We here argue that study of governance systems within increasingly pluralist health care systems needs to be broadened beyond traditionally public sector orientated literature. We develop an initial typology of multiple governance systems within the English health care sector and derive exploratory questions to inform future empirical investigation. We add to existing literature by considering the coexistence of – and possible tensions between – multiple governance systems in a pluralised health and social care system.
StevensS. Reform strategies for the English NHS. Health Aff2004; 23: 37–44.
2.
ØvretveitJ. Beyond the public-private debate: the mixed economy of health. Health Policy1996; 35: 75–93.
3.
ChecklandKAllenPColemanA. Accountable to whom, for what? An exploration of the early development of Clinical Commissioning Groups in the English NHS. BMJ Open2013; 3: e003769–e003769.
4.
CampbellHHotchkissRBradshawN. Integrated care pathways. Br Med J1998; 316: 133–133.
5.
ChambersNCornforthCThe role of corporate governance and boards in organizational performance. In: WalsheKHarveyGJasP (eds). Connecting knowledge and performance in public services, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Chapter 6, pp.99–123.
6.
RhodesR. The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of public service in Britain. Polit Quart1994; 65: 138–151.
7.
RhodesR. Understanding governance: ten years on. Organ Stud2007; 28: 1243–1264.
8.
HamCClarkJSpurgeonP. Doctors who become chief executives in the NHS: from keen amateurs to skilled professionals. J R Soc Med2011; 104: 113–119.
9.
MartinGPArmstrongNAvelingEL. Professionalism redundant, reshaped, or reinvigorated? Realizing the ‘third logic’ in contemporary healthcare. J Health Soc Behav2015; 56: 378–397.
10.
CarpenterJSchneiderJBrandonT. Working in multidisciplinary community mental health teams: the impact on social workers and health professionals of integrated mental health care. Br J Soc Work2003; 33: 1081–1103.
11.
DayPKleinR. Accountabilities: five public services, London: Tavistock, 1987.
12.
GriffithsR. NHS management enquiry, London: Department of Health, 1983.
13.
ChambersN. Healthcare board governance. J Health Organ Manag2012; 26: 6–14.
14.
AllenPKeenJWrightJ. Investigating the governance of autonomous public hospitals in England: multi-site case study of NHS foundation trusts. J Health Serv Res Policy2012; 17: 94–100.
15.
FerlieEAshburnerLFitzGeraldL. The new public management in action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
16.
FerlieEAshburnerLFitzgeraldL. Corporate governance and the public sector: some issues and evidence from the NHS. Publ Admin1995; 73: 375–392.
17.
SkelcherC. The appointed state, Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998.
18.
PeckhamSExworthyMGreenerI. Decentralizing health services: more local accountability or just more central control?Publ Money Manage2005; 25: 221–228.
19.
ExworthyMFrosiniFJonesL. Are NHS foundation trusts able and willing to exercise autonomy? ‘You can take a horse to water …’. J Health Serv Res Policy2011; 16: 232–237.
20.
DayPKleinR. Governance of foundation trusts: dilemmas of diversity, London: Nuffield Trust, 2005.
21.
AbbottSSmithRProcterS. Primary care trusts – what is the role of Boards?Publ Policy Admin2008; 23: 43–59.
22.
KumpunenSCurryNEdwardsN. Collaboration in general practice: surveys of GPs and CCGs, London: Nuffield Trust, 2015.
23.
SheaffR. Plural provision of primary medical care in England, 2002–2012. J Health Serv Res Policy2013; 18(2 suppl): 20–28.
24.
Sheaff R, Child S, Schofield J, et al. Understanding professional partnerships and non-hierarchical organisations. Final Project Report, University of Southampton. Southampton: NIHR Service and Delivery Organization Research and Development Programme, 2012.
25.
McDonaldRChecklandKHarrisonS. Rethinking collegiality: restratification in English general medical practice 2004–2008. Soc Sci Med2009; 68: 1199–1205.
26.
CharkhamJ. Effective Boards, Chartec: The Institute of Chartered Accountants, 1986.
27.
LorschJMcIverJ. Pawns or potentates? The reality of America’s corporate Boards, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.
28.
ChambersNCornforthCThe role of corporate governance and boards in organisational performance. In: WalsheKHarveyGJasP (eds). Connecting knowledge and performance in public services: from knowing to doing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Chapter 6, pp.99–127.
