This paper demonstrates the compatibility of three supposedly different approaches to political science. Concentrating upon `new institutionalism' it demonstrates that, by discarding theoretically untenable aspects, the fundamental truths of institutional analysis fit perfectly with both behavioural and rational choice methods. The paper then demonstrates that there are four logically separate ways in which rational choice methods can be used to help explain social outcomes and institutions. The demarcation of these separate rational choice methods dispels some common criticisms of rational choice theory.
Allison, G.
(1971) The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
2.
Almond, Gabriel A.
(1988) `The Return to the State', American Political Science Review82: 853-874.
3.
Axelrod, Robert
(1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Collard, E.
(1981) Altruism and Economy: A Study in Non-Selfish Economics. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
5.
Dahl, R. A.
(1961a) `The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest', American Political Science Review55: 763-772.
6.
Dahl, R. A.
(1961b) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Davidson, Donald
(1980) Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8.
Dowding, Keith (1987) `Collective Action, Group Organization and Pluralist Democracy', unpublished DPhil thesis: University of Oxford.
9.
Dowding, Keith
(1991) Rational Choice and Political Power. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
10.
Dunleavy, Patrick
(1991) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
11.
Elster, Jon
(1986) `Introduction', Rational Choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
12.
Hilton, Rita A.
(1992) `Institutional Incentives for Resource Mobilization: An Analysis of Irrigation Systems in Nepal', Journal of Theoretical Politics4: 283-308.
13.
Jordan, Grant
(1990) `Policy Community Realism versus “New” Institutionalist Ambiguity', Political Studies38: 470-484.
14.
Kiser, Larry L.
and Elinor Ostrom (1982) `The Three Worlds of Action: a Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches', in Elinor Ostrom (ed.) Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
McKean, Margaret A.
(1992) `Success on the Commons: A Comparative Examination of Institutions for Common Property Resource Management', Journal of Theoretical Politics4: 247-281.
16.
March, James G.
and Johan P. Olsen (1984) `The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life', American Political Science Review78: 734-749.
17.
March, James G.
and Johan P. Olsen (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. London: The Free Press.
18.
Maynard Smith, John
(1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Ostrom, Elinor
(1990) Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Ostrom, Elinor
(1991) `Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Toward Complementarity', American Political Science Review85: 237-243.
21.
Pettit, Philip
(1978) `Rational Man Theory' in Christopher Hookway and Philip Pettit (eds) Action and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Polsby, Nelson
(1980) Community Power and Political Theory, 2nd edn.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Sened, Itai
(1991) `Contemporary Theories of Institutions in Perspective', Journal of Theoretical Politics3: 379-402.
24.
Shepsle, K. A.
(1979a) `Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models', American Journal of Political Science23: 27-69.
25.
Shepsle, K. A.
(1979b) `The Role of Institutional Structure in the Creation of Policy Equilibrium', in D. W. Rae and T. J. Eismeir (eds) Public Policy and Public Choice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Shepsle, K. A.
(1986) `The Positive Theory of Legislative Institutions: An Enrichment of Social Choice and Spatial Models', Public Choice50: 135-178.
27.
Shepsle, K. A.
(1989) `Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach', Journal of Theoretical Politics1: 131-149.
28.
Shepsle, K. A.
and B. R. Weingast (1987) `The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power', American Political Science Review81: 85-104.
