A strong rise in non-regular employment has posed a major challenge to Japanese trade unions which have long limited membership to regular employees. However, a number of mainstream unions in the retail industry have responded by organizing non-regular workers. The article draws on a series of semi-structured interviews with union representatives to analyse the initiatives by the industrial federation UA Zensen and three affiliated enterprise unions. It addresses the implications for both the workers and the unions concerned. Unions have provided a stronger voice to non-regular workers and negotiated better working conditions. However, it has not brought material equality with regular workers or major changes to Japanese unionism. Instead, the enterprise-based and cooperative nature of unionism has shaped the initiatives and reproduced traditional equilibria and processes between labour and management, thus constraining the ability of unions to develop a strong stance for the emancipation of non-regular workers.
AllisonA (2012) A sociality of, and beyond, ‘my-home’ in post-corporate Japan. Cambridge Anthropology30(1): 95–108.
2.
BaccaroLHamannKTurnerL (2003) The politics of labour movement revitalization: the need for a revitalized perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1): 119–133.
3.
BenassiCDorigattiL (2015) Straight to the core – explaining union responses to the casualization of work: the IG Metall campaign for agency workers. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(3): 533–555.
4.
BroadbentK (2008) Japan: women workers and autonomous organizing. In: BroadbentKFordM (eds) Women and Labour Organizing in Asia: Diversity, Autonomy and Activism. London: Routledge, 156–171.
5.
CarterB (2000) Adoption of the organizing model in British trade unions: some evidence from manufacturing, science and finance (MSF). Work, Employment and Society14(1): 117–136.
6.
CarterB (2006) Trade union organizing and renewal: a response to De Turberville. Work, Employment and Society20(2): 415–426.
7.
CockburnC (1989) Equal opportunities: the short and long agenda. Industrial Relations Journal20(4): 213–225.
8.
ConnollyHMarinoSMartínez LucioM (2017) ‘Justice for janitors’ goes Dutch: the limits and possibilities of unions’ adoption of organizing in a context of regulated social partnership. Work, Employment and Society31(2): 319–335.
9.
De TurbervilleS (2004) Does the ‘organizing model’ represent a credible union renewal strategy?Work, Employment and Society18(4): 775–794.
10.
FregeCMKellyJ (2003) Union revitalization strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1): 7–24.
11.
GadreyJJany-CatriceFRibaultT (2001) Levels and systems of employment in the Japanese retail trade: a comparison with France. Cambridge Journal of Economics25(2): 165–184.
12.
GottfriedHHayashi-KatoN (1998) Gendering work: deconstructing the narrative of the Japanese economic miracle. Work, Employment and Society12(1): 25–46.
Gumbrell-McCormickR (2011) European trade unions and ‘atypical’ workers. Industrial Relations Journal42(3): 293–310.
15.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2013) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
HeeryE (2002) Partnership versus organising: alternative futures for British trade unionism. Industrial Relations Journal33(1): 20–35.
17.
HeeryE (2005) Sources of change in trade unions. Work, Employment and Society19(1): 91–106.
18.
HeeryE (2009) Trade unions and contingent labour: scale and method. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society2: 429–442.
19.
HodderAEdwardsP (2015) The essence of trade unions: understanding identity, ideology and purpose. Work, Employment and Society29(5): 843–854.
20.
HurdR (2004) The failure of organizing, the new unity partnership, and the future of the labor movement. Working USA: The Journal of Labour and Society8: 5–25.
21.
HymanR (1997) Trade unions and interest representation in the context of globalisation. Transfer3: 515–533.
22.
HymanR (1999) Imagined solidarities: can trade unions resist globalisation? In: LeisinkP (ed.) Globalization and Labour Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 94–115.
23.
HymanR (2001) Understanding European Trade Unionism: Between Market, Class and Society. London: SAGE.
24.
ImaiJ (2011) The Transformation of Japanese Employment Practices: Reform without Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training (JILPT) (2005) Pa-to taimū to seishain no kinkō shogū. Rōdō seisaku kenkyū hōkokusho, 34. Tokyo, Japan: JILPT.
26.
Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training (JILPT) (2016) The Labor Situation in Japan and Its Analysis: General Overview 2015/2016. Tokyo, Japan: JILPT.
27.
JeongDYAguileraRV (2008) The evolution of enterprise unionism in Japan: a socio-political perspective. British Journal of Industrial Relations46(1): 98–132.
