Academic observers have long criticized the European Union for being plagued with a `democratic deficit', a critique that is based on the European parliamentary model of democracy. Although widely considered to be a valid foundation for democratic evaluation of the Union, the parliamentary model is irrelevant to the EU's supranational context and character. This irrelevance brings the mainstream democratic deficit literature into question. The American `pluralist' model, with its emphasis on societal interest groups and a fragmented governmental structure, provides a more appropriate foundation for democratic decision-making at the EU's supranational level. This framework explains recent contributions to the literature, and suggests a transition from the traditional democratic deficit critique to a new theoretical conception of democracy in the European Union.
Andersen, Svein S.
and Tom R. Burns (1996) `The European Union and the Erosion of Parliamentary Democracy: A Study of Post-Parliamentary Governance', in Svein S. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage.
2.
Andersen, Svein S.
and Kjell A. Eliassen (1996a) `EU-Lobbying: Between Representativity and Effectiveness', in Svein S. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage.
3.
Andersen, Svein S.
and Kjell A. Eliassen (1996b) `Introduction: Dilemmas, Contradictions and the Future of European Democracy', in Svein S. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage.
4.
Attinà, Fulvio
(1990) `The Voting Behaviour of European Parliament Members and the Problem of Europarties', European Journal of Political Research18(5): 557-579.
5.
Attinà, Fulvio
(1994) `On Political Representation in the European Union: Party Politics, Electoral System, and Territorial Representation', Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop on Democratic Representation and the Legitimacy of Government in the European Community, Madrid.
6.
Bardi, Luciano (1987) `Representation in the European Parliament', PhD dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University.
7.
Bardi, Luciano
(1992) `Transnational Party Federations in the European Community', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960-90. London: Sage.
8.
Bardi, Luciano
(1994) `Transnational Party Federations, European Parliamentary Party Groups, and the Building of Europarties', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.
9.
Bartolini, Stefano
and Peter Mair (1990) Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Bentley, Arthur F.
(1908) The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Berger, Suzanne
(ed.) (1981) Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Bogdanor, Vernon
(1986) `The Future of the European Community: Two Models of Democracy', Government and Opposition21(2): 161-176.
13.
Bogdanor, Vernon
(1989a) `Direct Elections, Representative Democracy and European Integration', Electoral Studies8(3): 205-216.
14.
Bogdanor, Vernon
(1989b) `The June 1989 European Elections and the Institutions of the Community', Government and Opposition24(2): 199-214.
15.
Bogdanor, Vernon (1990) `Democratising the Community', Federal Trust Discussion Paper. London: Federal Trust for Education and Research.
16.
Budge, Ian
and Hans Keman (1990) Parties and Democracy: Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in Twenty States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Butler, David
and Bo Särlvik (eds) (1984) Special Issue of Electoral Studies3(3).
18.
Butler, David
and Bo Särlvik (eds) (1989) Special Issue of Electoral Studies8(3).
19.
Castles, Francis G.
(ed.) (1982) The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States. London: Sage.
20.
Castles, Francis G.
and Rudolf Wildenmann (eds) (1986) Visions and Realities of Party Government. Berlin: de Gruyter.
21.
Centre for Economic Policy Research
(1993) Making Sense of Subsidiarity: How Much Centralization for Europe?London: CEPR.
22.
Connolly, William E.
(ed.) (1969) The Bias of Pluralism. New York: Atherton Press.
23.
Cooke, Jacob E.
(ed.) (1961) The Federalist. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
24.
Crenson, Matthew A.
(1971) The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1966) `Patterns of Opposition', in Robert A. Dahl (ed.) Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1976) Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand McNally.
29.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1982) Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
Duff, Andrew
(ed.) (1993) Subsidiarity within the European Community. London: Federal Trust.
31.
Epstein, Leon D.
(1986) Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
32.
Garrett, Geoffrey
(1995) `From the Luxembourg Compromise to Codecision: Decision Making in the European Union', Electoral Studies14(3): 289-308.
33.
