The more links can be observed in the vertical line between intentions and results as embodied by a policy process, the smaller the chance will be of a congruent implementation of the public policy concerned. Pressman and Wildavsky (1973) expressed this view on implementation in one of the longest and most famous subtitles in the study of public administration. In this article this view is addressed as the thesis of incongruent implementation. Although still common with policy makers, since Bowen’s (1982) critique it hardly has been investigated further. At the same time, however, scholars across different research communities have started to explore the effects of intermediary variables between government intentions and governmental performance. The objective in this article is to look at what is known about the impact of such variables currently and to explore the implications for the study of implementation.
Allison GT ( 1971) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis . Boston: Little, Brown and Company .
2.
Barrett SM and Fudge C. ( 1981) Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy. London: Methuen .
3.
Bekkers VJJM,Dijkstra AG, Edwards AR and Fenger HJM ( 2007) Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Processes. Aldershot : Ashgate.
4.
Bowen ER ( 1982) The Pressman-Wildavsky Paradox: Four Addenda or Why Models Based on Probability Theory can Predict Implementation Success and Suggest Useful Tactical Advice for Implementers. Journal of Public Policy2(1): 1-21.
5.
Chun YH and Rainey HG ( 2005a) Goal Ambiguity in U.S. Federal Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(1): 1-30.
6.
Chun YH and Rainey HG ( 2005b) Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(2): 529-557.
7.
Forbes M., Hill CJ and Lynn Jr LE ( 2007) The Logic of Governance in Health Care Delivery: An Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Public Management Review9(4): 453-477.
8.
Goggin ML ( 1986) The ‘Too Few Cases/too Many Variables’ Problem in Implementation Research. Political Research Quarterly39: 328-347.
9.
Goggin ML, Bowman AOM, Lester JP and O’Toole Jr LJ ( 1990) Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation . Glenview, IL.: Scott Foresman /Little, Brown and Company.
10.
Hall ThE and O’Toole Jr. LJ ( 2000) Structures for Policy Implementation: An Analysis of National Legislation, 1965-1966 and 1993-1994. Administration and Society31(6): 667-686.
11.
Held D. ( 2006) Models of Democracy. Cambridge : Polity Press.
12.
Hicklin A., O’Toole Jr. LJ and Meier KJ ( 2008) Serpents in the Sand: Managerial Networking and Non-linear Influences on Organizational Performance. Journal of Public Management Theory and Research18(2): 252-273.
Hill MJ and Hupe PL ( 2003) The Multi-layer Problem in Implementation Research . Public Management Review5(4): 471-490.
15.
Hill MJ and Hupe PL ( 2006) Analysing Policy Processes as Multiple Governance: Accountability in Social Policy. Policy & Politics34(3): 557-573.
16.
Hill MJ and Hupe PL ( 2009) Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
17.
Hjern B. and Hull C. ( 1982) Implementation Beyond Hierarchy. Amsterdam : Elsevier (special issue of European Journal of Political Research).
18.
Hjern B. and Porter DO ( 1981) Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis. Organization Studies2(3): 211-227.
19.
Hupe PL and Hill MJ ( 2006) The Three Action Levels of Governance: Re-Framing the Policy Process Beyond the Stages Model. in Peters BG and Pierre J (eds) Handbook of Public Policy. London: SAGE.
20.
Hupe PL and Hill MJ ( 2007) The Accountability of Professionals in Social Policy: Or Why Governance is Multi-focal and Democracy is Multi-local’. in Bekkers VJJM, et al. (eds) Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate.
21.
Keiser LR and Meier KJ ( 1996) Policy Design, Bureaucratic Incentives, and Public Management: The Case of Child Support Enforcement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory6(3): 337-364.
22.
Kiser LL and Ostrom E. ( 1982) The Three Worlds of Action: A Meta-theoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. in Ostrom E (ed) Strategies of Political Inquiry. London: SAGE.
23.
Light PC ( 1995) Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchy and the Diffusion of Accountability. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
24.
Lindblom CE ( 1959) The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review19(2): 79-88.
25.
Lindblom CE ( 1979) Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review39(6): 517-525.
26.
Lipsky M. ( 1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
Lowi ThJ ( 1972) Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice. Public Administration Review32: 298-310.
28.
Lupia A. and McGubbins M. ( 2000) Representation or Abdication? How Citizens Use Institutions to Help Delegation Succeed. European Journal of Political Research37(3): 91-107.
29.
Lynn Jr LE ( 2007) Conceptual and Empirical Models of Governance and Public Management: A Symposium. Public Management Review9(4): 449-451.
30.
Lynn Jr LE, Heinrich CJ and Hill CJ ( 2000a) Studying Governance and Public Management: Why? How? in Heinrich CJ and Lynn Jr. LE (eds) Governance and Performance: New Perspectives . Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
31.
Lynn Jr LE, Heinrich CJ and Hill CJ ( 2000b) Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(2): 233-261.
32.
Lynn Jr LE, Heinrich CJ and Hill CJ ( 2001) Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research . Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
33.
Matland RE ( 1995) Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory5(20): 145-174.
34.
May PJ ( 1993) Mandate Design and Implementation: Enhancing Implementation Efforts and Shaping Regulatory Styles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12(4): 634-663.
35.
May PJ ( 2002) Policy Design and Implementation. in Peters BG and Pierre J (eds) Handbook of Public Administration. London: SAGE.
36.
Mazmanian DA and Sabatier PA ( 1983) Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
37.
Meier KJ ( 1999) Are We Sure Lasswell Did It This Way? Lester, Goggin and Implementation Research. Policy Currents9(1): 5-8.
38.
Meier KJ and O’Toole Jr LJ ( 2007) Modelling Public Management: Empirical Analysis of the Management-performance Nexus. Public Management Review9(4): 503-527.
39.
O’Toole Jr LJ ( 1986) Policy Recommendations for Multi-actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field. Journal of Public Policy6(2): 181-210.
40.
O’Toole Jr LJ and Meier KJ ( 1999) Modelling the Impact of Public Management: The Implications of Structural Context. Journal of Public Management Research and Theory9(October): 505-526.
41.
Peters BG and Pierre J. ( 2001) Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: Towards Multi-level Governance. Policy & Politics29(2): 131-135.
42.
Pressman J. and Wildavsky A. ( 1973/1984) Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
Riccucci NM ( 2005) How Management Matters: Street-Level Bureaucrats and Welfare Reform. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
44.
Sabatier P (ed) (2007) Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45.
Sætren H. ( 2005) Facts and Myths About Research on Public Policy Implementation: Out-of fashion, Allegedly Dead, But Still Very Much Alive and Relevant. The Policy Studies Journal33(4): 559-582.
46.
Scharpf FW ( 1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47.
Stoker RP ( 1991) Reluctant Partners: Implementing Federal Policy . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
48.
Strøm K. ( 2000) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies . European Journal of Political Research37(3): 261-289.
49.
Weber M. ( 1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Transl. Henderson AM, Parsons T. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
50.
Wildavsky A. ( 1979) Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis . Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
51.
Wilson W. ( 1887) The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly2: 197-222.
52.
Winter SC, Dinesen PT, May PJ ( 2007) Implementation Regimes and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Employment Service Delivery. Paper presented at the Public Management Research Conference, Tucson, Arizona , October 25-27.
