This study applies Hirschman’s Exit, Voice and Loyalty framework to examine the dynamics of employee voice in the gig economy, emphasizing the role of digital platforms. Using an exploratory mixed-methods approach, the research analyses Glassdoor data to compare the voice of gig workers to that of traditional employees in the United Kingdom transportation industry. The findings reveal that gig workers’ voices reflect a nuanced balance between autonomy and flexibility, juxtaposed with financial insecurity and precarious working conditions. Conversely, traditional employees often voice dissatisfaction with rigid management and limited flexibility. The study contributes three key insights. First, it proposes viewing Exit, Voice and Loyalty as a continuum, reflecting gig workers’ dynamic decision-making. Second, it identifies digital platforms as critical arenas for employee voice, shifting expressions from internal to public discourse. Third, it demonstrates the value of mixed methods, integrating social evaluation techniques to understand employee voice across different employment models.
AkhtarMNBalMLongL (2016) Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect reactions to frequency of change, and impact of change: A sensemaking perspective through the lens of psychological contract. Employee Relations38(4): 536–562.
2.
AloisiAGramanoE (2020) Workers without workplaces and unions without unity: Non-standard forms of employment, platform work and collective bargaining. In: PulignanoVHendrickxF (eds) Employment Relations for the 21st Century. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 37–59.
3.
ApostolidisPMuldoonJ (2025) ‘Neither work nor leisure’: Motivations of microworkers in the United Kingdom on three digital platforms. New Media & Society27(2): 747–769.
4.
BarryMWilkinsonA (2022) Employee voice, psychologisation and human resource management (HRM). Human Resource Management Journal32(3): 631–646.
5.
BergerTFreyCLevinG, et al (2019) Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ‘gig economy’. Economic Policy33(99): 429–477.
6.
CaseyCDelaneyH (2022) Keeping it quiet? The micro-politics of employee voice in company strategic decision-making. Work, Employment and Society36(3): 485–502.
7.
ChungH (2022) The Flexibility Paradox: Why Flexible Working Leads to (Self-) Exploitation. Bristol: Policy Press.
8.
CiniL (2023) Resisting algorithmic control: Understanding the rise and variety of platform worker mobilisations. New Technology, Work and Employment38(1): 125–144.
9.
CorritoreMGoldbergASrivastavaSB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly65(2): 359–394.
10.
CurchodCPatriottaGCohenL, et al (2020) Working for an algorithm: Power asymmetries and agency in online work settings. Administrative Science Quarterly65(3): 644–676.
11.
DabirianADibaHKietzmannJ (2017) A great place to work!? Understanding crowdsourced employer branding. Business Horizons60(2): 197–205.
12.
DellmuthLTallbergJ (2023) Legitimacy Politics. Elite Communication and Public Opinion in Global Governance. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
De StefanoVM (2016) The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work, crowd work and labour protection in the ‘gig-economy’. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal37: 471–504.
14.
DioufRSarrENSallO, et al (2019) Web scraping: State-of-the-art and areas of application. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Los Angeles, CA, 9–12 December. New York, NY: IEEE.
15.
DonagheyJReineckeJ (2018) When industrial democracy meets corporate social responsibility: A comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as responses to the Rana Plaza disaster. British Journal of Industrial Relations56(1): 14–42.
16.
DonagheyJCullinaneNDundonT, et al (2011) Reconceptualising employee silence. Work, Employment and Society25(1): 51–67.
17.
DubeSZhuC (2021) The disciplinary effect of social media: Evidence from firms’ responses to Glassdoor reviews. Journal of Accounting Research59(5): 1783–1825.
18.
DunnM (2020) Making gigs work: Digital platforms, job quality and worker motivations. New Technology, Work and Employment35(2): 232–249.
19.
EllmerMReichelA (2021) Mind the channel! An affordance perspective on how digital voice channels encourage or discourage employee voice. Human Resource Management Journal31(1): 259–276.
20.
ElmanCGerringJMahoneyJ (2020) The Production of Knowledge. Enhancing Progress in Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
EvertzLKollitzRSüßS (2021) Electronic word-of-mouth via employer review sites – the effects on organizational attraction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management32(16): 3428–3457.
22.
GandiniA (2019) Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations72(6): 1039–1056.
23.
GegenhuberTEllmerMSchüßlerE (2021) Microphones, not megaphones: Functional crowdworker voice regimes on digital work platforms. Human Relations74(9): 1473–1503.
24.
GlavinPBiermanASchiemanS (2021) Über-alienated: Powerless and alone in the gig economy. Work and Occupations48(4): 399–431.
25.
HealyJNicholsonDPekarekA (2017) Should we take the gig economy seriously?Labour and Industry27(3): 232–248.
26.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27.
HollandPCooperBHeckerR (2019) Social media at work: A new form of employee voice? In: HollandPTeicherJDonagheyJ (eds) Employee Voice at Work. Singapore: Springer, 73–89.
28.
HollandPCooperBKHeckerR (2016) Use of social media at work: A new form of employee voice?The International Journal of Human Resource Management27(21): 2621–2634.
29.
HölligC (2021) Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2021. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Hamilton Library. Available at: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/71144 (accessed 25 May 2025).
30.
JoyceSStuartMFordeC (2023) Theorising labour unrest and trade unionism in the platform economy. New Technology, Work and Employment38(1): 21–40.
31.
KallebergAL (2000) Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology26: 341–365.
32.
KampLTirrelHWinnenL (2024) The paradox of flexibility: Unraveling the impact of flexible work arrangements on affective commitment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Economics & Sociology17(2): 151–172.
