This study examines the effect of work–family conflict (WFC) and work–family enhancement (WFE) on the wellbeing of the self-employed and their spouses. Adopting a dyadic perspective, our analysis focuses on three dimensions of wellbeing: physical health, mental health and life satisfaction. Using the Spillover and Crossover Model as theoretical framework and the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model as an estimation technique, we investigate how work–family conflict and enhancement among the self-employed and their spouses were associated to their individual and mutual wellbeing. The analysis revealed a strong actor and partner effect, such that one’s own perception of WFC undermined the wellbeing for both the self-employed and their spouses. Further, WFE was associated with an improvement in wellbeing, mainly for the self-employed, and not their spouses. The results partially supported the ‘crossover hypothesis’, suggesting that launching a new business is a stressful endeavour at the dyadic level of the self-employed and their spouses.
AldrichHCliffJ (2003) The pervasive effects of family on self-employment: toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing18(5): 573–597.
2.
AllenTDFinkelsteinL (2014) Work-family conflict among members of full-time dual-earner couples: an examination of family life stage, gender, and age. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology19(3): 376–384.
3.
AnninkAden DulkLSteijnB (2016) Work–family conflict among employees and the self-employed across Europe. Social Indicators Research126(2): 571–593.
4.
BakkerADemeroutiE (2013) The spillover-crossover model. In: GrzywaczJGDemeroutiE (eds) New Frontiers in Work and Family Research. London: Psychology Press, 55–70. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-13387-004 (accessed 13 January 2022).
5.
BakkerADemeroutiEDollardM (2008) How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology93(4): 901–911.
6.
Boz SemerciAVoleryT (2018) Entrepreneurs as parents: the antecedents and consequence of parenting stress. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research24(1): 41–58.
7.
BroughPMullerWWestmanM (2018) Work, stress, and relationships: the crossover process model. Australian Journal of Psychology70: 341–349.
8.
BurchT (2020) All in the family: the link between couple-level work-family conflict and family satisfaction and its impact on the composition of the family over time. Journal of Business and Psychology35(5): 593–607.
9.
ButterworthPCrosierT (2004) The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the household income and labour dynamics in Australia Survey to examination of health inequalities. BMC Public Health4: 44.
10.
DahlMSNielsenJMojtabaiR (2010) The effects of becoming an entrepreneur on the use of psychotropics among entrepreneurs and their spouses. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health38(8): 857–863.
11.
DanesSM (2011) Pillow talk leaks: integrating couple interactions into self-employment research. Self-employment Research Journal1: 2.
12.
EaglyAH (1997) Sex differences in social behaviour: comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist52(12): 1380–1383.
13.
El ShoubakiABlockJLaschF (2022) The couple business as a unique form of business: a review of the empirical evidence. Management Review72: 115–147.
14.
FellowsKJChiuHYHillEJ, et al. (2016) Work–family conflict and couple relationship quality: a meta-analytic study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues37(4): 509–518.
15.
FrenchKAAllenTDKidwellKE (2022) When does work-family conflict occur?Journal of Vocational Behavior136: 103727.
16.
FroneMRussellMCooperM (1997) Relation of work–family conflict to health outcomes: a four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology70(4): 325–335.
17.
GislerSOmanskyRAlenickP, et al. (2018) Work-life conflict and employee health: a review. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research23(4): 1–46.
18.
GreenhausJHPowellGN (2006) When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review31(1): 72–92.
19.
GreenhausJHTen BrummelhuisLL (2013) Models and frameworks underlying work: life research. In: MajorDABurkeRJ (eds) Handbook of Work–Life Integration of Professionals: Challenges and Opportunities. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 14–34.
20.
GrzywaczJGMarksNF (2000) Reconceptualizing the work–family interface: an ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology5(1): 111–126.
21.
HagqvistEToivanenSBernhard-OettelC (2018) Balancing work and life when self-employed: the role of business characteristics, time demands and gender contexts. MDPI Open Access Journal7(8): 139.
22.
HenryCFossLAhlH (2016) Gender and self-employment research: a review of methodological approaches. International Small Business Journal34(3): 217–241.
23.
HsuDKWiklundJAndersonSE, et al. (2016) Entrepreneurial exit intentions and the business-family interface. Journal of Business Venturing31(6): 613–627.
