Images are at the heart of strategies of persuasion. They render certain aspects visible and leave others unrepresented; and they may shape processes of scientific reasoning and imagination. By tracing diagrammatic images in the anthropological sciences throughout the 20th century, the contributions to this special issue highlight some dominant pictorial traditions for rendering human evolution and diversity visible. This article aims to provide an overview of and an introduction to the special issue ‘Visibility Matters’.
AlterS. (1999) Darwinism and the Linguistic Image: Language, Race, and Natural Theology in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
ArnoldiM. J. (1999) ‘From the Diorama to the Dialogic: A Century of Exhibiting Africa at the Smithsonian’s Museum of Natural History’, Cahiers D’études Africaines39(155): 701–26.
3.
AuerbachF. (1913) ‘Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration’[The Law of Population Concentration], Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen59: 74–6.
BermanJ. C. (1999) ‘Bad Hair Days in the Paleolithic: Modern (Re)constructions of the Cave Man’, American Anthropologist101(2): 288–304.
6.
BouquetM. (1994) ‘Family Trees and Their Affinities: The Visual Imperative of the Genealogical Diagram’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute(N.S.)2: 43–66.
7.
BraceL. C. (1981) ‘Tales of Phylogenetic Woods: The Evolution and Significance of Evolutionary Trees’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology56: 411–29.
8.
ClarkC. A. (2001) ‘Evolution for John Doe. Pictures, the Public, and the Scopes Trial Debate’, The Journal of American History87(4): 1275–1303.
9.
ConkeyM. W. (1997) ‘Mobilizing Ideologies: Paleolithic “Art,” Gender Trouble, and Thinking About Alternatives’, in HagerL. D. (ed.) Women in Human Evolution. London: Routledge, pp. 172–207.
EdwardsE. (1992) Anthropology and Photography, 1860–1920. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press in association with the Royal Anthropological Institute, London.
12.
EdwardsE.MortonC. (2009) Photography, Anthropology and History. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
13.
FriendlyM. (2012) ‘Milestones in the History of Thematic Cartography, Statistical Graphics, and Data Visualization’, in RederC. (ed.) Kartographisches Denken [Cartographic Thinking]. Vienna: Springer, pp. 319–27.
14.
GannettL.GriesemerJ. (2004) ‘The ABO Blood Groups: Mapping the History and Geography of Genes in Homo Sapiens’, in RheinbergerH. J.GaudillièreJ. P. (eds) Classical Genetics Research and Its Legacy: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth Century Genetics. London: Routledge, pp. 119–72.
15.
GarnS. (1962) Human Races. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
16.
Gifford-GonzalezD. (1993) ‘You Can Hide, But You Can’t Run: Representation of Women’s Work in Illustrations of Palaeolithic Art’, Visual Anthropology Review9(1): 23–41.
17.
GoodyJ. (1977) The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
GouldS. J. (1995) ‘Ladders and Cones: Constraining Evolution by Canonical Icons’, in SilversR. B. (ed.) Hidden Histories of Science. New York: New York Book Review, pp. 38–67.
19.
GouldS. J. (1996[1981]) The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton.
20.
GroebnerV. (2003) ‘Complexio/Complexion: Categorizing Individual Natures, 1250–1600’, in DastonL.VidalF. (eds) The Moral Authority of Nature. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 361–83.
21.
HaeckelE. (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft; mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie [General Morphology of Organisms: General Outlines of the Science of Organic Forms based on Mechanical Principles through the Theory of Descent as reformed by Charles Darwin]. Berlin: Verlag Georg Reimer.
22.
HaeckelE. (1868) Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte: gemeinverständliche wissenschaftliche Vorträge über die Entwickelungslehre im Allgemeinen und diejenige von Darwin, Goethe und Lamarck im Besonderen[The History of Creation: Or the Development of the Earth and Its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes]. Berlin: Verlag Georg Reimer.
23.
HaeckelE. (1874) Anthropogenie oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen: gemeinverständliche wissenschaftliche Vorträge über die Grundzüge der menschlichen Keimes- und Stammesgeschichte[The Evolution of Man: A Popular Scientific Study]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
24.
