Since 1997, there has arguably been a 'rediscovery' of those most at risk of poverty and social exclusion by New Labour. Within this context, it is important to consider the European, national and sub-national policy frameworks within which interventions are being developed. The European Union's 'Open Method of Co-ordination' is of relevance given its emphasis on making a decisive impact on poverty and social exclusion by 2010 through stimulating domestic policy processes in the form of National Action Plans on Inclusion (NAPSI). It also attempts to provide a coordinating framework for member states to exchange policy ideas and practices. As part of the development of the 2006-8 UK NAPSI, a Social Policy Task Force worked jointly with the Department of Work and Pensions to take forward the 'Get Heard' process — a mechanism to ensure that the views of those at the 'grassroots' could be fed into the process of developing the plan. This article presents key findings from one case study area (Merseyside). There is a subsequent consideration of the degree to which either informal or more formalized arrangements are conducive to securing enhanced horizontal and vertical integration in governance frameworks, policy making and service delivery for those most marginalized.
Armstrong, K.A. (2006) `The "Europeanisation" of Social Exclusion: British Adaptation to EU Co-ordination' , British Journal of Politics and International Relations8: 79-100.
2.
Bakvis, H. and Juillet, L. (2004) The Horizontal Challenge: Line Departments, Central Agencies and Leadership. Ottawa: Canada School of Public Service.
3.
Burchardt, T. , LeGrand, J. and Piachaud, D. (2002) `Degrees of Exclusion: Developing a Dynamic, Multidimensional Measure', in J. Hills , J. LeGrand and J. Piachaud (eds) Understanding Social Exclusion, pp. 30-43. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
4.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006) Local Area Agreements: Guidance for Round 3 and Refresh of Rounds 1 and 2. London: DCLG.
5.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) ( 2004) Every Child Matters: Next Steps. Nottingham : DfES.
6.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) ( 2005) Early Impacts of Sure Start Local Programmes on Children and Families, Research Report NESS/2005/FR/13. Nottingham : DfES.
7.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2006 a) Working Together: UK National Action Plan on Social Inclusion 2006-08. London: DWP.
8.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2006 b) `Guidance for Towns and Cities Invited to Submit an Expression of Interest for DWP's City Strategy', URL (consulted May 2007 ): http://www.dwp.gov.uk/welfarereform/docs/
9.
Department of Social Security (DSS) (1999) Opportunity for All: Tackling Poverty and Social Exclusion. London: The Stationery Office.
10.
Diamond, J. and Liddle, J. (2005) The Management of Regeneration: Choices, Challenges and Dilemmas. London: Routledge .
11.
Goodwin, M. , Jones, M. and Jones, R. (2005) `Devolution, Constitutional Change and Economic Development: Explaining and Understanding the New Institutional Geographies of the British State' , Regional Studies39(4): 431-6.
12.
HM Treasury (2007) Review of Sub-national Economic Development and Regeneration. London : HM Treasury.
13.
Jordan, A. (2001) `The European Union: An Evolving System of Multi-level Governance . . . or Government?', Policy and Politics29(2): 193-208.
14.
Lawless, P. (2006) `Area Based Urban Interventions: Rationale and Outcomes - The New Deal for Communities Programme in England' , Urban Studies43(11): 1991-2011.
15.
Levitas, R. (1996) `The Concept of Social Exclusion and the New "Durkheiman" Hegemony' , Critical Social Policy46(16): 5-20.
16.
Levitas, R. (1998) The Inclusive Society: Social Exclusion and New Labour. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
17.
Levitas, R. (2005) The Inclusive Society: Social Exclusion and New Labour, 2nd edn. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
Levitas, R. (2006) `The Concept and Measurement of Social Exclusion' , in C. Pantazis , D. Gordon and R. Levitas (eds) Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey, pp. 123-60. Bristol : Policy Press.
19.
Liverpool Black and Other Racial Minorities (BRM) Network (2006) Liverpool Black and Other Racial Minorities (BRM) Joint Action Plan. Liverpool: BRM Network.
20.
Lloyd, M.G. (2007) `"Pooled Sovereignty" and Institutional Integration for Community Regeneration in Scotland and Canada' , revised paper submitted to Local Economy, March 2007. Available from the author on request at Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool: http://www.liv.ac.uk/civdes/staff/Lloyd.htm .
21.
