Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2014-1
Reforming the Civil Service and revising the role of the mandarin in Britain: A view from the perspective of a study of eight permanent secretaries at the Ministry of Education between 1976 and 2011
This article summarises some problems currently faced by the Civil Service and considers how the June 2012 Reform Plan would address them. It focuses on what the Plan might mean for permanent secretaries and their future role in policy making. It seeks to supplement the research on which this aspect of the Plan and its recommendations can be reviewed. For this purpose it draws on a longitudinal study of the eight permanent secretaries at the Department for Education between 1975 and 2011. All were interviewed twice along with 35 relevant others involved in the policy process in education nationally. Following a discussion of the limited literature on permanent secretaries, aspects of the background and career of the eight are examined. Given the importance of “dual leadership” to the Plan, the time in office they had with the 16 Secretaries of State they served was often short – 8 less than a year. To facilitate scrutiny of such issues an analytical framework of types is proposed varying according to how far a permanent secretary takes an active or passive part in policy. Examples of each type – making, resisting, shaping, sharing and taking – are discussed. The article concludes with suggestions for future research.
BarberisP (1994) Permanent secretaries and policy making in the 1980s. Public Policy and Administration9(1): 35–48.
2.
BarberisP (1996) The Elite of the Elite, Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
3.
Barberis P (2012) The managerial imperative: fifty years’ change in UK public administration. Public Policy and Administration. Epub ahead of print 5 November 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0952076712458789.
4.
Cameron S (2012) Whitehall’s top knights joust over reform. The Telegraph, 14 June, 25.
5.
Cameron S (2013) Mauling for Maude over his plans for change. The Telegraph, 16 May, 23.
6.
ChapmanL (1978) Your Disobedient Servant, London: Chatto and Windus.
EnglishF (2006) Understanding leadership in education: life writing and its possibilities. Journal of Educational Administration and History38(2): 141–155.
FryG (1969) Statesmen in Disguise: The Changing Role of the Administrative Class of the British Home Civil Service, 1853–66, London: Macmillan.
11.
FryG (1985) The Changing Civil Service, London: Allen and Unwin.
12.
Fry G (1989) The British Civil Service since 1954: A Policy Analysis of a Career Bureaucracy. The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) End of Award Report, R00231033. Swindon, UK: ESRC.
13.
FryG (1993) Reforming the Civil Service: The Fulton Committee on the British Home Civil Service of 1966–68, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
14.
GreerSJarmanH (2010) Definitions, demographics and the changing home Civil Service. Public Policy and Administration25(3): 251–270.
15.
HarrisJGarciaT (1966) The permanent secretaries: Britain’s top administrators. Public Administration Review26(1): 88–97.
PurnellJLewisL (2012) Leading a Government Department: The First 100 Days, London: Institute for Government.
27.
RhodesR (2005) Everyday life in a ministry: public administration as anthropology. American Review of Public Administration35(1): 3–26.
28.
RhodesR (2011) Everyday Life in British Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
RibbinsP (1999) Context and praxis in the study of school leadership. In: BegleyPLeonardP (eds) The Values of Educational Administration, London: Falmer, pp. 125–140.
30.
RibbinsPSherrattB (1997) Radical Educational Policies and Conservative Secretaries of State, London: Cassell.
31.
RibbinsPSherrattB (2012a) Permanent secretaries, consensus and centrism in policy making in education: David Hancock and the 1988 Reform Act. Educational Management Administration and Leadership40(5): 544–559.
32.
Ribbins P, Sherratt B (2012b) Portrait of a permanent secretary: reflections on the career of Sir Geoffrey Holland - a ‘big beast’ in Whitehall (unpublished).
33.
Ribbins P, Sherratt B (2012c) Michael Bichard at the Department of Education and Employment: the life and times of an un-mandarin like mandarin (unpublished).
34.
RibbinsPSherrattB (2013a) The permanent secretary as policy maker, shaper, taker, sharer and resister in education – Sir James Hamilton as a centralising outsider. Journal of Educational Administration and History45(1): 28–49.
35.
RibbinsPSherrattB (2013b) Leading education in the United Kingdom: a study of the policy and personal relationship of permanent secretaries and their secretaries of state. International Studies in Educational Administration41(1): 105–122.
36.
RichardsD (1997) The Civil Service under the Conservatives 1979–1997, Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press.
37.
RichardsD (2009) New Labour and the Civil Service, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
Rose (1887) Ministers and Ministries, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39.
SamierE (2006) Educational administration as a historical discipline. Journal of Educational Administration and History38(2): 125–141.
40.
Sherratt B (2004) Permanent Secretaries and Education Policy: The Meta-Politics of Bureaucratic Neutrality. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
41.
Smith M (2011) Women leading the way in senior Civil Service positions. Guardian Professional (Public Leaders Network), 14 December, 1–4.
42.
Stack J, Doyle J (2012) The rise and rise of Ms Incompetence. Daily Mail, 22 June, 13.
43.
TheakstonK (1999) Leadership in Whitehall, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
TheakstonKFryG (1989) British administrative elite: permanent secretaries 1900–86. Public Administration67(2): 129–147.
45.
ThomasP (2012) Civil Service Reform: Seven Crucial Tests for the New Reform Plan, London: Institute for Government.
46.
VerrierA (1983) Through the Looking Glass: British Foreign Policy in the Age of Illusions, London: Cape.
