Organisational arrangements with increased autonomy from politicians have become common in public service provision in Western countries. Agency deficiencies have been related to accountability and lack of trust, and a debate on re-municipalisation or re-integration of public services is emerging. In this article, we explore what caused the displacement of a local public transport agency in Norway by re-integrating agency tasks in to the public administration. We find two points are particularly especially important in explaining the displacement of the agency. First, powerful veto players that benefit from change, such as new political coalitions and local bus companies, are one driver for change. Second, weak administrative capacity and lack of competence in the county administration open opportunities for change agents who oppose to existing rules. The study also reflects the importance of seeing trust in an institutional context when studying public administration.
AarsJRingkjøbH-E (2011) Local democracy Ltd. Public Management Review13(6): 825–844.
2.
AberbachJDRockmanBA (2002) Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics35(4): 673–676.
3.
AdamCBauerMWKnillC (2007) The termination of public organizations: Theoretical perspectives to revitaliza a promising research area. Public Organization Review7: 221–236.
4.
BachT (2012) The involvement of agencies in policy formulation: Explaining variation in policy autonomy of federal agencies in Germany. Policy and Society31: 211–222.
5.
BardachE (1976) Policy termination as a political process. Policy Sciences7: 123–131.
6.
BlåkaSTjerboTZeinerH (2012) Kommunal organisering 2012. Redegjørelse for Kommunal og regionaldepartementets organisasjonsdatabase, Oslo: NIBR (available only in Norwegian).
7.
BoinAKuipersSSteenbergenM (2010) The life and death of public organizations: A question of institutional design?Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions23(3): 385–410.
8.
CarpenterDPLewisDE (2004) Political learnings from rare events: Poisson inference, fiscal constraints, and the lifetime of bureaus. Political Analysis12: 201–232.
9.
ChristensenTLægreidP (2007) Regulatory agencies – The challenges of balancing agency autonomy and political control. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions20(3): 499–520.
10.
County of Telemark (2014a) Meeting protocol from the county council 17–18 June (available only in Norwegian).
11.
County of Telemark (2014b) Meeting protocol from the county council 9 December (available only in Norwegian).
12.
County of Telemark (2013) Organization of public transport and school transport. Proposition 13/308 (available only in Norwegian).
13.
County of Telemark (2010) Public transport plan for Telemark. County Council Resolution, 28 April (available in Norwegian).
14.
FinsrudHDHildrumJ (2006) På veg mot en ny region? Evaluering av regionforsøket i Buskerud, Telemark og Vestfold, Oslo: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet (available only in Norwegian).
15.
HallDLobinaETerhorstP (2013) Re-municipalisation in the early twenty-first century: Water in France and energy in Germany. International Review of Applied Economics27(2): 193–214.
16.
HaugsbøMSErikssonTNorheimB (2014) Organisering av innkjøp i kollektivtransport i Telemark, notat 66/2014, Oslo: Urbanet Analyse (available only in Norwegian).
17.
HogwoodBJudgeDMcVicarM (2001) Agencies, ministers and civil servants in Britain. In: PetersGPierreJ (eds) Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform, New York: Routledge, pp. 35–44.
18.
JacobsenDI (2006) The relationship between politics and administration: The importance of contingency factors, formal structure, demography, and time. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions19(2): 303–323.
19.
Kaufman H (1976) Are Government Organizations Immortal? Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
20.
KlijnE-HEdelenbosJSteijnB (2010) Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes. Administration and Society42(2): 193–221.
21.
LeirenMD (2015) Re-integration failure and outsourcing upside: Organisation of public transport in Norway. Local Government Studies41(2): 240–259.
22.
LewisDE (2002) The politics of agency termination: Confronting the myth of agency immortality. The Journal of Politics64(1): 89–107.
23.
LongvaFOslandO (2010) Regulating the regulator: The impact of professional procuring bodies on local public transport policy and its effectiveness. Research in Transportation Economics29(1): 118–123.
24.
LægreidPVerhoestK (2010) Governance of Public Sector Organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
25.
MaccarthaighM (2014) Agency termination in Ireland: Culls and bonfires, or life after death?Public Administration92(4): 1017–1037.
26.
MahoneyJThelenK (2010) Explaining Institutional Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MortensenPB (2013) Public sector reform and blame avoidance effects. Journal of Public Policy33(2): 229–253.
28.
OlsenSKrogstadJRAarhaugJ (2012) Herre i eige hus? Evaluering av kollektivtrafikken i Telemark, Oslo: Transportøkonomisk institutt (available in Norwegian).
29.
OslandOLongvaFLeirenMD (2008) Fylkeskommunens bestiller – og samordningsrolle i samferdselssaker, Oslo: Transportøkonomisk institutt (available in Norwegian).
30.
Pierre J (2004) Central agencies in Sweden: A report from Utopia. In: Pollitt C and Talbot C (eds) Unbundled Government. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 203–214.
31.
PollittCBouckaertG (2011) Public Management Reform. A Ccomparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance and Neo-Webarian State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
PollittCTalbotCCaulfieldJ (2004) Agencies: How Governments Do Things Through Semiautonomous Organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.
RommelJChristiaensJ (2009) Steering from ministers and departments. Public Management Review11(1): 79–100.
35.
RollandVWRonessPG (2011) Mapping organizational change in the state: Challenges and classifications. International Journal of Public Administration34(6): 399–409.
36.
RollandVWRonessPG (2012) Foundings and terminations: Organizational change in the Norwegian state administration 1947–2011. International Journal of Public Administration35(12): 783–794.
37.
TanseyO (2007) Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics40(4): 765–772.
38.
UnanderBOBergHSundloH (2013) Organisering av lokal kollektivtrafikk og skoleskyss i Telemark, Oslo: Analyse og Strategi, Multiconsult (available in Norwegian).
39.
VaboSI (2000) New organisational solutions in Norwegian local councils: Leaving a puzzling role for local politicians?Scandinavian Political Studies23(4): 343–372.
40.
Van de VeldeDM (1999) Organisational forms and entrepreneurship in public transport Part 1: classifying organizational forms. Transport Policy6: 147–157.
41.
Van ThielSYesilkagitK (2014) Does task matter? The effect of task on the establishment, autonomy and control of semi-autonomous agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences80(2): 318–340.
42.
Van ThielSYesilkagitK (2011) Good neighbours or distant friends?Public Management Review13(6): 783–802.
43.
VerschuereBBachT (2012) Executive agencies, ministers and departments: Can policy and management ever be separated?Administration and Society44(2): 183–206.
44.
VerschuereB (2009) The role of public agencies in the policy making process: Rhetoric versus reality. Public Policy and Administration24(1): 23–46.
45.
VerschuereB (2007) The autonomy – Control balance in Flemish arm's length public agencies. Public Management Review9(1): 107–133.
46.
VerschuereBVancoppenolleD (2012) Policy-making in an era of agencification: An exploration of task divisions between politicians, core departments and public agencies. Policy and Society31: 249–258.
Wollmann (2014) Public services in European countries: Between public/municipal and private sector provision – and reverse? In: SilvaCNBucekJ (eds) Fiscal Austerity and Innovation in Local Governance in Europe, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 49–71.
49.
YeungK (2010) The regulatory state. In: BaldwinRCaveMLodgeM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–85.