Garrett, Geoffrey
and George Tsebelis (1996) `An Institutionalist Critique of Intergovernmentalism', International Organization50(2): 269-299.
34.
Ginsberg, Benjamin
and Martin Shefter (1990) Politics by Other Means: The Declining Importance of Elections in America. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Jacobs, Francis
, Richard Corbett and Michael Shackleton (1992) The European Parliament, 2nd edn.Harlow: Longman.
36.
Jones, Barry
and Michael Keating (eds) (1995) The European Union and the Regions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37.
Kaiser, André
(1997) `Types of Democracy: From Classical to New Institutionalism', Journal of Theoretical Politics9(4): 419-444.
38.
Kariel, Henry
(1961) The Decline of American Pluralism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
Kariel, Henry
(1966) The Promise of Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.
Katz, Richard S.
(ed.) (1987) Party Governments: European and American Experiences. Berlin: de Gruyter.
41.
Katz, Richard S.
and Robin Kolodny (1994) `Party Organization as an Empty Vessel: Parties in American Politics', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.
42.
Katz, Richard S.
and Peter Mair (eds) (1992) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960-90. London: Sage.
43.
Katz, Richard S.
and Peter Mair (eds) (1994) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.
44.
Key, V. O., Jr
(1964) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th edn.New York: Crowell.
45.
Kornhauser, William
(1959) The Politics of Mass Society. New York: Free Press.
46.
Lijphart, Arend
(1969) `Consociational Democracy', World Politics21(2): 207-225.
47.
Lijphart, Arend
(1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48.
Lijphart, Arend
(1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
Lijphart, Arend
(ed.) (1992) Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
Lipset, Seymour Martin
and Stein Rokkan (1967) `Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction', in Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
51.
Livingston, William S.
(1976) `Britain and America: The Institutionalization of Accountability', Journal of Politics38(4): 879-894.
Lodge, Juliet
(1985) `Euro-Elections and the European Parliament: The Dilemma Over Turnout and Powers', Parliamentary Affairs38(1): 40-55.
54.
Lodge, Juliet
(ed.) (1986a) Direct Elections to the European Parliament 1984. New York: St Martin's Press.
55.
Lodge, Juliet
(1986b) `Institutional Provisions: Towards A Parliamentary Democracy', in Juliet Lodge (ed.) European Union: The European Community in Search of a Future. New York: St Martin's Press.
56.
Lodge, Juliet
(ed.) (1990) The 1989 Election of the European Parliament. London: Macmillan.
57.
Lodge, Juliet (1991) `The Democratic Deficit and the European Parliament', Fabian Society Discussion Paper No. 4. London: Fabian Society.
58.
Lodge, Juliet
(1994) `The European Parliament and the Authority-Democracy Crisis', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science531: 69-83.
59.
Lodge, Juliet
(ed.) (1996a) The 1994 Elections to the European Parliament. London: Pinter.
60.
Lodge, Juliet
(1996b) `The European Parliament and Euro-Elections: A Quest for Legitimacy and Integration?', in Juliet Lodge (ed.) The 1994 Elections to the European Parliament. London: Pinter.
61.
Lodge, Juliet
(1996c) `The Future of the European Parliament', in Juliet Lodge (ed.) The 1994 Elections to the European Parliament. London: Pinter.
62.
Lord, Christopher
(1994) `Party Groups in the European Parliament: Rethinking the Role of Transnational Parties in the Democratization of the European Union', Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop on Democratic Representation and the Legitimacy of Government in the European Community, Madrid.
63.
Lowi, Theodore J.
(1969) The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: Norton.
64.
McConnell, Grant
(1966) Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
65.
Mahood, H. R.
(1990) Interest Group Politics in America: A New Intensity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
66.
Marriott, Sir John A. R.
(1975) English Political Institutions, 4th edn.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, first published 1938.
67.
Mazey, Sonia
and Jeremy Richardson (eds) (1993) Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
Mazey, Sonia
and Jeremy Richardson (1994) `Interest Groups and Representation in the European Union', Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop on Democratic Representation and the Legitimacy of Government in the European Community, Madrid.
