The European Commission has undergone successive waves of public management reforms since the second half of the 1990s that have led to substantive administrative change. This contribution aims at explaining how the “unique” politico-administrative context of the European Union affected the trajectory of reform of the Commission, compared with trajectories of reform of the public sector at the national level. On the basis of such analysis, the Pollitt and Bouckaert model of contextual influences on the dynamics of public management reform is revisited, and considerations on the use of historical institutionalism in the study of administrative reforms proposed.
BanC (forthcoming) Unity in Diversity: Management and Culture in an Enlarged European Commission, Basingstoke, UK. Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
BarzelayM (2001) The New Public Management. Improving Research and Policy Dialogue, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. University of California Press.
3.
BarzelayM (2009) Theorizing implementation of public management policy reforms: A case study of strategic planning and programming in the European Commission. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions22(2): 319–334.
4.
BarzelayMGallegoR (2006) From “New Institutionalism” to “Institutional Processualism”: Advancing knowledge about public management policy change. Governance19(4): 531–557.
5.
BauerMW (2008) Introduction: Organizational change, management reform and EU policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy15(5): 627–647.
6.
BauerMW (2009) Impact of administrative reform of the European Commission: Results from a survey of heads of unit in policy-making directorates. International Review of Administrative Sciences75(3): 459–472.
7.
BauerMW (2010) L'acceptation du changement au sein de l'administration de l'Union Européenne [An analysis of how change has been received in the core administration of the European Union]. Revue Française d'Administration Publique10(1): 81–98.
8.
Bauer M, Ege J (2012) Politicisation within the European Commission's bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Symposium on ‘Managerial reforms and the transformation of the administration of the European Commission’ 78(3).
9.
CiniM (1996) The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation, and Culture in the EU Administration, Manchester, UK. Manchester University Press.
10.
ConradY (2000) L'organizzazione amministrativa della Commissione europea ‘mercato comune’ [The administrative organisation of the European Commission for the common market]. Storia, Amministrazione Costituzione8, pp. 157–187.
11.
CoombesD (1970) Politics and Bureaucracy in the EC: A Portrait of the Commission of the EEC, London. Allen & Unwin.
12.
EgebergM (2006) Multilevel Union Administration. The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe, Basingstoke, UK. Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
EllinasASuleimanE (2008) Reforming the Commission: Between modernization and bureaucratization. Journal of European Public Policy15(5): 708–725.
14.
GeorgakakisD (2010a) Do skills kill? Les enjeux de la requalification de la compétence des eurofonctionnaires [Do skills kill? Gaming in the requalification of the competences of EU officials]. Revue Française d'Administration Publique10(1): 61–80.
15.
Georgakakis D (2010b) The deconsecrated administration: EU civil servants from mission to management. Paper presented at the meeting of the permanent study group on EU administration and multi-level governance, EGPA Annual Conference, Toulouse, France, 8–10 September 2010.
16.
HoogheL (1996) Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Building Multi- Level Governance, Oxford. Clarendon Press.
17.
HoogheLMarksG (1996) ‘Europe with the regions’: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. Publius: The Journal of Federalism26(1): 73–91.
18.
HoogheLMarksG (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Boulder, CO. Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
KassimH(2004) An historic achievement. Administrative reform under the Prodi Commission. In: DimitrakopoulosD (ed.) The Changing Commission, Manchester, UK. Manchester University Press, pp. 33–62.
20.
KassimH (2008) ‘Mission impossible’, but mission accomplished: The Kinnock reforms and the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy15(5): 648–668.
21.
KassimHPetersonJBauerMWConnollySDehousseR (2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
22.
KnillCBalintT (2008) Explaining variation in organizational change: The reform of human resource management in the European Commission and the OECD. Journal of European Public Policy15(5): 669–690.
23.
LevyR (2006) European Commission overload and the pathology of management reform: Garbage cans, rationality and risk aversion. Public Administration84(2): 423–439.
