Patient portals allow patients to access their health information and interact with their healthcare system. While their use is still limited, this article explores the behavioral intention to use a patient portal implemented by a public regional authority in Italy. The authors also investigate the role of sociodemographic moderators - age, gender, education, and occupation - on the intention to use the portal.
Methods
While most of the literature on patient portals is focused on small sets of respondents or is verticalized on specific diseases, this paper describes the results of a survey sent to 34,256 users registered on the patient portal. Of these, 15,102 users answered the questionnaire. The survey explored the acceptance of the patient portal through the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model (UTAUT2). Descriptive and SEM analyses were also conducted.
Results
The model has good explanatory power for the behavioral intention to use a patient portal. One construct of the UTAUT2 model showed insignificant effects on the intention to use. The results indicate that the impact of the constructs affecting the intention to use the patient portal is significantly moderated by individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics.
Conclusions
The analysis results confirm a good acceptance of patient portals provided by public authorities. This supports the idea that public institutions can also develop innovative tools. The results confirm the desirability of these tools among citizens. The results have important policy implications for public health investments.
BossenCPineKHCabitzaF, et al.Data work in healthcare: an Introduction. Health Inf J2019; 25(3): 465–474.
2.
DendereRSladeCBurton-JonesA, et al.Patient portals facilitating engagement with inpatient electronic medical records: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res2019; 21(4): e12779.
3.
CariniEVillaniLPezzulloAM, et al.The impact of digital patient portals on health outcomes, system efficiency, and patient attitudes: updated systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res2021; 23(9): e26189.
4.
DavidsonEJØsterlundCSFlahertyMG. Drift and shift in the organizing vision career for personal health records: an investigation of innovation discourse dynamics. Inf Organ2015; 25(4): 191–221.
LebIMagninSProkoschHU, et al.Patient portals: objectives, acceptance, and effects on health outcome-A scoping review of reviews. Stud Health Technol Inf2021; 283: 194–201.
8.
Palos-SanchezPRSauraJRRios MartinMÁ, et al.Toward a better understanding of the intention to use mHealth apps: exploratory study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2021; 9(9): e27021.
9.
GraetzIGordonNFungV, et al.The digital divide and patient portals: internet access explained differences in patient portal use for secure messaging by age, race, and income. Med Care2016; 54(8): 772–779.
10.
HarleCAListhausACovarrubiasCM, et al.Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record: a case report. J Am Med Inf Assoc2016; 23(1): 74–79.
11.
SauraJRPalos-SanchezPVelicia-MartinF. What drives volunteers to accept a digital platform that supports NGO projects?Front Psychol2020; 11: 429.
12.
ReinersFSturmJBouwLJ, et al.Sociodemographic factors influencing the use of eHealth in people with chronic diseases. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2019; 16(4): 645.
13.
ClarkeMALydenERMaJ, et al.Sociodemographic differences and factors affecting patient portal utilization. J Racial Ethn Health Dispar2021; 8: 879–891.
14.
KhairatSColemanCNewlinT, et al.A mixed-methods evaluation framework for electronic health records usability studies. J Biomed Inf2019; 94: 103175.
15.
MatthewsEBSavoyMParanjapeA, et al.Acceptability of health information exchange and patient portal use in depression care among underrepresented patients. J Gen Intern Med2022; 37(15): 3947–3955.
16.
Ben ArfiWBen NasrIKhvatovaT, et al.Understanding acceptance of eHealthcare by IoT natives and IoT immigrants: an integrated model of UTAUT, perceived risk, and financial cost. Technol Forecast Soc Change2021; 163: 120437.
17.
PanMGaoW. Determinants of the behavioral intention to use a mobile nursing application by nurses in China. BMC Health Serv Res2021; 21(1): 228.
18.
RouidiMElouadiAEHamdouneA, et al.TAM-UTAUT and the acceptance of remote healthcare technologies by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Inform Med Unlocked2022; 32: 101008.
19.