33.
KhanMMowbrayPKWilkinsonA (2023) Employee voice on social media: An affordance lens. International Journal of Management Reviews25(4): 687–706.
34.
KougiannouNKMendonçaP (2021) Breaking the managerial silencing of worker voice in platform capitalism: The rise of a food courier network. British Journal of Management32(3): 744–759.
35.
LandersRBrussoRAuerE (2019) Crowdsourcing job satisfaction data: Examining the construct validity of Glassdoor.com ratings. Personnel Assessment and Decisions5(3): 45–55.
McCarthyLTouboulicAGloverJ (2022) Who’s milking it? Scripted stories of food labour. Work, Employment and Society36(6): 1038–1059.
38.
MäntymäkiMBaiyereAIslamAN (2019) Digital platforms and the changing nature of physical work: Insights from ride-hailing. International Journal of Information Management49: 452–460.
39.
MartindaleNWoodAJBurchellBJ (2024) What do platform workers in the UK gig economy want?British Journal of Industrial Relations62(3): 542–567.
40.
MeijerinkJKeeganA (2019) Conceptualizing human resource management in the gig economy: Toward a platform ecosystem perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 214–232.
41.
MendonçaPKougiannouNK (2023) Disconnecting labour: The impact of intraplatform algorithmic changes on the labour process and workers’ capacity to organise collectively. New Technology, Work and Employment38(1): 1–20.
42.
MohamedMJRyeTFonzoneA (2019) Operational and policy implications of ridesourcing services: A case of Uber in London, UK. Case Studies on Transport Policy7(4): 823–836.
43.
MowbrayPK (2022) Is anybody there? An examination of the voice experiences of Uber ride-share drivers. In: WilkinsonADundonTMowbrayPK, et al. (eds) Missing Voice? Worker Voice and Social Dialogue in the Platform Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 175–193.
44.
MowbrayPKWilkinsonATseHH (2015) An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews17(3): 382–400.
45.
PangrazioLBishopCLeeF (2023) Old media, new gigs: The discursive construction of the gig economy in Australian news media. Work, Employment and Society37(3): 606–624.
46.
PastuhDGeppertM (2020) A ‘circuits of power’-based perspective on algorithmic management and labour in the gig economy. Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management27(2): 11–12.
47.
Patrick-ThomsonHKranertM (2021) Don’t work for free: Online discursive resistance to precarity in commercial photography. Work, Employment and Society35(6): 1034–1052.
48.
PeròDDowneyJ (2024) Advancing workers’ rights in the gig economy through discursive power: The communicative strategies of indie unions. Work, Employment and Society38(1): 140–160.
49.
PichaultFMcKeownT (2019) Autonomy at work in the gig economy: Analysing work status, work content and working conditions of independent professionals. New Technology, Work and Employment34(1): 59–72.
50.
SaqibSIAllenMMMartínez LucioM, et al (2024) Sustaining solidarity through social media? Employee social-media groups as an emerging platform for collectivism in Pakistan. Work, Employment and Society38(3): 636–656.
51.
SchmiedelTMüllerOVom BrockeJ (2019) Topic modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research: A tutorial with an application example on organizational culture. Organizational Research Methods22(4): 941–968.
52.
StewartAStanfordJ (2017) Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?The Economic and Labour Relations Review28(3): 420–437.
53.
TallbergJZürnM (2019) The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. The Review of International Organizations14(4): 581–606.
54.
TassinariAMaccarroneV (2020) Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society34(1): 35–54.
55.
ThäterLGegenhuberTSchüßlerE, et al (2022) How do workers gain voice on digital work platforms? Hotspots and blind spots in research on platform worker voice. In: WilkinsonADundonTMowbrayPK, et al. (eds) Missing Voice? Worker Voice and Social Dialogue in the Platform Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 71–107.
56.
TirapaniANWillmottH (2023) Revisiting conflict: Neoliberalism at work in the gig economy. Human Relations76(1): 53–86.
57.
UmneyCStuartMBessaI, et al (2024) Platform labour unrest in a global perspective: How, where and why do platform workers protest?Work, Employment and Society38(1): 3–26.
58.
WilkinsonAFayC (2011) New times for employee voice?Human Resource Management50(1): 65–74.
59.
WilkinsonABarryMMorrisonE (2020) Toward an integration of research on employee voice. Human Resource Management Review30(1): 100677.
60.
WilkinsonADundonTMowbrayPK, et al (eds) (2022) Missing Voice? Worker Voice and Social Dialogue in the Platform Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
61.
WilkinsonAKnollMMowbrayPK, et al (2021) New trajectories in worker voice: Integrating and applying contemporary challenges in the organization of work. British Journal of Management32(3): 693–707.
62.
WoodAJLehdonvirtaV (2021) Antagonism beyond employment: How the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy. Socio-Economic Review19(4): 1369–1396.
63.
WoodAJGrahamMLehdonvirtaV, et al (2019) Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society33(1): 56–75.
64.
WoodAJLehdonvirtaVGrahamM (2018) Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries. New Technology, Work and Employment33(2): 95–112.
65.
WrightCFWailesNBamberGJ, et al (2017) Beyond national systems, towards a ‘gig economy’? A research agenda for international and comparative employment relations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal29(4): 247–257.
66.
ZahnRBusbyN (2023) Trade unions, women’s labour, and the gig economy. In: NessIOvetzRRoqueI, et al (eds) The Routledge Handbook of the Gig Economy. London; New York, NY: Routledge, 145–157.