HaleC. R. (2008) Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship. Oakland: University of California Press.
25.
HankeC. (2007) Zwischen Auflösung und Fixierung. Zur Konstitution von ‘Rasse’ und ‘Geschlecht’ in der physischen Anthropologie um 1900[Between Dissolution and Fixation. On the Constitution of ‘Rasse’ and ‘Geschlecht’ in Physical Anthropology around 1900]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
26.
HarawayD. (1984–5) ‘Teddy Bear Patriarchy: Taxidermy in the Garden of Eden, New York City, 1908–1936’, Social Text11 (Winter, 1984–5): 20–64.
27.
HarawayD. (1990) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
28.
HartmannH. (2011) Der Volkskörper bei der Musterung [The Volkskörper under Screening]. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.
29.
HeßlerM.AdelmannR.FrercksJ.. (2009) Datenbilder: Zur digitalen Bildpraxis in den Naturwissenschaften[Data Images: About Digital Imaging Practices in the Natural Sciences]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
30.
HightE. M.SampsonG. D. (2004) Colonialist Photography: Imag(in)ing Race and Place. London: Routledge.
31.
HoßfeldU. (2005) Geschichte der Biologischen Anthropologie[History of Biological Anthropology]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
32.
KeevakM. (2011) Becoming Yellow: A Short History of Racial Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
KudraßE. (2009) ‘Zwischen Natur- und Geisteswissenschaft: Der Streit um Felix von Luschan an der Berliner Universität’[Between Natural Sciences and the Humanities: The Controversy on Felix von Luschan at the Berlin University], in RuggendorferP.SzemethyH. D. (eds) Felix von Luschan (1854–1924). Leben und Wirken eines Universalgelehrten[Felix von Luschan (1854–1924): Life and Work of a Polymath]. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, pp. 99–112.
34.
LaukötterA. (2007) Von der ‘Kultur’ zur ‘Rasse’ – vom Objekt zum Körper? Völkerkundemuseen und ihre Wissenschaften zu Beginn des 20 Jahrhunderts[From ‘Culture’ to ‘Race’ – From Object to Body? Ethnological Museums and the Sciences at the Beginning of the 20th Century]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
35.
LindeeS.Ventura SantosR. (2012) ‘The Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Histories, National Styles, and International Networks: An Introduction to Supplement 5’, Current Anthropology53 (S5): S3–S16.
36.
LipphardtV. (2009) ‘Von der “europäischen Rasse” zu den “Europiden”. Wissen um die biologische Beschaffenheit des Europäers in Sach- und Lehrbüchern, 1950–1989’[From the ‘European Race’ to the ‘Europids’. Knowledge about the Biological Nature of the European in Popular Science Books and Textbooks, 1950–1989], in BlucheL.LipphardtV.PatelK. K. (eds) Der Europäer – ein Konstrukt. Wissensbestände, Diskurse, Praktiken[The European – a Construct: Knowledge Resources, Discourses, Practices]. Göttingen: Wallstein, pp. 158–86.
37.
LipphardtV.PatelK. K. (2007) ‘Auf der Suche nach dem Europäer. Wissenschaftliche Konstruktionen des Homo Europaeus’[Searching for the European: Scientific Constructions of Homo Europaeus], Themenportal Europäische Geschichte(2007), URL: accessed 25 June 2015 @:http://www.europa.clio-online.de/2007/Article=204
38.
LivingstoneD. N. (2010) ‘Cultural Politics and the Racial Cartographics of Human Origins’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35: 204–21.
39.
LynchM. E.WoolgarS. (1990) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
LynchM. E.WoolgarS. (2014) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
MarksJ. (2006) ‘The Scientific and Cultural Meaning of the Odious Ape–Human Comparison’, in EllisonG. T. H.GoodmanA. H. (eds) The Nature of Difference: Science, Society and Human Biology. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 35–52.
42.
MassinB. (1996) ‘From Virchow to Fischer: Physical Anthropology and “Modern Race Theories” in Wilhelmine Germany (1890–1914)’, in StockingG. W. (ed.) Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, vol. 8. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 79–154.