24.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Governance Forms and Performance in 36 Countries, New Haven, CT. Yale University Press.
25.
MarchJG (1999) The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence, Malden, MA. Blackwell.
26.
MarksGScharpfFWSchmitterPCStreekW (1996) Governance in the European Union, London. SAGE.
27.
OngaroE (2009) Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy and France, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA. Edward Elgar.
28.
OngaroE(2010) The Napoleonic administrative tradition and public management reform in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain. In: PainterMPetersBG (eds) Tradition and Public Administration, Basingstoke, UK. Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
OngaroE (2011) The role of politics and institutions in the Italian administrative reform trajectory. Public Administration89(3): 738–755.
30.
Ongaro E (2012a) Editorial introduction: Managerial reforms and the transformation of the administration of the European Commission. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Symposium on ‘Managerial reforms and the transformation of the administration of the European Commission’. 78(3).
31.
OngaroE(2012b) From reluctant to compelled reformers? Reflections on three decades of public management reform in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. In: DiamondJLiddleJ (eds) Critical Perspectives in International Public Sector Management, Bingley, UK. Emerald, pp. 105–127.
32.
OngaroE(forthcoming) Explaining contextual influences on the dynamics of public management reforms: Reflections on some ways forward. In: PollittC (ed.) Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link?, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA. Edward Elgar.
33.
OngaroEMasseyAHolzerMWayenbergE (2010) Governance and Intergovernmental Relations in the European Union and the United States: Theoretical Perspectives, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA. Edward Elgar.
34.
OngaroEMasseyAHolzerMWayenbergE (2011) Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations: Transatlantic Perspectives, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA. Edward Elgar.
35.
PageE (1997) People Who Run Europe, Oxford. Clarendon Press.
36.
PainterMPetersBG (2010) Tradition and Public Administration, Basingstoke, UK. Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
PetersBG (2001) The Future of Governing, 2nd edn. Lawrence, KS. University Press of Kansas.
38.
PetersBG (2005) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, 2nd edn, 1st edn 1999. London and New York. Continuum.
39.
PiattoniS(2010) The evolution of the studies of the European Union MLG. In: OngaroEMasseyAHolzerMWayenbergE (eds) Governance and Intergovernmental Relations in the European Union and the United States: Theoretical Perspectives, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA. Edward Elgar.
40.
PiattoniS (2011) Multi- Level Governance: Theoretical, Empirical and Normative Challenges, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
41.
PiersonP (2000a) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review94(2): 251–267.
42.
PiersonP (2000b) The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration13(4): 475–499.
43.
PollittC (forthcoming) Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link?, Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA. Edward Elgar.
44.
Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (1st edn. 2000, 2nd edn. 2004, 3rd edn. 2011) Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
PredaD (2000) Hallstein e l'amministrazione pubblica europea [Hallstein and the European public administration]. Storia, Amministrazione Costituzione8, pp. 79–103.
46.
RaginCC (1987) The Comparative Method, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. University of California Press.
47.
SassiC (2000) Gli statuti del personale delle istituzioni comunitarie (1952–1968) [Personnel statutes in community institutions (1952–1968)]. Storia, Amministrazione Costituzione8, pp. 189–223.
48.
StevensAStevensH (2001) Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union, Basingstoke, UK. Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
StreeckWThelenK(2005) Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In: StreeckWThelenK (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
50.
Trondal J (2012) On Bureaucratic Centre Formation in Government Institutions. Lessons from the European Commission. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Symposium on managerial reforms and the transformation of the administration of the European Commission 78(3).
51.
WallaceHPollackMYoungAR (2010) Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford, New York. Oxford University Press.
52.
Wille A (2012) The politicization of the EU Commission: Democratic control and the dynamics of executive selection. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Symposium on ‘Managerial reforms and the transformation of the administration of the European Commission, 78(3).
53.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London. SAGE.
