Formal theorists use a unified collection of models to generate intentional and causal explanations of political behavior. I explicate this claim and argue that disagreements about the role of unification and intentionality are at the root of persistent friction between theorists and empiricists. A debate around pathologies of rational choice theory is used to illustrate the argument.
AshworthSBerryCRBueno de MesquitaE (2021) Theory and Credibility: Integrating Theoretical and Empirical Social Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BinmoreK (2008) Rational Decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BlairGCooperJCoppockA, et al. (2019) Declaring and diagnosing research designs. American Political Science Review113(3): 838–859.
4.
BlumeLEEasleyD (2008) Rationality. In: Durlauf SN and Blume LE (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 884–893.
5.
DavidsonD (1963) Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy60(23): 685–700.
6.
DennettDC (1989) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
DrayWH (1957) Laws and Explanation in History. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
FerejohnJSatzD (1996) Unification, universalism, and rational choice theory. In: Friedman J (ed) The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. New Haven: Yale University Press, 71–84.
9.
FriedmanJ (1996) The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
FriggRNguyenJ (2020) Scientific representation. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2020 ed. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
11.
GiereRN (1988) Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
GiereRN (2006) Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Godfrey-SmithP (2006) The strategy of model-based science. Biology and Philosophy21(5): 725–740.
14.
GreenDShapiroI (1994) Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
GreenDShapiroI (1996) Pathologies revisited: Reflections on our critics. In: Friedman J (ed) The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. New Haven: Yale University Press, 235–276.
16.
GreenDPHaSEBullockJG (2010) Enough already about “Black Box” experiments: Studying mediation is more difficult than most scholars suppose. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science628(1): 200–208.
17.
HalpernJY (2016) Actual Causality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18.
HempelCG (1962) Deductive-nomological vs. statistical explanation. In: Feigl H and Maxwell G (eds) Scientific Explanation, Space & Time, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. III). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 98–169.
19.
ImaiKKeeleLTingleyD (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods15(4): 309.
20.
ImbensGWRubinDB (2015) Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
JamesGWittenDHastieT, et al. (2021) An Introduction to Statistical Learning. New York: Springer.
22.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47(2): 263–291.
23.
KrehbielK (2010) Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LucasJr.RobertE (1999) Interview with Brian Snowden and Howard R. Vane. In: Snowden B and Vane HR (eds) Conversations with Leading Economists: Interpreting Modern Macroeconomics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 145–165.
26.
MorganM (2012) The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MyersonRB (1991) Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
PaulSK (2010) Deviant formal causation. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy5(3): 1–24.
29.
PearlJ (2009) Causality. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
PrzeworskiATeuneH (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley Interscience.
31.
SenA (1993) Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica61(3): 495–521.
32.
SenA (2004) Incompleteness and reasoned choice. Synthese140(1/2): 43–59.
33.
SimonHA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review63(2): 129–138.
34.
ThomaJ (2021) In defence of revealed preference theory. Economics & Philosophy37(2): 163–187.
35.
WestwoodSJGrimmerJTylerM, et al. (2022) Current research overstates American support for political violence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119(12): e2116870119.
