How does policy information flow through Washington `issue networks'? And how does information flow determine which lobbyists get access in policy-making? Drawing upon the `strength of weak ties' argument, the authors argue that policy information passes more through acquaintances (`weak ties') than through close, trusted, contacts (`strong ties'). They support this argument in an analysis of data on lobbying networks in health-care policy-making in the 1970s and 1980s. The statistical analyses show that access to policy-makers in Washington is network-autocorrelated: a lobbyist's access depends upon the access of other lobbyists s/he knows. The results demonstrate the importance of weak ties as a restricted form of `social capital' in policy-making.
Anselin, Luc
(1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. New York: Kluwer Academic.
2.
Austen-Smith, David
(1992) `Strategic Models of Talk in Political Decision Making', International Political Science Review13(1): 45-58.
3.
Austen-Smith, David (1997) `Endogenous Informational Lobbying', manuscript, Northwestern University.
4.
Austen-Smith, David
and John R. Wright (1992) `Competitive Lobbying for a Legislator's Vote', Social Choice and Welfare9: 229-257.
5.
Austen-Smith, David
and John R. Wright (1994) `Counteractive Lobbying', American Journal of Political Science38(1): 25-44.
6.
Bauer, Raymond A.
, Ithiel De Sola Pool and Lewis Anthony Dexter (1972) American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade, 2nd edn.Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
7.
Boorman, Scott A.
(1975) `A Combinatorial Optimization Model for Transmission of Job Information Through Job Contact Networks', Bell Journal of Economics6(1): 216-249.
8.
Brehm, John
and Wendy Rahn (1997) `Individual-level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital', American Journal of Political Science41(3): 999-1023.
9.
Browne, William P.
(1988) Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. Lawrence: Kansas University Press.
10.
Gais, Thomas L.
, Mark A. Peterson and Jack L. Walker (1984) `Interest Groups, Iron Triangles and Representative Institutions in American National Government', British Journal of Political Science14: 161-185.
11.
Galbraith, John Kenneth
(1967) The New Industrial State. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
12.
Granovetter, M. S.
(1973) `The Strength of Weak Ties', American Journal of Sociology78: 1360-1380. Reprinted in Samuel Leinhardt (ed.) (1977) Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Heclo, Hugh
(1978) `Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment: Government Growth in an Age of Improvement, in Anthony King (ed.) The New American Political System. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
14.
Heinz, John P.
, Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson and Robert H. Salisbury (1993) The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Hojnacki, Marie and David Kimball (1997) `Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress', typescript, Penn State University.
16.
King, Gary
(1989) Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Kingdon, John W.
(1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
18.
Kollman, Ken
(1997) `Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees', American Journal of Political Science41(2): 519-544.
19.
Laumann, Edward O.
and David Knoke (1987) The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
20.
Leech, Beth L.
(1997) `Conflictual and Cooperative Lobbying Strategies', paper presented at the 1997 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
21.
Lindblom, Charles E.
(1977) Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Milbrath, Lester W.
(1963) The Washington Lobbyists. Chicago: Rand McNally.
23.
Peterson, Mark A.
(1992) `The Presidency and Organized Interests: White House Patterns of Interest Group Liaison', American Political Science Review86(3): 612-625.
24.
Putnam, Robert D.
(1995) `Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital', Journal of Democracy pp. 63-78.
25.
Radner, Roy
(1993) `The Organization of Decentralized Information Processing', Econometrica61(5): 1109-1146.
26.
Rasmusen, Eric
(1993) `Lobbying When the Decisionmaker Can Acquire Independent Information', Public Choice77(4): 899-913.
27.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman
and John T. Tierney (1986) Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
28.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman
and John T. Tierney (1988) `More of the Same: Washington Pressure Group Activity in a Decade of Change', Journal of Politics45: 351-375.
29.
Schneider, Mark
, Paul Teske, Melissa Marschall, Michael Mintrom and Christine Roch (1997a) `Institutional Arrangements and the Creation of Social Capital: The Effects of Public School Choice', American Political Science Review91(1): 82-93.
30.
Schneider, Mark
, Paul Teske, Christine Roch and Melissa Marschall (1997b) `Networks to Nowhere: Segregation and Stratification in Networks of Information about Schools', American Journal of Political Science41(4): 1201-1223.
31.
Wright, John R.
(1996) Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
Zafonte, M. and P. Sabatier (1997) `Shared Beliefs and Functional Interdependence as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems: An Analysis of San Francisco Bay/Delta Water Policy', APSA conference paper.
