This article looks at different conceptions of what political philosophy is as a vocation, with an eye on the question of what is the point of writing books specifically on global justice. The occasion for reflecting on this question is a particular line of criticism that has been advanced against my 2012 book On Global Justice. I introduce a Platonic conception of political philosophy and then turn to two contemporary conceptions: one due to Habermas and one due to Rawls. The Rawlsian approach strikes me as most plausible. I develop that approach some more by defending it against different versions of realism and bring it to bear on the title question.
AngleS (2012) Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2.
BlakeM (2013) Justice and Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
DrebenB (2003) On Rawls and political liberalism. In: FreemanS (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 316–347.
4.
EnochD (2013) The disorder of public reason. Ethics124(1): 141–176.
5.
EstlundD (2008) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
FinlaysonJGFreyenhagenF (eds) (2011a) Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. New York: Routledge.
7.
FinlaysonJGFreyenhagenF (2011b) Introduction: The Habermas-Rawls dispute—Analysis and reevaluation. In: FinlaysonJGFreyenhagenF (eds) Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–25.
8.
ForstR (2014) The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
GeussR (2005) Outside Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
GeussR (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
GeussR (2010) Politics and the Imagination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
HabermasJ (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Vol. 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, Vol. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
13.
HabermasJ (1994) Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
HabermasJ (2011) Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. Liberalism92: 109–131 (reprinted in Finlayson and Freyenhagen, 2011a, pp. 25–46).
16.
HamptonJ (1989) Should political philosophy be done without metaphysics?Ethics99: 791–814.
17.
HerzJ (1951) Political Realism and Political Idealism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
HonigBStearsM (2011) The new realism: From modus vivendi to justice. In: FloydJStearsM (eds) Political Philosophy Versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–205.
19.
HorkheimerM (1974) Notizen 1950 bis 1969, und Dämmerung: Notizen in Deutschland (ed BredeW). Frankfurt: Fischer.
20.
LadenA (2011) The justice of justification. In: FinlaysonJGFreyenhagenF (eds) Habermas and Rawls. Disputing the Political. New York: Routledge, pp. 135–153.
21.
LarmoreC (2003) Public reason. In: FreemanS (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–394.
22.
MearsheimerJ (2014) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, updated edn. New York: Norton.
23.
OakshottM (1959) The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind. London: Bowes and Bowes.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
RawlsJ (1985) Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs14: 223–251
27.
RawlsJ (1996) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
RawlsJ (1999) The Law of Peoples, with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.”Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
RawlsJ (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (ed KellyE). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
30.
RawlsJ (2007) Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy (ed FreemanS). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
31.
RisseM (2012) On Global Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
RozziESleatM (forthcoming) Realism in normative political theory. Philosophical Compass.
33.
SablA (2011) History and reality: Idealist pathologies and “Harvard School” remedies. In: FloydJStearsM (eds) Political Philosophy Versus History?Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–176.
34.
ScanlonTM (2003) Rawls on justification. In FreemanS (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–168.
ShklarJ (1998) The liberalism of fear. In: HoffmannS (ed.) Judith Shklar: Political Thought and Political Thinkers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–20.
37.
SleatM (2013) Liberal Realism. A Realist Theory of Liberal Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
38.
StraussL (1953) Natural Rights and History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
StraussL (1959) What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
TullyJ (2009) Public Philosophy in a New Key, Volume I: Democracy and Civic Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
WaldronJ (1999) Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
WeithmanP (1994) Liberalism and the political character of philosophy. In: DelaneyC (ed.) The Liberalism-Communitarianism Debate. Maryland, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 189–212.
WilliamsB (2005a) In the beginning was the deed. In: WilliamsB (ed.) In the Beginning Was the Deed. Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 18–28.
45.
WilliamsB (2005b) Realism and moralism in political theory. In: WilliamsB (ed.) In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–17.