YanSKwanYHThumbooJ, et al.Characteristics and health care utilization of different segments of a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore. JAMA Netw Open2019; 2(9): e1910878.
20.
AntonioMGPetrovskayaOLauF. The state of evidence in patient portals: umbrella review. J Med Internet Res2020; 22(11): e23851. DOI: 10.2196/23851.
21.
AlturkistaniAQaviAAnyanwuPE, et al.Patient portal functionalities and patient outcomes among patients with diabetes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res2020; 22(9): e18976.
22.
EccherCGiosLZanuttoA, et al.TreC platform. An integrated and evolving care model for patients’ empowerment and data repository. J Biomed Inf2020; 102: 103359.
23.
VenkateshVThongJYXuX. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q2012; 36: 157–178.
24.
Rondan-CataluñaFJArenas-GaitánJRamírez-CorreaPE. A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models: a non-linear perspective. Kybernetes2015; 44(5): 788–805.
25.
WilliamsMDRanaNPDwivediYK. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. J Enterprise Inf Manag2015; 28(3): 443–488.
26.
RahimiBNadriHLotfnezhad AfsharH, et al.A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl Clin Inf2018; 9(03): 604–634.
27.
KruseCSArguetaDALopezL, et al.Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res2015; 17(2): e40.
28.
KimJKimHBellE, et al.Patient perspectives about decisions to share medical data and biospecimens for research. JAMA Netw Open2019; 2(8): e199550.
29.
DünnebeilSSunyaevABlohmILeimeisterJM, et al. Determinants of physicians’ technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care. International journal of medical informatics. 2012; 81(11): 746–760.
30.
StrawleyCRichwineC. Individuals access and use of patient portals and smartphone health apps, 2022. ASTP Health IT Data Brief, 2023.
31.
SapioBTurkTCornacchiaM, et al.Building scenarios of digital television adoption: a pilot study. Technol Anal Strat Manag2010; 22(1): 43–63.
32.
NiehavesBPlattfautR. Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. Eur J Inf Syst2014; 23(6): 708–726.
33.
SutartoAPAnsoriNWidyantiA, et al.Driving the future: using TAM and UTAUT to understand public acceptance of fully autonomous vehicles. 2023 10th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–8.
34.
ChopdarPK. Adoption of Covid-19 contact tracing app by extending UTAUT theory: perceived disease threat as moderator. Health Policy Technol2022; 11(3): 100651.
35.
TavaresJOliveiraT. Electronic health record portal adoption: a cross country analysis. BMC Med Inf Decis Making2016; 16(1): 2–16.
36.
GuyRFNorvellM. The neutral point on a Likert scale. J Psychol1977; 95(2): 199–204.
37.
Hair JrJFMatthewsLMMatthewsRL, et al.PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis2017; 1(2): 107–123.
38.
TieuLSchillingerDSarkarU, et al.Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere?J Am Med Inf Assoc2017; 24(e1): e47–e54.
39.
TaoDIntention to use and actual use of electronic information resources: further exploring Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). In AMIA Annu Symp Proc2009; 2009: 629–633.
40.
HuangDWhiteheadCKuperA. Competing discourses, contested roles: Electronic health records in medical education. Medical Education. 2024; 58(12): 1490–1501.
41.
Calvo-PorralCPesqueira-SanchezR. Generational differences in technology behaviour: comparing millennials and Generation X. Kidorui2020; 49(11): 2755–2772.
42.
RavangardRKazemiZAbbasaliSZ, et al.Development of the UTAUT2 model to measure the acceptance of medical laboratory portals by patients in Shiraz. Electron Physician2017; 9(2): 3862–3869.
43.
AyangunnaE (2023). Factors associated with patient portal utilization, preventive services utilization, and health promoting behaviors among adults in the United States.
44.
ZanuttoA. ‘Two clicks and I’m in!’Patients as co-actors in managing health data through a personal health record infrastructure. Health Informatics Journal. 2019; 25(2): 389-400.
