A range of literature has attempted to reconceptualize union agendas for firm-level restructuring by identifying variety in local union strategic responses. This article explores the conditions under which local unions respond strategically to company restructuring in the Netherlands, Italy and Ireland. Two distinct types of union strategies are identified: confrontation based on ‘job protection’; cooperation based on ‘job transition’. Evidence suggests that different combinations of structural and socio-political firm-level conditions encourage the choice of specific union strategy. Understanding the nature and the interactions between firm-level contextual factors, within a broader institutional setting during restructuring, is important to provide a fuller explanation for the variety of strategic choices facing local unions.
BaconN (2008) Management strategy and industrial relations. In: BlytonP. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, 241–57.
2.
BaconNBlytonP (2004) Trade union responses to workplace restructuring: exploring union orientations and actions. Work, Employment and Society18(4): 749–73.
3.
BaconNTurnbull (2004) The Dynamics of Employee Relations. London: Macmillan.
4.
BaconNBlytonPMorrisJ (1996) Among the ashes: trade union strategies in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations34(1): 25–50.
5.
BielerALindbergI (2011) Globalisation and the new challenges for transnational solidarity: an introduction. In: BielerALindbergI (eds) Global Restructuring, Labour and the Challenges for Transnational Solidarity. London: Routledge, 3–15.
6.
CookeWMeyerD (1990) Structural and market predictors of corporate labor relations strategies. Industrial and Labor Relations Review43(2): 280–93.
7.
CrouchC (1982) Trade Unions: The Logic of Collective Action. Glasgow: Fontana.
8.
DobbinsT (2010) The case for ‘beneficial constraints’: why permissive voluntarism impedes workplace cooperation in Ireland. Economic and Industrial Democracy31(4): 497–519.
9.
DohertyM (2011) It must have been love … but it’s over now: the crisis and collapse of social partnership in Ireland. Transfer17(3): 371–85.
10.
DufourCHegeA (2002) L’Europe syndicale au quotidien. La représentation des salariés en France, Allemagne, Grande-Bretagne et Italie. Bruxelles/P.I.E.: Peter Lang.
11.
EatonA (1990) The extent and determinants of local union control of participative programs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review43(5): 605–20.
12.
EMCC (European Monitoring Center on Change) (2008) European Restructuring Monitor Quarterly: Issue 3.
13.
FairbrotherP (2000) Trade Unions at the Crossroads. London: Mansell.
14.
FregeCGodardJ (2010) Cross-national variation in representation rights and governance at work. In: WilkinsonA. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organisations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 526–51.
15.
FregeCKellyJ (2004) Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalisation in a Globalising Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
FrenkelSRoyalC (1998) Corporate-subsidiary relations, local context and workplace change in global corporations. Relations Industrielles/ Industrial Relations53(1): 154–81.
17.
FrostA (2000) Explaining variation in workplace restructuring: the role of local union capabilities. Industrial and Labor Relations Review53(4): 559–78.
18.
FrostA (2001) Reconceptualizing local union responses to workplace restructuring in North America. British Journal of Industrial Relations39(4): 539–64.
19.
GearyJFRocheWK (2000) Collaborative production and the Irish boom: work organisation, partnership and direct involvement in Irish workplaces. Economic and Social Review31(1): 1–36.
20.
GhemawatP (2007) Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a World Where Differences Still Matter. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
GunniglePCollingsDMorleyM (2005) Exploring the dynamics of industrial relations in US multinationals: evidence from the Republic of Ireland. Industrial Relations Journal36(3): 241–56.
22.
HallPSoskiceD (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HannonEMonksKConwayE (2011) The state and industrial policy in Ireland: a case study of the Irish pharmaceutical sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(18): 3692–3710.
24.
HeeryE (2005) Sources of change in trade unions. Work, Employment and Society19(1): 91–106.
25.
KatzH (1988) Policy debates over work reorganisation in North American unions. In: HymanRStreeckW (eds) New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 48–60.
26.
KatzHBattRKeefeJ (2003) The revitalization of the CWA: integrating collective bargaining, political action, and organizing. Industrial and Labor Relations Review56(4): 573–89.
27.
KellyJ (1996) Union militancy and social partnership. In: AckersP. (eds) The New Workplace and Trade Unionism: Critical Perspectives on Work and Organization. London: Routledge, 77–109.
KochanTKatzHMcKersieR (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York, NY: Basic Books.
30.
LevesqueCMurrayG (2002) Local versus global: activating local union power in the global economy. Labour Studies Journal27(3): 39–65.
31.
LevesqueCMurrayG (2005) Union involvement in workplace change: a comparative study of local unions in Canada and Mexico. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 489–514.
32.
LevesqueCMurrayG (2010) Understanding union power: resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity. Transfer16(3): 333–50.
33.
LockeR (1992) The demise of the national union in Italy: lessons for comparative industrial relations theory. Industrial and Labor Relations Review45(2): 229–49.
34.
MacKenzieR (2009) Union responses to restructuring and the growth of contingent labour in the Irish telecommunications sector. Economic and Industrial Democracy30(4): 539–63.
35.
MahoneyJ (2004) Comparative historical methodology. Annual Review of Sociology30: 81–101.
36.
Martinez LucioMStuartM (2004) Swimming against the tide: social partnership, mutual gains and the revival of ‘tired’ HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management15(2): 410–24.
37.
Martinez LucioMWestonS (1992) The politics and complexity of trade union responses to new management practices. Human Resource Management Journal2(4): 77–91.
38.
MeardiGMarginsonPFichterMFrybesMStanojevićMTóthA (2009) The complexity of relocation and the diversity of trade union responses: efficiency-oriented foreign direct investment in Central Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations15(1): 27–47.
39.
RamirezMGuyFBealeD (2007) Contested resources: unions, employers, and the adoption of new work practices in US and UK telecommunications. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(3): 495–517.
40.
ReginiM (1995) Uncertain Boundaries: The Social and Political Construction of European Economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
RocheWGearyF (2002) Advocates, critics and union involvement in workplace partnership: Irish airports. British Journal of Industrial Relations40(4): 659–88.
42.
RuigrokWVan TulderR (1995) The Logic of International Restructuring. London: Routledge.
43.
SakoMJacksonG (2006) Strategy meets institutions: the transformation of management-labor relations at Deutsche Telekom and NTT. Industrial and Labor Relations Review59(3): 347–66.
44.
ThompsonP (2003) Disconnected capitalism: or why employers can’t keep their side of the bargain. Work, Employment and Society17(2): 359–78.
45.
Van KlaverenMSprengenW (2004) Tiptoe through the tulips: the uneasy development of strategic unionism in polder country. In: HuzzardT. (eds) Strategic Unionism and Partnership. Boxing or Dancing?London: Palgrave, 107–24.
46.
WailesN (1999) The importance of small differences: the effects of research design on the comparative study of industrial relations reform in Australia and New Zealand. International Journal of Human Resource Management10(6): 1006–30.
47.
WaltonREMcKersieRB (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
