TagliacozzoG., ed. (1983) Vico and Marx: Affinities and Contrasts. London: Macmillan.
31.
TateoL. (2013) ‘Generalization as Creative and Reflective Act: Revisiting Lewin’s Conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian Modes of Thought in Psychology’, Theory & Psychology23(4): 518–36.
32.
TateoL.IannacconeA. (2011) ‘Social Representations, Individual and Collective Mind: A Study of Wundt, Cattaneo and Moscovici’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science46(1): 57–69.
33.
TateoL.MarsicoG. (2013) ‘The Self as Tension of Wholeness and Emptiness’, Interaçcoes24: 1–19.
34.
TristramR. J. (1988) ‘Vico on the Production and Assessment of Knowledge’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research48(3): 355–88.
35.
ValsinerJ. (2014) An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: Sage.
36.
VicoG. (1948[1744]) The New Science of Giambattista Vico, trans. Goddard BerginT.FischM. H.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
VicoG. (1965[1709]) On the Study Methods of Our Time, trans. GianturcoE.. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
38.
WundtW. (1916) Elements of Folk Psychology: Outlines of a Psychological History of the Development of Mankind. New York: Macmillan.
39.
ZagorinP. (1984) ‘Vico’s Theory of Knowledge: A Critique’, The Philosophical Quarterly34(134): 15–30.
