Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

`I just want a fair share!' We all say it, but what is fair? The most complete answer is John Rawls's A Theory of Justice. Experimental tests of Rawls's theory were conducted to generate some empirical data to compare with similar studies done in the United States and Poland by Norm Frohlich and Joe Oppenheimer. The subjects were university students who made decisions behind a veil of ignorance to govern subsequent distributions of money. Subjects identified and agreed on distributive principles, as Rawls's theory asserts, but they gave little support to Rawls's principle of maximizing the worst off. The main conclusion is that individuals and groups have complex conceptions of justice that do not reduce to a simple principle. These subjects were less confident than their American counterparts, and they changed their minds as the experiment continued.

Keywords

justice Rawls experiments Frohlich Oppenheimer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bean, Clive (1991) `Are Australian Attitudes to Government Different? A Comparison with Five Other Nations', in Francis Castles (ed.) Australia Compared, pp. 79-97. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Bond, Doug and Jong-Chul Park (1991) `An Empirical Test of Rawls's Theory of Justice', Simulations and Gaming 22(4): 443-462.

Braithwaite, John (1988) `Economic Policy: What Does the Electorate Think?', in Jonathan Kelly and Clive Bean (eds) Australian Attitudes, pp. 27-40. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Frohlich, Norman and Joe Oppenheimer (1992) Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Grafton, Anthony (1992) New Worlds, Ancient Texts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hill, Peter (1990) `An Antipodean Perspective on Distributive Justice: An Experimental Approach', BA Honours thesis, Department of Government, University of Sydney.

Jackson, Michael (1986) Matters of Justice. London: Croom Helm.

Jackson, Michael (1992) `The Gedankenexperiment Method of Ethics', Journal of Value Inquiry 26(4): 525-535.

Kukathas, Chandran and Philip Pettit (1990) Rawls: A Theory of Justice and Its Critic. Cambridge: Polity.

10.

Lissowski, Grzegorz , Tadeuz Tyszka and Wladzimierz Okrasa (1991) `Principles of Distributive Justice: Experiments in Poland and America', Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(1): 98-115.

11.

Miller, David (1976) Social Justice. London: Oxford University Press.

12.

New York Times (1972) `Five Significant Books of 1972', New York Times Book Review 3 December: 1-1.

13.

Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

14.

Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

15.

Soltan, Karol (1987) The Causal Theory of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

A Fair Share

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References