Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
The use of faculty inventor social capital to facilitate university technology transfer: A multiple case study inquiry using qualitative comparative analysis
The current practices of the university technology transfer profession seem to reflect the belief that the chances for success are greatly improved when faculty inventors employ their social capital to facilitate the process. However, this notion has not been extensively investigated directly. There is a gap in the university technology transfer literature regarding our understanding of faculty inventor social capital in the context of the occurrence of technology transfer outcomes. The aim of this study was to understand whether the use of faculty inventor social capital is a causal condition for the occurrence of university technology transfer. This question was examined using a multiple case study approach and the qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method. The data were generated by collecting information on 21 cases that occurred during or around calendar year 2019 in which a private sector organization considered whether to obtain and assimilate a technology that was created at a university in the United States of America. The results of the study suggest that the use of faculty inventor social capital is not a necessary, sufficient, or INUS condition for the occurrence of university technology transfer.
AgapovaEZharovaMVGushchinaI, et al. (2020) The social capital impact on the effectiveness of university departments. E3s Web of Conferences208: 09019.
2.
AggerAJensenJO (2015) Area-based initiatives and their work in bonding, bridging and linking social capital. European Planning Studies23(10): 2045–2061.
3.
AgrawalA (2001) University‐to‐industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews3(4): 285–302.
4.
AgrawalAHendersonR (2002) Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science48(1): 44–60.
5.
AhmadZSoroyaSHMahmoodK (2023) Bridging social capital through the use of social networking sites: a systematic literature review. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment33(4): 473–489.
6.
Al-TabbaaOAnkrahS (2016) Social capital to facilitate ‘engineered’ university–industry collaboration for technology transfer: a dynamic perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change104: 1–15.
7.
AmarathungaPABH (2025) Mapping social capital and unveiling emerging trends through systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Review9(3): 133–153.
8.
BengoaAMasedaAIturraldeT, et al. (2020) A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer46: 1514–1550.
9.
BhandariHYasunobuK (2009) What is social capital? A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian Journal of Social Science37(3): 480–510.
10.
BhideAV (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. Oxford University Press.
11.
BohWFDe-HaanUStromR (2016) University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. Journal of Technology Transfer41: 661–669. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9399-6, In this issue.
ChakrabartiAKSantoroMD (2004) Building social capital and learning environment in university-industry relationships. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital1(1): 19.
14.
ClaridgeT (2018) Criticisms of social capital theory: and lessons for improving practice. Social capital research4(2): 1–8.
15.
ClarysseBWrightMLockettA, et al. (2005) Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing20(2): 183–216.
16.
ColyvasJCrowMGelijnsA, et al. (2002) How do university inventions get into practice?Management Science48(1): 61–72.
17.
CorvelloVChimentiMCGiglioC, et al. (2020) An investigation on the use by academic researchers of knowledge from scientific social networking sites. Sustainability12(22): 9732.
18.
Di GregorioDShaneS (2003) Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?Research Policy32(2): 209–227.
19.
Duke University. (2025). Duke translation and commercialization - frequently asked questions: how can I assist in marketing my invention?https://otc.duke.edu/faqs/
20.
EdwardsR (2011) Social capital. In: RitzerGRyanJM (eds) The Concise Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley-Blackwell, 554–555.
21.
EngbersTThompsonMFSlaperT (2015) Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research132(2): 537–558.
22.
FilieriRAlguezauiS (2014) Structural social capital and innovation. Is knowledge transfer the missing link?Journal of Knowledge Management18(4): 728–757.
23.
FoleyMWEdwardsB (1999) Is it time to disinvest in social capital?Journal of Public Policy19(2): 141–173.
24.
GopalakrishnanSSantoraMD (2004) Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: the role of key organizational factors. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management51(1): 57–69.
InkpenACTsangEW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review30(1): 146–165.
27.
InkpenACTsangEWK (2016) Reflections on the 2015 decade award—social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer: an emergent stream of research. Academy of Management Review41(4): 573–588.
28.
IsmailMHamzahSRBebenrothR (2018) Differentiating knowledge transfer and technology transfer. European Journal of Training and Development42(9): 611–628.
