The writings of Bruno Latour have invigorated empirical inquiry in the social sciences and in the process helped to redefine their character. In recent years the philosophy of social science that made this inquiry possible has been deployed to a different end, namely that of rethinking the character of politics. Here I suggest that in the pursuit of this goal, inflated claims are made about that philosophy, and some basic theoretical tools are asked to do a job for which they may not be best equipped.
AdornoT. (1992) ‘The Handle, the Pot and Early Experience’, in Notes to Literature, vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 211–19.
3.
AmsterdamskaO. (1990) ‘Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour’, Science, Technology and Human Values15(4): 495–504.
4.
ArnheimR. (1966) ‘Perceptual Analysis of a Symbol of Interaction’, in Towards a Psychology of Art. London: Faber & Faber, pp. 222–44.
5.
BakerN. (1989) The Mezzanine. London: Granta.
6.
BaldamusW. (1976) The Structure of Sociological Inference. London: Martin Robertson.
7.
BaldamusW. (1992) ‘Understanding Habermas’s Methods of Reasoning’, History of the Human Sciences5(2): 97–115.
8.
BloorD. (1999) ‘Anti-Latour’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science30(1): 81–112.
9.
BlumenbergH. (1979) ‘The Concept of Reality and the Possibility of the Novel’, in AmacherR. E.LangeV. (eds) New Perspectives in German Literary Criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 29–48.
10.
BlumenbergH. (1982[1966/1972]) The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
BlumenbergH. (1985) Work on Myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
BlumenbergH. (1987) Das Lachen der Thräkerin[The Laughter of the Thracian Maid]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
BlumenbergH. (1996) Shipwreck with Spectator. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
BlumenbergH. (2010[1960]) Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
BultmannR. (1958) Jesus Christ and Mythology. London: SCM Press.
17.
CollinsH. M.YearleyS. (1992) ‘Epistemological Chicken’, in PickeringA. (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 301–26.
18.
DunnJ. (1985) ‘Modernity and the Claim to Know Better’, in Rethinking Modern Political Theory: Essays 1979–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–53.
19.
GeertzC. (1983) ‘Blurred Genres’, in Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books, pp. 19–35.
20.
GoffmanE. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin.
21.
GoodyJ. (1977) The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GoodyJ. (1993) The Culture of Flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GumpertG. (1987) Talking Tombstones and Other Tales of the Media Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HarmanG. (2009) The Prince of Networks. Prahran, Melbourne: re-press.
25.
HeineH. (1982) Poetry and Prose. London: Continuum.
26.
LatourB. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
LatourB. (1988) The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
LatourB. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
29.
LatourB. (1996) Aramis, or, The Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
LatourB. (1999) Pandora’s Hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
LatourB. (2004) The Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. London: Harvard University Press.
32.
LatourB. (2005) Reassembling the Social: and Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LatourB. (2010a) ‘Coming out as a Philosopher’, Social Studies of Science40(4): 599–608.
35.
LatourB. (2010b) The Making of Law. Cambridge: Polity.
36.
LatourB.LépinayV. A. (2009) The Science of Passionate Interests: An Introduction to Gabriel Tarde’s Economic Anthropology. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
37.
LynchM. (1991) ‘Pictures of Nothing? Visual Construals in Social Theory’, Sociological Theory9(1): 1–21.
38.
MarcusS. (1974) Engels, Manchester and the Working Class. New York: W. W. Norton.
39.
MillsC. Wright (1960) The Sociological Imagination. Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin.
WeberM. (1949) ‘Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy’, in The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press, pp. 49–112.
54.
WildingA. (2010) ‘Naturphilosophie Redivivus: on Bruno Latour’s “Political Ecology”’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy6(1): 18–32.
55.
WilliamsE. (1985) The Bells of Russia: History and Technology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
