Although there are well-developed theories of two-party competition in a one-dimensional policy space, it has proven extremely difficult to construct a model of multi-party competition (with three or more parties) in two or more dimensions. One difficulty with developing such a model is due to the phenomenon of political uncertainty over the expected nature of the governing coalition. A cooperative equilibrium notion, the `political heart', is used here to characterise post-election coalition formation. Empirical evidence from 12 European political systems in the post-war period is presented, to corroborate this equilibrium concept. Using this notion, a typology based on fragmentation and centrality is proposed. A model of multi-party competition over pre-election policy proposals is described. It is argued that this model is compatible with the predictions of the political heart concerning coalition formation.
Austen-Smith, D.
and J. Banks (1988) `Elections, Coalitions and Legislative Outcomes', American Political Science Review81: 405-422.
2.
Axelrod, R.
(1970) Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.
3.
Baron, D.
(1993) `Government Formation and Endogenous Parties', American Political Science Review87: 37-47.
4.
Budge, I.
, D. Robertson and D. J. Hearl (eds) (1987) Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cohen, L.
(1979) `Cyclic Sets in Multidimensional Voting Models', Journal of Economic Theory20: 1-12.
6.
Cohen, L.
and S. Matthews (1980) `Constrained Plott Equilibria, Directional Equilbria and Global Cycling Sets', Review of Economic Studies47: 975-986.
7.
Cox, G.
(1987) `The Uncovered Set and the Core', American Journal of Political Science31: 408-422.
8.
De Swaan, A.
(1973) Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9.
Dittrich, K.
(1987) `The Netherlands 1946-1982', in I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. J. Hearl (eds) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Dodd, L. C.
(1974) `Party Coalitions in Multiparty Parliaments: A Game Theoretic Analysis', American Political Science Review68: 1093-1117.
11.
Dodd, L. C.
(1976) Coalitions in Parliamentary Governments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Downs, A.
(1957) Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
13.
Duverger, M.
(1951) Political Parties. London: Methuen.
14.
Duverger, M.
(1984) `Which is the Best Electoral System?', in A. Lijphart and B. Grofman (eds) Choosing an Electoral System, pp. 31-39. New York: Praeger.
15.
Gamson, W.
(1961) `A Theory of Coalition Formation', American Sociological Review26: 373-381.
16.
Grofman, B.
(1982) `A Dynamic Model of Proto-coalition Formation in Ideological n-Space', Behavioral Science27: 77-90.
17.
Hearl, D. J.
(1987a) `Belgium: 1946-1981', in I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. Hearl (eds) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies, pp. 230-253. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Hearl, D. J.
(1987b) `Luxembourg', in I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. Hearl (eds) Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies, pp. 254-269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Hearl, D. J.
(1992a) `Party and Coalition in Belgium', in M. J. Laver and I. BudgeParty Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 244-276. New York: St Martin's Press.
20.
Hearl, D. J.
(1992b) `Party and Coalition in Luxembourg', in M. J. Laver and I. Budge, Party Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 223-243. New York: St Martin's Press.
21.
Herman, V.
and J. Pope (1973) `Minority Governments in Western Democracies', British Journal of Political Science3: 191-212.
22.
Holmstedt, M.
and T. L. Schou (1987) `Sweden and Denmark, 1945-1982: Election Programmes in the Scandinavian Setting', in I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. J. Hearl (eds) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies, pp. 177-206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Ishida, T.
and E. S. Krauss (1989) Democracy in Japan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
24.
King, G.
, J. Alt, N. Burns and M. Laver (1990) `A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies', American Political Science Review34: 846-871.
25.
Kramer, G. H.
(1973) `On a Class of Equilibrium Conditions for Majority Rule', Econometrica41: 283-297.
26.
Kramer, G. H.
(1977) `A Dynamic Model of Political Equilibrium', Journal of Economic Theory16: 538-548.
27.
Laakso, M.
and R. Taagepera (1979) `Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Applications to West Europe', Comparative Political Science12: 3-27.
28.
Laver, M. J.
(1992) `Coalition and Party Policy in Ireland', in M. J. Laver and I. Budge (eds) Party Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 41-60. New York: St Martin's Press.
29.
Laver, M. J.
and I. Budge (1992) Party Policy and Government Coalitions. New York: St Martin's Press.
30.
Laver, M. J.
and N. Schofield (1990) Multiparty Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
McKelvey, R. D.
(1976) `Intransitivities in Mltidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control', Journal of Economic Theory12: 472-482.
32.
McKelvey, R. D.
(1979) `General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models', Econometrica47: 1085-1111.
33.
McKelvey, R. D.
and N. Schofield (1987) `Generalized Symmetry Conditions at a Core Point', Econometrica55: 923-933.
34.
Mastropaolo, A.
and M. Slater (1992) `Party Policy in Italy, 1948-1987: Is There Order Behind the Chaos?' in M. J. Laver and I. Budge, Party Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 312-345. New York: St Martin's Press.
35.
Mershon, C.
