This article examines the relationship between workers’ well-being and digitalisation at work. It is based on the findings of a qualitative study carried out in a manufacturing company, and it focuses on the development of a wearable device for well-being. Using the analytical concepts of ‘translation’ and ‘inscription’ taken from Actor-Network Theory, it explores how digital technologies for well-being are designed in corporate programmes and shows how the final technology results from processes of inscription and translation performed by the actors involved in the design phase. The end device embodies a concept of well-being that has been called ‘bounded’ to emphasise how well-being at work is limited by organisational constraints. The article invites a rethinking of hedonic well-being at work as a precondition for eudaimonic well-being so that the human being is understood as a psychophysical unit that is part of a rich social context.
Anderson-ConnollyRGrunbergLGreenbergES, et al. (2002) Is lean mean? Workplace transformation and employee well-being. Work, Employment and Society16(3): 389–413.
2.
BerteraRL (1990) The effects of workplace health promotion on absenteeism and employment costs in a large industrial population. American Journal of Public Health80(9): 1101–1105.
3.
BrooksJKingN (2014) Doing Template Analysis: Evaluating an End of Life Care Service. London: SAGE.
4.
BruniA (2005) Shadowing software and clinical records: on the ethnography of non-humans and heterogeneous contexts. Organization12(3): 357–378.
5.
CallonM (1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: LawJ (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. London: Routledge, 132–161.
6.
CalvardTSSangKJ (2017) Complementing psychological approaches to employee well-being with a socio-structural perspective on violence in the workplace: an alternative research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management28(16): 2256–2274.
7.
CederströmCSpicerA (2015) The Wellness Syndrome. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
CooCRichterAvon Thiele SchwarzU, et al. (2021) All by myself: how perceiving organizational constraints when others do not hampers work engagement. Journal of Business Research136: 580–591.
9.
CresswellKMWorthASheikhA (2010) Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making10(1): 1–11.
10.
CzarniawskaB (2014) A Theory of Organizing, 2nd edn.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
CzarniawskaBHernesT (2005) Actor-Network Theory and Organizing. Malmo: Liber.
12.
DannaKGriffinRW (1999) Health and well-being in the workplace: a review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management25(3): 357–384.
13.
DaviesW (2015) The Happiness Industry: How the Government and Big Business Sold Us Well-Being. London: Verso books.
14.
DeciELRyanRM (2008) Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies9(1): 1–11.
15.
der KinderenSKhapovaSN (2020) Positive psychological well-being at work: the role of eudaimonia. In: DhimanS (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–28.
16.
DienerESuhEMLucasR, et al. (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bullettin125(2): 276–302.
17.
FlemingP (2019) Robots and organization studies: why robots might not want to steal your job. Organization Studies 40(1): 23–38.
18.
FosterD (2018) The health and well-being at work agenda: good news for (disabled) workers or just a capital idea?Work, Employment and Society32(1): 186–197.
19.
FoucaultM (1979) Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
20.
GrantAMChristiansonMKPriceRH (2007) Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives21(3): 51–63.
21.
GuestDE (2017) Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal27(1): 22–38.
22.
HuettermannHBruchH (2019) Mutual gains? Health-related HRM, collective well-being and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies56(6): 1045–1072.
23.
HuppertFA (2009) Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being1(2): 137–164.
24.
HutaVRyanRM (2010) Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies11: 735–762.
25.
JamesEPZollerHM (2018) Resistance training: (re)shaping extreme forms of workplace health promotion. Management Communication Quarterly32(1): 60–89.
26.
JoergesBCzarniawskaB (1998) The question of technology, or how organizations inscribe the world. Organization Studies19(3): 363–385.
27.
KenttäPVirtaharjuJ (2023) A metatheoretical framework for organizational wellbeing research: toward conceptual pluralism in the wellbeing debate. Organization30(3): 551–572.
28.
KhakurelJMelkasHPorrasJ (2018) Tapping into the wearable device revolution in the work environment: a systematic review. Information Technology & People31(3): 791–818.
29.
KowalskiTHLorettoW (2017) Well-being and HRM in the changing workplace. The International Journal of Human Resource Management28(16): 2229–2255.
30.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
31.
LatourB (1991) The impact of science studies on political philosophy. Science, Technology, & Human Values16(1): 3–19.
32.
LuptonD (2016) The Quantified Self. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
33.
MacKenzieDWajcmanJ (1999) The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
34.
MaltsevaK (2020) Wearables in the workplace: the brave new world of employee engagement. Business Horizons63(4): 493–505.
35.
MettlerTWulfJ (2019) Physiolytics at the workplace: affordances and constraints of wearables use from an employee’s perspective. Information Systems Journal29(1): 245–273.
