‘Who else would we speak to?’ National Policy Networks in post-devolution Britain: The case of spatial planning

Abstract

The implementation of the devolution process that started in 1999 was frequently assumed by contemporary commentators and scholars to lead to a fractured relationship with the national centre and a fragmented state as a consequence. However, discourse analysis and policy reviews in relation to spatial planning policies demonstrates that agendas and legislation implemented by central and devolved governments since devolution are characterised by marked similarities in intention and type (albeit with some differences in name and delivery route). In investigating the potential sites and sources of these policy similarities and possible mobilities, and drawing on research data, we suggest that the British Irish Council’s spatial planning task group as one of the potential candidates to be considered as a national policy community or network. Alongside a range of other factors following devolution, this has contributed to development and delivery in one specific policy area that has taken a convergent rather than divergent character.

Keywords

British Irish Council devolution policy mobility policy networks spatial planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aughey

(2005) The Politics of Northern Ireland: Beyond the Belfast Agreement, Abingdon: Routledge.

Bennett

(1991) What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science 21(2): 215–233.

Benson

Jordan

(2011) What have we learned form policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited. Political Studies Review 9(3): 366–378.

Benson

Jordan

(2012) Policy transfer research: Still evolving, not yet through? Political Studies Review 10(3): 333–338.

Bevir M and Rhodes R (2003) Interpreting British Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.

BIC (2014) ‘About’. Available at: http://www.britishcouncil.org/about (accessed 11 August 2014).

BIC (2015) Areas of work. https://www.britishirishcouncil.org/9 (accessed 19 September 2016).

Birrell

(2012) Comparing Devolved Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bradbury

(1997) The Blair government’s white papers on British devolution: A review of Scotland’s parliament and a voice for Wales. Regional & Federal Studies 7(3): 115–133.

10.

Bradbury

(1998) The devolution debate in Wales during the major governments: The politics of a developing union state? Regional & Federal Studies 8(1): 120–139.

11.

Bulmer

Burch

(2009) The Europeanisation of Whitehall UK Central Government and the European Union, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

12.

Cairney

(2011) The New British policy style: From a British to a Scottish political tradition? Political Studies Review 9(2): 208–220.

13.

Cairney

(2012) Understanding Public Policy, Basingstoke: Macmillan Palgrave.

14.

Clifford BP and Tewdwr-Jones M (2013) The Collaborating Planner? Bristol: Policy Press.

15.

Cochrane

(2011) Foreword. In: McCann

Ward

(eds) Mobile Urbanism Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age. London, ix–xi.

16.

Cole

(2012) Serving the nation: Devolution and the Civil Service in Wales. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14(3): 458–476.

17.

Dolowitz

(2012) Conclusion: What have we learned? Regional and Federal Studies 22(3): 341–351.

18.

Dolowitz

Marsh

(1996) Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies 4: 343–357.

19.

Dolowitz

Marsh

(2012) The future of policy transfer research. Political Studies Review 10(3): 339–345.

20.

Dussauge-Laguna

(2012) On the past and future of policy transfer research: Benson and Jordan revisited. Political Studies Review 10(3): 313–324.

21.

Ellis

Neill

(2006) Spatial governance in contested territory: The case of Northern Ireland/Ireland. In: Tewdwr-Jones

Allmendinger

(eds) Territory, Identity and Spatial Planning, London: Routledge, pp. 123–138.

22.

Gallagher

(2012) Intergovernmental relations in the UK: Co-operation, competition and constitutional change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14(2): 198–213.

23.

Hallsworth M (2011) System Stewardship the future of policy making. Working Paper. London: Institute for Government.

24.

Harris

Moore

(2013) Planning ‘Histories and practices of circulating urban knowledge. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(5): 1499–1509.

25.

Haughton G, Allmendinger P, Counsell D, et al. (2009) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. Abingdon: Routledge.

26.

Hay

(1998) The tangled webs we weave: The discourse, strategy and practice of networking. In: Marsh

(ed.) Comparing Policy Networks, Buckingham: Open University Press.

27.

Hazell

(2000) The State and the Nations: The First Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom, Exeter: Imprint Academic.

28.

Hazell

(2006) The English Question, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

29.

Heclo

Wildavsky

(1984) The Private Government of Public Money, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.

30.

Henderson

Jeffery

Liñeira

(2015) National identity or national interest? Scottish, English and Welsh attitudes to the constitutional debate. The Political Quarterly 86(2): 265–274.

31.

Hood

(1998) The Art of the State, Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

32.

Hussain

Miller

(2006) Multiculturalism Nationalism Islamaphobia, Anglophobia and Devolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33.

James

(2010) Managing European policy at home: Analysis network adaptation within the core executive. Political Studies 58(5): 930–950.

34.

James

Lodge

(2003) The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research. Political Studies Review 1: 179–193.

35.

Jessop

(1990) State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place, Cambridge: Polity Press.

36.

Jordan

(1990) Policy community realism versus ‘new’ institutionalist ambiguity. Political Studies 38: 470–484.

37.

