The category of not in employment, education or training (NEET) refers to young people who are recorded as neither in paid employment nor formal education either at one time point, or for a continuous period. This article assesses levels of employment scarring for those aged 36–39, at Census 2011 (prime employment years) who were recorded as NEET when aged 16–19 at Census 1991 in Scotland. Outcomes are compared for those who moved from NEET into economic activity and by gender. We find evidence that NEET status leads to long-term scarring associated with economic inactivity and unemployment and that this is only partially offset for those who moved from NEET in 1991 to be economically active in 2001. The results also highlight gendering of NEET outcomes. NEET may be a category borne of administrative convenience, rather than sociological consistency but, as intended, it captures a group who experience disadvantage.
ArnettJJ (2006) Emerging adulthood: understanding the new way of coming of age. In: ArnettJJTannerJL (eds) Emerging Adults in America: Coming of Age in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 3–19.
2.
ArulampalamWGreggPGregoryM (2001) Unemployment scarring. The Economic Journal111(475): 577–584.
3.
AtkinsL (2013) From marginal learning to marginal employment? The real impact of ‘learning’ employability skills. Power and Education5(1): 28–37.
4.
AvisJ (2014) Beyond NEET: precariousness, ideology and social justice – the 99%. Power and Education6(1): 61–72.
5.
BäckmanOJakobsenVLorentzenT, et al. (2015) Early school leaving in Scandinavia: extent and labour market effects. Journal of European Social Policy25(3): 253–269.
6.
BastaMKarakonstantisSKoutraK, et al. (2019) NEET status among young Greeks: association with mental health and substance use. Journal of Affective Disorders253: 210–217.
7.
BeckV (2017) Capabilities and choices of vulnerable, long-term unemployed individuals. Work, Employment and Society32(1): 3–19.
8.
BellDNBlanchflowerDG (2010) UK unemployment in the great recession. National Institute Economic Review214(1): R3–R25.
BurgessSPropperCReesH, et al. (2003) The class of 1981: the effects of early career unemployment on subsequent unemployment experiences. Labour Economics10(3): 291–309.
11.
BynnerJParsonsS (2002) Social exclusion and the transition from school to work: the case of young people not in education, employment, or training (NEET). Journal of Vocational Behavior60(2): 289–309.
12.
CarstairsVMorrisR (1990) Deprivation and health in Scotland. Health Bulletin48(4): 162–175.
13.
ChungHBekkerSHouwingH (2012) Young people and the post-recession labour market in the context of Europe 2020. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research18(3): 301–317.
ColeM (2008) Sociology contra government? The contest for the meaning of unemployment in UK policy debates. Work, Employment and Society22(1): 27–43.
16.
CrawfordCDuckworthKVignolesA, et al. (2011) Young People’s Education and Labour Market Choices Aged 16/17 to 18/19. London: Centre for Analysis of Youth Transitions, Department of Education.
17.
CrespoL (2008) Caring for parents and employment status of european mid-life women. Working Paper 615. Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI). Available at: https://www.cemfi.es/ftp/wp/0615.pdf (accessed 9 February 2021).
18.
CrollP (2009) Educational participation post-16: a longitudinal analysis of intentions and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Studies57(4): 400–416.
19.
CroxfordLRaffeD (2000) Young people not in education, employment or training: an analysis of the Scottish school leavers survey. Report to the Scottish Executive, CES, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
20.
DevineF (2004) Class Practices: How Parents Help Their Children Get Good Jobs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DickensLMarxP (2018) NEET as an outcome for care leavers in South Africa: the case of girls and boys town. Emerging Adulthood8(1): 64–72.
22.
DuckworthKSchoonI (2012) Beating the odds: exploring the impact of social risk on young people’s school-to-work transitions during recession in the UK. National Institute Economic Review222(1): R38–R51.
23.
EscottK (2012) Young women on the margins of the labour market. Work, Employment and Society26(3): 412–428.
24.
FengZEveringtonDRalstonK, et al. (2015) Consequences, risk factors, and geography of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET). Social Research series, October. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/10/2258/downloads (accessed 3 November 2016).
25.
FurlongA (2006) Not a very NEET solution: representing problematic labour market transitions among early school-leavers. Work, Employment and Society20(3): 553–569.
26.
FurlongA (2007) The zone of precarity and discourses of vulnerability. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities381: 101–121.
27.