29.
JansenCDillonHF (2000) Where do the leads for licences come from? source data from six U.S. institutions. Industry and Higher Education14(3): 150–156.
30.
JensenRThursbyM (2001) Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. The American Economic Review91(1): 240–259.
31.
KalarBAntoncicB (2016) Social capital of academics and their engagement in technology and knowledge transfer. Science and Public Policy43(5): 646–659.
32.
KalhorRHashemiFNeysariN, et al. (2020) The mediating role of entrepreneurship eehavior in the relationship between social capital and job performance: a study among faculty members of a medical university. Health Scope9(4): 102691.
33.
KyneDAldrichDP (2020) Capturing bonding, bridging, and linking social capital through publicly available data. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy11(1): 61–86.
34.
ManningP (2017) The social capital concept in management and organizational literature: a synthesis and critical discussion of contemporary applications and research directions. International Journal of Organizational Analysis25(5): 875–893.
35.
MartinelliAMeyerMTunzelmannNv. (2007) Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. The Journal of Technology Transfer33(3): 259–283.
O'SheaRPAllenTJChevalierA, et al. (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy34(7): 994–1009.
38.
OanaIESchneiderCQThomannE (2021) Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using R: A Beginner's Guide. Cambridge University Press.
RaginCC (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press.
42.
RaginCCAmorosoLM (2011) Constructing Social Research: The Unity and Diversity of Method. Pine Forge Press.
43.
RobertsonJMcCarthyIPPittL (2019) Leveraging social capital in university-industry knowledge transfer strategies: a comparative positioning framework. Knowledge Management Research and Practice17(4): 461–472.
RohlfingI (2020) The choice between crisp and fuzzy sets in qualitative comparative analysis and the ambiguous consequences for finding consistent set relations. Field Methods32(1): 75–88.
46.
RossoniALVasconcellosEPGd.RossoniRLd. C (2023) Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly74(3): 1841–1877.
RStudio Team (2023) RStudio: integrated development environment for R (version 2023.03.03 build 386). Post Software, PBC. https://posit.co
49.
SchneiderCQWagemannC (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
50.
SecundoGBeerCDFaiF, et al. (2019) Increasing university entrepreneurialism: qualitative insights from the technology transfer office. Measuring Business Excellence23(3): 253–268.
51.
SehringJKorhonen-KurkiKBrockhausM (2013) Challenges and limitations of QCA. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): An application to compare national REDD+ policy processes. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research, 17–20. Retrieved March 3, 2021 fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02339.8
52.
ShaneSStuartT (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science48(1): 154–170.
53.
The R Foundation (2023) The R Project for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation. https://www.R-project.org
54.
ThiemABaumgartnerMDusaA, et al. (2018) QCApro: advanced functionality for performing and evaluating qualitative comparative analysis (version 1.1-2). The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/QCApro/index.html
55.
ThursbyJGThursbyMC (2001) Industry perspectives on licensing university technologies: sources and problems. Industry and Higher Education15(4): 289–294.
56.
ThursbyJGThursbyMC (2004) Are faculty critical? Their role in university–industry licensing. Contemporary Economic Policy22(2): 162–178.
57.
TownesMS (2022) The Influence of Technology Maturity Level on the Incidence of University Technology Transfer and the Implications for Public Policy and Practice (Publication Number 29209868). Doctoral dissertation. ProQuest: Saint Louis University.
58.
TownesMS (2024) The role of technology maturity level in the cccurrence of university technology transfer. Journal of the Knowledge Economy16: 10685–10757.
59.
TownesMS (2025) The conceptualisation of techology in scholarly research and public policy regarding university technology transfer. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation21(3): 239–277.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (2025) FAQs - marketing an invention to identify potenital licensees: how are most licensees found?https://otc.uthscsa.edu/faqs/
63.
Villalonga-OlivesEKawachiI (2015) The measurement of bridging social capital in population health research. Health & Place36: 47–56.
64.
WoolcockM (1998) Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society27(2): 151–208.
65.
ZuckerLGDarbyMRArmstrongJS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science48(1): 138–153.