28.
KeizerAB (2008) Non-regular employment in Japan: continued and renewed dualities. Work, Employment and Society22(3): 407–425.
29.
KeizerAB (2010) Changes in Japanese Employment Practices: Beyond the Japanese Model. London: Routledge.
30.
KeuneM (2013) Trade union responses to precarious work in seven European countries. International Journal of Labour Research5(1): 59–78.
31.
KingN (2004) Template Analysis. In: CassellCMSymonG (eds) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: SAGE, 118–134.
32.
LockeRMThelenK (1995) Apples and oranges revisited: contextualized comparisons and the study of comparative labor politics. Politics & Society23(3): 337–367.
33.
MarinoS (2012) Trade union inclusion of migrant and ethnic minority workers: an Italy-Netherlands comparison. European Journal of Industrial Relations18(5): 5–20.
34.
MorozumiM (2009) Balanced treatment and bans on discrimination: significance and issues of the revised Part-Time Work Act. Japan Labor Review6(2): 39–55.
35.
NagaseN (2003) Standard and nonstandard work arrangements, pay difference and choice of work by Japanese mothers. In: HousemanSOsawaM (eds) Nonstandard Work in Developed Economies. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 267–305.
36.
NakakuboH (2004) The 2003 revision of the Labour Standards Law: fixed-term contracts, dismissal and discretionary-work schemes. Japan Labor Review1(2): 4–25.
37.
OhH-S (2012) The current status and significance of general unions: concerning the resolution of individual labor disputes. Japan Labor Review9(1): 63–85.
38.
PalierBThelenK (2010) Institutionalizing dualism: complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society38(1): 119–148.
39.
PassetO (2003) Stability and change: Japan’s employment system under pressure. In: AuerPCazesS (eds) Employment Stability in an Age of Flexibility: Evidence from Industrialized Countries. Geneva: ILO, 159–217.
40.
PulignanoVMeardiGDoerflingerN (2015) Trade unions and labour market dualisation: a comparison of policies and attitudes towards agency and migrant workers in Germany and Belgium. Work, Employment and Society29(5): 808–825.
41.
RoyleTUranoE (2012) A new form of union organizing in Japan? Community unions and the case of the McDonald’s ‘McUnion’. Work, Employment and Society26(4): 602–622.
42.
RuedaD (2005) Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies: the challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review99(1): 61–74.
43.
SimmsM (2012) Imagined solidarities: where is class in union organising?Capital & Class36(1): 97–115.
44.
SimmsMHolgateJ (2010) Organising for what? Where is the debate on the politics of organising?Work, Employment and Society24(1): 157–168.
45.
StandingG (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
46.
StewartP (2006) Marginal movements and minority struggles? The case of the Japanese minority social and labour movements. The Sociological Review54(4): 753–773.
47.
SuzukiA (2008) Community unions in Japan: similarities and differences of region-based labour movements between Japan and other industrialized countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy29(4): 492–520.
48.
SuzukiH (2004) Enterprise unionism in crisis in Japan. ESAN Cuadernos de Difusión16: 7–19.
49.
TachibanakiTNodaT (2000) The Economic Effects of Trade Unions in Japan. London: Macmillan.
50.
TsuchidaM (2004) Career formation and balanced treatment of part-time workers: an examination focusing on legal policy. Japan Labor Review1(4): 27–47.
UranoEIStewartP (2007) Including the excluded workers? The challenges of Japan’s Kanagawa City union. The Journal of Labour and Society10: 103–123.
53.
UranoEIStewartP (2009) Beyond organised labour in Japan: the case study of the Japanese Community Union Federation. In: McBrideJGreenwoodI (eds) Community Unionism: A Comparative Analysis of Concepts and Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 121–138.
54.
WeathersC (2007) Organizing marginalized and non-regular workers: a US-Japan comparison. Discussion Paper No. 4. Osaka, Japan: Center for Research on Economic Inequality, Osaka City University.
55.
WeathersC (2010) The rising voice of Japan’s community unions. In: VinckenHNishimuraYWhiteBLJDeguchiM (eds) Civic Engagement in Contemporary Japan: Established and Emerging Repertoires. New York: Springer, 67–83.
56.
YunJ-W (2010) Unequal Japan: conservative corporatism and labour market disparities. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(1): 1–25.