FurlongA (2008) The Japanese hikikomori phenomenon: acute social withdrawal among young people. The Sociological Review56(2): 309–325.
28.
GardeckiRNeumarkD (1997) Order from chaos? The effects of early labour market experiences on adult labor market outcome. NBER Working paper series 5899. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29.
GariépyGIyerS (2019) The mental health of young Canadians who are not working or in school. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry64(5): 338–344.
30.
GaspaniF (2018) Young adults NEET and everyday life: time management and temporal subjectivities. YOUNG27(1): 69–88.
31.
GayleVLambertPS (2007) Using quasi-variance to communicate sociological results from statistical models. Sociology41(6): 1191–1208.
32.
GilmartinMKorobilisD (2012) On regional unemployment: an empirical examination of the determinants of geographical differentials in the UK. Scottish Journal of Political Economy59(2): 179–195.
33.
GodfreyCHuttonSBradshawJ, et al. (2002) Estimating the cost of being ‘not in education, employment or training’ at age 16–18. Heslington: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
34.
GregoryMJukesR (2001) Unemployment and subsequent earnings: estimating scarring among British men 1984–94. The Economic Journal111(475): 607–625.
35.
Gutiérrez-GarcíaRABenjetCBorgesG, et al. (2017) NEET adolescents grown up: eight-year longitudinal follow-up of education, employment and mental health from adolescence to early adulthood in Mexico City. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry26(12): 1459–1469.
36.
GuvenenFKarahanFOzkanS, et al. (2015) What Do Data on Millions of US Workers Reveal about Life-cycle Earnings Risk?Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
HelblingLASacchiS (2014) Scarring effects of early unemployment among young workers with vocational credentials in Switzerland. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training6(1): 12.
38.
HeyesJ (2012) Vocational training, employability and the post-2008 jobs crisis: responses in the European Union. Economic and Industrial Democracy34(2): 291–311.
39.
HolteBH (2017) Counting and meeting NEET young people: methodology, perspective and meaning in research on marginalized youth. YOUNG26(1): 1–16.
40.
IshiiKUchidaY (2015) Japanese youth marginalization decreases interdependent orientation. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology47(3): 376–384.
41.
KeatingM (2002) Devolution and public policy in the United Kingdom: divergence or convergence. In: AdamsJRobinsonP (eds) Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 3–21.
42.
KellyEMcGuinnessS (2015) Impact of the great recession on unemployed and NEET individuals’ labour market transitions in Ireland. Economic Systems39(1): 59–71.
43.
KnabeARätzelS (2011) Scarring or scaring? The psychological impact of past unemployment and future unemployment risk. Economica78(310): 283–293.
44.
LeeN (2014) Grim down South? The determinants of unemployment increases in British cities in the 2008–2009 recession. Regional Studies48(11): 1761–1778.
45.
LiTMLiuLWongPW (2017) Withdrawal experience and possible way-outs from withdrawal behavior in young people. Qualitative Social Work17(4): 537–555.
46.
LunsingW (2007) The creation of the social category of NEET (Not in Education, Employment or Training): do NEET need this?Social Science Japan Journal10(1): 105–110.
47.
LuongMHébertB-P (2009) Age and earnings. Perspectives on Labour and Income10: 5–11.
48.
MacDonaldR (2011) Youth transitions, unemployment and underemployment: plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose?Journal of Sociology47(4): 427–444.
49.
MaguireS (2015) Young people not in education, employment or training (NEET): recent policy initiatives in England and their effects. Research in Comparative and International Education10(4): 525–536.
50.
MascheriniMSalvatoreLMeierkordA, et al. (2012) NEETS: Young People not in Employment, Education or Training: Characteristics, Costs and Policy Responses in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
51.
MasonCBrownRHartM, et al. (2015) High growth firms, jobs and peripheral regions: the case of Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8(2): 343–358.
52.
MertonRK (1988) The Matthew effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis79(4): 606–623.
53.
MurphyAKWallaceD (2010) Opportunities for making ends meet and upward mobility: differences in organizational deprivation across urban and suburban poor neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly91(5): 1164–1186.
54.
MurphyECOeschD (2017) Is employment polarisation inevitable? Occupational change in Ireland and Switzerland, 1970–2010. Work, Employment and Society32(6): 1099–1117.
55.
NilsenØReisoK (2011) Scarring effects of unemployment. NHH Department of Economics Discussion paper no. 26/2011. Bergen: NHH.
