This article examines the patch-working strategies of migrant entrepreneurs as a form of social agency. ‘Patch-working’ – the reliance on supplementary forms of income to support business activity – is often seen as a means of cushioning the financial vulnerability of small firms. However, the mechanisms and forms that patch-working takes tend to be overlooked. Evidence from 42 West Midlands’ firms shows that, despite the highly constrained operating environment, the exercise of social agency can help to cushion against disadvantage and to rework their current conditions through patch-working. This allows for business growth, and even transformational growth in some cases, rather than sheer survival. Even so, our findings show that the agency of migrant entrepreneurs brings about only minor improvements in revenue and is certainly not capable of fundamentally changing either the nature of the sector or the structure of the labour market in which they are embedded.
AhmadAN (2008) Dead men working: Time and space in London’s (illegal) migrant economy. Work, Employment and Society22(2): 301–318.
2.
AlbertiG (2014) Mobility strategies, ‘mobility differentials’ and ‘transnational exit’: The experiences of precarious migrants in London’s hospitality jobs. Work, Employment and Society28(6): 865–881.
3.
AndersonB (2010) Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society24(2): 300–317.
4.
ArcherM (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ArcherM (2005) Structure, culture and agency. In: JacobsMDWeiss HanrahanN (eds) The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 17–34.
6.
BakerTNelsonR (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly50(3): 329–366.
7.
BatnitskyAMcDowellL (2013) The emergence of an ‘Ethnic Economy’? The spatial relationships of migrant workers in London’s health and hospitality sectors. Ethnic and Racial Studies36: 1997–2015.
8.
BerntsenL (2016) Reworking labour practices: on the agency of unorganized mobile migrant construction workers. Work, Employment and Society30(3): 472–488.
9.
BiernackiPWaldorfD (1981) Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research10(2): 141–163.
10.
BlochA (2013) The labour market experiences and strategies of young undocumented migrants. Work, Employment and Society27(2): 272–287.
11.
CarterSRamM (2003) Reassessing portfolio entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics21(4): 371–380.
12.
CarterSTaggSDimitratosP (2004) Beyond portfolio entrepreneurship: multiple income sources in small firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development16(6): 481–499.
CoeNJordhus-LierD (2010) Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography35(2): 211–233.
15.
DattaKMcIlwaineCEvansYHerbert MayJWillsJ (2007) From coping strategies to tactics: London’s low-pay economy and migrant labour. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(2): 404–432.
16.
EdwardsPRamMJonesTDoldorS (2016) New migrant businesses and their workers: Developing, but not transforming, the ethnic economy. Ethnic and Racial Studies39(9): 1587–1617.
17.
EmirbayerMMischeA (1998) What is agency?American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962–1023.
18.
FoltaTBDelmarFWennbergK (2010) Hybrid entrepreneurship. IFN Working Paper no. 825.
19.
HardingJ (2012) Border Vigils: Keeping Migrants Out of the Rich World. London and New York: Verso.
20.
JonesTRamM (2007) Re-embedding the ethnic business agenda. Work, Employment and Society21(3): 439–457.
21.
JonesTRamMVillares-VarelaM (2017) Injecting reality into the migrant entrepreneurship agenda. In: EssersCDeyPTedmansonDVerduyinK (eds) Critical Perspectives on Entrepreneurship. Challenging Dominant Discourses on Entrepreneurship (Routledge Rethinking Entrepreneurship Research). Abingdon: Routledge, 125–145.
22.
JonesTRamMEdwardsPKiselinchevAMuchenjeL (2014) Mixed embeddedness and new migrant enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development26(5–6): 500–520.
KibriaN (1994) Household structure and family ideologies: The dynamics of immigrant economic adaptation among Vietnamese refugees. Social Problems41(1): 81–96.
25.
KloostermanR (2010) Matching opportunities with resources: A framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development22: 25–45.
26.
KundnaniA (2014) The End of Tolerance: Racism in 21st Century Britain. London: Pluto Press.
27.
LegrainP (2009) Immigrants: Your Country Needs Them. London: Abacus.
28.
LiYSavageMPicklesS (2003) Social capital and social exclusion in England and Wales (1972–1999). British Journal of Sociology54(4): 497–526.
29.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
30.
McDowellLBatnitzkyADyerS (2009) Precarious work and economic migration: Emerging immigrant divisions of labour in Greater London’s service sector. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(1): 3–25.
31.
MacKenzieRFordeC (2009) The rhetoric of the good worker versus the realities of employers’ use and the experiences of migrant workers. Work, Employment and Society23(1): 142–159.
PenrodJPrestonDBCainREStarksMT (2003) A discussion of chain referral as a method of sampling hard-to-reach populations. Journal of Transcultural Nursing14(2): 100–107.
34.
RaijmanR (2001) Mexican immigrants and informal self-employment in Chicago. Human Organization60(1): 47–55.
35.
RainnieA (1989) Industrial Relations in Small Firms. London: Routledge.
36.
RamM (1994) Managing to Survive: Working Lives in Small Firms. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
RamMJonesTVillares-VarelaM (2016) Migrant entrepreneurship: Reflections on research and practice. International Small Business Journal35(1): 3–18.
38.
RamMTheodorakopoulosNJonesT (2008) Forms of capital, mixed embeddedness and Somali enterprise. Work, Employment and Society22(3): 427–446.
39.
RogalyB (2009) Spaces of work and everyday life: Labour geographies and the agency of unorganised temporary migrant workers. Geography Compass3(6): 1975–1987.
40.
SepulvedaLSyrettSLyonF (2011) Population superdiversity and new migrant enterprise: The case of London. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development23(7–8): 469–497.
41.
TheodorakopoulosNRamMShahMBoyalH (2005) Experimenting with supply chain learning (SCL): Supplier diversity and ethnic minority businesses. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal1(4): 461–478.
42.
VershininaNBarrettRMeyerM (2011) Forms of capital, intra-ethnic variation and Polish entrepreneurs in Leicester. Work, Employment and Society25(1): 101–117.
43.
VertovecS (2007) Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6): 1024–1054.
44.
Villares-VarelaMRamMTrevorJ (2017) Female immigrant global entrepreneurship: From invisibility to empowerment? In: ColletteHNelsonTLewisK (eds) The Routledge Companion to Global Female Entrepreneurship. Abingdon: Routledge, 342–357.
45.
VincentSWapshottRGardinerJ (2014) Putting the agent into research in black and minority ethnic entrepreneurship: A new methodological proposal. Journal of Critical Realism13(4): 368–384.