69.
Moe, Terry M.
and Michael Caldwell (1994) `The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics150(1): 171-195.
70.
Niedermayer, Oskar
(1984a) `The Transnational Dimension of the Election', Electoral Studies3(3): 235-243.
71.
Niedermayer, Oskar
(1984b) `Transnational Party Co-operation', in Karlheinz Reif (ed.) European Elections 1979/81 and 1984: Conclusions and Perspectives from Empirical Research. Berlin: Quorum.
72.
Niedermayer, Oskar
(1990) `Turnout in the European Elections', Electoral Studies9(1): 45-50.
73.
Niedermayer, Oskar
(1991) `The 1989 European Elections: Campaigns and Results', European Journal of Political Research19(1): 3-16.
74.
Nugent, Neill
(1994) The Government and Politics of the European Union, 3rd edn.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
75.
Obradovic, D.
(1994) `Interest Representation and the Legitimacy of the EC Decision Making Process', Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop on Democratic Representation and the Legitimacy of Government in the European Community, Madrid.
76.
Olson, Mancur
(1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
Panebianco, Angelo
(1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power, trans. Marc Silver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, first published 1982.
78.
Parenti, Michael
(1974) Democracy for the Few. New York: St Martin's Press.
79.
Pedersen, Mogens N.
(1996) `Euro-Parties and European Parties: New Arenas, New Challenges and New Strategies', in Svein S. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage.
80.
Price, Don K.
(1943) `The Parliamentary and Presidential Systems', Public Administration Review3(4): 317-334.
81.
Ranney, Austin
(1954) The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origins and Present State. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
82.
Reif, Karlheinz
(1984) `National Electoral Cycles and European Elections 1979 and 1984', Electoral Studies3(3): 244-255.
83.
Reif, Karlheinz
and Hermann Schmitt (1980) `Nine Second Order Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results', European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3-44.
84.
Schattschneider, E. E.
(1942) Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
85.
Schmitter, Philippe C.
(1974) `Still the Century of Corporatism?'Review of Politics36(1): 85-131.
86.
Schmitter, Philippe C.
and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds) (1979) Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage.
87.
Schmitter, Philippe C.
and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds) (1982) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. Beverly Hills: Sage.
88.
Smith, Andy
(1994) `Going Beyond “the Democratic Deficit”. European Union Policies for Rural Development: Subsidiarity and Partnership in Networked Societies', Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop on Democratic Representation and the Legitimacy of Government in the European Community, Madrid.
89.
Sorauf, Frank J.
(1976) Party Politics in America, 3rd edn.Boston: Little, Brown.
90.
Steed, Michael
(1983) `The European Parliament', in Vernon Bogdanor and David Butler (eds) Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and their Political Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91.
Steed, Michael
(1984) `Failure or Long-Haul? European Elections and European Integration', Electoral Studies3(3): 225-234.
92.
Streeck, Wolfgang
and Philippe C. Schmitter (1991) `From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the Single European Market', Politics and Society19(2): 133-164.
93.
Truman, David
(1951) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.
94.
Tsebelis, George
(1994) `The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter', American Political Science Review88(1): 128-142.
95.
Tsebelis, George
(1995a) `Conditional Agenda Setting and Decision Making Inside the European Parliament', Journal of Legislative Studies1(1): 65-93.
96.
Tsebelis, George
(1995b) `Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism', British Journal of Political Science25(3): 289-325.
97.
Tsebelis, George
(1995c) `Will Maastricht Reduce the “Democratic Deficit”?'APSA-CP Newsletter6(1): 4-6.
98.
Wessels, Wolfgang
(1996) `The Modern West European State and the European Union: Democratic Erosion or a New Kind of Polity?', in Svein S. Andersen and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage.
99.
Wheare, K. C.
(1946) Federal Government. London: Oxford University Press.
100.
Williams, Shirley
(1990) `Sovereignty and Accountability in the European Community', Political Quarterly61(3): 299-317.