36.
MieleF (2022) On care infrastructures and health practices: how people in health promotion programmes try to change their everyday life. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. Epub ahead of print 18 May 2022. DOI: 10.1177/13634593221093503.
37.
MieleFTirabeniL (2020) Digital technologies and power dynamics in the organization: a conceptual review of remote working and wearable technologies at work. Sociology Compass14(6): e12795.
38.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: SAGE.
39.
MissonierSLoufrani-FedidaS (2014) Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: from stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology. International Journal of Project Management32(7): 1108–1122.
40.
MoorePV (2018) The Quantified Self in Precarity: Work, Technology and What Counts. London: Routledge.
41.
MoorePRobinsonA (2016) The quantified self: what counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society18(11): 2774–2792.
42.
MorozovE (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
43.
MüllerM (2015) Assemblages and actor-networks: rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass9(1): 27–41.
44.
O’NeillC (2017) Taylorism, the European science of work, and the quantified self at work. Science, Technology, & Human Values42(4): 600–621.
45.
OrlikowskiWJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science11(4): 404–428.
46.
PlesterBSayersJKeenC (2022) Health and wellness but at what cost? Technology media justifications for wearable technology use in organizations. Organization. Epub ahead of print 3 August 2022. DOI: 10.1177/13505084221115841.
47.
RamillerNC (2007) Constructing safety: system designs, system effects, and the play of heterogeneous interests in a behavioral health care setting. International Journal of Medical Informatics76: S196–S204.
48.
RobsonKPittLFKietzmannJ (2016) Extending business values through wearables. MIS Quarterly Executive15(2): 167–177.
49.
RossiPMieleFPirasEM (2022) The co-production of a workplace health promotion program: expected benefits, contested boundaries. Social Theory & Health. DOI: 10.1057/s41285-022-00186-4.
50.
RuckensteinMPantzarM (2017) Beyond the quantified self: thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm. New Media and Society19(3): 401–418.
51.
SchröerSHauptJPieperC (2014) Evidence-based lifestyle interventions in the workplace: an overview. Occupational Medicine64(1): 8–12.
52.
SheldonKMCorcoranMPrenticeM (2019) Pursuing eudaimonic functioning versus pursuing hedonic well-being: the first goal succeeds in its aim, whereas the second does not. Journal of Happiness Studies20: 919–933.
53.
SilvastAVirtanenMJ (2023) On theory–methods packages in science and technology studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values48(1): 167–189.
54.
SimonHA (1977) The New Science of Management Decision, 2nd edn.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55.
SirvenNCardebatJMCoupaudM (2017) Working conditions and the health of workers: an elaboration of a responsible prevention ratio. Economic and Industrial Democracy38(4): 562–587.
56.
SouzaMMiyagawaTMeloP, et al. (2017) Wellness programs: wearable technologies supporting healthy habits and corporate costs reduction. In: StephanidisC (ed.) HCI International 2017 – Posters’ Extended Abstracts. HCI 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 714. Cham: Springer.
57.
SpencerDA (2018) Fear and hope in an age of mass automation: debating the future of work. New Technology, Work and Employment33(1): 1–12.
58.
SpicerA (2005) The political process of inscribing a new technology. Human Relations58(7): 867–890.
59.
StamKSiebenIVerbakelE, et al. (2016) Employment status and subjective well-being: the role of the social norm to work. Work, Employment and Society30(2): 309–333.
60.
TillC (2018) Commercialising bodies: action, subjectivity and the new corporate health ethic. In: LynchRFarringtonC (eds) Quantified Lives and Vital Data. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 229–249.
61.
ValsecchiRAndersonNBaltaME, et al. (2023) Managing health and well-being in SMEs through an adviceline: a typology of managerial behaviours. Work, Employment and Society37(2): 449–466.
62.
Van MarrewijkAVeenswijkMCleggS (2010) Organizing reflexivity in designed change: the ethnoventionist approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management23(3): 212–229.
63.
WajcmanJ (2006) New connections: social studies of science and technology and studies of work. Work, Employment and Society20(4): 773–786.
64.
WarrP (1990) The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology63(3): 193–210.
65.
WhitsonJR (2014) Foucault’s fitbit: governance and gamification. In: WalzSPDeterdingS (eds) The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications. London: MIT Press, 339–358.
66.
WilsonHJ (2013) Wearables in the workplace. Harvard Business Review91: 1–27.
67.
ZollerHM (2003) Working out: managerialism in workplace health promotion. Management Communication Quarterly17(2): 171–205.
68.
ZuboffS (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