29.
RobertsJMcNultyTStilesP. Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: creating accountability in the boardroom. Br J Manage2005; 16: S5–S26.
30.
McNultyTPettigrewA. Strategists on the board. Organ Stud1999; 20: 47–74.
31.
FreemanTMillarRMannionR. Enacting corporate governance of healthcare safety and quality: a dramaturgy of hospital boards in England. Soc Health Illn2016; 38: 233–251.
32.
RobertsJ. Trust and control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: the individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability. Hum Relat2001; 54: 1547–1572.
33.
RobertsJSandersonPBarkerR. In the mirror of the market: the disciplinary effects of company/fund manager meetings. Account Organ Soc2006; 31: 277–294.
34.
Short H, Zhang H and Keasey K. 2002. The link between dividend policy and institutional ownership. J Corp Finance 2002; 8: 105–122.
35.
SkelcherC. The appointed state, Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998.
36.
RobinsonFShawKWho governs North East England? A regional perspective on governance. In: CornforthC (ed). The governance of public and non profit organizations, London: Routledge, 2003. Chapter 1, pp.23–49.
37.
Jas P and Skelcher C. 2005. Performance decline and turnaround in public organizations: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Br J Manage 2005; 16: 195–210.
38.
MartinSBoazA. Public participation and citizen-centred local government: lessons from the best value and better government for older people pilot programmes. Publ Money Manage2000; 20: 47–54.
39.
O’BrienPPikeA. City deals, decentralisation and the governance of local infrastructure funding and financing in the UK. Natl Inst Econ Rev2015; 233: R14–R26.
40.
RochesterCThe role of boards in small voluntary organizations. In: CornforthC (ed). The governance of public and non profit organizations, Abingdon: Routledge, 2003. Chapter 6, pp.115–130.
41.
BillisDFrom welfare bureaucracies to welfare hybrids. In: BillisD (ed). Hybrid organizations and the third sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Chapter 1, pp.3–24.
42.
DenisJLFerlieEVan GestelN. Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Publ Admin2015; 93: 273–289.
43.
CornforthCSimpsonCThe changing face of charity governance: the impact of organizational size. In: CornforthC (ed). The governance of public and non profit organizations, London: Routledge, 2003. Chapter 10, pp.187–206.
44.
Myners Review. Report of the independent governance review. UK: The Co operative Group, 2014.
45.
CornforthCNonprofit governance research: the need for innovative perspectives and approaches. In: CornforthCBrownW (eds). Non profit governance: innovative perspectives and approaches, Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. Chapter 1, pp.1–15.
46.
YoungDThe state of theory and research on social enterprises. In: GidronBHasenfeldY (eds). Social enterprises: an organizational perspective, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Chapter 1, pp.19–46.
47.
NewmanJ. Modernizing governance: new labour, policy and society, London: Sage, 2001.
48.
BauldLJudgeKBarnesM. Promoting social change: the experience of Health Action Zones in England. J Soc Policy2005; 34: 427–445.
49.
Ferlie E, FitzGerald L, McGivern G, et al. 2013. Making wicked problems governable? The case of managed networks in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
50.
Stoker G. 1999 Introduction. In: Stoker G (ed.) The new management of British local governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999, Chapter 1, pp.1–21.
ColemanAChecklandKSegarJ. Joining it up? Health and wellbeing boards in English local governance: evidence from clinical commissioning groups and shadow health and wellbeing boards. Local Govern Stud2014; 40: 560–580.
53.
MarksLHunterDJScalabriniS. The return of public health to local government in England: changing the parameters of the public health prioritization debate?Publ Health2015; 129: 1194–1203.
54.
DavisGF. The significance of board interlocks for corporate governance. Corp Govern Int Rev1996; 4: 154–159.
55.
KlausenKKSelleP. The third sector in Scandinavia. Voluntas1996; 7: 99–122.
56.
JespersenPKQuality development and professional autonomy in modern hospital fields. In: TeelkenCFerlieEDentM (eds). Leadership in the public sector: promises and pitfalls, Abingdon: Routledge, 2012. Chapter 7, pp.126–152.
57.
WaldorffSB. Accounting for organizational innovations: mobilizing institutional logics in translation. Scand J Manage2013; 29: 219–234.