24.
KennyDLedermannT (2010) Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology24(3): 359–366.
25.
KennyDKashyDCookW (2006) Dyadic Data Analysis. New York; London: Guilford Press.
26.
KönigSCesingerB (2015) Gendered work–family conflict in Germany: do self-employment and flexibility matter?Work, Employment and Society29(4): 531–549.
27.
LapierreLLiYKwanH, et al. (2018) A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work–family enrichment. Journal of Organizational Behavior39(4): 385–401.
28.
LiangCDunnP (2009) Entrepreneurial couples in new venture creation: reflections on expectations, reality and family relationships. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development6(2): 165–183.
29.
LuCLuJ-JDuD, et al. (2016) Crossover effects of work-family conflict among Chinese couples. Journal of Managerial Psychology31(1): 235–250.
30.
McNallLANicklinJMMasudaAD (2010) A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work-family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology25(3): 381–396.
31.
MarshallNLBarnettRC (1993) Work-family strains and gains among two-earner couples. Journal of Community Psychology21(1): 64–78.
32.
NguyenHSawangS (2016) Juggling or struggling? Work and family interface and its buffers among small business owners. Self-Employment Research Journal6(2): 207–246.
33.
NikolovaM (2018) Switching to self-employment can be good for your health. Journal of Business Venturing34(4): 664–691.
34.
ObschonkaMSchmitt-RodermundESilbereisenRK, et al. (2013) The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology105(1): 104–122.
35.
ParasuramanSPurohitYSGodshalkVM, et al. (1996) Work and family variables, entrepreneurial career success, and psychological well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior48(3): 275–300.
36.
PowellGNEddlestonKA (2013) Linking family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes?Journal of Business Venturing28(2): 261–280.
37.
Sanchez-RuizPMaldonado-BautistaIRutherfordM (2018) Business stressors, family-business identity, and divorce in family business: a vulnerability-stress-adaptation (VSA) model. Journal of Family Business Strategy9(3): 167–179.
38.
SchjoedtL (2013) The influence of work-and-family conflict on male entrepreneurs’ life satisfaction: a comparison of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Self-employment26(1): 45–65.
39.
SchoenewolfG (1990) Emotional contagion: behavioral induction in individuals and groups. Modern Psychoanalysis15(1): 49–61.
40.
ShirNNikolaevBNWincentJ (2019) Entrepreneurship and well-being: the role of psychological autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Journal of Business Venturing34(5): 105875.
41.
StasLKennyDAMayerA, et al. (2018) Giving dyadic data analysis away: a user-friendly app for actor-partner interdependence models. Personal Relationships25(1): 103–119.
42.
StephanU (2018) Entrepreneurs’ mental health and well-being: a review and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives32(3): 290–322.
43.
StephanURauchAHatakI (2022) Happy entrepreneurs? Everywhere? A meta-analysis of self-employment and wellbeing. Self-Employment Theory and Practice47: 553–593.
44.
ThukralE (2022) Self-employment in Australia: social values and perceptions. In: RattenV (ed.) Oceania Self-Employment. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 127–135.
45.
van der ZwanPHesselsJRietveldCA (2018) Self-employment and satisfaction with life, work, and leisure. Journal of Economic Psychology64: 73–88.
46.
Van SteenbergenEFKluwerESKarneyBR (2014) Work-family enrichment, work-family conflict, and marital satisfaction: a dyadic analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology19(2): 182–194.
47.
WatsonNWoodenMP (2012) The HILDA survey: a case study in the design and development of a successful household panel survey. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies3(3): 369–381.
48.
WestmanM (2001) Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations54(6): 717–751.
49.
WestmanMEtzionDL (2005) The crossover of work-family conflict from one spouse to the other. Journal of Applied Social Psychology35(9): 1936–1957.
50.
WiklundJHatakIPatzeltH, et al. (2018) Mental disorders in the entrepreneurial context: when being different can be an advantage. The Academy of Management Perspectives32(2): 182–206.
51.
WiklundJNikolaevBShirN, et al. (2019) Self-employment and well-being: past, present, and future. Journal of Business Venturing34(4): 579–588.
52.
YucelD (2017) Work-to-family conflict and life satisfaction: the moderating role of type of employment. Applied Research in Quality of Life12(3): 577–591.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