(1995) `The Costs of Coalition: The Italian Anomoly', forthcoming in N. Schofield (ed.) Social Choice and Political Economy. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
36.
Paloheimo, H.
(1984) Governments in Democratic Capitalist States. Turku, Finland: University of Turku Studies on Political Science.
37.
Plott, C.
(1967) `A Notion of Equilibrium and its Possibility under Majority Rule', American Economic Review57: 787-806.
38.
Popper, K.
(1945) The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge.
39.
Popper, K.
(1988) `The Open Society and its Enemies Revisited', The Economist307: 19-22.
40.
Rae, D.
(1967) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Riker, W. H.
(1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
Robertson, D.
(1987) `Britain, Australia, New Zealand and the United States, 1946-1987, An Initial Comparative Analysis', in I. Budge, D. Robertson and D. Hearl (eds) Democracy, Strategy and Party Change, pp. 39-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Rose, R.
(1984) `A Question of Degree or Principle?', in A. Lijphart and B. Grofman (eds) Choosing an Electoral System, pp. 73-81. New York: Praeger.
44.
Schofield, N.
(1978) `Instability of Simple Dynamic Games', Review of Economic Studies45: 575-594.
45.
Schofield, N.
(1980) `Generic Properties of Simple Bergson-Samuelson Welfare Functions', Journal of Mathematical Economics7: 175-192.
46.
Schofield, N.
(1982) `Bargaining Set Theory and Stability in Coalition Governments', Mathematical Social Science3: 9-31.
47.
Schofield, N.
(1984) `Social Equilibrium and Cycles on Compact Sets', Journal of Economic Theory33: 59-71.
48.
Schofield, N.
(1985) Social Choice and Democracy. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
49.
Schofield, N.
(1986) `Existence of a “Structurally Stable” Equilibrium for a Non-Collegial Voting Rule', Public Choice51: 267-284.
50.
Schofield, N.
(1993a) `Political Competition in Multiparty Coalition Governments', European Journal of Political Research23: 1-33.
51.
Schofield, N.
(1993b) `Party Competition in a Spatial Model of Coalition Formation', in W. Barnett, M. J. Hinich and N. Schofield (eds) Political Economy: Institutions, Competition and Representation, pp. 133-174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Schofield, N.
(1995a) `Existence of a Social Choice Functor', in W. Barnett, H. Moulin, M. Salles and N. Schofield (eds) Social Choice, Welfare and Ethics, pp. 213-246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Schofield, N.
(1995b) `The Heart of a Polity', forthcoming in N. Schofield (ed.) Social Choice and Political Economy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
54.
Schofield, N.
(1995c) `Multiparty Electoral Politics', forthcoming in D. Mueller (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Schofield, N. and R. Parks (1993) `Existence of a Nash Equilibrium in a Spatial Model of n-Party Competition', unpublished typescript, Center in Political Economy, Washington University.
56.
Schou, T. L.
and D. Hearl (1992) `Party and Coalition Policy in Denmark', in M. J. Laver and I. Budge (eds) Party Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 151-188. New York: St Martin's Press.
57.
Sened, I. (1994) `Making Formal Theory Meet its Empirical End: Coalition Formation in Israel, 1948-1994', unpublished typescript, Washington University.
58.
Sened, I.
(1995) `Equilibria in Weighted Voting Games in Two-Dimensional Spaces', Journal of Theoretical Politics7(3): 283-300.
59.
Shaked, A.
(1975) `Non-Existence of Equilibrium for the 2-Dimensional 3-Firm Location Problem', Review of Economic Studies42: 51-56.
60.
Shepsle, K.
(1991) Models of Multiparty Electoral Competition. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood.
61.
Strom, K.
(1990) `A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties', American Journal of Political Science34: 565-598.
62.
Strom, K.
(1993) `Policy, Institutions and Coalition Avoidance: Norwegian Governments, 1945-1990', American Political Science Review87: 870-887.
63.
Strom, K.
and T. Bergman (1992) `Sweden: Social Democratic Dominance in One Dimension', in M. J. Laver and I. Budge, Party Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 109-150. New York: St Martin's Press.
64.
Strom, K.
and J. Leipart (1992) `Norway: Policy Pursuit and Coalition Avoidance', in M. J. Laver and I. Budge, Party Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 61-108. New York: St Martins Press.
65.
Taagepera, R.
and M. S. Shugart (1989) Seats and Votes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
66.
Taylor, M.
and M. Laver (1973) `Government Coalitions in Western Europe: 1945-1986', The European Journal of Political Research3: 555-591.
67.
Tops, P.
and K. Dittrich (1992) `The Role of Policy in Dutch Coalition Building, 1946-1981', in M. J. Laver and I. Budge, Party Policy and Government Coalitions, pp. 277-311. New York: St Martin's Press.
68.
Warwick, P.
(1979) `The Durability of Coalition Governments in Parliamentary Democracies', Comparative Political Studies11: 464-498.
69.
Warwick, P.
and S. T. Easton (1992) `The Cabinet Stability Controversy: New Perspectives on a Classic Problem', American Journal of Political Science36: 122-136.