43.
MoserS. (1992) ‘The Visual Language of Archaeology: A Case Study of the Neanderthals’, Antiquity66: 831–44.
44.
MoserS. (1993a) ‘Gender Stereotyping in Pictorial Reconstructions of Human Origins’, in CrosH. D.SmithL. (eds) Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, the Australian National University, pp. 75–92.
45.
MoserS. (1993b) ‘Picturing the Prehistoric’, Metascience4: 58–67.
46.
MoserS. (1998) Ancestral Images: The Iconography of Human Origins. New York: Cornell University Press.
47.
MoserS.GambleC. (1997) ‘Revolutionary Images: The Iconic Vocabulary for Representing Human Antiquity’, in MolyneauxB. L. (ed.) The Cultural Life of Images: Visual Representation in Archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 184–212.
48.
Müller-WilleS.RheinbergerH. J. (2007) ‘Heredity: The Production of an Epistemic Space’, in Müller-WilleS.RheinbergerH. J. (eds) Heredity Produced: At the Crossroad of Biology, Politics and Culture, 1500–1870. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–34.
49.
NesturchM. F. (1959) Menschenrassen[Human Races]. Leipzig and Jena: Urania-Verlag.
50.
ParnesO. (2007) ‘On the Shoulders of Generations: The Problem of Heredity in 19th Century Science and Culture’, in Müller-WilleS.RheinbergerH. J. (eds) Heredity Produced: At the Crossroad of Biology, Politics and Culture, 1500–1870. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 315–45.
51.
PauwelsL. (2006) Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication. Lebanon, CT: Dartmouth College Press.
52.
PooleD. (1997) Vision, Race, and Modernity: A Visual Economy of the Andean Image World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
PorterT. M. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
ProctorR. N. (2003) ‘Three Roots of Human Recency: Molecular Anthropology, the Refigured Acheulean and the UNESCO Response to Auschwitz’, Current Anthropology44(2): 213–39.
55.
QureshiS. (2011) Peoples on Parade: Exhibitions, Empire, and Anthropology in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
RedknapM. (2002) Re-Creations: Visualizing Our Past. National Museums and Galleries of Wales and Welsh Historic Monuments. Cardiff: Westdale.
57.
ScholzS.GriemJ. (2010) TATORT Stadt. Mediale Topographien eines Fernsehklassikers[TATORT City: Medial Topographies of a Television Classic]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
58.
SecordJ. A. (2001) Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
SommerM. (2006) ‘Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Neanderthal as Image and “Distortion” in Early 20th-Century French Science and Press’, Social Studies of Science36(2): 207–40.
60.
SommerM. (2007) Bones and Ochre: The Curious Afterlife of the Red Lady of Paviland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
SommerM. (2008) ‘History in the Gene: Negotiations between Molecular and Organismal Anthropology’, Journal of the History of Biology41(3): 473–528.
62.
SommerM. (2010) ‘Seriality in the Making: The Osborn-Knight Restorations of Evolutionary History’, History of Science48(161): 461–82.
63.
SommerM. (2015) Evolutionäre Anthropologie zur Einführung[Introduction into Evolutionary Anthropology]. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.
64.
StolerA. L. (1997) ‘Racial Histories and their Regimes of Truth’, in DavisD. E. (ed.) Political Power and Social Theory 11. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 183–206.
65.
TattersallI.EldredgeN. (1977) ‘Fact, Theory, and Fantasy in Human Paleontology’, American Scientist65 (March–April): 204–11.
66.
TufteE. R. (1990) Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
67.
TufteE. R. (1997) Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
68.
TufteE. R. (2001) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
69.
UNESCO (1952) What Is Race? Evidence from Scientists. Paris: Department of Mass Communication, UNESCO.
70.
WiberM. G. (1997) Erect Men, Undulating Women: The Visual Imagery of Gender, ‘Race’ and Progress in Reconstructive Illustrations of Human Evolution. Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
71.
WolpoffM.CaspariR. (1997) Race and Human Evolution: A Fatal Attraction. New York: Simon & Schuster.