56.
NortonECDowdBE (2018) Log odds and the interpretation of logit models. Health Services Research53(2): 859–878.
57.
O’DeaBLeeRMcGorryP, et al. (2016) Depression course, functional disability, and NEET status in young adults with mental health problems. European Psychiatry33: S176–S177.
58.
O’ReillyJEichhorstWGábosA, et al. (2015) Five characteristics of youth unemployment in Europe: flexibility, education, migration, family legacies, and EU policy. SAGE Open5(1): 1–19.
59.
PembertonS (2008) Tackling the NEET generation and the ability of policy to generate a ‘NEET’ solution: evidence from the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(1): 243–259.
RalstonKFengZEveringtonD, et al. (2016) Do young people not in education, employment or training experience long-term occupational scarring? A longitudinal analysis over 20 years of follow-up. Contemporary Social Science11: 203–221.
62.
ReeskensTvan OorschotW (2012) Those who are in the gutter look at the stars? Explaining perceptions of labour market opportunities among European young adults. Work, Employment and Society26(3): 379–395.
63.
ReiterHSchlimbachT (2015) NEET in disguise? Rival narratives in troubled youth transitions. Educational Research57(2): 133–150.
64.
RiddellWCSongX (2011) The impact of education on unemployment incidence and re-employment success: evidence from the U.S. labour market. Labour Economics18(4): 453–463.
65.
RobertsS (2011) Beyond ‘NEET’ and ‘tidy’ pathways: considering the ‘missing middle’ of youth transition studies. Journal of Youth Studies14(1): 21–39.
66.
RussellL (2014) Formerly NEET young people’s pathways to work: a case-study approach. Power and Education6(2): 182–196.
67.
RussellL (2016) The realities of being young, unemployed and poor in post-industrial Britain. Power and Education8(2): 160–175.
68.
SchoonI (2014) Parental worklessness and the experience of NEET among their offspring. Evidence from the longitudinal study of young people in England (LSYPE). Longitudinal and Life Course Studies5(2): 129–150.
Scottish Government (2015) Analysis of characteristics of 16-19 year olds who are NEET from the 2011 Census. Analytic Service Division Employability, Skills and Lifelong Learning Analysis: Edinburgh. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Labour-Market/ReportNEETCensus (accessed 9 February 2020).
71.
SelenkoEPilsK (2016) The after-effects of youth unemployment: more vulnerable persons are less likely to succeed in Youth Guarantee programmes. Economic and Industrial Democracy40: 285–300.
72.
SipilaJRepoKRissanenT (2010) Cash-for-Childcare: The Consequences for Caring Mothers. Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
73.
SissonsPJonesK (2012) Lost in Transition? The Changing Labour Market and Young People not in Employment, Education or Training. London: The Work Foundation.
74.
SleedMEcclestonCBeechamJ, et al. (2005) The economic impact of chronic pain in adolescence: methodological considerations and a preliminary costs-of-illness study. Pain119(1–3): 183–190.
Statistics New Zealand (2011) Introducing the Youth Not in Employment, Education, or Training Indicator. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
77.
TamesbergerDLeitgöbHBacherJ (2014) How to combat NEET? Evidence from Austria. Intereconomics49(4): 221–227.
78.
TinsonAAyrtonCBarkerK, et al. (2016) Monitoring poverty and social exclusion 2016. Children3: 3–7.
79.
WattsA (2010) Social exclusion and career development: a United Kingdom perspective. Australian Journal of Career Development19(1): 30–35.
80.
WhiteRJGreenAE (2015) The importance of socio-spatial influences in shaping young people’s employment aspirations: case study evidence from three British cities. Work, Employment and Society29(2): 295–313.
81.
WilliamsR (2012) Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal12(2): 308–331.
82.
ZuccottiCO’ReillyJ (2017) Ethnicity and gender differences of being employed in the UK: policy implications. In: O’ReillyJMoyartCNazioT, et al. (eds) Youth Employment. Brighton: STYLE, 107.
83.
ZuccottiCO’ReillyJ (2018a) Ethnicity, gender and household effects on becoming NEET: an intersectional analysis. Work, Employment and Society33(3): 351–373.
84.
ZuccottiCO’ReillyJ (2018b) The impact of youth labour market experiences on later employment opportunities: what roles do ethnicity and gender play?Human Relations72: 646–676.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