Keating

(2013) Rescaling the European State: The Making of Territory and the Rise of the Meso, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

38.

Keating

Cairney

Hepburn

(2009) Territorial policy communities and devolution in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economics and Society 2: 51–66.

39.

Keating

Cairney

Hepburn

(2012) Policy convergence, transfer and learning in the UK under devolution. Regional and Federal Studies 22(3): 289–307.

40.

Keating

McEwen

(2005) Introduction: Devolution and public policy in comparative perspective. Regional and Federal Studies 15(4): 413–421.

41.

Kingdon J (2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman Pub Group.

42.

Knox

(2010) Devolution and the Governance of Northern Ireland, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

43.

Laffin M and Shaw E (2005) The new sub national politics of the British Labour Party, ESRC Devolution and Constitutional Change Research Programme.

44.

Lloyd

Peel

(2005) Tracing a spatial turn in planning practice in Scotland. Planning Practice and Research 20(3): 313–325.

45.

Lloyd

Peel

(2009) New labour and the planning system in Scotland: An overview of a decade. Planning Practice and Research 24(1): 03–118.

46.

Lloyd

Purves

(2009) Identity and territory: The creation of a national planning framework for Scotland. In: Davoudi Strange (ed.) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, London: Routledge, pp. 71–94.

47.

Loughlin J (nd) Territorial Policy Communities in Wales. Published by http://europadiversa.org, Swindon.

48.

Loughlin J and Sykes S (2004) Devolution and policy-making in Wales: Restructuring the system and reinforcing identity. ESRC Research Programme on Devolution and Constitutional Change.

49.

Lynch

Hopkins

(2001) The British‐Irish Council: Progress frustrated. Regional Studies 35(8): 753–758.

50.

McCann

(2011) Urban policy mobilities and the global circuits of knowledge: Towards a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101: 107–130.

51.

McCann E and Ward K (2011) In: McCann and Ward (eds) Introduction: Urban Assemblages: Territories, Relations, Practices and Power. London, pp. 1–14.

52.

McCann

Ward

(2011) Mobile Urbanism Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age, London: University of Minnesota Press.

53.

McCann

Ward

(2012) Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Towards a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review 10(3): 325–332.

54.

McEwen

Swenden

Bolleyer

(2012a) Introduction: Political opposition in a multi-level context. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14(2): 187–197.

55.

McEwen

Swenden

Bolleyer

(2012b) Intergovernmental relations in the UK: Continuity in a time of change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14(2): 323–343.

56.

Midwinter

McVicar

(1996) The devolution proposals for Scotland: An assessment and critique. Public Money & Management 16(4): 13–20.

57.

Mitchell

(1998) The evolution of devolution: Labour’s home rule strategy in opposition. Government and Opposition 33(04): 479–496.

58.

Mitchell

(2011) Devolution in the UK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

59.

Mooney

Croall

Munro

et al. (2015) Scottish criminal justice: Devolution, divergence and distinctiveness. Criminology and Criminal Justice 15(2): 205–224.

60.

Morphet

(2010) Reflections on alterity in Irish and Scottish spatial planning: Fragmentation or fugue? Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies 4(2): 173–194.

61.

Morphet

(2011a) Delivering infrastructure through spatial planning: The multi-scalar approach in the UK. Local Economy 26(4): 285–293.

62.

Morphet

(2011b) Effective Practice in Spatial Planning, Abingdon: Routledge.

63.

Murray

(2009) Building consensus in contested spaces and places? The regional development strategy for Northern Ireland. In: Davoudi

Strange

(eds) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 125–146.

64.

Nye

(2004) Soft Power The Means to Success in World Politics, New York, NY: Public Affairs.

65.

ODPM (2001) Planning: Delivering a Fundamental Change, London: ODPM.

66.

Parry

(2012) The civil service and intergovernmental relations in the post-devolution UK. British. Journal of Politics and International Relations 14(2): 285–302.

67.

Paun

Munro

with Whitehall Monitor (2014) The Civil Service in Territorial Perspective: A Data-driven Analysis of Whitehall and the Devolved Administrations, London: Institute for Government.

68.

Pemberton

Morphet

(2012) Libertarian paternalism as a tool to explore strategic sub-regional planning in England? European Planning Studies 21(12): 2020–2036.

69.

Pemberton

Morphet

(2013) The rescaling of economic governance: Insights into the transitional territories of England. Urban Studies 51(11): 2354–2370.

70.

Stone

(2004) Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy 11: 545–566.

71.

Trench

(2007) Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

72.

Trench

(2012) The courts and devolution in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14(2): 303–322.

73.

Ward

(1999) The international diffusion of planning: A review and a Canadian case study. International Planning Studies 4(1): 53–77.

74.

Wolman

(2009) Policy transfer: What we know about what transfers, how it happens and how to do it. George Washington University Institute of Public Policy Working Papers. working paper 38.

75.

Wolman

Page

(2002) Policy transfer amongst local governments: An information theory approach. Governance 15(4): 477–501.

76.

Wood

(2016) Tracing policy movements: Methods for studying learning and policy circulation. Environment and Planning A 48(2): 391–406.