Local Agreements Network (2007) Strategic Cross-boundary Working: How Will Maas Help?London: Shared Intelligence .
22.
Local Government Association (LGA) (2005) Briefing: Reaching Out: An Action Plan on Social Exclusion. London: LGA.
23.
McGhee, D. (2003) `Joined-Up Government, "Community Safety" and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans-gendered Citizens' , Critical Social Policy23(5): 345-74.
24.
Marsh, D. and Smith, M.J. (2001) `There is More Than One Way to do Political Science: On Different Ways to Study Policy Networks' , Political Studies49(3): 528-41.
25.
Mason, M. (2004) `Collaborative Partnerships for Urban Development: A Study of the Vancouver Agreement'. London: LSE Research Online, URL (consulted May 2007): http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000692
26.
Meegan, R. and Mitchell, A. (2001) `It's Not Community Round Here, It's Neighbourhood: Neighbourhood Change and Cohesion in Urban Regeneration Policies' , Urban Studies38(12): 2167-94.
27.
Merseyside Social Inclusion Observatory (MSIO) ( 2005) Merseyside Gets Heard: A Profile of Social Exclusion and Poverty on Merseyside, MSIO Research Report No. 6. Liverpool : MSIO.
28.
Morgan, K. (2002) `The New Regeneration Narrative: Local Development in the Multi-Level Polity' , Local Economy17(3): 191-9.
29.
Morphet, J. (2004) Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI): Scoping Paper on Integrated Planning. London: Royal Town Planning Institute Research and Knowledge Committee.
Noon, D. , Smith-Canham, J. and Eagland, M. (2000) `Economic Regeneration and Funding', in P. Roberts and H. Sykes (eds) Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, pp. 61-85. London : SAGE.
32.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) ( 2003) More than a Roof: A Report into Tackling Homelessness . London: ODPM.
33.
Payne, M. and Yates, S. (2006) `Not so NEET?: A Critique of the Use of the Term "NEET" in Setting Targets for Interventions with Young People' , Journal of Youth Studies9(3): 329-44.
34.
Pepper, J. and Perkins, R. (2003) Social Inclusion and Recovery: A Model for Mental Health Practice. London: Elsevier .
35.
Peters, G.B. and Pierre, J. (2001) `Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: Towards Multi-level Governance' , Policy and Politics29(2): 131-5.
36.
Pierre, J. and Stoker, G. (2000) `Towards Multi-level Governance', in P. Dunleavy , A. Gamble , I. Holliday and G. Peele (eds) Developments in British Politics, 6th edn, pp. 29-46. London: Macmillan .
37.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996) `The New Governance: Governing without Government' , Political Studies44(4): 652-67.
38.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
39.
Room, G. (ed.) (1995) Beyond the Threshold?: The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.
40.
Sabatier, P.A. and Pelkey, N. (1987) `Incorporating Multiple Actors and Guidance Instruments into Models of Regulatory Policymaking: An Advocacy Coalition Framework' , Administration and Society19: 236-63.
41.
Silver, H. (1995) `Reconceptualising Social Disadvantage: Three Paradigms of Social Exclusion', in G. Rodgers , C. Gore and J.B. Figueiredo (eds) Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses, pp. 56-79. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
42.
Social Exclusion Taskforce (2006) Reaching Out: An Action Plan on Social Exclusion . London: HM Government.
43.
Social Exclusion Taskforce (2007) The Multidimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion . London: HM Government.
44.
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) (1997) Social Exclusion Unit: Purpose, Work Priorities and Working Methods. London: The Stationery Office.
45.
Social Exclusion Unit (SEU) (2001) A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy Action Plan. London: SEU.
46.
Sullivan, H. and Skelcher, C. (2002) Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
Summerfield, D. (2001) `Asylum Seekers, Refugees and Mental Health Services in the UK' , Psychiatric Bulletin25: 161-3.
48.
Teague, P. (2006) `Social Partnership and Local Development in Ireland: The Limits to Deliberation' , British Journal of Industrial Relations44(3): 421-43.
49.
Theodore, N. and Peck, J. (2000) `Searching for Best Practice in Welfare-to-work: The Means, the Method and the Message' , Policy and Politics29(4): 81-98.
50.
Walker, R. (ed.) (1999) Ending Child Poverty: Popular Welfare for the 21st Century. Bristol : Policy Press.
